Skip to main contentSkip to navigation
Survivors from the fishing boat that sank in the Mediterranean, in Kalamata, Greece.
Survivors from the fishing boat that sank in the Mediterranean in Kalamata, Greece. Photograph: Thanassis Stavrakis/AP
Survivors from the fishing boat that sank in the Mediterranean in Kalamata, Greece. Photograph: Thanassis Stavrakis/AP

The Guardian view on danger at sea: looking out for all those in peril

The contrast between the frantic hunt for a missing submersible and the failure to save migrants drowning in the Mediterranean is illuminating

A massive operation is under way to find and save a stricken vessel and its passengers. As time passes, anxious families and friends wait with growing fear. The US coastguard, Canadian armed forces and commercial vessels are all hunting for the Titan submersible, which has gone missing with five aboard on a dive to the wreck of the Titanic in the north Atlantic. The UK’s Ministry of Defence is also monitoring the situation.

It is hard to think of a starker contrast with the response to a fishing boat which sank in the Mediterranean last week with an estimated 750 people, including children, packed onboard. Only about 100 survived, making this one of the deadliest disasters in the Mediterranean. Greece and the EU blame people smugglers, who overcrowd boats and abuse those aboard them. But both have profound questions to answer about their own role in such disasters. Activists say authorities were repeatedly warned of the danger this boat faced, hours before it went down, but failed to act.

Greece has said that the vessel was moving steadily, was not at risk, and that passengers refused help; survivors and tracking data paint a very different picture. The Greek coastguard’s record includes forcible and dangerous pushbacks of asylum seekers, with a recent video showing a family including small children being set adrift on a raft. Frontex, the EU’s border and coast guard, is also – rightly – under growing scrutiny.

Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, has praised Greece as the bloc’s “shield” against migration – not only applauding its role, but using the language of combat and self-defence. Josep Borrell, the EU’s foreign policy chief, last year described Europe as a “garden” and most of the world as a “jungle” which “could invade” it unless there was greater engagement. Following the backlash, he said he was sorry “if some were offended” and insisted he was referring to the rule of law in contrast with lawlessness. On the most generous interpretation, he showed a startling ignorance of the implications of such language. On a more cynical one, he pandered to it.

The rhetoric of a hostile world’s encroachment upon Europe is used in part to try to stem the advance of the far right, showing that mainstream politicians and officials are not ignoring the issues it exploits to win support. But this contributes to an environment in which there is a growing sense of an “us”, living in safety and relative comfort, menaced by a “them” seeking the same things. Most of those on board the boat last week are believed to have been Pakistani nationals, who had grown desperate as the country’s economic situation deteriorated.

“Migrant” has become a word that disguises rather than illuminates the individuals behind the label – humans with the usual struggles, hopes and fears for themselves and their families, loved as dearly as any others, and as deserving of dignity, safety and concern. That mass drownings have become so common – more than 25,000 people have died or gone missing in the Mediterranean since 2014 – is shameful in itself. What is worse is that these disasters have come to be seen as almost normal. Planes and boats are scrambled to save a handful of people who took a risk for an adventure, while children and adults in imminent danger wait until catastrophe strikes.

  • Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wondered if you would consider taking the step of supporting the Guardian’s journalism. 

It’s that time again: all eyes are on the supreme court, as we await the final decisions of the session. One year after the court overturned Roe v Wade, its approval ratings are at record lows and its legitimacy in crisis. 

That should come as no surprise: a far-right movement has helped seat justices who have redefined public life through precedent-shattering decisions that most Americans do not support. In addition to taking away the right to abortion from half the country, the supreme court has enabled a deluge of money into politics, the proliferation of guns in public spaces, the gutting of environmental protections and more.

As recent revelations have made clear, some supreme court justices do not follow basic ethical standards, and an absence of limits on their power means they can operate, in many ways, above the law. 

That makes the job of journalists all the more important. At the Guardian, our reporting is produced to serve the public interest; we have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. And our unique, reader-supported model means that readers around the world can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism – whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.

Help us hold power to account by supporting the Guardian’s journalism today. If you can, please consider supporting us just once from $1, or better yet, support us every month with a little more. Thank you.

Betsy Reed

Editor, Guardian US

Betsy Reed, Editor Headshot for Guardian US Epic

Contribution frequency

Contribution amount
Accepted payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express and PayPal

opinion

opinion

  • The Guardian view on the Reddit rebellion: a historic standoff

  • Seamus Jennings on the UK’s mortgage crisis – cartoon

  • With even leavers regretting Brexit, there’s one path back to rejoining the EU

  • The Greens’ class conflict strategy on housing is a risk to Labor – and renters have nothing to lose but their bonds

  • The millions of Australians in the survivor community are asking: what does justice look like for us?

  • Should Victoria’s DPP have laid charges over Lawyer X scandal?

  • The sudden warming of Britain’s seas will tear through ocean life like a wildfire

  • The Brexit Question Time’s audience backs up what our survey found: no regrets

More from Opinion

More from Opinion

  • With even leavers regretting Brexit, UK has one path back to rejoining the EU

  • We were afraid for the Titan five. But this story generated an uglier emotion, too: excitement

  • A year ago Roe v Wade was overturned. Grieve for the new America

  • Fair play, Musk v Zuckerberg – as a bleat for attention, a megarich-weirdo cage fight is hard to top

  • Digested week: Public’s reaction to the Titan sub billionaires is shaming

  • Britain has changed hugely since 2016. This is how the Brexit vote would go now

  • The sudden warming of Britain’s seas will tear through ocean life like a wildfire

Most viewed

Most viewed