Expose The Nose

Cui Bono?

It should be patently obvious to every sentient person by now that the only country to derive any benefit from the tragic events of September 11, 2001 has been Israel. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, ostensibly attributed to Osama bin Laden and his shadowy Al-Qaeda outfit despite loud denials from Bin Laden himself, finally provided the outraged public atmosphere conducive for the United States to launch a long-planned "War on Terror" on countries that unsurprisingly happen to be the numerous obstacles to Israeli hegemony in the Middle East.

While there is substantial evidence that the monstrous events of that fateful day were in fact orchestrated by the state of Israel and her myriad Zionist Jewish conspirators in America, few things illustrate the motivation to do so as clearly as the barely-concealed jubilation many Israelis expressed in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 and afterwards.

1.) Benjamin Netanyahu: ''It's very good...it will generate immediate sympathy."

King Kike himself

Israeli leaders, who have chafed at occasional American criticism of their measures against Palestinians, said the day's attacks would awaken the United States to the threat of global terrorism.

Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, ''It's very good.'' Then he edited himself: ''Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.'' He predicted that the attack would ''strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we've experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.''

2.) Ehud Sprinzak: "From the perspective of the Jews, [9/11] is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favour.

Israeli academic Ehud Sprinzak (1940-2002)

The Israelis, meanwhile, were in the rare position of feeling that the world had at last understood their warnings about Islamic militancy.

Omer Gavriel Marmari, one of the infamous 5 Dancing Israelis arrested on 9/11/2001 after being seen by eyewitnesses elatedly celebrating and taking happy photos with the burning Twin Towers in the background

An employee of Urban Moving said his co-workers had laughed about the Manhattan attacks the day they happened. "I was in tears," the man said. "These guys were joking and that bothered me. These guys were like, Now America knows what we go through.'"

The Israeli newspaper Ma'ariv on Wednesday reported that Likud leader Benjamin Netanyahu told an audience at Bar Ilan university that the September 11, 2001 terror attacks had been beneficial for Israel. 

"We are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq," Ma'ariv quoted the former prime minister as saying. He reportedly added that these events "swung American public opinion in our favor."

All smiles - and why not?

How did these Israelis know the attack would benefit Israel before it was determined who was behind it? Logic dictates that if these Israelis “knew” the attacks would benefit Israel they must have not only known beforehand that an attack against the WTC was going to take place, but also who was going to be blamed for it: the Arabs.

The well-established fact of Jewish Bolshevism is not merely backed up by dry statistics, but with anecdotes from Jews themselves suggesting a widespread romance at the grassroots level with the most murderous political ideology of modern times.

I had originally planned to include these anecdotes in my scathing review of Paul Hanebrink's A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism but eventually decided against doing so, feeling that it was already becoming quite lengthy as is and that the more personal nature of these quotes would slightly clash with the detached scholarly information that otherwise comprised my citations there.

However, since they are extremely revealing and were likely overlooked at the time of their publication, I figured using that leftover material for a separate post would be a good idea to draw attention to them.

1.) Seth Rogen: "Where I come from, communism is not a terrible word"

Fat slob Seth Rogen is another Jewish Hollywood creep who hates white people with a passion

8/31/2008:

It was Rogen's parents who encouraged him towards comedy. Sandy, a social worker, and Mark, employed by non-profit organisations, met on an Israeli kibbutz – "Where I come from," Rogen says, "communism is not a terrible word." They would drive their 13-year-old to Yuk Yuk's, the Canadian comedy chain, watch him do his routine about his bar mitzvah and grandparents, then drive home. "I'm 13," he'd tell hecklers. "In 30 years, I'll be 43. You'll be dead."

The surprisingly sinister nature of the relationship between Jews and comedy will be the subject of a future blog post, but right now it's worth noting that the Israeli kibbutzes were attempts at utopian collective living, highlighting the relationship between Jews and socialism.

2.) Peter Beinart: "Communism was particularly attractive to Jews"

The rat-faced Peter Beinart is a white-hating Jewish liberal who writes for several publications including The Atlantic and the Jewish Daily Forward.

4/26/2017:

Finally, in June 1948, Congress passed a law allowing 200,000 people in DP camps to enter the United States. Among them are many of the American survivors to whom Trump paid tribute yesterday. They came from regions where Communism was rife, at a time when Soviet subversion was becoming an American obsession. And Communism was particularly attractive to Jews.

Is it any mystery what Trump — who is more hostile to admitting refugees than virtually any other major American politician — would have said?

Peter Beinart calls himself a "liberal Zionist" - an oxymoron if I've ever heard one - who has lately been paying lip service to treating Palestinians suffering under Israeli subjugation more humanely than the usual brutal Talmudic fury. But don't hold your breath for this hypocritical snake to come out in favor of a single bi-national state between the Mediterranean Sea and the Jordan River with full equal voting rights for all citizens, because he's still a Jewish supremacist at heart. While obliquely defending Jewish supremacy in occupied Palestine, in America he also gloats over the demographic decline of the white Christian majority that he so despises.

3.) Bret Stephens: "If you’re Jewish in America, chances are there’s at least one [Communist sympathizer] somewhere in your family tree"

Bret Stephens is a neocon propagandist for the New York Times who agitates for war with Israel's enemies and advocates for amnesty for illegal immigrants in America while simultaneously defending Israel's racist "nation-state" law.

1/18/2018:

Until his dying day, my dad’s Uncle Bern was a communist sympathizer. I remember him as an affable old man with a gracious wife who made a modest living selling antique lace. He probably wouldn’t have hurt a fly. Yet he found much to admire in the most murderous ideology of the 20th century, responsible for tens of millions of deaths from the killing fields of Cambodia to the gulags of Murmansk.

If you’re Jewish in America, chances are there’s at least one Uncle Bern somewhere in your family tree. As the scholar Ruth Wisse noted last year in Tablet magazine, Jewish intellectual life in the 1930s and 40s was largely defined by one’s stance toward one thing: The Party. Historians reckon that Jews accounted for nearly half the Communist Party’s total membership in those years, while many other Jews were close fellow travelers.

Notes In The Margin (Yes, I'm cribbing this from the late Justin Raimondo, RIP)

Sure, Jews had an overwhelming role in Communist tyranny...BUT DOES EVERYONE HAVE TO KEEP POINTING IT OUT?!

Paul Hanebrink's A Specter Haunting Europe: The Myth of Judeo-Bolshevism is an intellectually unserious whitewash of the conspicuous role Jews played in international Communism. To have the audacity to make the claim that Judeo-Bolshevism, as it was known by its many tragic victims, was a "myth" is to deliberately ignore the voluminous scholarly research on the subject proving otherwise over the last 40 years, of which much has been published by Jews themselves. This particular work of apologia takes the peculiarly novel approach of not even attempting to disprove the charge (as a scant few previous works have weakly attempted and in the opinion of this reviewer, failed), and instead chooses to treat it as "one among many forms of anti-Semitism", regardless of its veracity. The result is a truly appalling work of deceit masquerading as scholarship.

Jewish academics openly brag about the Jewish role in Communism

The tone is set early on when Hanebrink avers that investigating whether or not Jews were Communists, were overrepresented among party members or leaders, voted for or supported Communist parties in high numbers, or joined Communist secret police forces are all fool's errands because attempting to do so "requires historians to impose rigid ethnic categories on men and women whose sense of themselves was always more complex and multifaceted." Yet Jewish academics curiously don't seem to share his need for such piously sensitive nuance.

Jewish historian Norman F. Cantor observed that

The Bolshevik Revolution and some of its aftermath represented, from one perspective, Jewish revenge. During the heyday of the Cold War, American Jewish publicists spent a lot of time denying that — as 1930s anti-Semites claimed — Jews played a disproportionately important role in Soviet and world Communism. The truth is until the early 1950s Jews did play such a role, and there is nothing to be ashamed of. In time Jews will learn to take pride in the record of the Jewish Communists in the Soviet Union and elsewhere. It was a species of striking back. [1]

Jewish political science professor Benjamin Ginsberg writes:

... during the period leading up to the 1917 revolution, Jews were among the leaders of both the Menshevik and the Bolshevik parties. ... Thus, while they had no state of their own, within a few years after the Bolshevik revolution, Jews had a good deal of influence within the new Soviet state. ... in the aftermath of the Bolshevik revolution, the Jews of the new Soviet Union, at least, might appear to have secured the protection of a powerful state that they helped to build and in which they exercised significant influence. [2]

Consulting the Encyclopedia Judaica reveals the following in its article on Communism:

The Communist movement and ideology played an important part in Jewish life, particularly in the 1920s, 1930s, and during and after World War II. ... Individual Jews played an important role in the early stages of Bolshevism and the Soviet regime. ... Communist trends became widespread in virtually all Jewish communities. In some countries Jews became the leading element in the legal and illegal Communist parties and in some cases were even instructed by the Communist International to change their Jewish-sounding names and pose as non-Jews, in order not to confirm right-wing propaganda that presented Communism as an alien, Jewish conspiracy (e.g., the Polish slogan against "Żydo-Komuna" and the Nazi reiteration against "Jewish Bolshevism," etc.) [3]

If these shocking revelations weren't clear enough, Jewish scholar Eliyahu Stern takes it even further:

... even within Marx’s lifetime, Jewish revolutionaries were referring to him as a second Moses and comparing his works to the Bible. In the 1870s, Jewish intellectuals were already assimilating Marx’s insights into messianic theories and even developing materialist readings of Jewish history. By 1899, the leading Marxist theorist of the time, Karl Kautsky, felt compelled to begin his introduction to the Yiddish translation of the Communist Manifesto with an admonition to his readers to stop referring to Karl Marx’s works as “Torah.”...

Not only did Marx’s influence on Jews extend to political projects such as Communism, Zionism, and Jewish Socialism, it also played a role in the worldviews espoused by those ranging from the American Reconstructionist Rabbi Mordecai Kaplan to the spiritual father of the Israeli settler movement, Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook. [4]

(...)

It was in Russian lands where Jews began to read Marx and Darwin through a specifically Jewish lens. Conversely, it reveals the kabbalistic, Hasidic, and biblical sources for today’s supposedly “secular” modern Jewish politics. Jews in Russia read Marx as part of a Jewish prophetic tradition and identified the project of historical materialism as reflecting a new form of tikkun olam...The American Jewish Left’s employment of Tikkun Olam to describe their commitment to social and economic equality was rooted in a long tradition that runs back to the very first yeshiva bochruim who read Marx in the 1870s and became the founders of Jewish socialism, Zionism and Communism. [5]

Many such alarming and self-incriminating statements in this vein can be easily marshaled from any competent history of 19th and 20th century Eastern European Jewry, but evidently this means nothing to our author.

The Soviet Union slaughtered millions of Christians while making "anti-Semitism" punishable by death!

Hanebrink disapprovingly writes on p. 15  that future Pope Pius XII "Eugenio Pacelli, like so many others, looked at the revolution and saw only Jews at the center of the action. His perception of Jews as revolutionary leaders, and of Jews as the revolution’s principal beneficiaries, was overwhelming. It was also culturally constructed. His immediate experience of “seeing” Jews as Bolsheviks was shaped by his beliefs about what revolution was and why it was happening. Some Bolsheviks were Jews. But this “fact" by itself signified nothing. Its meaning had to be made."

This exculpation is breathtaking in its dishonesty, because it is fact that, mirroring the traditional rabbinic hatred of Jesus Christ and his Mother Mary inherent in the Jewish religion[6], "the atheistic Soviet regime made war on Christians, murdering tens of thousands of Orthodox priests" while "it also showed its true colors by making anti-Semitism a capital crime." [7]

No less an authority than Joseph Stalin himself said "In the U.S.S.R. anti-semitism is punishable with the utmost severity of the law as a phenomenon deeply hostile to the Soviet system. Under U.S.S.R. law active anti-semites are liable to the death penalty." [8]

This particular (and by no means unique) pro-Jew affirmation of Stalin's was made in 1931, the same year that the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour was dynamited to rubble by the order of his Jewish commissar "Iron" Lazar Kaganovich. [9]

Lazar Kaganovich (1893-1991), responsible for the death of millions of Ukrainians, was one of many bloodthirsty Jewish tyrants riding high in the Soviet Union as feared political commissars [10]

In fact, anyone not able to see how Jews were the principal beneficiaries of the revolution would have to be wearing a blindfold. The Encyclopedia Judaica once again illuminates to just what extent the Soviet Union went in its attempts to secure the loyalties of world Jewry, even going so far as creating a special Jewish province - Birobidzhan, a.k.a "Palestine in Siberia" - with the goal of enticing Zionist Jews into the competing Communist fold:

In the first two decades after 1917, a kind of Jewish Communist nationalism arose and flourished in the Soviet Union and it was attractive to many Jews outside the borders of the U.S.S.R...during [Stalin's] early years in power he continued the policy of Lenin, to permit the Jews to organize a system of cultural life in Yiddish, provided the Jewish nationality, like all the others in the Soviet Union, made Communism the central political purpose of its cultural activity. Schools on all levels and even college courses in Yiddish were created in the 1920s. Hundreds of books were published and a press and theaters were encouraged. Additionally, with the help of such Western Jews as the Chicago millionaire, Lessing Rosenwald, who was opposed to Zionism, there was some settlement of Jews on the land in southern Russia and the Crimea. An even more grandiose attempt was made to create an autonomous Jewish region on a stretch of land in Siberia, Birobidzhan...into the 1930s the reality of Jewish autonomy and the vision of state-sponsored Yiddish creativity in the Soviet Union, allied with its official outlawing of antisemitism, seemed to some Jews in the west, not only of the extreme political Left, an option to be preferred to Zionism. [11]

Hanebrink's fact-free insinuation that Jews were not conspicuous beneficiaries of the Bolshevik Revolution would surely be contested by Ginsberg, who writes:

After the revolution, among the first official acts of the victorious Bolsheviks was outlawing the pogroms and anti-Semitic movements that Russian Jews had feared for centuries. In a radical break with the Russian past, moreover, the new regime provided Jews with the opportunity to participate fully in government and society. They quickly came to play major roles in the ruling Communist Party and the Soviet state. [12]

 

Now consider the frightening implications of these sinister developments.

Winston Churchill's views on Judeo-Bolshevism hardly differed from Hitler's!

What did he mean by this?

While noting that "Judeo-Bolshevism made Adolf Hitler" in terms of his political career (p. 83), it is interesting to observe that Hanebrink bestows Winston Churchill a grand total of two fleeting mentions in the entirety of this book. While furtively revealing that Churchill "noted that Jewish revolutionaries had “gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads", our author lies by omission by wholly neglecting to mention that the Roaring Lion's views on this topic were detailed, unambiguous, and even simpatico with Hitler's. Pat Buchanan notes:

Though a philo-Semite and supporter of Zionism, Churchill’s views on the roots of Bolshevism seem not markedly different from those of Hitler. In the Illustrated Sunday Herald of February 8, 1920, after the failed Allied intervention in Russia, Churchill wrote that in the “creation of Bolshevism” the role of “atheistical Jews…probably outweighs all others.”¹⁸⁵ Contrasting the patriotism of “National Russian Jews” with the “schemes of the International Jews,” Churchill describes the latter:

[A] sinister confederacy…[of] men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all, of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (the United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of the arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing…. [T]his band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.^{186 [13]}

Now consider the similarity to what Adolf Hitler wrote about the "Russian" Revolution three years later in Mein Kampf:

Now begins the great last revolution. In gaining political power the Jew casts off the few cloaks that he still wears. The democratic people’s Jew becomes the blood-Jew and tyrant over peoples. In a few years he tries to exterminate the national intelligentsia and by robbing the peoples of their natural intellectual leadership makes them ripe for the slave’s lot of permanent subjugation.

The most frightful example of this kind is offered by Russia, where he killed or starved about thirty million people with positively fanatical savagery, in part amid inhuman tortures, in order to give a gang of Jewish journalists and stock exchange bandits domination over a great people. [14]

It should also be understood that Churchill's virulent support of Zionism was in no small part animated by his apprehension that if not granted their demands to steal Palestine from its Arab inhabitants, Jews would otherwise Bolshevize the entire planet.

Why does this matter?

Harvard professor of Yiddish Ruth Wisse makes this extraordinary admission in Tablet Magazine. Jewish publications reveal all kinds of jaw-dropping things almost daily in small circulation volumes that only fellow Jews read while denouncing as "anti-Semitic" any Gentile who quotes their own words back to them.

Far from being a sterile academic debate about an arcane issue from a hundred years ago, getting to the bottom of the disturbing relationship between Jews and Communism holds special relevance to critically important issues of today, such as mass immigration, endless wars of aggression, freedom of speech, and more. To start with, Jews are quite open about the fact that they are society's most extreme liberals. Even today, Jewish political opinion ranges from Jewish Bolshevik red to Pale of Settlement Bundist-Socialist pink. The only "exception" are the neocons, who are little more than Israel-firster Zionist Jews posing as conservatives who literally originated from yesteryear's Trotskyist Communist milieu. The nationalist campaign rhetoric of Donald Trump's 2016 campaign exposed their true nature as fundamental leftists. People everywhere are waking up to the fact that Jews are the heart and soul of the anti-American, anti-Europe, anti-national, Christian-hating left and are well on their way of their evil goal of subjugating us all like they do the Palestinians. As a result, Big Tech organizations (themselves mostly run by Jewish executives) have been working hand in hand with anti-American subversive Jewish outfits such as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith to censor debate and chill freedom of speech.

But wait! There's more!

 

An exhaustive examination of the endless links between Jews and Communism is outside the scope of this review for sake of brevity, but further investigation of these points is recommended for those who would like to learn more:

- Jewish leftist radicalism long predates the Bolshevik Revolution.[15]
- Western intelligence agencies and diplomats were simultaneously and independently reaching the conclusion that Jews were a dominant element of the Communist conspiracy. The U.S. State Department, for example, authored a paper actually titled "The Power and Aims of International Jewry" in 1919.
- Hollywood, a famously Jewish stronghold, has a long and notorious association with Communism
- The extensive Yiddish Communist literati, remarkably described as "the most pro-Soviet literature in the world".
- The socialist origins of the self-described Jewish state of Israel, perhaps encapsulated by the famous kibbutz collective farms
- The deep Jewish involvement in nuclear treason (Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, David Greenglass, "Harry Gold" [Henrich Golodnitsky], Morton Sobell, etc. and pinko sympathizers like J. Robert Oppenheimer and Albert Einstein)
- The Jewish origins of Cultural Marxism rooted in the entirely Jewish outfit known as the Frankfurt School, which is the origin of radical feminism, homosexualism, and other lunatic left "liberation" hokum.
- Jews have been absurdly overrepresented in Communist activities worldwide, from South Africa to places even as far-flung as China.

Conclusion

Frankly, I'm unconvinced that the author even believes his own thesis. The marvel of this odious tome is that it managed to secure reputable publishers at all, much less Harvard University Press. I don't know if Paul Hanebrink is a Jew or not. If he is, the motivation to lie about this explosive subject due to tribal loyalty is obvious. But if he's a Gentile, this exercise in obscurantism is a shameful reminder of the farce of "academic freedom". The reality is that honest intellectual inquiry in academia is a thing of the past when it comes to subjects Jews wish to cloud in a haze of misinformation, such as the true nature of Communism and Zionism. And pusillanimous careerists are often far too willing to sacrifice their integrity in order to eagerly lick the boots of the Elders of Zion.

Sources:

[1] Norman Cantor, The Jewish Experience: An Illustrated History of Jewish Culture & Society (New York; Castle Press, 1996), p. 364
[2] Benjamin Ginsberg, How the Jews Defeated Hitler: Exploding the Myth of Jewish Passivity in the Face of Nazism (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2013), p. 11
[3] Communism, Encyclopedia Judaica article
[4] https://muse.jhu.edu/article/693305/pdf
[5] https://kavvanah.wordpress.com/2018/05/24/interview-with-eliyahu-stern-jewish-materialism/
[6] https://forward.com/culture/105242/do-jews-have-a-jesus-problem/
[7] Joe Sobran, The Church and Jewish Ideology (Sobran's, 1999) http://www.sobran.com/jewid.shtml
[8] Joseph Stalin, Reply to an Inquiry of the Jewish News Agency in the United States https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1931/01/12.htm
[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cathedral_of_Christ_the_Saviour#Demolition
[10] Sever Plocker, Stalin's Jews (Ynetnews) https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3342999,00.html
[11] Zionism, subheading Soviet Jewish Culture, Encyclopedia Judaica article
[12] Benjamin Ginsberg, How the Jews Defeated Hitler: Exploding the Myth of Jewish Passivity in the Face of Nazism (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2013), p. 9
[13] Pat Buchanan, Churchill, Hitler, and The Unnecessary War: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World (Crown, 2008)
[14] Adolf Hitler, Excerpts from Mein Kampf  https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/excerpts-from-mein-kampf 
[15] I'll have to elaborate on this in a separate article, but for now take note of racialist scholar Lothrop Stoddard (1883-1950) observing that Jewish radicalism was a factor in the European Revolutions of 1848 and seemingly began as soon as Jews were emancipated from their ghettos and given political rights.

This will be a blog investigating all aspects of the Jewish Question, presented in much more comprehensive terms than the character limit of Twitter will allow.