Tweet
Conversation
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="701" height="900"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
yes by me
2
Show replies
Replying to
Bro roblox is coping, seething, and malding because you played their game in a cool way.
1
14
Replying to
to explain some reasoning: Ruben Sim 2 weeks back re-released a video that he made of ROBLOX gameplay called "Infiltrating Roblox's Worst 'Gangs'", so it considered itself violation of the participation. It would've happened without this as he's making a 2nd ROBLOX expose video.
3
8
tbh, the case shouldn't be too devastating as it'll most likely be the explanation of reuploading it. It all most depends on if ROBLOX will be willing to just accept it. Also feel free to correct me on anything I might've said wrong.
1
is this a good thing
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="540" height="406"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Show more replies
New to Twitter?
Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="135"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24" height="24"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="132"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="74"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)