There's a widespread idea in Korea, even among Korean linguists, that Hangul is "superior" to other writing systems because it's "scientific" "logical" etc.
ツイートを翻訳
引用ツイート
Haesung Jeon (she/her)
@HaesungJeon
·
the National Institute of the Korean Language made the English/contemporary Korean translation of the original #Hunminjeongeum (the Korean alphabet) open access. Download https://korean.go.kr/front/etcData/etcDataView.do?mn_id=208&etc_seq=693&pageIndex=1…#KoreanLanguage#훈민정음#hangul
Most of the reasons for such claim are factually wrong to begin with.
1. "Hangul was created out of nowhere" It probably wasn't (Phags-Pa), and even if it was, it's not unique in that regards (Ol Chiki)
3. "Hangul visually codes phonological features" Which applies to most phonological scripts as well (voicedness in Kana, vowel length in Thai) Even Latin does it: C-G, P-B