I mean, ONE time, means you probably met an asshole. FIVE times, maybe it’s you?
ツイート
新しいツイートを表示
会話
返信先: さん, さん
TBF this is the subtext of every Dilbert strip.
What is wrong with that dude ?!‽
返信先: さん, さん
I really don't know how to process this
返信先: さん, さん
Has anyone started taking his tweets and putting them into Dilbert strips yet?
返信先: さん, さん
You're wrong. This explains nothing and I have no idea what to make of it.
返信先: さん, さん
It really explains why Dogbert was originally going to be named "Dildog".
返信先: さん, さん
I have no idea who Scott Adams is, but I’d really really like to never meet him
返信先: さん, さん
I'm no psychiatrist, but...
返信先: さん, さん
It’s always projection with these guys. Does Scott believe most men are preoccupied with either doing this to other men or having other men do this to him?
返信先: さん, さん
The opinion of someone who's never wondered if *they* were wrong, lol
返信先: さん, さん
Ah, the old 'stick your fingers in his ass' gambit. Debate Masterclass 101.
返信先: さん, さん
That seems like an example of introducing violence into a situation where there wasn't any.
返信先: さん, さん
He needs to test this theory, on a random sample of the broader population. I think he'll be surprised by how little the responses correlate with gender, or familial affiliation.
Sidenote: I don't want to hear about the results of his test. Ever.
返信先: さん, さん
His comic strip should be called "Dillhole"
返信先: さん, さん
Imagine the horror when young Scott asked his dad for help with his homework. Then again, I doubt he ever asked more than once.
返信先: さん, さん
That action sure takes away the whole implied portion of the interaction, dunnit?!?
返信先: さん, さん
Is that how his species establishes dominance?
返信先: さん, さん
Lol, no wonder people keep pointing guns at him.