3,068 views
Kamil Galeev Profile picture
May 25 34 tweets 8 min read
War and Procedure

It's not the Russian regulars who are bearing the main burden of war in Eastern Ukraine. It is the troops of pro-Russian puppet states Donetsk People's Republic and Luhansk People's Republic. Just now 105th and 107th regiments of the DPR refused to fight 🧵 Image
When Russia took control over parts of Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts it didn't annex or unite them. They created two states: DPR and LPR, which were formally sovereign and separate from each other. This procedural decision backfired now with DPR fighters refusing to go to the LNR Image
Watch this video with fighters of DPR's 107th regiments. They just spent three months fighting for Mariupol. Now they complain that their commanders want to send them fight to the LPR which is a "completely different republic", presenting them as "some Cossack volunteers"
This shouldn't be viewed as a proof of some "Donetsk identity" being separate from that of Luhansk. Motivation of these guys is clear, they openly say they don't want to be the "cannon fodder" and "non-mercenaries" (бессребренники) who are not even paid for fighting in Mariupol
They don't want to be used as the unpaid cannon fodder. How can they avoid it? Well, by correctly grasping and exploiting the nature of the Russian state (with its DPR & LPR proxies) which are all very procedural. They are not run by a personal whim, but rather by procedures
All arguments are procedural:

- We are DPR citizens being sent to a "completely different republic"
- They listed us as "Cossack volunteers". We are neither
- They mobilised us without a medical checkup
- They want to trick us from righting a complaint to the military attorney
Now watch a complaint by the fighters of the DPRth 105th regiment. It's even better. I hope you know Russian so that you can enjoy its most beautiful канцелярит, the formal language of bureaucratic papers which nobody speaks on in real life (unless you want to make people laugh)
- We are not soldiers. We used to be college students and workers of various enterprises who were forcibly mobilised into the DPR army
- They told us we'll only maintain law and order or stand in the third line of defence. Bullshit. They sent us to attack Mariupol instead
- The medical examination is compulsory during the mobilisation. Nobody examined us. Many have chronic illnesses
- They want to send us to fight in the LPR. But we are citizens of the DPR, not of the LPR
- We already suffered casualties in Mariupol. Only 60% remain in service
News about the DPR army unrests are confirmed by Evgeniy Mikhailov in his live journal. Mihailov is an ex-governor of Pskov Oblast, ex-Deputy Chief of the Putin's Presidential Administration and also the ex Minister for the Council of Ministers of the DPR mikhailove.livejournal.com/416539.html Image
Now Mikhailov is constantly showing up together with Strelkov. They're always bashing Putin for waging the war so inefficiently. For a number of reasons which I don't want to list here, I think that Mikhailov is sincere in his criticism of Putin not being a strongman enough Image
What does the story of the DPR army unrest teach us? Well, first of all that many in the DPR army are unwilling to fight any further. They were forcibly mobilised and now their discontent reached the point when they dared to show an open disobedience. Fighting is too risky
In fact, fighting may b way riskier for the DPR troops than for the Russian regulars. Russian government is way more comfortable with using them as the cannon fodder than with using the Russian citizens. After all, DPR and LPR casualties are not even counted as "Russian" ones
Since DPR casualties are not counted as "Russian" , you'll mobilise in Donetsk everyone you can catch and then send them to attack the massive Ukrainian fortifications. You run out of the Donetsk males of course, but on the bright side you keep official Russian casualties low
It sucks being an DPR recruit sent to assault the Azovstal with only an ancient Mosinka rifle. And yet, those recruits absolutely can try to avoid being used as the cannon fodder if they understand the nature of the Russian regime. Which is - procedural. Like very procedural
Out of three branches of the pro-Russian forces fighting in Ukraine, Russian army is the most procedural, Chechen troops are the least procedural with the Donetsk and Luhansk armies having drifted from the non-procedural warlordships to the procedural bureaucracies over the years Image
How can you protest decisions of a bureaucracy? Pointing out to the procedural requirements not being met of course:

"We are from the DPR and yet they are sending us to the LPR. Which is a completely different state that we are not citizens of. Procedural requirements not met"
"Procedure of mobilisation requires a compulsory medical examination. Nobody examined us. Many have chronic illnesses"

Btw: every young Russian male with an IQ above the room temperature collects as many certificates about chronic illnesses as possible. For this very reason
"We're trying to contact a military attorney to file a formal complaint. They are tricking us away from him"

Again this guys are trying to fight with the procedural decisions by procedural means. The decisions of their commanders are illegal and yet, procedural. You can protest
As we can see, the mental model of the Russian state machine (including its DPR and LPR proxies) these people have on mind is very different from the mental model of many Westerners who view Russian policies as completely arbitrary and whimsical (which they are not)
DPR conscripts view Russian (+DPR+LPR) state as a huge machine, working according to an algorithm which absolutely can be hacked. Just don't protest openly and find some procedural pretexts in order not to follow its orders. Try being creative, that works
I'd even say that Germans or French would understand the Russian state machine much better than Anglos. Russian legal system is based upon the civil law rather than the common law model. It's much more about the letter rather than the spirit of the law. I'll give examples later
NB: don't view the Russian state as a human. Don't judge its actions or policies by a human logic. That's wrong. It's a super bureaucratic machine operating in a super bureaucratic algorithm and according to a machine rather than to a human logic
Notice that I'm talking about the peculiarities of the Russian institutional *culture* rather than about the peculiarities of the Russian state per se. Not only the Russian state but many of its rivals in the region ultimately share or shared the same institutional culture
Derluguian who studied the documents of Chechen rebels of the 1990s was impressed by their administrative style. They tried to document everything very meticulously, copying the Soviet style, conceptual framework and Soviet logic. They didn't know any other way of doing things
That's btw is a major difference between Chechnya and Afghanistan. For the entire 20th c Chechens had been learning how to live in a super bureaucratic Russian culture and adapted to it quite well. Afghans didn't have a comparable experience. Also Chechnya is not nearly as tribal
Let's assume for the sake of argument that those DPR conscripts know the institutional culture they're living in well and try to exploit it. In this case, the procedurality, the machine-like logic and the algorithmic-style policies would be particular features of that machine
I would argue that the quality of the Western, specifically American expertise on Russia is very uneven. When it comes to the "hardware", everything objective, material and quantifiable, its average quality varies from okays to absolutely great
When it comes to something as elusive and often unverifiable as culture, the quality of the expertise deteriorates quickly. Western expertocracies may understand well *what* their adversaries but they may have little idea why. They are not interested at all
What has always puzzled me about the American expertocracy is its incredible contempt to the public discourse and the public imagination of other cultures. That's why the American academia has little idea about the modern Russian nationalism which is a big factor of the Z-war
Don't get me wrong. I don't claim that the American pundits or journalists have no idea about the modern Russian nationalism. I claim that the American academia and the entire Russian studies industry doesn't. Because they never paid attention to it in the first place
Let me illustrate my thesis with the following blogpost of Mikhailov, who worked as a governor of Pskov a deputy of Putin's presidential administration and then a DPR minister:

The most horrifying Russian weapon is Dmitry Galkovsky

mikhailove.livejournal.com/390139.html Image
Have you heard about Galkovsky? I bet you didn't. Academia is not very much interested either. I quickly typed the name into the google scholar and got just 91 results most of which focus on him as on a "postmodernist writer" Image
Paradoxically enough, the person who created the language and the discourse of the modern Russian nationalism gets almost no coverage in the West. Because the Western (=American) academia has fundamentally wrong system of incentives when it comes to the Russian studies. End of 🧵

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kamil Galeev

Kamil Galeev Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @kamilkazani

4h
Regarding the video with a castration of a Ukrainian POW, comments from the Russian ДШРГ Русич may give some context to the story:

"I have seen up to ten such clips. They're usually published 1-2 years after the events though to make perpetrators more difficult to identify" ImageImage
Русич (Rusich) is a Russian Neonazi group fighting in Ukraine. They're reportedly closely associated with the Wagner mercenary company Image
A Rusich fighter who told he had seen "up to ten such clips" is Evgeny Rasskazov (Topaz). Here you see his post commemorating Hitler's birthday:

"Today is birthday of out comrade who became example for many of us... his Word and Deed inspires us to beat the Ukro-Bolshevik scum" Image
Read 14 tweets
Jul 27
Die Fürstenstadt

There was a Soviet joke:

- What is long, green and smells with sausage?
- Moscow-Tver train

Why? Well, under the USSR provincials had to go shopping to Moscow. Their shops had no food, often very literally. Today we'll learn an expression "supply category"🧵
Under the centrally planned economy it was the state which supplied food to the localities. It would assign each city one of four "supply categories" determining how much food there will be on shelves. Moscow was supplied far better than anyone while cities like Tver - horribly
Provincial Soviet cities of the lower supply categories might have no food on the shelves at all. Sometimes very literally. Sometimes they would have only the scraps from the table of the higher status city: like some algae, or the disgusting paste "Ocean"
Read 26 tweets
Jul 25
I find this line of argumentation illustrative of the general state of Russian discourse, whether "patriotic" or "liberal". Everything Turkic occupies the same place in the Russian debates as everything Irish in the Imperial British. The Inner Other and the source of all the evil
Reading the Russian-Ukrainian debates with both sides accusing each other of racial impurity and having too many Steppe admixtures or influences, I noticed that their argumentation is mirroring each other. See this Russian nationalist material for example sputnikipogrom.com/history/15934/…
This mutuality and almost exact symmetry of Russian-Ukrainian accusations reminds me of a brilliant thread on the British rule over the Ionian Isles. Bach then the discourse was similar. Brits and Greeks were constantly accusing each other of Irishness
Read 14 tweets
Jul 24
Russian bureaucracy is *massive*. It's also diverse. Judging from my observations, it's less integrated than let's say the apparatus of the U.S. federal bureaucracy. Different agencies have different cultures and operate by different rules. Avoid sweeping generalisations (not🧵)
I see a very common attitude among the Russian pro-war community. It can be summarised this way:

"We expected dumb and incompetent bureaucrats to destroy our economy. But our glorious army would prevail against all odds. It turned out we were wrong. It's the other way around"
Now much of the Z-community argues that they greatly overestimated the Russian army (and the military apparatus). It's very, very much worse than anyone thought before. But they underestimated the economic bureaucracy. Which is very much better than they could have thought
Read 22 tweets
Jul 23
No. Describing Russian regime as "kleptocracy" is misrepresentation. It's not technically false, just absurdly reductionist. Let's be honest, if Putinism was *entirely* about stealing it would not be able to wage wars or produce armaments. And it produces hella lots of them
Keep in mind that public rhetorics work according to the rhetorical logic. Public position doesn't have to be factually accurate, it has to be rhetorically advantageous for it to work. They talk about "corruption" so much because it's rhetorically advantageous. That's it
When you don't have a positive agenda/vision of future or it's too hideous, you talk about "corruption". Examples - Lukashenko or Yeltsin. "Anti-corruption fight" is an ideal topic for a power hungry politician. Because talking about corruption = avoiding the actual conversation
Read 19 tweets
Jul 23
Kremlin may not have a grey cardinal. But it has a bald engineer. The Kinder Egg is a major architect of Putinism. In 1998 he made Putin the FSB Chief. In 2000s he dismantled the regional autonomy imposing the centralised rule. Now he manages Putin's domestic policy and Ukraine🧵
Sergey Kirienko was born as Sergey Israitel in a mixed Russian-Jewish family. After the divorce his mother changed his surname from father's "Israitel" to her own "Kirienko". That could be a pragmatic decision. A boy with a Slavic name would have better career chances in the USSR
In childhood Kirienko lived with his mom in subtropical Sochi. Here he started the bureaucrat career as a Komsomol manager (комсорг) of his high school class. NB: the role of Komsomol in Soviet to post-Soviet transition is underrated. Komsomol management were its main benefactors
Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(