Mathew Lawrence on why privatisation has been a costly failure in Britain
The energy transition further strengthens the argument for state ownership, says the think-tank head
THE BRITISH economy has been subject to a giant experiment: privatisation on a scale more extensive than in almost any other OECD country. Perhaps most strikingly, following the lead of Augusto Pinochet’s Chile, in 1989 the Conservative government privatised the water industry in England and Wales. This outlier status remains to this day: the majority of water infrastructure in other countries is held and managed by the public. To see the disastrous effects of this experiment, one need only look at England’s crisis-ridden water companies—or brave a swim in an English river flooded with sewage.
Emblematic of these failures is Thames Water, England’s largest water company. Having accumulated debts of £14bn ($18bn), in part the legacy of a leveraged buy-out by Macquarie, an Australian investment group, it is now precariously exposed to higher interest rates. But the problem extends beyond one company.
Already have an account? Log in
Get the full story
Enjoy a month of insightful analysis for free.
Cancel at any time
Start trial- Distinctive global analysis with more than 100 articles a week on The Economist app and economist.com
- An immersive world with podcasts and digital newsletters
- Intelligent debate with a global community in subscriber-only digital events
More from By Invitation
Thames Water may be troubled but privatisation has served Britain well, argues Michael Howard
The former Conservative leader reckons that private investors have spent more than the state could have done
David Eaves on the promise and pitfalls of digital government
Public infrastructure has become a front in global geopolitics, says the UCL professor
Alexander Gabuev on China’s strategic calculations after the turmoil in Russia
Xi Jinping has no other option than to support Vladimir Putin—or someone like him