ISO 10218-1, Robotics - Safety requirements – Part 1: Industrial robots (revision of ISO 10218-1:2011)
Since 2011, industrial robots have undergone many enhancements and improvements due to market demand and a broadening of uses. In particular, industrial robots increasingly have many more safety functions than even mentioned in the 2011 edition. These enhancements and improvements provide improved ease of use – particularly for small and medium enterprises that might have no previous robot experience. Another aspect of the enhancements are capabilities for enabling collaborative robot applications (see ISO 10218-2 revision).
This standard provides requirements for industrial robots, as such it is used by manufacturers of industrial robots although it could be of interest to others. The revision of ISO 10218-1:2011 started in 2017 with the new edition expected to be completed at the end of 2022.
- Changes between the 2011 edition and the ongoing revision (as of the FDIS) are:
- Retain harmonization status with participating member countries, including the Machinery Directive in Europe.
- Move contents between the Part 1 and the Part 2 to make sure content is in the correct Part of the standard.
- Updated definitions, most notably “safeguarded space” and “industrial environment”.
- Added requirements about
- mechanical strength,
- stability,
- materials,
- packaging, lifting, transport and handling,
- hazardous substances,
- temperatures and risks of fires,
- special equipment,
- position holding,
- braking systems,
- auxiliary axes,
- power loss or change,
- cybersecurity,
- classification of robots (Class I having low energy transfer capability),
- test methodology for Class I robots,
- unexpected start,
- interlocking devices,
- status indication and warning devices,
- operational modes,
- portable control stations capable of initiating motion or other hazardous situations,
- direct and external control,
- means of initiating automatic operation,
- single point of control,
- start and restart interlocking,
- resetting internal robot safety functions,
- normal stop,
- speed limit monitoring,
- monitored standstill,
- stopping time limiting,
- stopping distance limiting,
- communications,
- information for use.
- Collaborative:
- Greater details about requirements if the robot includes any of the following capabilities: hand guided controls (HGC), speed and separation monitoring (SSM), and power and force limiting (PFL).
- Removed the following terms:
- “collaborative robot”,
- “collaborative operation”,
- “safety-rated monitored stop” (this concept is now a safety function called “monitored standstill” which happens after a Stop Category 2 (IEC 60204-1 happens).
- Collaborative describes a robot application (see Part 2), collaborative is not a mode and collaborative is not a robot.
- Optional robot capabilities to enable collaborative applications according to Part 2 are specified, e.g. the requirements and safety functions for HGC (Hand-Guided Controls), SSM (Speed and Separation Monitoring) and PFL (Power and Force Limiting).
- Degree of collaboration or cooperation is not relevant and therefore not presented.
- Functional safety changes include:
- PLd Category 3 or SIL2 HFT=1 or PFHD less than 4.43 x 10-7.
- Requiring compliance with Annex C for safety functions.
- Approximately 38 safety functions are listed.
- Not all safety functions are required to meet PLd or SIL2 requirements
- Not all safety functions are mandatory.
- Clarity about safety functions and the safety functions characteristics
- Information for use requires providing extensive functional safety information.
(Pictures by permission from ABB, Universal Robots, Yaskawa)