body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScript is not available.

We’ve detected that JavaScript is disabled in this browser. Please enable JavaScript or switch to a supported browser to continue using twitter.com. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Imprint Ads info © 2022 Twitter, Inc.

Don’t miss what’s happening

People on Twitter are the first to know.

DDK

31.7K Tweets

Follow

Click to Follow ddk20000

DDK

@ddk20000

徒然なるままに／談合容認にNO／スギ花粉症撲滅／改憲派／誤字脱字多し

石川県金沢市Joined April 2010

DDK’s Tweets

そもそも論として、宗教法人としての実体に問題があるなら名称変更以前の問題です。それなら宗教法人法80条1項に基づく認証取消しや81条1項5号に基づく解散命令に動くのが筋でしょう。後は教会側の不申請も、「文科省側の不適切な説明によるもの」と彼らが主張した場合、反駁が難しくなります。

Quote Tweet

川内博史

@kawauchihiroshi

· 8h

何回もありがとうございます。宗教法人法には審査要件の第一に「宗教団体であること」とあります。法のどこにも「形式審査」という言葉は無いのでは？「受理して審査」「拒否する場合は審議会」とあり、統一教会側が「審議会」に付議され、おおごとになるよりも申請しないことを選んだのでは？ twitter.com/ddk20000/statu…

1

2

4

それは「宗教法人認可」の問題であって、名称変更とは関係ありません。一般に名称変更で行政が何らかの応答を期待していない以上、形式審査と考える他ないのです。第一、霊感商法の問題と信教の自由は両立するので、前者を理由に宗教団体性を否定するとそれこそ憲法問題になる。

Quote Tweet

川内博史

@kawauchihiroshi

· 8h

何回もありがとうございます。宗教法人法には審査要件の第一に「宗教団体であること」とあります。法のどこにも「形式審査」という言葉は無いのでは？「受理して審査」「拒否する場合は審議会」とあり、統一教会側が「審議会」に付議され、おおごとになるよりも申請しないことを選んだのでは？ twitter.com/ddk20000/statu…

2

7

どうぞご随意に。相手が反社会的であるからこそ、「付け入る隙を与えない」ことが非常に重要。その為には恣意的な行政をしない、必要に応じて立法措置を取る等の対応がある。そんなことも解らない奴が、省庁の次官や国会議員をやっていることに呆れるばかり。 twitter.com/freeze210929/s

You’re unable to view this Tweet because this account owner limits who can view their Tweets. Learn more

2

2

宗教法人の名称変更に関しては行政解釈・運用共に形式審査で、実体を問題にする余地は本来ないはずです。仮にあるとすれば、申請を受け入れて認証しなければ足りる。しかし文科省はそうしなかったのは、出来ないからです。これでは虚偽説明を疑って当然で、前川氏の官僚としての資質を疑う。

Quote Tweet

川内博史

@kawauchihiroshi

· 9h

ありがとうございます。ところで、何をもって虚偽説明とおっしゃるのか？前川氏は「オウム真理教事件もあり、宗教団体としての実体が問題だった」と発言。統一教会は勧誘方法や霊感商法が違法と判示されており、審査要件の「宗教団体であること」に疑義がある、と文科省は判断していたのでは？ twitter.com/ddk20000/statu…

4

4

これが本当なら文科省が旧統一教会側に虚偽説明を行った疑いがあり、だから教会側の弁護士から突き上げられたのでしょう。恣意的な行政運用が彼らに付け入る隙を与えました。かかる運用は本来野党が批判すべき。これでは議員としての資質が疑われて当然で、だから「選挙に落ちる」と書いたのです。

Quote Tweet

川内博史

@kawauchihiroshi

· 11h

御指摘、ありがとうございます。前川氏は「受理して審査したら認証を拒否することになると説明したら、統一教会側が申請しなかった」と発言しました。その法的構造を解説しただけで、どこにも違法はありません。それから、私が落選したこととは無関係です。 twitter.com/ddk20000/statu…

4

7

訂正：「後ろから撃つ」は誤解を招きかねない内容なので、取り消します。

Quote Tweet

DDK

@ddk20000

· 17h

その理屈だと、文部科学省が統一教会側の申請を受理して「法令の規定に適合しない」と判断すれば済むのに、どうして申請させないという対応を取ったのかという話になってしまう。反論のつもりが、文部科学省（前川氏）を後ろから撃つだけのものになっている。 twitter.com/ShinHori1/stat…

Show this thread

Topics to follow

Sign up to get Tweets about the Topics you follow in your Home timeline.

Carousel

安倍一族と林一族の因縁・対立はつとに有名な話だが、ここまで表に出るとは思わなかった。「あいつならやりかねん」くらいは考えていたのだろうか。もっとも安倍元首相もかつて岸田首相批判のツイートに「いいね」を押していたから、良くも悪くも皆あまり考えていないだけかもしれないが。＞RT

1

1

2

青葉ギャル

林外相が中国のハニートラップに引っかかっているという内容のツイートを、なんと岸信夫防衛大臣がRTしている。自民党も安倍晋三という要石を喪い、不安定化に向かっていると思ってしまうな。

4

66

96

@TheInsiderPaper

NEW

Eric Trump reportedly said that FBI found nothing in the safe in a raid at Trump’s home

59

388

1,560

Sharyl Attkisson

🕵️‍♂️

@SharylAttkisson

(Remember, this isn't the normal way such matters are handled. Officials in both parties have long histories of alleged document destruction or other mishandling. I've written stories recounting examples. There is discussion but no FBI raids or charges.)

Quote Tweet

William Amos

@WilliamAmos

· Aug 8

Replying to @SharylAttkisson

twitter.com/kyledcheney/st

24

178

466

Sharyl Attkisson

🕵️‍♂️

@SharylAttkisson

2-If even some of Trump's opponents are chilled, I'm not sure the DOJ and FBI actions will have the impact some are hoping for. One official said, "This is how afraid they are that Trump will get re-elected."

129

606

2,151

Sharyl Attkisson

🕵️‍♂️

@SharylAttkisson

1-I just heard separately from 2 officials who do not support Trump. They won't speak publicly, but say they are bowled over by the "stunning" and "unjustified" actions against Trump.

981

2,738

10.1K

まあその通りで、6年前のやらかしのせいで今度の強制捜査も碌に信用されていない、というのは一因としてある。

Quote Tweet

Greg Price

@greg_price11

· Aug 9

In 2016, the FBI lied in FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign, fabricated the claim of Russian collusion, and framed Michael Flynn and Carter Page as Russian agents. In 2022, they're full on raiding his home.

1

1

In 2016, the FBI lied in FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign, fabricated the claim of Russian collusion, and framed Michael Flynn and Carter Page as Russian agents. In 2022, they're full on raiding his home.

185

2,524

7,224

BTW, for those claiming that a violation of law regarding classified documents would prevent Trump from running, nope -- the statutory penalties for any such violation do not overcome the Constitution definition of qualifications for eligibility.

407

850

7,109

Show this thread

If Sandy Berger shoves classified documents in his pants, that's unqualifiedly a legal violation. But the president has the ability to declassify materials before leaving the White House. So this is even more dicey for the FBI and DOJ than usual, requiring real specifics.

514

1,054

8,586

Show this thread

This sort of move requires serious levels of trust by the American public in its institutions. That trust no longer exists. If those institutions fail yet again, and target the leader of Joe Biden's political opposition in doing so, this looks like banana republic stuff.

386

1,424

12.6K

Show this thread

We won’t know how fully insane the FBI raid on Trump is until we see the warrant and warrant application. But after Russiagate – years of investigation predicated largely on Clinton campaign misinformation -- if the basis for this isn’t bedrock-solid, there should be hell to pay.

3,380

6,490

43K

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...That is why, again, we cannot assume that criminal charges are inevitable after such a raid . On MSNBC, a host said that the "orange jumpsuit may be coming." That is rather premature given history of prosecutions in this area and the absence of confirmed evidence.

140

387

2,236

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

Mike Emanuel just reported that sources indicate that the safe was opened by a safe cracker but was found empty. That only highlights questions of any evidence of direct involvement by Trump and any intention effort at concealment.

525

1,668

5,083

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

......Even with intentional and egregious acts like Sandy Bergers, there was no jail time and a misdemeanor plea. Much will depend on the scope of the violation and the intent behind any retention or concealment...

82

137

661

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

To tamp down the speculation, it is not a given that criminal prosecution would result even if documents are found at the location. Such acts can result in prosecution but PRA violations are rarely subject to prosecution...

306

490

1,985

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...The reported forced entry into the safe is obviously notable. Documents removed to the safe could show such selection retention but FBI agents tend to scoop up and all documents that falls with the parameters of the search warrant.

37

83

410

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...There are a host of details that remain unclear, particularly any communications since the seizure of the boxes a couple months ago on suspected omissions or retentions. There will also be questions of Trump's personal handling or knowledge of such documents...

23

82

432

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...My assumption is that the Trump legal team has already contacted the FBI to ask for safeguarding the material to allow for challenges or protective orders for any privileged or private content.

22

64

161

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...The question is why a subpoena would not suffice, particularly when the subject is not present at the location. Instead, a raid was ordered to scope up boxes of potential sensitive documents that were not reviewable at the scene.

25

85

186

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...I would be more interested in what communications occurred since the removal of boxes two months ago. If the Archives identified missing documents or has reason to believe that PRA material remained at the home, it would be interesting to confirm if a request was made.

6

32

104

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...Berger was given no jail time but was fined and given two years of probation and 100 hours of community service. He was stripped of his security clearance for three years. However, he was prosecuted.

6

25

77

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

New reports indicate the raid on Trump was based on the retention of presidential papers. I misstated one item tonight in the coverage. Sandy Berger did plead to a misdemeanor for removing documents in this socks but did not face more serious charges for his knowing violation.

13

54

134

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...We will have to wait and see if more details emerge on why such an extraordinary raid was necessary and whether specific documents were identified as still missing by the archives.

58

85

319

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...The most obvious basis is that, since boxes were collected why the archives two months ago, any retention of presidential records was knowing and intentional...

8

32

111

Show this thread

Jonathan Turley

@JonathanTurley

...The PRA has not been ordinarily a matter of criminal prosecution. Indeed, records cases as a whole are have not been prosecuted. James Comey removed FBI material and leaked it to the press. That was not a PRA case but was also not subject to any prosecution.

24

179

447

Show this thread

喩えて言えば、婚姻届を出されると受理しない訳にいかないので、役所が婚姻届を出すなと指導していたようなもの。こうした行政対応は法律に基づかないので、変更を「申請させろ」と詰め寄られた。文化庁は前川氏が始めた行政対応を踏襲するのではなく、申請されても拒絶できる法改正をすべきだった。

11

252

661

Show this thread

New to Twitter?

Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!

Sign up with Apple

Sign up with phone or email

By signing up, you agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, including Cookie Use.

Trending now

What’s happening

News

Yesterday

台風7号「ムーラン」が発生気象庁

Entertainment · Trending

大島優子

4,582 Tweets

Trending in Japan

#伊藤の浮気にイワクラ涙

Trending with #守屋麗奈, #大園玲

All About

August 9, 2022

酷暑で千葉に脚光、なぜ？関東の「暑い」＆「涼しい」スポットTOP10との関連【気象予報士が解説】

World news

LIVE

ロシアによるウクライナへの侵攻状況