Understanding Community Behaviors in For-Profit Open Source Hardware Projects

Zhuoxuan Li; Warren Seering; Tiffany Tao; Shengnan Cao

doi:10.1017/dsi.2019.246

Skip to main content Accessibility help

Cambridge University Press

Home
Journals
Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design
Volume 1 Issue 1
Understanding Community Behaviors in For-Profit Open...

Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design

Article contents

Understanding Community Behaviors in For-Profit Open Source Hardware Projects

Part of: Innovation Engineering

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 July 2019

Tiffany Tao and

Zhuoxuan Li*: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Warren Seering: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Tiffany Tao: Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Shengnan Cao: Affiliation:
Northeastern University
*: Contact: Li, Zhuoxuan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Mechanical Engineering, United States of America, zxli@mit.edu

Article

Article contents

Abstract

HTML view is not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Free contributors have successfully shown the potential in large/complex software co-creation in the Free and Open Source Software Movement, triggering many discussions and exploration ventures from academia to industry and to the government. Though many research efforts explored whether the same level of co-creation efforts could take place broadly in the hardware realm, very few research studies focus on profit-seeking hardware projects initiated by companies. In fact, the specific nature of being tangible and profitable makes company-led open source hardware projects suspicious to be really “open” to contributors. Community has been identified as the critical driver in many open projects. By reviewing the evolution of company-community interactions over time and different community behaviors in different open development context, authors in this paper hope to identify best community- company interaction forms for open source hardware companies. Using grounded theory and case studies, we construct a framework to describe and identify company community's different behaviors and different roles.

Keywords

Open source design Open innovation Design management Collaborative design

Type: Article
Information: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , July 2019 , pp. 2397 - 2406

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.246[Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright: © The Author(s) 2019

References

Alexy, O. and Reitzig, M. (2013), “Private-collective innovation, competition, and firms’ counterintuitive appropriation strategies”, Research Policy, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 895–913.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bagozzi, R.P. and Dholakia, U.M. (2006), “Open Source Software User Communities: A Study of Participation in Linux User Groups”, Management Science, Vol. 52 No. 7, pp. 1099–1115. Available at: http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0545.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bonvoisin, J., et al. (2017), “Current state of practices in open source product development”. 21st International cnference on engineering design, ICED17, (August), pp. 26–28.Google Scholar

Bruijn, E. De, (2010), On the viability of the Open Source Development model for the design of physical objec - Lessons learned from the RepRap project, University of Tilburg. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cbdv.200490137/abstract%5Cnhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:On+the+viability+of+the+Open+Source+Development+model+for+the+design+of+physical+objec#0.Google Scholar

Dahlander, L. (2007), “Penguin in a new suit: A tale of how de novo entrants emerged to harness free and open source software communities”. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 913–943.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dahlander, L. and Magnusson, M. (2008), “How do Firms Make Use of Open Source Communities?”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 629–649. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.09.003.CrossRef Google Scholar

Fjeldsted, A. et al (2012), “Open Source Development of Tangible Products”, NordDesign 2012, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar

Gacek, C. and Arief, B. (2004), “The Many Meanings of Open Source”, IEEE Software, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 34–40+4.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gassmann, O., Enkel, E. and Chesbrough, H. (2010), “The future of open innovation”, R and D Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 213–221. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2017.1255054.CrossRef Google Scholar

Habibi, M.R., Laroche, M. and Richard, M.O. (2014), “The roles of brand community and community engagement in building brand trust on social media”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 37, pp. 152–161. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.04.016.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harhoff, D. and Lakhani, K.R. (2016), “Revolutionizing Innovation: Fundamentals and New Perspectives”,. In Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities and Open Innovation. pp. 1–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hellenes, Ø. (2016), The Impact of Social Capital on Entrepreneurial Activity in Makerspaces, Hackerspaces and Fab labs. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Available at: https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/2433794.Google Scholar

von Hippel, E. (2017), “Free Innovation by Consumers—How Producers Can Benefit: Consumers’ free innovations represent a potentially valuable resource for industrial innovators”, Research-Technology Management, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 39–42.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hippel, E. Von, (2001), “Innovation by User Communities : Learning from Open-Source Software”, MIT Sloan Management Review, pp. 82–86.Google Scholar

Hippel, E. Von, (2002), “Open Source Software and the “Private-Collective” Innovation Model : Issues for Organization Science i Open Source Software and the “ Private-Collective “ Innovation Model : Issues for Organization Science”, Organization Science, Vol. 14 No. 2003, pp. 208–223.Google Scholar

Jaspers, A., 2014. Understanding the Motivations of Open-source Hardware Developers: Insights from the Arduino Community. Universidade Católica Portuguesa.Google Scholar

Kyriakou, H. and Nickerson, J. V. (2014), “Collective Innovation in Open Source Hardware”, Ssrn, (Tuomi 2002), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

Lakhani, K.R. (2016), “Managing Communities and Contests to Innovate with Crowds Crowds”, In Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities and Open Innovation. pp. 1–43.Google Scholar

Lakhani, K.R. and Wolf, R.G. (2005), “Why Hackers Do What They Do : Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free / Open Source Software Projects”, In Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Li, Z., Ramos, J.D. and Yang, M. (2017), “Why Open Source? Exploring the Motivations of Using an Open”, Proceedings of the ASME 2017 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2017CrossRef Google Scholar

Malinen, T. et al. (2011), “Community created open source hardware: A case study of eCars - Now!”, First Monday, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar

Martinez, M.G. and Walton, B. (2013), “Crowdsourcing: The potential of online communities as a tool for data analysis”. Open Innovation in the Food and Beverage Industry, Vol. 34 no. 4, pp. 332–342. Available at: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.011.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mellis, D. and Buechley, L. (2012), “Collaboration in open-source hardware”, Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ‘12, p. 1175. Available at: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2145204.2145377.Google Scholar

Moritz, M., Redlich, T. and Wulfsberg, J.P. (2016), Value Creation in Open-Source Hardware Communities: Case Study of Open Source Ecology, pp. 1–6.CrossRef Google Scholar

Muniz, A. and Thomas, O. (2001), “Brand Community”. Journal of consumer research, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 46–55.Google Scholar

Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004), “Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation”, Journal of Interactive Marketing.CrossRef Google Scholar

Rubow, E. (2008), “Open Source Hardware: Examples of OSH Projects”, International Journal of Solar System Studies, pp. 1–5. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19352529.Google Scholar

Way, N.A. (2002), “Coase's Pengui, or Linux and the NAture of the Firm”, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112. Available at: http://www.benkler.org/CoasesPenguin.html.Google Scholar

Weber, S. (2004), The success of open source, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2004. Available at: http://libproxy.mit.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=cookie,sso,ip,uid&db=cat00916a&AN=mit.001264781&site=eds-live.Google Scholar

Access

Open access

1: Cited by

Reply to: Submit a response

Title * Please enter a title for your response.

Contents * Please enter your response.

Your details

First name * Please enter your first name.

Last name * Please enter your last name.

Please enter a valid email address.

Occupation Please enter your occupation.

Affiliation Please enter any affiliation.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Yes No

More information * Please enter details of the conflict of interest or select 'No'.

Please tick the box to confirm you agree to our Terms of use. *

Please accept terms of use.

Please tick the box to confirm you agree that your name, comment and conflicts of interest (if accepted) will be visible on the website and your comment may be printed in the journal at the Editor’s discretion. *

Please confirm you agree that your details will be displayed.

Article contents

Understanding Community Behaviors in For-Profit Open Source Hardware Projects

Abstract

Keywords

References

Related content

<div class="title">Defining success in open source hardware development projects: a survey of practitioners</div>

<div class="title">Seven observations and research questions about Open Design and Open Source Hardware</div>

<div class="title">Does Open Source Hardware Have a Sustainable Business Model? An Analysis of Value Creation and Capture Mechanisms in Open Source Hardware Companies</div>

<div class="title">Understanding the motivations for open-source hardware entrepreneurship</div>

<div class="title">Issues and challenges of knowledge management in online open source hardware communities</div>

<div class="title">Open-design: A state of the art review</div>

Innovation under the Radar

<div class="title">Open Source Hardware Communities: Investigating Participation in Design Activities</div>

Open-Source Software

<div class="title">DEVELOPMENT OF OPEN SOURCE HARDWARE IN ONLINE COMMUNITIES: INVESTIGATING REQUIREMENTS FOR GROUPWARE</div>

Save article to Kindle

Save article to Dropbox

Save article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests