会話
返信先: さん
And here’s a randomized experiment on the impact of Wikipedia on scientific research.
引用ツイート
Ethan Mollick
@emollick
As any academic will tell you, influencing the direction of science through research is hard... so here is an easier path. One quality Wikipedia article written by chemistry experts influenced the content of 250 published peer-reviewed academic papers! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf
このスレッドを表示
49
207
返信先: さん
1
1
7
返信先: さん
This is so interesting (and a little concerning). I am a librarian who lives in a rural area and edits local town articles just so they will show up on Google above the spammy links "Buy a cemetery plot in $TOWN" This is both great if done well and a mess for WP if done poorly.
2
3
27
返信を表示
返信先: さん
See also the review of this paper in our monthly newsletter (including more information about the Wikipedia editor communities' reactions to this experiment):
2
16
返信先: さん
With respect to helping improve things, yes! Look to WikiProject Women in Red to get connected with like-minded editors there who are experiencing at navigating the very real beuracracy.
3
2
6