About everything.txt size #13
Comments
|
I'm actually about 2/3 done now. That means I've indexed 2/3 of what's been
sent me, which is about 7mil, and that 7mil has been shrunk down to about
3.6mil by removing duplicates. The output .txt's magnet growth is slowing
considerably as finding magnets I don't already have is becoming rarer and
rarer. And yes, my next few steps go like this:
- Finish indexing all magnets into one file
- Clean out any non-RARBG magnets
- Split the magnets into files according to their category (TV HD, TV UHD,
1080p x265, PC ISO, etc)
So the final file sizes will be much more manageable, and more useful for
people who don't care about some of the categories.
…On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 3:18 AM HilbertMaximov ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear author
First of all thank you for your work!
From your readme .txt I learned that you have completed a quarter of the
magnets, which currently have 3,500,000, does that mean there are about
14,000,000 or so for this great work? Would you please put these magnets
into multiple txt files? The existing everything .txt will freeze when it
opens (probably because of my computer configuration), but I think when
your work is over, 14,000,000 magnets are placed in a txt file, then this
txt will be very large, and the average computer will be very stuttering
when opening it.(and may I ask that how many magnets are there in the
RARBG?)
Thanks!
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6BQTMYHDKERDLX5ZXM2OXLXJQZD3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYZYRTUY>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Thank you for your reply, I would like to ask if you can display the size of the file corresponding to each magnet? This will definitely increase your workload, for which I thank and apologize, but with the size of the file, it will be easier to choose between different magnets for the same file. |
|
I don't have a source for the size of the majority of the files, so I
can't, sorry. Not that I want to anyway. But the resolution and media
source contained in the title of the magnet should give you a good idea.
RARBG is really consistent with that, so a -RARBG movie for example would
probably have a max of maybe five different copies, all able to be
distinguished as different in the title. Take all the -RARBG 1080p BluRay
x265s for example, they're all between about 1.3-2GB, so any movie with
that format you'll know the rough size after downloading just one.
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 11:26 AM HilbertMaximov ***@***.***>
wrote:
… I'm actually about 2/3 done now. That means I've indexed 2/3 of what's
been sent me, which is about 7mil, and that 7mil has been shrunk down to
about 3.6mil by removing duplicates. The output .txt's magnet growth is
slowing considerably as finding magnets I don't already have is becoming
rarer and rarer. And yes, my next few steps go like this: - Finish indexing
all magnets into one file - Clean out any non-RARBG magnets - Split the
magnets into files according to their category (TV HD, TV UHD, 1080p x265,
PC ISO, etc) So the final file sizes will be much more manageable, and more
useful for people who don't care about some of the categories.
… <#m_284772833842410333_>
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 3:18 AM HilbertMaximov *@*.*> wrote: Dear author
First of all thank you for your work! From your readme .txt I learned that
you have completed a quarter of the magnets, which currently have
3,500,000, does that mean there are about 14,000,000 or so for this great
work? Would you please put these magnets into multiple txt files? The
existing everything .txt will freeze when it opens (probably because of my
computer configuration), but I think when your work is over, 14,000,000
magnets are placed in a txt file, then this txt will be very large, and the
average computer will be very stuttering when opening it.(and may I ask
that how many magnets are there in the RARBG?) Thanks! — Reply to this
email directly, view it on GitHub <#13
<#13>>, or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6BQTMYHDKERDLX5ZXM2OXLXJQZD3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYZYRTUY
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6BQTMYHDKERDLX5ZXM2OXLXJQZD3ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYZYRTUY>
. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: @.*>
Thank you for your reply, I would like to ask if you can display the size
of the file corresponding to each magnet? This will definitely increase
your workload, for which I thank and apologize, but with the size of the
file, it will be easier to choose between different magnets for the same
file.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6BQTMZVIYGL4UWBTBP7DZLXJSSL7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYZYRTUY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Here's an example
|
|
Hey perfect thanks.
…On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 11:59 AM showstoppre ***@***.***> wrote:
Here's an example
title size_gb
Inception.2010.720p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG 1.92 GB
Inception.2010.BRRip.XviD.MP3-XVID 2.0 GB
Inception.2010.1080p.BluRay.x265-RARBG 2.48 GB
Inception.2010.1080p.BluRay.H264.AAC-RARBG 3.03 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.UHD.BluRay.x265.10bit.HDR.DDP5.1-RARBG 9.63 GB
Inception.2010.1080p.BluRay.x264-REFiNED 11.82 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.UHD.BluRay.x265.10bit.HDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-RARBG 13.59
GB
Inception.2010.1080p.BluRay.x264.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-SWTYBLZ 18.78 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.BluRay.x265.10bit.HDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-TERMiNAL 25.75 GB
Inception.2010.1080p.BluRay.REMUX.VC-1.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-FGT 32.98 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.BluRay.x265.10bit.SDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-SWTYBLZ 51.0 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.BluRay.x264.8bit.SDR.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-SWTYBLZ 56.88 GB
Inception.2010.PROPER.2160p.BluRay.REMUX.HEVC.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-FGT 85.43 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.BluRay.REMUX.HEVC.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-FGT 85.44 GB
Inception.2010.2160p.BluRay.HEVC.DTS-HD.MA.5.1-COASTER 92.47 GB
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6BQTM3LUP4IV7HELFEV7XTXJSWE7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAYZYRTUY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
Hi there! Do you know when your site will be active? |
|
i'm not ever putting up a site, i think some other people are with my
database.
…On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 9:14 PM Scoobie56 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi there! Do you know when your site will be active?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#13 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A6BQTMZXEQLZKTQM7M6HYITXKULZBANCNFSM6AAAAAAYZYRTUY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
I believe the theRargb was working on it but it looks like they gave up! They haven't answered questions for a couple of days now! Dead silent! People are saying that their new site is dead! Hopefully someone new comes along.Thankyou for what your achieving here! |
Dear author
First of all thank you for your work!
From your readme .txt I learned that you have completed a quarter of the magnets, which currently have 3,500,000, does that mean there are about 14,000,000 or so for this great work? Would you please put these magnets into multiple txt files? The existing everything .txt will freeze when it opens (probably because of my computer configuration), but I think when your work is over, 14,000,000 magnets are placed in a txt file, then this txt will be very large, and the average computer will be very stuttering when opening it.(and may I ask that how many magnets are there in the RARBG?)
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: