NEW:
Correlations with Logima
Strictica 36 by Robert Lato can be found HERE.
After 20, 40, 80 and 120 testees, together with new norm
reports, I'll publish detailed statistical information about quality of each
test.
First of all, I give some notes and explain my procedure.
S=number of points achieved by all testees on a particular
item
R=number of points achieved by the best S testees
For each solved item I'll calculate the ratio R/S.
This ratio would ideally be equal to 1, and otherwise less
than 1.
If this ratio will be 0.7 or above, an item will be
qualified as good, and that item can measure approximate intelligence
quotient (AIQ).
If this ratio will be lower than 0.7, an item will be qualified
as average, and that item can measure only specific intelligence quotient (SIQ).
If this ratio will be lower than 0.5, an item will be qualified
as suspicious, and that item can measure only knowledge-dependent intelligence
quotient (DIQ).
If this ratio will be lower than 0.3, an item will be qualified
as bad, and that item can measure only mystical intelligence quotient (MIQ).
An overall quality of each test will be calculated as average
ratio of all solved items. Quality in the certain range (130-150, 140-160 or
150-170) will be calculated too.
Top three tests in each range are highlighted. Read
more...
Click here for the INTERPRETATION
OF QUALITY PERCENTAGE.
| IQ
test |
the best score |
good
items |
average
items |
suspicious
items |
bad
items* |
unsolved
items |
overall quality |
IQ 130-150 quality |
IQ 140-160 quality |
IQ
150-170 quality |
| Numerus Delight |
24 |
22 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
89,3% |
85,7% |
79,2% |
78,7% |
| Numerus Ultrafun |
30 |
28 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
86,1% |
86,8% |
83,2% |
63,8% |
| Lipt |
10 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
84,3% |
79,9% |
76,5% |
- |
| WIC 2014 |
36 |
29 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
83,4% |
82,1% |
78,1% |
68,5% |
| Numerus Light 2 (FINAL) |
35 |
32 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
82,7% |
83,5% |
77,9% |
68,6% |
| Numerus Light (FINAL) |
30 |
23 |
4 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
81,9% |
79,4% |
68,4% |
53,5% |
| Numiracle |
23 |
20 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
79,8% |
84% |
74,2% |
68% |
| Simtollect |
40 |
28 |
10 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
78,6% |
81,7% |
70,8% |
59,4% |
| Vermentary |
38 |
30 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
78,1% |
74,9% |
67,7% |
59% |
| Einplex (FINAL) |
28 |
22 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
0 |
78% |
75,4% |
67,1% |
58,4% |
| Numerus Classic (FINAL) |
36 |
20 |
15 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
77,1% |
75,5% |
66,7% |
61,4% |
| FREE Fall |
27 |
21 |
2 |
5 |
2 |
0 |
70,5% |
77,4% |
67,3% |
51% |
| Triplex |
25 |
16 |
8 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
69,2% |
77,8% |
64% |
51,6% |
| HI-Qlass |
31 |
21 |
7 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
68,7% |
75,7% |
64,2% |
50,3% |
| Impostor |
21.5 |
18 |
6 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
67% |
78,1% |
70,7% |
59,7% |
| Triplex Light |
29.5 |
19 |
8 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
66,7% |
72,9% |
66,1% |
51% |
| SPEED |
25 |
15 |
11 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
66,6% |
76,3% |
67,3% |
59,1% |
| LSHR Light (FINAL) |
27 |
16 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
1 |
66,3% |
72,9% |
58,9% |
49,1% |
| Daster |
22 |
10 |
10 |
4 |
1 |
0 |
63,2% |
64,1% |
55,1% |
51,7% |
| Numerus (FINAL) |
30 |
12 |
8 |
9 |
1 |
0 |
61,4% |
70,9% |
60,9% |
58% |
| Elementary |
21 |
9 |
9 |
4 |
3 |
0 |
58,6% |
72,4% |
60,2% |
53% |
| LSHR Classic |
27 |
12 |
11 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
58,2% |
68,6% |
57,9% |
46,7% |
| Verllectual |
21 |
9 |
13 |
3 |
3 |
2 |
57,5% |
71,4% |
64,5% |
52,4% |
| LSHR (FINAL) |
22.5 |
7 |
9 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
53,8% |
67,2% |
58% |
49,2% |
| Pert |
2 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
41% |
- |
- |
- |
* Hard items are easily qualified as bad on a low sample of testees. Accurate
estimates are expected for final norm reports.
Second attempt average improvement: 7% (based on more than 200
submissions) |
|