Kamil Galeev Profile picture
Jun 15 45 tweets 17 min read
What's happening with Russian economy?

Dynamics of Russian economy have been quite counterintuitive. Many, including myself expected the quick crash of the Russian currency. Indeed, usd/rub exchange rate initially skyrocketed. But since March 10 ruble started growing quickly🧵 Image
One could assume that the ruble price somehow correlated with Russian military successes. Indeed, Russians were advancing quickly. And still, less quickly than almost everyone had expected. Plus subsequent Russian retreat from the north in early April didn't stop the ruble rise
Much better and more obvious explanation would be: the price of the ruble dependent primarily on the trade balance rather than with what was happening on the Ukrainian battlefields. Strong ruble is a result of the trade surplus. And the Russian trade surplus skyrocketed in 2022 Image
Trade balance depends on exports and imports. Now what does Russia export? That's the figures of 2017 but that's good enough to see the structure of its exports. It's overwhelmingly raw materials. Fossil fuels, ore, metals, mineral fertilisers. Very little machinery or equipment Image
Now let's have a look on Russian import structure. It's nearly reverse. Machinery, equipment, components. It's not only the consumption products but also pretty much everything that is necessary to keep the Russian industry going from the machine tools to the cassette bearings Image
To illustrate my thesis, I'll give you some examples from Russian civilian machinery, military machinery and transport. NB this is not a *proof*. That's an illustration. Let's start with civilian machinery. See an interview with the trade union leader of the Avtovaz car producer
Now let's do Russian military industry. That's a vacancy description of a construction bureau designing missiles. They are looking for a technician who would be able to write soft for machines operating on Sinumerik 840D (Siemens) & Heidenhahn software

ekaterinburg.jobfilter.ru/vacancy/893555… Image
The massive use of Western, specifically German machines and software in the Russian military industry, including missiles and rockets isn't secret. It's openly shown on the Russian TV. See this Россия 1 broadcast from Kalinin plant on 3:01

"Heidenhahn"

Image
FYI: this Heidenhahn using Kalinin plant in Yekaterinburg is a produce of the Russian air defence systems, including the С-300

There's a massive evidence that most of software used on Russian programmable machines in the military industry is either

Siemens
Heidenhahn Image
Discussions of the Russian military capacities miss one crucial element: it's total dependency upon the technological import. And vice versa, discussions on the EU-Russia relations miss the economic dependency of so many European producers upon the technological export to Russia Image
Strange behaviour of Germany during the war in Ukraine might make more sense if we consider that German and Russian economies are surprisingly compatible ImageImage
It was the Germany that was the main provider of machine tools for the Russian industry and specifically for Putin's rearmament program

(See a report of Swedish Defence Research Agency. Tomas Malmlöf. The Russian machine tool industry
Prospects for a turnaround? February 2019) Image
German industrial producers lobbied the government for rapprochement with Russia. Consider Christian Thönes of DMG MORI, 2015

"We are very effectively working on building relations with Russian politicians and try to influence on the German politicians"

informdom.com/uploads/metal/… Image
Christian Thones who talked on lobbying the German politicians ("to the extent it is possible") in 2015, after Crimea, when the war in Ukraine was already going, is now the Chairman of the Executive Board of the DMG MORI

en.dmgmori-ag.com/company/execut… Image
While Germany was the major supplier of machine tools and equipment for the Putin's military industrial complex, France was also quite important as a supplier of armaments and components

See the Investigate Europe material
investigate-europe.eu/en/2022/eu-sta… Image
Now let's do transport. Russia is not the Upper Volta with nukes. It's the Brazil with railways. [=absolutely reliant on railways]. Railways are the main means of:

1. Cargo
2. Long distance passenger
3. To the lesser extent, daily commuting within large urban agglomerations Image
New Russian cargo trains use cassette bearing. In 2022 there were only three producers in Russia:

Тимкен ОВК (joint venture with the American Timken)
ЕПК-Бренко (joint venture with the subsidiary of the American Amsted Rail)
ООО СКФ (Swedish SKF)

They all stopped production Image
I gave three brief illustrations of Russian total dependency upon technological import in:

1. Civilian machinery
2. Military machinery
3. Transport

After the start of the war the technological import stopped nearly completely, even in industries not touched by sanctions Image
After February 26 two things happened:

1. Sudden and almost complete obliteration of import
2. Actual increase in the export value (partially due to the rising prices on raw materials)

As a result, Russian trade surplus skyrocketed (see the graph) and the ruble grew stronger Image
Paradoxically enough, the growth of raw materials export in combination with obliteration of technological import boosted the trade surplus. But this situation is simply unsustainable. Russia can't do without the technological import. It can't even sustain its fossil fuel export Image
This is a very illustrative case. Nordstream gas supply decreased by 40%. Why? Siemens was supposed to repair a gas compressor and deliver it back to Russia. But due to the Canadian sanctions it can't, so the supply decreased dramatically. Now they're working on a solution Image
Now let's sum up. Why has ruble grown stronger?

1. You can't judge the Russian economic dynamics on the monetary indicators
2. Trade surplus skyrocketed due to the export booming and import reduced dramatically
3. This situation is unsustainable. Russia can't do without import
How is Russia dependent upon import?

1. Civilian manufacturing
2. Military manufacturing
3. Transport

Are all critically dependent upon imported tools & components, although the main chokepoints vary. Russian UAVs are component-dependent rather than tool dependent for example Image
Why is Germany supporting Russia?

Because their economies are so compatible. Putin's militarism creates demand on German precision manufacturing tools & components. Thus German industrialists try to influence German politicians to be pro-Russian "to the extent it is possible" Image
Why is France advocating for peace?

Because it helped to keep Putin's military machine going after Crimea. After the 2014 it became much harder for the Russian military to get components for their industry. Fortunately, the French obliged and issued all the necessary licenses Image
Why China can't compensate for the loss of European suppliers?

Because Russian military producers didn't want it and the state didn't allow it. On public Putin conflicted with Europe and befriended China. In practice he didn't allow to switch to the Chinese technological import
Theoretically Russian state imposed heavy import substitution requirements for the tools for the military industry. In practice though the law is used selectively. You won't be *really* jailed for supplying a German tool pretending it's Russian. But you will be jailed for Chinese Image
According to the law, supplying a foreign-produced tool as Russian to meet the import-substitution requirement is fraud. But Russia has a rule *by law*, not *of law*. The law is used selectively. If you supply German stuff, it won't be applied. Chinese though? To the jail you go Image
Hypothesis:

Friendship with China is a political project. It's quite possible that the Russian political leadership and the upper bureaucracy don't *really* trust the Chinese machines, tools and components as much as the Western
National divergence

Russian economy is falling, but it's falling unevenly. Consider a visualisation of the unemployment prognoses by a Russian state think tank ЦСР. There is a negative correlation between the economic complexity and the prognoses of unemployment increase Image
Consider these two clusters of losers. Volga cluster (Tatarstan, Samara, Ulyanovsk) and Kaluga. What unites them? Complex non-military machinery production. This sector is obliterated. Everyone who specialised on complex non-military manufacturing is destroyed by the war Image
Let's compare Kaluga (red) with nearby (Tula) yellow. They are both heavily industralized but Kaluga is obliterated and Tula is doing okayish. Why? Tula is a cluster of military industry, while Kaluga made its regional economic miracle, becoming a major car production cluster Image
Who's doing okayish macro economically? The agrarian south - huge yellow area to the south of Moscow. They didn't suffer that much. Moreover, according to the info I can't prove some regional elites of Southwest regions especially in Rostov are the major benefactors of the war Image
Look at this map again. It doesn't only reflect the current macroeconomic situation in Russia. It's also reflecting a very long and fundamental trend - Russia is shrinking southwestward, with the demographic and economic center gradually shifting in direction of Krasnodar Image
Now who's doing the best unemployment-wise? Look at the green. Those are poor and underdeveloped ethnic regions. Caucasus, Tuva, Astrakhan. That's Putin's cannon fodder

Much of the local youth will be recycled in Ukraine and those who don't will at least be employed in the army Image
That's a powerful signal for the Russian regions. Your specialisation determines your fate

You serve as the cannon fodder or produce armament -> You survive

You build a complex civilian manufacturing, especially with FDI help -> You get obliterated

Lesson for the future Image
It's not only about Russia going the North Korea scenario right now. It's also about the signal Russian business, officials and let's be honest the people are getting. Which is:

The best way to survive is to serve the military machine of the state. Self-reliance is suicidal Image
Should Russian empire survive, its imperial ethos will be very much reinforced. On regional level, on company level, on personal level those who serve the war are doing the best

There is no salvation beyond the state and its military machine

That's what Russians gonna learn Image
Indeed, this is exactly the reason why Russian imperialism and militarism exists in the first place

Because those who serve the war machine are being systematically rewarded and those who pursue other strategies are systematically selected out

They'll be selected out again Image
Should Russian empire survive this crisis it will become more aggressive and militaristic, no matter who rules in Moscow. People, companies, regions will once again learn that only within the state you can find salvation and that will define their future strategies

It should not Image
Wess Mitchell pretty openly advocated for redirecting Russian attention eastward, towards China nationalinterest.org/feature/strate…

That's a delusion. Russia is shrinking and its shrinking southwestward, to the sunbelt directly bordering Ukraine. It's shrinking *away* from China Image
Indeed, Putin's decision to invade which many perceived as "madness" may look less mad if we consider that Russian demographic and economic centres are objectively shrinking southwestward, towards Krasnodar. In this context, decision to expand southwest kinda makes sense Image
Here I gave only few preliminary considerations regarding the Russian regional dynamics based on one single indicator - unemployment prognoses by a Russian gov think tank ЦСР. I'll give more details and sources in my next thread on the National Divorce. End of 🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

5h
Regarding the video with a castration of a Ukrainian POW, comments from the Russian ДШРГ Русич may give some context to the story:

"I have seen up to ten such clips. They're usually published 1-2 years after the events though to make perpetrators more difficult to identify" ImageImage
Русич (Rusich) is a Russian Neonazi group fighting in Ukraine. They're reportedly closely associated with the Wagner mercenary company Image
A Rusich fighter who told he had seen "up to ten such clips" is Evgeny Rasskazov (Topaz). Here you see his post commemorating Hitler's birthday:

"Today is birthday of out comrade who became example for many of us... his Word and Deed inspires us to beat the Ukro-Bolshevik scum" Image
Read 14 tweets
Jul 27
Die Fürstenstadt

There was a Soviet joke:

- What is long, green and smells with sausage?
- Moscow-Tver train

Why? Well, under the USSR provincials had to go shopping to Moscow. Their shops had no food, often very literally. Today we'll learn an expression "supply category"🧵
Under the centrally planned economy it was the state which supplied food to the localities. It would assign each city one of four "supply categories" determining how much food there will be on shelves. Moscow was supplied far better than anyone while cities like Tver - horribly
Provincial Soviet cities of the lower supply categories might have no food on the shelves at all. Sometimes very literally. Sometimes they would have only the scraps from the table of the higher status city: like some algae, or the disgusting paste "Ocean"
Read 26 tweets
Jul 25
I find this line of argumentation illustrative of the general state of Russian discourse, whether "patriotic" or "liberal". Everything Turkic occupies the same place in the Russian debates as everything Irish in the Imperial British. The Inner Other and the source of all the evil
Reading the Russian-Ukrainian debates with both sides accusing each other of racial impurity and having too many Steppe admixtures or influences, I noticed that their argumentation is mirroring each other. See this Russian nationalist material for example sputnikipogrom.com/history/15934/…
This mutuality and almost exact symmetry of Russian-Ukrainian accusations reminds me of a brilliant thread on the British rule over the Ionian Isles. Bach then the discourse was similar. Brits and Greeks were constantly accusing each other of Irishness
Read 14 tweets
Jul 24
Russian bureaucracy is *massive*. It's also diverse. Judging from my observations, it's less integrated than let's say the apparatus of the U.S. federal bureaucracy. Different agencies have different cultures and operate by different rules. Avoid sweeping generalisations (not🧵)
I see a very common attitude among the Russian pro-war community. It can be summarised this way:

"We expected dumb and incompetent bureaucrats to destroy our economy. But our glorious army would prevail against all odds. It turned out we were wrong. It's the other way around"
Now much of the Z-community argues that they greatly overestimated the Russian army (and the military apparatus). It's very, very much worse than anyone thought before. But they underestimated the economic bureaucracy. Which is very much better than they could have thought
Read 22 tweets
Jul 23
No. Describing Russian regime as "kleptocracy" is misrepresentation. It's not technically false, just absurdly reductionist. Let's be honest, if Putinism was *entirely* about stealing it would not be able to wage wars or produce armaments. And it produces hella lots of them
Keep in mind that public rhetorics work according to the rhetorical logic. Public position doesn't have to be factually accurate, it has to be rhetorically advantageous for it to work. They talk about "corruption" so much because it's rhetorically advantageous. That's it
When you don't have a positive agenda/vision of future or it's too hideous, you talk about "corruption". Examples - Lukashenko or Yeltsin. "Anti-corruption fight" is an ideal topic for a power hungry politician. Because talking about corruption = avoiding the actual conversation
Read 19 tweets
Jul 23
Kremlin may not have a grey cardinal. But it has a bald engineer. The Kinder Egg is a major architect of Putinism. In 1998 he made Putin the FSB Chief. In 2000s he dismantled the regional autonomy imposing the centralised rule. Now he manages Putin's domestic policy and Ukraine🧵
Sergey Kirienko was born as Sergey Israitel in a mixed Russian-Jewish family. After the divorce his mother changed his surname from father's "Israitel" to her own "Kirienko". That could be a pragmatic decision. A boy with a Slavic name would have better career chances in the USSR
In childhood Kirienko lived with his mom in subtropical Sochi. Here he started the bureaucrat career as a Komsomol manager (комсорг) of his high school class. NB: the role of Komsomol in Soviet to post-Soviet transition is underrated. Komsomol management were its main benefactors
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(