"Jewish wife is not a luxury, but a means of transportation"
Old cynical Soviet joke. It makes more sense for those familiar with the Russian literature beyond Tolstoyevsky
If you want to understand *modern* Russian culture, don't read 19th c. aristocrats. They're all dead and their world is dead, too. Read the "Twelve Chairs" and "Golden Calf" instead. Picaresques on Ostap Bender's adventures may be two most influential books of the Russian 20th c
And they are certainly the most quotable in normal talk, in every day situations
Quoting the 19th c poetry is classy for Russians for the same reason it is classy for Europeans to quote Roman or Greek authors. It is a dead language of a dead culture. 19th century is the Russian antiquity. That world died and modern Russia doesn't have much continuity with it
1921-1929 - that's when modern Russian culture started for real. Retrospectively the roaring twenties may look as a flash of light in the darkness. Old pre-revolutionary culture is honestly not that relatable. Regarding the Soviet culture of 1930-1980s, few want to relate with it
Crazy yet witty Galkovsky made a good observation. Muslims described Christians and Jews as "People of the Book". Soviets could also be described this way. Except this book would be the Twelve Chairs rather than Bible or Torah. Yuri Andropov reportedly learnt this book by heart
The high to late Soviet literature turned out to be sterile. Writers were not all bad, it's just that the world they lived in and described is unattractive. Stalinism what nightmarish, Khrushchevism absurdly delusional, Brezhnevism just outright dull. Who reads Trifonov nowadays?
In spite of all their hardships and horrors, the 1920s turned out to be a breath of fresh air before the darkness fully gathered. And few want to relate with the art created under the Necropolis of Stalinism. That's why it is so unreadable today
1920s were probably the highest point of the 20th c Russian literature, at least in terms of their long term cultural impact. These books are so readable and quotable largely because of the world they picture. This world might be horrifying. But it is certainly not dull. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Daily reminder that Putin's army of invasion was trained on the Rheinmetall-built training centre Mulino. In 2014 they "left" and construction was finished by "Гарнизон" company, probably a proxy. 100% of its imports came from Germany, last Rheinmetall shipments coming in 2019
In 2011 Rheinmetall got a contract for building a training center in Mulino, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast. They modelled it after the training center of Bundeswehr in Altmark. They planned to build "the most advanced system of its kind worldwide"
Mulino started in 2011 was the high point of Serdyukov's reforms. Two things you must understand about Serdyukov ministry:
1. No other minister of defence made such a big focus on the land army 2. No other minister of defence was so eager to import ready solutions from the West
I think this interpretation may lack cultural context. In Russia an official getting a monetary token of gratitude for allowing the project to proceed is normal. It's called "откат" (something that rolls back). It's not a "bribe", more like tribute. Not demanding откат is unusual
That's why "Serdyukov was ousted for corruption" argument is dumb. It's not "corruption", it's just normal rules of the game. When a high official falls "corruption scandal" is just a pretext. You must charge them with something so you pretend they did a "crime" by taking откат
When Ulyukaev was jailed that was seen as a result of his personal conflict with Igor Sechin. When Serdyukov was fired, this was seen as погорел на бабах. I don't think that either of this interpretations is exhaustive. But those with half a brain know it's not about "corruption"
One point: Draft plays a major role in Russian stealth mobilisation. First you need to get them into army, even as conscripts. Then you force/persuade them to sign a contract and now it's legal to send them to Ukraine
And my earlier comment. Serdyukov tried to modernise the land army, equipping and training it according to the NATO standards (= context for the Rheinmetall story). But he made enemies, was ousted from power and his successor dismantled much of his legacy
The Rheinmetall-built Mulino training center modelled after a Bundeswehr center in Altmark may be the biggest achievement of Serdyukov. No wonder that manoeuvres West-2021 which prepared the Russian land army for Z-invasion opened and closed in Mulino
Historically this has been (largely) correct. With major and important exceptions science used to be a business of the idle rich and weirdos till around WWII*. In the last decades though it taylorised so much that I'm not sure if we can view it as the same institution as before
* Of course I'm generalising. Some disciplines (chemistry) could have more potential for practical applications and thus earning potential than others (physics). But the science itself transformed into a somewhat normal industry with somewhat normal career potential only recently
I'd even argue that the post-WWII world when academia was indeed a normal career track, was a historical aberration mistakenly taken for a new norm. Under normal conditions you either have some other means of income or you starve. Now we're simply returning to the historical norm
Researchers studying regionalism and diversity in Russia produced tons of great books on Caucasus but very few on Volga region. This is by far the best book on Tatarstan that I know. She:
1. Has actually learnt the language 2. Lived into the culture rather than merely studied it
What makes Faller's book special is that she tried to grasp the conceptual framework of a culture she studied rather than apply her own. That's very rare. That requires lots of intellectual humility and the great language fluency. Unfortunately, too many researchers have neither
Helen Faller focuses on cultural politics. Unlike many others though, she has actually learnt the culture she's writing on. She raises tons of minor questions most researchers would never ask. Like, what constitutes a well-organised domestic space in Russian and in Tatar culture?