By Invitation | Privatisation

Mathew Lawrence on why privatisation has been a costly failure in Britain

The energy transition further strengthens the argument for state ownership, says the think-tank head

An illustration of Matthew Lawrence
image: Dan Williams

THE BRITISH economy has been subject to a giant experiment: privatisation on a scale more extensive than in almost any other OECD country. Perhaps most strikingly, following the lead of Augusto Pinochet’s Chile, in 1989 the Conservative government privatised the water industry in England and Wales. This outlier status remains to this day: the majority of water infrastructure in other countries is held and managed by the public. To see the disastrous effects of this experiment, one need only look at England’s crisis-ridden water companies—or brave a swim in an English river flooded with sewage.

Emblematic of these failures is Thames Water, England’s largest water company. Having accumulated debts of £14bn ($18bn), in part the legacy of a leveraged buy-out by Macquarie, an Australian investment group, it is now precariously exposed to higher interest rates. But the problem extends beyond one company.

The Economist today

Handpicked stories, in your inbox

A daily newsletter with the best of our journalism

More from By Invitation

Thames Water may be troubled but privatisation has served Britain well, argues Michael Howard

The former Conservative leader reckons that private investors have spent more than the state could have done

David Eaves on the promise and pitfalls of digital government

Public infrastructure has become a front in global geopolitics, says the UCL professor


Alexander Gabuev on China’s strategic calculations after the turmoil in Russia

Xi Jinping has no other option than to support Vladimir Putin—or someone like him