How Apple’s privacy push cost Meta $10bn
A change to iOS has made it harder to sell ads on Facebook and Instagram
POP-UP NOTIFICATIONS are often annoying. For Meta, one in Apple’s iOS operating system, which powers iPhones, is a particular headache. On February 2nd Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, told investors that privacy-focused changes to iOS, including the “ask app not to track” notification, would cost the company around $10bn in 2022. That revelation, along with growing competition and sluggish growth in user numbers, helped to prompt a 23% plunge in Meta’s share price and showed Apple’s might. But what did Apple actually do, and why was it so costly?
The promise of digital advertising has always been its ability to precisely target people. Before the digital age, companies placed ads in places where they expected potential customers would see them, such as a newspaper, and hoped for the best. Online, companies could instead target ads based on people’s browsing history and interests. This fuelled the profits of companies like Meta, which held vast amounts of data on their users. For years, Apple helped by offering an “identifier for advertisers” (IDFA), giving advertisers a way to track people’s behaviour on its devices. Users have long been able to disable IDFA in their phones' settings. But last year, citing privacy concerns, Apple turned off IDFA by default and forced apps to ask people if they want to be tracked. It seems most do not: a study in December by AppsFlyer, an ad-tech company, suggested that 54% of Apple users who saw the prompt opted out.
More from The Economist explains
How is artificial snow made?
The Winter Olympics in Beijing are the first to rely entirely on fake flakes
Who will be Joe Biden’s pick for the Supreme Court?
The president will whittle down a shortlist of 13 black women to choose his nominee
How big is Russia’s military build-up around Ukraine?
It is the biggest concentration of firepower in Europe since the cold war