1st - but not last -- SCOTUS op: Chief Justice (6-3) writes Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller that emotional distress damages are not available in suits under the Rehabilitation Act or Affordable Care Act
https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-219_1b82.pdf…
***** NOTE: this is important: Cummings was argued in the December sitting. So was Dobbs (the MS abortion case).
There are only 9 cases argued in December --> that SEEMS TO IMPLY that the Chief Justice was NOT assigned the opinion in Dobbs ....
... now perhaps the Chief could/would have assigned the opinion to Kavanaugh or Barrett, in the hope that they would see their way to not completely overruling Roe, but just eviscerating it (for now)....
and it's also possible things changed after conference -- the opinion was assigned to someone else, but someone from that majority peeled off to join a separate writing from the chief that's narrower.
we'll see....
it just means that, when the justices initially voted and decided who would write what opinion, the dobbs opinion was not assigned to the chief justice to write the controlling opinion.
the chief was the one pushing "don't completely overrule roe, just narrow it."
Im sorry, I'm not seeing how you jumped from (writes Cummings/others will be from Chief/both were in Dec) to the chief will not write it? Maybe Im missing something in the chain...
I agree. But am no expert. Why couldn’t he write both (though he may not have)? If he’s in the majority he can right every single opinion if he wants no? He’d never do so but that’s not relevant here.