Protests in Nukus, Karakalpakstan continue. Uzbek President Mirziyoyev already suggested not to amend the articles 70, 71, 72, 74, 75 of the constitution on the sovereignty and status of Karakalpakstan. But his forces are suppressing the protests. Emergency declared till August 2
International community should pressure Uzbek President Mirziyoyev to deescalate the situation. Karakalpak minority sees the entire "constitutional reform" project, especially regarding the Chapter XVII as highly provocative. That's a video from the yesterday's protests in Nukus
Keep in mind that Uzbekistan is:
1) Diverse 2) Young 3) Poor
Average age in Uzbekistan (29) is not much higher than in Syria (25). GDP per capita not much higher than in Cambodia. Most of territory is desert so almost everyone lives in a few overcrowded oases and river valleys
Uzbek government tries to picture the country more homogenous than it really is. For example they pretend that Khwarezmian language (Oghuz) is a dialect of Uzbek (Karluk) which is an obvious lie. Country is way more diverse & heterogenous than you may think looking at statistics
Young, poor and diverse population of Uzbekistan is very much affected by the rapid inflation. What is worse, previously the poor rural youth could travel to Russia to take some low paid manual jobs. That was a way for Uzbekistan to relieve its demographic pressure and earn cash
Many (myself included) feared that Russian-Ukrainian war would lead to explosion Central Asia. It was the imbecile move of president to grasp even more powers and reduce regional autonomy of Karakalpakstan that triggered the crisis. But it has more fundamental underlying reasons
I am very much concerned that Karakalpakstan may be only the starting point of a major Central Asian crisis. The next obvious point for explosion is Khorezm. Khorezm viloyet is located in oasis on the lower Amu Darya. By Uzbek standards it's very poor, rural and densely populated
It is also ethnically different. Uzbek government pretends Khwarezmians are Uzbeks but that is a lie. Uzbeks are Karluk, Khwarezmians are Oghuz. Uzbeks look down upon Khwarezmians and the latter resent that being being such an ancient culture they are ruled by alien Uzbeks
What is happening in Uzbekistan looks like the very beginning of the Syrian war. It can also trigger a general Central Asian crisis. All these countries are affected by pretty much the same socioeconomic factors and now can't send their excess rural youth to work to Russia
I think that the international community should pressure President Mirziyoyev to:
1. Stop the "constitutional reform". No amendments at all 2. Choose scapegoats among his own administration and police and jail them for massacring the protestors in Nukus. Make a show out of it
Political deescalation however won't solve the structural socioeconomic problems of Uzbekistan which are many. It's necessary to find employment for excessive rural youth, at home or abroad. So far South Korea has been a preferable alternative to Russia rferl.org/a/uzbekistans-…
Contrary to the popular perception, Uzbekistan has been developing fairly well. It showed some of the highest rates of industrial growth in the former USSR. But again, contrary to the popular perception, growing rapidly doesn't prevent you from spiralling into chaos and violence
President Mirziyoyev must be urged to stop the constitutional reform. He must be urged to appoint scapegoats for the massacre and jail them. That can deescalate it for now. But in the long run it's vital to find/create employment for the rural youth that now can't go to Russia
Labour contracts with South Korea or with other East Asian countries can be a very good idea. Cash transfers of labor migrants could keep the rural economy afloat, creating many jobs at home. That could allow Uzbekistan to survive through the current global recession
Finally, international community should help Tashkent to work out a more fair, decentralised and inclusive political system. The extreme dissatisfaction of many Khorezmians with the alien rule of Tashkent was obvious when you talked to them privately. The system must be reformed
PS While the political system of Uzbekistan is too centralised and unfair, underrepresenting the regions and minorities, in Turkmenistan it is *MUCH* worse than that. I don't know any other Central Asian country with so much potential for an internal war of extermination. The end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
thread 1/13 Putin's risk appetite is far greater than we realised. We are deluding ourselves (I was too complacent and thought he wouldn't go this far) So forget the stirring talk about Western unity and a revived spirit of purpose in NATO.
2/13 Warm words and high spirits do not bring the dead back to life. As you read this, Ukrainians are huddling in bomb shelters, dodging bullets, and seeing their dreams of a free, prosperous, law-governed independent country destroyed.
3/13 For the West, this may be (yet another) wake-up call. For Ukraine, it is a death-knell.We will have years (decades, probably) to mull the combination of naivete, complacency, arrogance, ignorance and — most of all — greed that brought us to this catastrophe.
In February 2020, just 2 years ago, 52 of 53 Republican senators voted to allow (then) President Trump to block congressionally authorized sale of critical military supplies to the courageous President Zelensky of Ukraine, unless Ukraine manufactured anti-Democratic propaganda.
Whatever those 52 senators say now about how tough they're on Putin (criticizing Biden for not being tough enough) is insulting & useless BS until they acknowledge & apologize for their vote to allow Trump to blackmail Zelensky for their support of authoritarianism over democracy
Big Thread: After a few more days of war, I've been carefully monitoring Russian social media reaction and production and I'm more convinced than before that Putin's regime has totally overestimated its ability to win a propaganda war.
Russians are being bombarded with very effective Russian-language anti-war propaganda. We're seeing a lot about Zelensky etc. but Russians are widely viewing some HUGE celebrities with big, big follower counts coming out against the war.
You might have read about Yury Dud, the popular Russian blogger, speaking out against the war. 5 million followers, and look at what he's sharing at the top of his Instagram page: strong stuff.
One of my biggest pet peeves: When old historic maps overlap with modern political maps.
A 🧵
English possessions in 1154 vs the 1st round of the presidential election
+ Where British citizens currently reside in France
Zooming in on Paris, districts that voted for Macron vs districts that voted for Mélenchon in the 1st round of the presidential election vs the 1871 commune of Paris. (Diamonds are important barricades)
- What is long, green and smells with sausage?
- Moscow-Tver train
Why? Well, under the USSR provincials had to go shopping to Moscow. Their shops had no food, often very literally. Today we'll learn an expression "supply category"🧵
Under the centrally planned economy it was the state which supplied food to the localities. It would assign each city one of four "supply categories" determining how much food there will be on shelves. Moscow was supplied far better than anyone while cities like Tver - horribly
Provincial Soviet cities of the lower supply categories might have no food on the shelves at all. Sometimes very literally. Sometimes they would have only the scraps from the table of the higher status city: like some algae, or the disgusting paste "Ocean"
I find this line of argumentation illustrative of the general state of Russian discourse, whether "patriotic" or "liberal". Everything Turkic occupies the same place in the Russian debates as everything Irish in the Imperial British. The Inner Other and the source of all the evil
Reading the Russian-Ukrainian debates with both sides accusing each other of racial impurity and having too many Steppe admixtures or influences, I noticed that their argumentation is mirroring each other. See this Russian nationalist material for example sputnikipogrom.com/history/15934/…
This mutuality and almost exact symmetry of Russian-Ukrainian accusations reminds me of a brilliant
thread on the British rule over the Ionian Isles. Bach then the discourse was similar. Brits and Greeks were constantly accusing each other of Irishness
Russian bureaucracy is *massive*. It's also diverse. Judging from my observations, it's less integrated than let's say the apparatus of the U.S. federal bureaucracy. Different agencies have different cultures and operate by different rules. Avoid sweeping generalisations (not🧵)
I see a very common attitude among the Russian pro-war community. It can be summarised this way:
"We expected dumb and incompetent bureaucrats to destroy our economy. But our glorious army would prevail against all odds. It turned out we were wrong. It's the other way around"
Now much of the Z-community argues that they greatly overestimated the Russian army (and the military apparatus). It's very, very much worse than anyone thought before. But they underestimated the economic bureaucracy. Which is very much better than they could have thought
No. Describing Russian regime as "kleptocracy" is misrepresentation. It's not technically false, just absurdly reductionist. Let's be honest, if Putinism was *entirely* about stealing it would not be able to wage wars or produce armaments. And it produces hella lots of them
Keep in mind that public rhetorics work according to the rhetorical logic. Public position doesn't have to be factually accurate, it has to be rhetorically advantageous for it to work. They talk about "corruption" so much because it's rhetorically advantageous. That's it
When you don't have a positive agenda/vision of future or it's too hideous, you talk about "corruption". Examples - Lukashenko or Yeltsin. "Anti-corruption fight" is an ideal topic for a power hungry politician. Because talking about corruption = avoiding the actual conversation
Kremlin may not have a grey cardinal. But it has a bald engineer. The Kinder Egg is a major architect of Putinism. In 1998 he made Putin the FSB Chief. In 2000s he dismantled the regional autonomy imposing the centralised rule. Now he manages Putin's domestic policy and Ukraine🧵
Sergey Kirienko was born as Sergey Israitel in a mixed Russian-Jewish family. After the divorce his mother changed his surname from father's "Israitel" to her own "Kirienko". That could be a pragmatic decision. A boy with a Slavic name would have better career chances in the USSR
In childhood Kirienko lived with his mom in subtropical Sochi. Here he started the bureaucrat career as a Komsomol manager (комсорг) of his high school class. NB: the role of Komsomol in Soviet to post-Soviet transition is underrated. Komsomol management were its main benefactors