Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="289" height="525"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="287" height="540"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
I don't care about bourgeois democracy but all those parties are united in one front.
Show replies
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="900" height="254"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
"guys just because is single party is not a democracy" think outside the fucking box.
Show replies
Replying to
do you think having democratic in the title makes them a functioning democracy
Show replies
Replying to
You could also take screenshots of the wiki for the US govt. This does not a democracy make.
Replying to
Curious; who are the independents? Or is that info not known?
Because I didn’t know the Assembly had independents, that’s cool.
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="252" height="35"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
Me realizing DPRK has a fucking social democratic party:
The media could not be played.
Reload
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="586" height="680"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
this is the exact same argument as seriously thinking hitler was a socialist
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="339" height="208"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
Ah yes this totally sounds like a functional democracy. Very normal stuff here.
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="611"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
Look at the Italian parliament under mussolini! Truly a huge example of democracy!
The following media includes potentially sensitive content. Change settings
View
Replying to
A communist dictatorship using liberal democracy to look better when we all know they oppress the people as capitalism does but in a different way.
Replying to
NK has had one ruling family since the 1950s, it's own propaganda deifies the dictator, we don't need any sources to demonstrate that it's a totalitarian hellscape, you just have to view their own propaganda.
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="282" height="360"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="377" height="679"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
Local Twitter user discovers that dictatorships build phony-democratic institutions in order to manufacture an appearance of legitimacy.
Please read beyond the Wikipedia sidebars.
New to Twitter?
Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!