会話

返信先:

さん、

False, Uncurcumcised males under 4 are the highest risk group for balantis Also, the main risk of meatal stenosis is UTI. Which even with this risk of meatal stenosis are far less common in circumsized men. 90% less chance of a uti for someone circumsized

返信先:

さん、

さん、他2人

1: Source? 2: The 2nd biggest risk is painful urination according to my urologist. It's also the most common. 3: UTIs are decreased by around 50%, and are rare adc.bmj.com/content/90/8/8 (Meta Analysis)

adc.bmj.com

Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of random...

返信先:

さん、

さん、他2人

"Balanitis and balanoposthitis are common. Not only do they lead to frequent medical consultations, but if not treated, the consequences can include acquired phimosis and LS, the treatment of which can often be challenging. Balantis Source ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P

返信先:

さん、

さん、他3人

"The research evidence that male circumcision is efficacious in reducing sexual transmission of HIV from women to men is compelling … and has been proven beyond reasonable doubt.” STD/HIV Source

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Male Circumcision for the Prevention of Acquisition and Transmission of Sexually Transmitted...

返信先:

さん、

さん、他3人

The single risk factor of lack of circumcision confers a 23.3% chance of urinary tract infection during the lifetime. This greatly exceeds the prevalence of circumcision complications (1.5%), which are mostly minor. "

返信先:

さん、

さん、他3人

"The potential seriousness of urinary tract infection supports circumcision as a desirable preventive health intervention in infant males." Source-

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Circumcision and lifetime risk of urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis -...

返信先:

さん、

さん、他2人

Most of those are studies by Brian J Morris, a dude who got banned as a source from Wikipedia, that takes a lot to do, I'm gonna be real, and it's because he's a Circumcision fetishist. The one study which isn't is out of date.

ツイートを翻訳

件の表示

返信先:

さん、

さん、他2人

Who is irrelevant. The data is what matters

返信先:

さん、

さん、他2人

The data is made by a biased source. That matters. It matters a lot. Bias made us think in the 90s that carbs were great, and fats were awful. Bias made us think Lobotomies are good for a while.

返信を表示