新しいツイートを表示

会話

liʾayyi (Q77:12) is regularly spelled لايى, rather than لاى. This presumably representing loss of the hamzah: /li-yayy/. This is often missed in text editions of manuscripts. You also see it regularly spelled this way for biʾayyi بايى and fa-bi-ʾayyi فبايى.

Marijn van Putten

@PhDniX

2018年11月26日

With my new copy of an amazing and brand new edition of the Našr al-Qirāʾāt al-ʿašr (thanks @therealsidky!) I have no found some confirmation of such a reading. al-ʾAṣbahānī (transmitter of Warš) reads fa-bi-ʾayyi as [fabiyayyi] whenever it occurs.

Marijn van Putten

@PhDniX

2018年11月26日

There is disagreement among the transmitters whether bi-ʾayyi (Q31:34) and bi-ʾayyi-kum (Q68:6) (spelled باييكم even in the Cairo edition!) are read with the loss of the hamzah as well, but at least some transmissions say so. No word on li-ʾayyi, however.

Marijn van Putten

@PhDniX

2018年11月26日

ʾayyi is not spelled like this when it is not preceded by bi- or li-, e.g. min ʾayyi šayʾ (Q80:18).

返信先:

さん

Marijn, I think it would be very helpful if you check the two occurrences of فأيّ in Q6:81 and Q40:81 in order to check whether it is systematic or not

返信先:

さん

Just فاى. It seems to be triggered by the i vowel in the prefixes bi-/li-. So it doesn't happen with fa-!

返信先:

さん

BTW, I think it must happen only with the high front vowel /i/. I guess the process went this way: /bi-ʔajj/ > */bi-i-ajj/ > /bi-jajj/. I mean the drop of the glottal stop results finally in a front glide

返信先:

さん

Yep, I think so too. I argued for that in this paper: academia.edu/35556452/Hamza It seems to also be conditioned by the *j later in the word. All clear examples of this consist of ʔay or ʔāy: bi-ʔayyām, bi-ʔayyi, bi-ʔāyāt li-ʔayyi, li-ʔāyāt. but never bi-ʔannahum or something

academia.edu

Hamzah in the Quranic Consonantal Text. Orientalia 87:1 (2018), pp. 93-120

The glottal stop (ʔ) in Classical Arabic is expressed by the hamzah sign, which rather than being its own independent sign in the orthography, is generally treated as a diacritic sign placed on...

返信先:

さん

Sorry, I passed it because my sight is getting always worse

Marijn van Putten

@PhDniX

返信先:

@ashraf1974108

さん

No problem! It's good to see that you reproduced the same questions I asked the data and suggested the same solution. Great minds think alike.

午後10:10 · 2018年11月26日

返信先:

さん

I hate you Marijn. I left my work (although I'm too delayed) to read your article. Very great work. I liked it so much.

Twitterを使ってみよう

今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。

Appleのアカウントで登録

アカウントを作成

アカウントを登録することにより、利用規約とプライバシーポリシー（Cookieの使用を含む）に同意したとみなされます。

トレンド

いまどうしてる？

エンターテインメント · トレンド

Christopher Walken

4,079件のツイート

エンターテインメント · トレンド

HDMI

12,160件のツイート

スポーツ · トレンド

Terry Tate

政治 · トレンド

Speaker of the House

18,502件のツイート

スポーツ · トレンド

#IPL2023

トレンドトピック: #GTvCSK

さらに表示