RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
ABSTRACT
Background The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including among those who have received 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines, has increased substantially since Omicron was first identified in the province of Ontario, Canada.
Methods Applying the test-negative design to linked provincial data, we estimated vaccine effectiveness against infection (irrespective of symptoms or severity) caused by Omicron or Delta between November 22 and December 19, 2021. We included individuals who had received at least 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses (with at least 1 mRNA vaccine dose for the primary series) and used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effectiveness of two or three doses by time since the latest dose.
Results We included 3,442 Omicron-positive cases, 9,201 Delta-positive cases, and 471,545 test-negative controls. After 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection declined steadily over time but recovered to 93% (95%CI, 92-94%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose. In contrast, receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron. Vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was 37% (95%CI, 19-50%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose.
Conclusions Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less than against Delta. Our results may be confounded by behaviours that we were unable to account for in our analyses. Further research is needed to examine protection against severe outcomes.
Competing Interest Statement
K.W. is CEO of CANImmunize and serves on the data safety board for the Medicago COVID-19 vaccine trial. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) through a grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CNF 151944). This project was also supported by funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada, through the Vaccine Surveillance Reference Group and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. This study was also supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH). J.C.K. is supported by Clinician-Scientist Award from the University of Toronto Department of Family and Community Medicine. P.C.A. is supported by a Mid-Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation. This work was supported by Public Health Ontario. This study was also supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of Long-Term Care (MLTC). This study was supported by the Ontario Health Data Platform (OHDP), a Province of Ontario initiative to support Ontarios ongoing response to COVID-19 and its related impacts. The study sponsors did not participate in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and by Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement by ICES, MOH, MLTC, OHDP, its partners, the Province of Ontario, CIHI or CCO is intended or should be inferred.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Section 45 of PHIPA authorizes ICES to collect personal health information, without consent, for the purpose of analysis or compiling statistical information with respect to the management of, evaluation or monitoring of, the allocation of resources to or planning for all or part of the health system. Projects that use data collected by ICES under section 45 of PHIPA, and use no other data, are exempt from REB review. The use of the data in this project is authorized under section 45 and approved by ICES Privacy and Legal Office.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @hughjassdevice: Negative efficacy. #theydontfuckingwork
RT @j_sato: mRNA生物製剤の3回目接種の7日後以降の対オミ株有効率が37%なわけど、これって承認基準の50%を下回っているので承認されないのではないのかな??しかもどうせ1-2ヶ月しか有効性保てないぞ…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @hironutrition: そうか気づかなかった。 一時的なリンパ球の破壊は避けられないけど、240日経過すると回復するということは、逆転写は起こっていないし、LNPも徐々に減少するということだよね。 もしかして、早めに対処してうまいことやれば最悪の事態は避けられ…
RT @sanggr3al: @Chicago1Ray Canadian study says the same thing. https://t.co/fRjydIdDcf
RT @stanfordkirklin: NEGATIVE VE (vaccine effectiveness) with Omicron. Danish study data corroborated in Ontario. https://t.co/8FGcUKOqxI
RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @sarahbeth345: ummm
RT @kerpen: Ontario. "Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some prote…
RT @kaoruman00: どう考えても日本では追加接種はオミクロンのピークに間に合わないのだし⬇
RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…
Same findings with SA.
RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @replys17: 超朗報
RT @baby_kamex: ってことは、時間が経てば自分の身体が徐々に正常化されていく。次を打てば一瞬感染しにくくなるけどしばらくすると無接種よりも感染しやすくなる。 無限接種ループの入るか、解脱するかってことかな。
Or, if you have no conditions that increase your risk of severe complications, you could continue taking zinc & other supplements, get the virus, stay home, treat your symptoms with appropriate OTC meds, recuperate, then live the rest of your life in t
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
カナダからの報告。ワクチン2回接種の場合、ο株の場合はVEがマイナスに転じています。これをもって「ワクチンで重症化する」と思い込む人が続出しているわけです。 https://t.co/nX6gjhtfIP
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @j_sato: mRNA生物製剤の3回目接種の7日後以降の対オミ株有効率が37%なわけど、これって承認基準の50%を下回っているので承認されないのではないのかな??しかもどうせ1-2ヶ月しか有効性保てないぞ…
RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…
RT @hughjassdevice: Negative efficacy. #theydontfuckingwork
RT @kylamb8: The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from se…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @JeremyRedfernFL: Keep telling us that we are wrong, but we will keep following the data in Florida. Third full dose is showing to be…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @shibby3235: Negative Efficacy
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
Trust the $ci£₦c€!
RT @Emily_Burns_V: Reminder of what NEGATiVE VAX effectiveness means: it means that you are MORE likely to get the disease (transmission im…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @Iamthe10percen7: Truth.
More Translation: This **** does not work at all ! !
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @morilyn1123: デンマークに続いてカナダでも2回目接種数か月後(ここでは120日)にはワクチン効果がマイナスというデータが。信頼区間を見ても「有意にマイナス」という感じです。行動パターンが違う!と言い張ってないで、生物学的な機序等、基礎的検討をすぐに始めるべき…
RT @jcephus84: @JoeKanter @HealthFreedomLA @LouisianaGov @LADeptHealth
RT @JeremyRedfernFL: Keep telling us that we are wrong, but we will keep following the data in Florida. Third full dose is showing to be…
RT @gaitifuji: ADEとは何か。それはウイルス感染やワクチン接種によって体内にできた抗体が、ウイルスの感染や症状をむしろ促進してしまうという現象をさす。 https://t.co/D4zzKjdNdQ
RT @Ellengyn: 37 são os novos 50 😏
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @yuzokamei47005: ワクチン効果がマイナスってことは呼び込む、悪化させる、つまりADEが起きるってこと??怖すぎです。SARSだったかMERSのときそれでワクチンを断念したらしく。 https://t.co/DJsjPWepfh
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @O7uGh2tQAT6nbqq: 窃取したひと可愛そうじゃないですか、足も洗えなくなっちゃったみたいですし。 https://t.co/gnOkd8DoYt
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @ducatish: ががーん ごごーん と除夜の鐘が・・・ https://t.co/It3mEmpcol
これが事実と仮定して、 240日以上保てばええけど、それまでにアウトになったら終わりよな 結局は打たないことが正しい事に変わりはない
RT @yansuke_sax: 最後の一文を3回ご唱和ください。 https://t.co/ptdT8XfWCw
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
Negative?
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…
RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @CorinneReverbel: « L'efficacité du vaccin contre #Omicron était de 37 % (IC à 95 %, 19-50 %) ≥7 jours après avoir reçu un vaccin à ARNm…
RT @JeremyRedfernFL: Keep telling us that we are wrong, but we will keep following the data in Florida. Third full dose is showing to be…
RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…
RT @kylamb8: The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from se…
RT @sputnikvaccine: Study of mRNA vaccines real-world efficiency shows two shots are not protective against #Omicron, #mRNAs ineffective as…
RT @holmenkollin: Die nächste hochwertige Studie (test-negative design, Omicron n=3442) mit negativer VE von mRNA-Impfungen: Infektionssch…
RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…
RT @kylamb8: The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from se…
The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from severe illness and Omicron isn't giving most people severe illness.
RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…
RT @morilyn1123: デンマークに続いてカナダでも2回目接種数か月後(ここでは120日)にはワクチン効果がマイナスというデータが。信頼区間を見ても「有意にマイナス」という感じです。行動パターンが違う!と言い張ってないで、生物学的な機序等、基礎的検討をすぐに始めるべき…
RT @sputnikvaccine: Study of mRNA vaccines real-world efficiency shows two shots are not protective against #Omicron, #mRNAs ineffective as…
RT @j_sato: mRNA生物製剤の3回目接種の7日後以降の対オミ株有効率が37%なわけど、これって承認基準の50%を下回っているので承認されないのではないのかな??しかもどうせ1-2ヶ月しか有効性保てないぞ… https://t.co/k2bsdUuk8r
RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…
RT @kerpen: Ontario. "Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some prote…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…
RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…
RT @sputnikvaccine: Study of mRNA vaccines real-world efficiency shows two shots are not protective against #Omicron, #mRNAs ineffective as…
Must mandate then
Negative efficacy. #theydontfuckingwork