![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="96" height="96"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Man the details in a 200mp shot is crazy
![画像](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="510"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![画像](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="317" height="680"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
23
14
217
会話
返信先: さん
They are good but only for close subjects in my experience. Doesn't apply to scenery / landscapes etc.. which is too bad or a bug.
1
返信先: さん
Im not sure about this. For this shot I'm really not close up. But I have seen some great landscape picture where I can punch in on a subject form miles away
1
1
返信先: さん
I dont think so, here are a few landscapes i shot past week with mine. Most of close subjects (1-5 meters) are fine though. 12MP shots get same or better overall details than 200MP smh when looking at full sized picture (not on twitter) for landscapes. Something is wrong in sw
ツイートを翻訳
![12MP](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="360" height="270"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
画像の説明を読む
ALT
画像の説明を読む
ALT
画像の説明を読む
ALT
画像の説明を読む
ALT