bombing of civilians at Kramatorsk rail station by Tochka missile was criminal. But let's look at available data before uncritically accepting claims from Zelensky regime. The tail section of missile was found in parkette to WSW of rail station.
Google street view from east entrance of rail station looking south supports geolocation of tail section to WSW of station. google.com/maps/@48.72605…
the shadows in the picture are consistent with morning sun in Ukraine being to the ESE and the photo being taken looking south. Both the direction of the rocket itself and the direction from section to station indicate a WSW origin for the rocket
for all plausible distances, territory to the WSW is held by Ukraine - a point that has been made by others but which I wanted to check out. Russian MOD is reported
in my quick survey, I haven't seen any counter-arguments that establish attribution to Russia - only that attribution of origin in Ukraine zones is not established by "metadata".
most such arguments focus on orientation of tail section itself as opposed to the direction indicated by line from tail section to head section, though the latter seems to me (as non-expert) as the more convincing.
unsurprisingly, tail section of Tochka-U in Kramatorsk looks similar to tail section of Tochka-U missile sent by Ukraine against Donetsk city.
a lot of shrapnel generated from cluster bomb delivered by Tochka-U in Donetsk city attack. Presumably munition in Kramatorsk was similar.
serial number of Kramatorsk missile Ш91579 has been located in one of the photos and firmly linked to Ukraine inventory. See
Attribution of Kramatorsk missile to Zelensky regime now appears to be conclusive.
neo-Nazi Ukrainian Pravy Sektor previously attested to have written "For children of Ukraine" on artillery shells - the message on Ukrainian Tochka-U used to bomb civilians in Kramatorsk
initially, Ukrainian leaders Pavlo Lyrylenko, the local governor, and Zelensky adviser Oleksiy Arestyvich falsely or fraudulently stated that Iskander missile (unique to Russia) had been used at Kramatorsk. This framed opening narrative.
During the morning, as pictures became available, commenters pointed out that the missile was actually Tochka-U, the missile used by Ukraine - including at the attack on civilians at Donetsk city on March 14 (which did not interest Western media)
the false identification of rocket as Iskander enabled the narrative of a "Russian" attack to become established. So later, when rocket identified as Tochka, increasingly elaborate theories were advocated to maintain attribution to Russia, despite Tochka pointing to Ukraine.
it will not surprise readers that CNN reported the fake news that attack was by Iskander missiles used by Russia, not the Tochka missiles used by Ukraine cnn.com/2022/04/08/eur…
a few commenters have argued that the serial numbers don't PROVE anything, that it's equally possible that W91579 went to Russia, even if W91566, W91565, W91511 and others are firmly attribted to Ukraine. But there's an important statistical error that these commenters are making
to state obvious, serial numbers are not RANDOMLY assigned. If they were, then we wouldn't be able to conclude anything, but they weren't. They were assigned in order.
second, rockets included in a shipment batch would not randomly chosen from an infinite inventory, but from an actual inventory (or to order) in which serial numbers would be related.
information that Ukraine was in possession of Tochkas W91566, W91565, W915611 (among others) is prior information that is highly relevant to attribution of W91579. It's theoretically possible that there was a break and appearance of W91579 in same close quarters was coincidence
But for that to be true, there has to be a pretty amazing coincidence i.e. statistically improbable. When combined with information from trajectory - again not total PROOF, but strongly indicative, and similarity of Kramatorsk attack to Mar 14 Donetsk attack by Ukraine
IMO the practical odds that rocket was not fired by Ukraine are minuscule.
Oleksiy Arestovych, the important Zelensky adviser, who was jointly responsible for original fraudulent story of Iskander missile at Kramatorsk, admired ISIS cruelty techniques and tactics in interview a couple of years ago
Arestovych admired ISIS commanders as "wise and successful commanders" who thought through "detail, even the degree of cruelty" and that "cruelty for show" was "a wise strategy, taking their particular interests into account".
Arestovych said that governance according to the precepts of ISIS - "terrorism, middle age cruelty, the burning of people, shooting and cutting off heads" was "absolutely a network of the future".
Arestovych played a leading role in attribution of Kramatorsk to Russia, beginning with the fraudulent information about "Iskander" missiles. Would Arestovych have any scruples about sacrificing some Russian-speaking residents of Donets oblast? I doubt it.
uatv.ua/en/view-from-b…
Arestovych appears to have led Ukraine visit to Biden admin in Sep 2021 in which Kyiv regime's refusal to implement Minsk agreements was reinforced by Biden neocons.
this entire Sep 2021 interview is worth reading. At the time, Kyiv regime was shelling Avdiivka in Donbas and feeling smug about losses among Donbas civilians. Feckless Biden admin, then reeling from Afghan fiasco, seems to have egged them on, rather than trying to promote peace.
after reading this disturbing interview with ISIS-admiring Zelensky adviser Arestovych, it occurred to me that it's entirely likely that Zelensky is to Arestovych as Justin Trudeau was to Gerald Butts.
both Trudeau and Zelensky are actors. Canadians know that Justin Trudeau is a featherweight with intellectual depth of a minnow, but he is skilful at delivering poses, photo ops and word salads. An actor. Why should we expect anything more of Zelensky?
While we can learn nothing about Zelensky from his past political reflections (since, like Trudeau, there are none), maybe we can learn about his administration from the unscrupulous Arestovych, who admired ISIS tactics measured as political theatre.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Robbie Mook's affidavit re Sussmann storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco… declared that he "was not aware during the campaign of any contractor Perkins Coie engaged" to assist in in providing "legal services and legal advice". Is this true?
one of the seminal moments in Russiagate occurred on July 24, 2016 when Robbie Mook took to Sunday morning talk shows to unveil the Democrat/HFA response to Wikileaks drop of DNC emails on July 22. Mook's phrasing was quite distinctive.
on Jake Tapper cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2016/07/24/moo…, Mook said: "EXPERTS are telling us Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these e-mails. And OTHER EXPERTS are now saying the Russians are releasing these e-mails for the purpose of actually helping Trump". Who were his "experts"?
@BarryMeier a question: we think that you may have information on identity of the FBI (Crossfire) interviewee by telephone on August 5, 2016 and in person on August 17, 2016 in Mueller 302s themyefiles.knack.com/mueller-files/…. Would you be prepared to identify or confirm identification?
In a DM, I suggested a proposed identification of the August 5 and 17 interviewee to @BarryMeier and asked him for a comment. He said "I have no idea who this person is — and that includes people I know".
to put the two August 2016 302s in better context, in the entire set of 302s archived by Mueller, there are only 5 302s from Crossfire in 2016, all identities redacted. Two with mystery August interviewee, Alexandra Chalupa and Deripaska in Sept and (prob) Jean Camp in early Oct
Both Zelensky and the @Guardiantheguardian.com/world/live/202… cite "Andriy Biletsky, the leader of the neo-Nazi Azov volunteer battalion", as source for (fraudulent) chemical allegations
Biletsky, a favorite of both Zelensky and neocons, is author of (among other hateful creeds) of "Ukrainian racial social nationalism" web.archive.org/web/2008040902…
the first plank of Biletsky's "Ukrainian racial social nationalism" is "complete denial of democracy and liberalism".
The missile at Kramatorsk appears to be a Tochka-U missile which is in use by Ukraine, rather than an Iskander missile which is in use by Russia. Missile said to have come from SW (Ukraine-held) territory.
Arguments and counter-arguments are raging. It should be possible to pin down whether missile came from SW and whether it was a Tochka-U. I'm equally sure that western media and governments have little interest in actually finding out and will run with Zelensky regime narrative
on March 14, a Tochka-U missile went off over a bus stop and killed 20+ civilians and injured 28+. Incident was in Donetsk city, which is about 100 km from Kramatorsk. aa.com.tr/en/russia-ukra…
Is it possible that responsibility for Tochka-U in Kramatorsk is same as Donetsk?
for anyone wondering how US rationalizes continuing occupation of eastern Syria, while hyperventilating against Russian support of separatist regions of Ukraine (both pre-invasion situation, as well as now), maybe they can explain this DoD screed on Syria: defense.gov/News/News-Stor…
DOD complains that US occupying forces "experience on a very regular basis threats from Iran and Iran-backed proxies". "Iran-backed" in DoD lingo is any Middle Easterner who resents US occupation. Of course, the "threat" only exists because continuing US occupation gives targets
DOD claims that its mission is to "defeat ISIS", but its real mission is to balkanize Syria and prevent Syrian reconstruction.
tho few people realize it, this peculiar search is the ONLY stated evidence in Mueller's Netyshko indictment (and Mueller Report) purporting to link Unit 74455 personnel to dcleaks and/or Guccifer 2. The indictment (of course) contains numerous details of DCLeaks/G2 conduct, but
2/ but, other than the search, these other actions are on a sort of island. The other actions demonstrate linkages between G2 and DCLeaks (a linkage already known tho not clear) and to Wikileaks and others, but are not, at least in pleadings, direct linkages to Unit 74455 or GRU
3/ even bitcoin trails, which give impression of a linkage to GRU, don't close the loop. The indictment identifies a couple of blockchain transactions, but doesn't show how they connect to GRU. (Indictment says GRU and Conspirators many times, but, unless linked, only armwaving