Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts
Found the internet!
314

White House to extend student loan pause through August

314

White House to extend student loan pause through August

371 comments
96% Upvoted
Log in or sign up to leave a comment
User avatar
level 1
· 21 hr. ago
John Locke

why forgive student loans when you can just never pay them back?

190
User avatar
level 2

I think the gov needs to start repayments sooner rather than later, and I'm saying that as someone with an obscene amount of debt due to law school (but a high salary thankfully).

However, the federal government, at least on the grad school side, is massively responsible for inflating the cost of education via unlimited graduate loans. There should be some recognition for them just completely fucking the market, and reducing or zeroing out interest rates, followed by massive reform to student lending generally.

138
User avatar
level 2
· 19 hr. ago
Milton Friedman

Because forgiving them right away removes the incentive to continually harvest votes to "delay payments" for all election cycles ahead?

7
User avatar
level 1

So, going from "during an election year" to "right before the elections"?

Yeah, this is going to get extended again.

275
User avatar
level 2

This is straight up pathetic from this administration.

94
User avatar
level 2
· 15 hr. ago
Paul Krugman

Good. This is the smart political move.

2
User avatar
level 2
· 18 hr. ago
Austan Goolsbee

Same time we can get a new SCOTUS justice

1
User avatar
level 1

lmao, I'm just never paying student loans again.

90
User avatar
level 2

I’ve been making payments the whole time I’m starting to reconsider lol

11
User avatar
level 2
· 20 hr. ago
Christine Lagarde

No, we're never paying student loans again

39
User avatar
level 2

As PSLF applicant, every month they delay is another free month for me. On a selfish level I'm loving this. Never spent a dime, and yet I'm at least a year and a half through my 10 years (not sure if anything before 2021 os counted).

6
User avatar
level 1

They're gonna cancel it at this rate. My friend's strategy of maxing out on loans on the off chance they're forgiven is really going to pay off at this rate.

52
User avatar
level 2

TFW the Bernie Bros get something right :(

16
User avatar
level 2

Not if the repubelickers win.

2
User avatar
level 1
· 21 hr. ago
George Soros 🇺🇦

As soon as I got this notification I thought "oh boy, r/neoliberal isn't going to like this" and headed over. Can't wait to see the anger.

Personally, I'm cool with the pause because I'm just taking advantage of the 0% interest and investing the payments I would be making.

115
level 2

Yup, this is the right strategy.

41
level 2

Having payments start up after August 31 more closely aligns with the end of temporary PSLF (October 31).

I can't tell if that's either to try and give the Department of Education/FedLoan a head start on dealing with payments restarting before the flood of last-minute TEPSLF applications, or if it's going to be set up as a way to extend both to give an appearance of "student loan forgiveness, sort of" right before the election, though.

8
level 2

Personally, I'm cool with the pause

Well no shit, it's good for the specific people it targets. The issue is it's bad in general

24
level 2

Nice! I am finishing my private loan payments and then I think I will start a rainy day savings account. Also I am able to contribute 9% to my 401k

3
level 2

My only serious complaint is inflation and this is probably a drop in the bucket.

8
level 2
· 20 min. ago
Ben Bernanke

Politically, holding interest payments hostage is a good strategy. Dems should just keep it at 0% and leave it to the GOP to resume them when they're back in power. Gives people in debt a good reason to vote Dem, and doesn't cause the same level of resentment or budget problems a full scale forgiveness policy would.

2
level 1

Old article (2021 but):

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/07/16/graduate-students-owe-around-50percent-of-all-student-debt.html

About half of student loan debt is held by graduate students with advanced degrees. The highest loan amounts go to lawyers and doctors who get paid really well.

I get people don't like paying their loans, but student loan relief should be way down the list of priorities for anyone in the U.S. Most of the people with loans can pay them!

74
level 2

Blanket relief is also just a regressive policy

15
level 2
· 21 hr. ago · edited 20 hr. ago

Most lawyers do not get paid nearly well enough to service their loans. If you're not in biglaw, you're relying on IBR. Even with a modest scholarship, a typical law school will set you back 200k. This creates an incredible incentive among elite law students to not work in the public sector and to congregate in the Vault 50 and either stay there or exit into tech/finance.

Any doctor who goes into primary care is probably also relying on IBR. Med school is an easy 300-400k and unlike law school scholarships are essentially non-existent. You've also got a few years of shit pay residency post school where any payments you make aren't making a dent in even your interest. Again, creating incentives for people to do something other than what we need more of.

Doctors who specialize and lawyers in biglaw can afford the current system. Everyone else can't unless subsidized by IBR, and that bill comes due for the government eventually.

*This all ignores people who didn't pay for their grad school, which is a decent chunk of them, but then that's another issue- do we want to perpetuate only the upper middle class/wealthy having access to these professions and entrench their advantage? There's also obviously more nuance to this than I wrote (for example, law school LRAP programs or the couple med schools that have gone tuition free) but it conveys the point I think reasonably well.

27
level 2
· 20 hr. ago · edited 19 hr. ago

Half of the money is owed by graduate student with advanced degrees since they tend to borrow much larger amounts. But they're not half of the students with debt

You might say it's not worth it to delay loans for 10k of debt for 10 people if you also have to do it for 100k for 1 lawyer. But in a world where no legislation passes there are few options, and this does help a lot of people who need help. Plus some who don't

17
level 2
· 18 hr. ago
Michel Foucault

lawyers

paid really well.

Not true since at least 2008

6
level 2

Yeah, just let people declare bankruptcy on them. Most people won’t have to and those with 200k and a crap degree can take that option

4
level 2

Most of the people with loans can pay them!

[citation needed]

1
level 2

At most cancel 10k of debt for everyone. If someone owes 30k, they would still owe 20k. But people who owe less than 10k, would be free of the debt.

-1
level 1
· 20 hr. ago
Let me be clear | SEA organizer

Making Republicans restart payments is a smart political move.

44
level 2
· 20 hr. ago
🇺🇦 Слава Україні! 🇺🇦

So you think we should have student loans paused, at minimum, through 2024?

15
level 2

Do we care about policy, or only whether blue team wins?

-3
level 1

White house to extend student loan pause through heat death of the universe

10
level 2

Good

1
level 1
· 21 hr. ago
George Soros

Based and electoralism pilled.

28
level 1

I had no idea Neoliberals were against students loan cancelation this bad. Ya'll some toxic ass fellas. Don't get me wrong, it's good to see the true colors of the establishment, but holly fuck, who hurt you guys so bad you want indentured debt workers?

3
level 1
· 20 hr. ago
did you get that thing I sent ya?

So bad lmao this is such a giveway to high-salaried advanced degree holders with six figure debt (me) but fuck it it works for me. Let me keep paying down my principal babyyy

29
level 2
· 18 hr. ago
United Nations

So bad lmao this is such a giveway to high-salaried advanced degree holders

Well, and the 40% of people with student loan debt who never actually graduated from college and don't have literally any benefit from the money they spent.

9
level 2
· 14 hr. ago · edited 14 hr. ago
IMF

Why would you pay down principal? Seriously I mean, look were this train is going. I paid off my student loans, and apparently I'm a sucker for it. At this rate they'll never resume payments. It's defacto cancellation.

Also literally why would you? Wouldn't you be better putting your money in a savings account, earning like 1%, and then if they ever resume payments, you now have more money to pay back with?

1
level 1

Genuine question can someone explain why we don’t like that? As someone with student loans I’ll take it but wanna know the opinions here

14
level 2
· 20 hr. ago
Helpful
Friedrich Hayek

It's because our system of financing higher education is super broken. We socially encourage students to take out large amounts of debt to attend. Schools are then, because many students are making socially pressured decisions during a period of vulnerability, taking advantage of an inflated and not socially beneficial high level of demand to raise prices. They're also competing now on the basis of services that are not socially valuable and would not be paid for but as part of the now inflated tuition. (see the accommodations spending at UChicago or many new student unions).

Engaging in perpetual payment delay, which is effectively relief without eliminating the paperwork or all of the stress to borrowers, incentivizes increased levels of borrowing by future students who anticipate the money is now a grant. It also incentivizes schools to increase costs and services provided to students, as a result of the further inflated demand curve.

52
level 2

Let's imagine you have 1 million dollars to give away to Americans in need. Who would you give it to?

  1. Everyone

  2. Specifically poor people, and not rich people

  3. Specifically a group that makes more money on average and specifically NOT most poor people

Student loan forgiveness when not targeted is choice 3.

The average person with a degree is going to be making way more money than the average person without one. In fact, the more debt you have, the more likely it is you have a high paying job. A lawyer or doctor has way more student debt than a McDonald's fry cook.

Student debt relief disproportionately helps people who are well off and doesn't help the majority of struggling families

Of course, if you're included in the group that gets a benefit, you can't help but like it. But as a societal policy it's bad.

35
level 2

Yo will hear lots of answers, most talking about how regressive it is. My argument is just, you took out a loan, you have some obligation to pay it back. Why are the rest of us suddenly on the hook for someone else's loans in exchange for nothing?

Should we forgive mortgage debt too. Or car loans? Why student loans specifically?

10
level 2
· 19 hr. ago
Thomas Paine

The problem with immediate blanket student loan forgiveness is that it largely benefits the upper middle class. The best argument I hear in favor of it is mainly to serve as a buy in for the upper middle class for increased taxes to fund free/lowered tuition. Meaning that free college and debt forgiveness can still produce a net progressive effect if tax brackets are restructured. Problem is we aren't anywhere close to that.

4
level 2
· 15 hr. ago
Paul Krugman

Some people don’t like that it benefits the upper middle class, which I find to be unconvincing. Helping the upper middle class can be a good thing and it also helps plenty of lower and middle income Americans. What many people in this sub don’t seem to get is maximizing measures of tax progressivity is a means to an end not an end in and of itself.

3
level 1
· 19 hr. ago
Milton Friedman

Personally I don’t believe any cancelation of student loan debt is a good idea (assuming we are thinking about practicality and effectiveness in practice rather than just making people vote for you). Canceling all student loan debt (which is also an extreme I don’t think Biden would lean towards however this is just for the sake of example) wouldn’t really solve anything besides giving the current class of loan debtees some relief while still leaving plenty of space for the future class of loan debtees who will still have to take out loans for their classes. Forgetting that aspect, there is also the fact that the US gov would have to be the one taking on this debt I imagine, a debt which is currently about $1.6 trillion (and its interest of course). This would put a massive strain on the economy and would probably lead to massive inflation (due to the government opting to pay all those loans and interest now rather than later). This would not bode well for anyone.

A much better solution would involve screwing with the interest rates themselves, either making them low interest loans (maybe 1%) or bypassing the interest rates altogether and making them interest free loans. Then there is the obvious solution of just making college free for all (public of course) and thus no one would need to take out large, unpayable loans in order to get an education. The free college approach is very obviously not a realistic solution at the moment but the interest route does not seem like a bad option in my opinion. To be fair, I’m not even sure if Biden is able to unilaterally change the interest rates of these loans so maybe I’m just talking out of my ass. These are just solutions I would imagine would work better than just flat out canceling student loan debt and basically kicking the problem down the road.

Thank you for coming to my ted talk lmao 😤

6
level 2

bypassing the interest rates altogether and making them interest free loans.

I mean, you have to convince banks to lend thousands of dollars to teenagers with no collateral or credit history somehow.

3
level 2
· 15 hr. ago
George Soros

A much better solution would involve screwing with the interest rates themselves, either making them low interest loans (maybe 1%) or bypassing the interest rates altogether and making them interest free loans.

How is this better? This is a regressive policy that massively favors wealthy students getting enormous loans for high-paying and well-connected careers.

The vast majority of student loan holders have between 10k-30k in debt. Forgiving a flat rate of 20k-30k completely wipes out the debt owed by the people most likely to be in need of relief, while keeping the students with the highest potential net worth on the hook for what they borrowed.

1
level 1
· 20 hr. ago
Milton Friedman

Fucking Succs

27
level 2

Out here got me agreeing with a milty flair. :(

5
level 2
· 18 hr. ago
Court Jester Steve

Winning midterms good, actually

5
level 1

They should have just restarted payments earlier which would have helped reduced the inflationary effects we are feeling now. Kicking the can down the road doesn't help the situation.

8
level 2
· 15 hr. ago
Paul Krugman

It would have little to no impact on inflation.

1
level 2
· 14 min. ago
George Soros

They should have just restarted payments earlier which would have helped reduced the inflationary effects we are feeling now.

By how much?

0
level 1
· 14 hr. ago · edited 14 hr. ago
Milton Friedman

Knew this would happen...my wife and I have a combined networth of around $650k, around $350k liquid...she went back to get a masters, and despite our cash holdings, we decided to take out federal loans last fall...0% interest for a year for no reason, and a decent likelihood he knocks off $10k this fall in order to get millennials to polls.

Anyways, after years of complaining what a stupid policy this is (both the prolonged freeze, and the promise of forgiveness), I' decided to give up, respond the incentives, and just profit from it. Thanks for the bailout everyone :)

7
level 2

Same. Capitalism typically resolves issues in favor of those with capital. So this obviously benefits me. It feels good to keep winning.

1
level 1

Oh boy a thread about student loans 🍿🍿🍿

6
level 1
· 16 hr. ago
Shillary did nothing wrong ╮(╯▽╰)╭

Brandon moment

7
level 1
· 16 hr. ago
Norman Borlaug

As someone who’s already getting my loans paid off by the federal government because I work for them, I don’t particularly care about this, but I understand that letting loans restart during an election year is a tough political message to send. Particularly when Republicans started this.

5
level 1
· 15 hr. ago
Robert Nozick

Does anyone believe Biden won't kick the can down the road again in August? This is student debt cancellation in all but name.

2
level 1
· 21 hr. ago
Friedrich Hayek

Cringe

8
level 1

🤮🤮

8
level 1

I dont know why y’all vote. But I vote Democrat for the “give me that”. So yes give me that student loan pause babyyyyyyy. Blue no matter who

10
level 2

If I voted for "give me that', I'd vote red

18
level 2

Do you support rich people voting Republican?

12
level 2

Maybe I should start voting Republican in that case? I would be much, much, much better off.

11
level 2

I vote Democrat for the “give me that”.

At least you stopped pretending to be anything but self-obsessed. The cosplay of being actually liberal/progressive was pretty obvious anyhow. At least those in need can now safely assume you're in it only to leave them farther behind.

8
level 2

Taking from Peter and giving it to Paul is unsurprisingly popular with Paul

6
level 2

Anyone who needs to be bribed into voting is the last person who should be voting.

You should vote blue no matter who because it is the only moral decision you can make come election time, not because the dems did something for you.

5
level 1

Boooo

7
level 1

Booooo!!!!!

5
level 1

I’m so tired.

11
level 2

I'm so tired of this phrase

35
level 2
· 15 hr. ago
Paul Krugman

Out of everything going on in the world this is what exhausts you? I don’t think you’re focusing on the right problems.

3
level 2
· 18 hr. ago
John Keynes

I’m so tired.

It must be so difficult being you. Poor baby.

12
level 1

This is personally very good for me (0% interest part) so I approve!

Seriously if the final fix is you have to pay but interest is VERY low (1-2% vs the 7 I currently have) I think that would be fair.

5
level 2
· 20 hr. ago
Friedrich Hayek

If we offer ultra low loan rates in the midst of high inflation we're offering a huge subsidy to higher education that will continue to drive up costs and push people toward expensive debt.

It's not so much fairness, but doing what you describe would actively worsen the long term problem.

18
level 2

It's bad for the rest of us because it costs the government money to do that, and contributes to inflation.

12
level 2

Isn't 7% for graduate loans? Or perhaps undergrad a while back?

4
level 1

Jesus the whining from this sub is going to be insufferable.

5
level 1

Meh, I'm just going to start paying anyways. COVID hasn't had an effect on my work.

1
level 1

I'm so tired of defending this administration.

2
level 1
· 20 hr. ago
Michel Foucault

Make me pay intrest at least. Not everyone else, just the girl with an engineering degree that can afford it

1
level 1

This is fucking dumb. Smh this administration. I feel lost politically.

1
level 1
level 1

Shit I have a locked in refi rate. I dunno if I should take it or wait and have a higher rate—but maybe not pay for another while and invest it

-2
level 1

Biden trying to buy more votes. You took them, you pay them back. I paid mine now you expect me to pay yours.

-1
level 1

Or how about just pay your fucking loans!

-1
level 1

Student loans are a giant scam, these pauses have affected no one but the borrower, just drop the damn debt

0
More posts from the neoliberal community
2.4k
Post image
2.4k
313 comments
2.0k
Post image
2.0k
198 comments
2.0k
Post image
2.0k
75 comments
1.9k
View Comments
Play
0:00
0:00
Settings
Fullscreen
1.9k
244 comments
1.8k

In case you still aren’t aware, within the last few hours many images have been shared of absolutely horrific mass killings of civilians in Ukraine. Apparently before retreating, the Russian forces seem to have decided to execute every male aged 16-60, with many with their hands tied behind their back. Many were then dumped in mass graves, the sewers, or just left in the streets. This appears to have repeated in village after village throughout the Kyiv oblast. Personally my gut feeling is that these images have serious potential of pushing the world over the edge and potentially getting involved in this conflict. Absolutely brutal, horrific stuff.

1.8k
493 comments
1.6k
Post image
1.6k
108 comments
1.6k
Post image
1.6k
339 comments
1.5k
Post image
1.5k
219 comments
1.4k
Post image
1.4k
219 comments
1.3k
Post image
1.3k
64 comments
1.3k
Post image
1.3k
110 comments
1.3k
Post image
1.3k
70 comments
1.3k
Post image
1.3k
36 comments
1.1k
Post image
1.1k
79 comments
1.0k
Post image
1.0k
108 comments
954
Post image
954
60 comments
948
🚨 ATTENTION ALL NEOLIBERAL SHILLS 🚨

r/Place is being resurrected by the admins. For those of you who aren't familiar, the basic idea is that Reddit provides a canvas and users can place pixels onto the canvas to form an image. Once a pixel is placed, it can be overwritten by anyone else - nothing is permanent. For some history, see this Wikipedia page.

r/Neoliberal and fellow lib-sphere subreddits including r/NonCredibleDefense, r/GlobalTribe, r/EnoughCommieSpam and r/Enough_Sanders_Spam have formed a coalition to leave our mark on r/Place this year. NCD will be joining our logo and GlobalTribe will be putting the Earth Flag just above and to the left of our image, while Enough_Sanders_Spam will be placing their logo beneath ours.

If any other lib-sphere subreddits would like to join us, please get in touch!

Edit: The Discord server has closed. Thank you so much to everyone who participated!
948
9.9k comments
942
942
68 comments
936
Post image
936
84 comments
935
Post image
935
165 comments
926
Post image
926
57 comments
926
Post image
926
287 comments
895
Post image
895
31 comments
879
Post image
879
243 comments
Continue browsing in r/neoliberal
Free trade, open borders, taco trucks on every corner. Please read the sidebar for more information.
133k

advisors to Governor Polis

1.2k

online now


Created Apr 14, 2011