3D, VR, AR, AI for Medicine, Bioinformatics, NLP, Research Integrity, Engineering Ethics, My views do not represent the views of my employer.
http://note.com/hkakeya
NO Transparency on Dr. Fauci's Finances, as Efforts are BLOCKED and...
Megyn Kelly is joined by Adam Andrzejewski, founder and CEO of OpenTheBooks.com, to discuss the efforts to block transparency on Dr. Fauci’s finances, Dr. Fa...
Stanford's John Ioannidis had vaccine preprint rejected by medRxiv (too sensitive) & arXiv (we'll post after you publish!???) He then published in Nature https://nature.com/articles/s41541-021-00362-z…
Why does science treat vaccine papers different?
The BBC carried a story this week with the headline ‘Covid origin studies say evidence points to Wuhan market’.
Bizarrely the paper in Science they are referring to, by Michael Worobey and colleagues, says no such thing. #OriginOfCovid
NEW: The CDC coordinated with social media platforms and Google to censor users who questioned the COVID-19 vaccine, according to internal communications obtained by the Free Beacon.
Via
The early split in lineage A vs B cases in Wuhan was 1:2, while samples from inside the market had a 1:68 split. The first known lin A cases had no connection to the market yet were found within a few km of it. How can we rule out A didn’t get into market from surrounding area?
Still, they’re not linked to the market and the fact that the earliest lineage A cases circulated in the vicinity of the market, while inside it there were overwhelmingly lineage B cases could just as well mean that lineage A was brought into the market from the surrounding area.