Reportedly the Moskva on 4/15
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="510"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Thread
Conversation
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Replying to
I can’t verify the authenticity, but this is a Slava class cruiser and I don’t think any of them have been destroyed in this manner.
32
126
2,452
There is a discrepancy between the reported photo date of 4/15 and the Russian reported sinking date of 4/14.
42
88
1,512
Quote Tweet
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24" height="24"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
OSINTtechnical
@Osinttechnical
·
Another photo of the Moskva
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="510" height="680"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
27
295
2,251
Where fire is.
1
13
Show replies
This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more
Show replies
Replying to
I mean, shouldn't it be easy to say if it is the Moskva by just comparing this picture with the original pictures?
1
Show replies
Replying to
Quote Tweet
Мike Right
@BormanIke
·
Replying to @Saturnax1 @KingNeptune767 and 9 others
Newest photo from 15 April 2022. Damaged Moskva.
10
16
291
Replying to
I see like 8 black holes&circles . Anyone to explain what that possibly mean ?
17
10
Fireball from a missile penetrating the hull and detonating inside the ship. The blast wave would spread almost instantaneously vaporising unlucky (or maybe lucky) crew members and quickly finding vents/portholes/hatches to blow out into the atmosphere.
3
2
59
Replying to
The front side, Helipad and Radar, look about correct. Sadly any identifiers are either submerged or on the other side.
This looks legitimate but it isn't a smoking gun.
2
35
Replying to
Original reports were saying that the boat capsized. It certainly looks like it's tipping over here.
1
57
Yes, capsized on port side was the report. The way it is leaning would be inline with that report.
13
Replying to
Heavy, heavy seas! Need to take Dramamine just to look for more than a few seconds!
1
1
50
Show replies
Only during special operations
81
Replying to
Some navy experts are lurking here, we should get a confirmation within the next the hour.
1
39
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="425"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Was Moskva the Russians biggest ship?
10
11
Replying to
Interesting. There are signs of smoke and flames having emerged through the ports all the way along the side. The internal damage must have been considerable.
3
1
165
Yes, missel impact must have been at center radar caldron (laser center of object), injecting rocket weapon into interior.
Most crew became Russian BBQ.
Internal fire and heat signs are visible with brown stains. And some visible flames through center caldron windows below.
1
38
Replying to
Definitely a Slava burning and there isn't any record of any of the 3 suffering this form of damage in the past so it has to be Moskva from recent events.
1
4
173
Replying to
It's possible. It looks rusty and unmaintained like typical Russian ships
2
22
You have never seen a car fire? It rusts the minute the fire is out. Pouring sea water on it where the paint has cooked off would do this in hours.
3
12
![Image](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="440"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
New to Twitter?
Sign up now to get your own personalized timeline!
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="135"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="72"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="80"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)