ll.ol.ll.i (4)

1 Name: lilu [Del]

Lo.la*fa*n Fo*ru*m キディ映画
-
9k.gg/OTaFT
--
9k.gg/OTaFT
-
9k.gg/OTaFT
--
9k.gg/OTaFT
--
9k.gg/OTaFT
--
9k.gg/OTaFT
--
9k.gg/OTaFT
--
9k.gg/OTaFT

2 Name: ｷﾀ━━━━━━━━(　・∀・）━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

Get stung to death, pedo faggot.

3 Name: ｷﾀ━━━━━━━━(　・∀・）━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

Censorship at 4-ch.net/dqn/kareha.pl/1646142103/l50
--->

433 Name: (（●）ﾄｪｪｪｲ（●）) : 1993-09-10458 19:25
>>258

>I dislike most loli doujins because they feature things like vaginal penetration at ages that seem quite unrealistic.

Artwork of fictional sex with toddlers or babies looks kinda gross. So that age group would be unrealistic I think. Ages above that seem realistic enough. A vagina can expand significantly in order to give birth or for a whore to insert a huge dildo into it. I guess it would expand enough for vaginal penetration at ages older than a toddler.

One of the things that is usually a turn off for me is the whole fuck-a-loli-with-an-unrealistically-huge-penis thing. It is like the artist has a huge penis fetish due to drawing unrealistically large penises.

My vc looks like "doxable"; it is "doyxable".

4 Name: ｷﾀ━━━━━━━━(　・∀・）━━━━━━━━!!!! [Del]

>>3
Post deleted by janny faggot:

"433 This post sucked."

seen at Wed Apr 20 10:08:55 2022 UTC

Return Entire thread Last 50 posts
Name: Link:
Leave these fields empty (spam trap):
More options...