Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • News & Notes
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search
Comment on this paper

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection

Sarah A. Buchan, Hannah Chung, Kevin A. Brown, Peter C. Austin, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonathan B. Gubbay, View ORCID ProfileSharifa Nasreen, Kevin L. Schwartz, Maria E. Sundaram, Mina Tadrous, Kumanan Wilson, Sarah E. Wilson, Jeffrey C. Kwong
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Sarah A. Buchan
1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON
2ICES, Toronto, ON
3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
4Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannah Chung
2ICES, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin A. Brown
1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON
2ICES, Toronto, ON
3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter C. Austin
2ICES, Toronto, ON
5Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deshayne B. Fell
6School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, ON
7Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonathan B. Gubbay
1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON
8Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sharifa Nasreen
2ICES, Toronto, ON
3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sharifa Nasreen
Kevin L. Schwartz
1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON
2ICES, Toronto, ON
3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria E. Sundaram
9Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mina Tadrous
2ICES, Toronto, ON
10Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON
11Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kumanan Wilson
12Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
13Bruyere and Ottawa Hospital Research Institutes, Ottawa, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah E. Wilson
1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON
2ICES, Toronto, ON
3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
4Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey C. Kwong
1Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON
2ICES, Toronto, ON
3Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
4Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
14Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON
15University Health Network, Toronto, ON
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jeff.kwong@utoronto.ca
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Background The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, including among those who have received 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines, has increased substantially since Omicron was first identified in the province of Ontario, Canada.

Methods Applying the test-negative design to linked provincial data, we estimated vaccine effectiveness against infection (irrespective of symptoms or severity) caused by Omicron or Delta between November 22 and December 19, 2021. We included individuals who had received at least 2 COVID-19 vaccine doses (with at least 1 mRNA vaccine dose for the primary series) and used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the effectiveness of two or three doses by time since the latest dose.

Results We included 3,442 Omicron-positive cases, 9,201 Delta-positive cases, and 471,545 test-negative controls. After 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine, vaccine effectiveness against Delta infection declined steadily over time but recovered to 93% (95%CI, 92-94%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose. In contrast, receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vaccines was not protective against Omicron. Vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was 37% (95%CI, 19-50%) ≥7 days after receiving an mRNA vaccine for the third dose.

Conclusions Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some protection in the immediate term, but substantially less than against Delta. Our results may be confounded by behaviours that we were unable to account for in our analyses. Further research is needed to examine protection against severe outcomes.

Competing Interest Statement

K.W. is CEO of CANImmunize and serves on the data safety board for the Medicago COVID-19 vaccine trial. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) through a grant from the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CNF 151944). This project was also supported by funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada, through the Vaccine Surveillance Reference Group and the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force. This study was also supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH). J.C.K. is supported by Clinician-Scientist Award from the University of Toronto Department of Family and Community Medicine. P.C.A. is supported by a Mid-Career Investigator Award from the Heart and Stroke Foundation. This work was supported by Public Health Ontario. This study was also supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health (MOH) and the Ministry of Long-Term Care (MLTC). This study was supported by the Ontario Health Data Platform (OHDP), a Province of Ontario initiative to support Ontarios ongoing response to COVID-19 and its related impacts. The study sponsors did not participate in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Parts of this material are based on data and/or information compiled and provided by the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) and by Cancer Care Ontario (CCO). However, the analyses, conclusions, opinions and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors, and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement by ICES, MOH, MLTC, OHDP, its partners, the Province of Ontario, CIHI or CCO is intended or should be inferred.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Section 45 of PHIPA authorizes ICES to collect personal health information, without consent, for the purpose of analysis or compiling statistical information with respect to the management of, evaluation or monitoring of, the allocation of resources to or planning for all or part of the health system. Projects that use data collected by ICES under section 45 of PHIPA, and use no other data, are exempt from REB review. The use of the data in this project is authorized under section 45 and approved by ICES Privacy and Legal Office.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The dataset from this study is held securely in coded form at ICES. While legal data sharing agreements between ICES and data providers (e.g., healthcare organizations and government) prohibit ICES from making the dataset publicly available, access may be granted to those who meet pre-specified criteria for confidential access, available at www.ices.on.ca/DAS (email: das@ices.on.ca).

Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Tweets referencing this article:
192 followers
Sky11
@Sapphire_Sky11

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:54AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
88 followers
Liberals Are Destroying WA
@libsinWA

RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…

04:54AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,338 followers
Lishka
@littleLishka

RT @hughjassdevice: Negative efficacy. #theydontfuckingwork

04:54AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
454 followers
asatohan2 (习近平是小熊维尼)
@asatohan2

RT @j_sato: mRNA生物製剤の3回目接種の7日後以降の対オミ株有効率が37%なわけど、これって承認基準の50%を下回っているので承認されないのではないのかな??しかもどうせ1-2ヶ月しか有効性保てないぞ…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
32 followers
qiaoliangusa🇺🇸🇺🇸
@qiaoliangusa

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
147 followers
落ちていたパンティ🌷原稿中の為低浮上
@0UsVM9hnxhpSEMA

RT @hironutrition: そうか気づかなかった。 一時的なリンパ球の破壊は避けられないけど、240日経過すると回復するということは、逆転写は起こっていないし、LNPも徐々に減少するということだよね。 もしかして、早めに対処してうまいことやれば最悪の事態は避けられ…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
512 followers
Jay_In_RI
@Jamiesopinions

RT @sanggr3al: @Chicago1Ray Canadian study says the same thing. https://t.co/fRjydIdDcf

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,545 followers
harold hand
@haroldhand8

RT @stanfordkirklin: NEGATIVE VE (vaccine effectiveness) with Omicron. Danish study data corroborated in Ontario. https://t.co/8FGcUKOqxI

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
116 followers
野悪@にじさんじ箱推し
@rock_noir_egf

RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
72 followers
Simon Koolwitz
@koolwitz

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
14 followers
NoFalseHustle
@HustleFalse

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
12 followers
laythefavorite69
@laythefavorite1

RT @sarahbeth345: ummm

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,338 followers
Lishka
@littleLishka

RT @kerpen: Ontario. "Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some prote…

04:53AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
19 followers
ERIKO
@ERIKO0624ab

RT @kaoruman00: どう考えても日本では追加接種はオミクロンのピークに間に合わないのだし⬇

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
11,099 followers
polaris💉💉
@Polaris_sky

RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
38 followers
iris
@bluetala_iris

Same findings with SA.

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
0 followers
mnmn
@WAFcRYiNFfkNXf3

RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
219 followers
Gardener Min
@GardenerMinOne

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,241 followers
Chris Rampey 🤘😎🤠
@texaseattle

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
147 followers
落ちていたパンティ🌷原稿中の為低浮上
@0UsVM9hnxhpSEMA

RT @replys17: 超朗報

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
347 followers
マナマロン
@mmaarroonn1608

RT @baby_kamex: ってことは、時間が経てば自分の身体が徐々に正常化されていく。次を打てば一瞬感染しにくくなるけどしばらくすると無接種よりも感染しやすくなる。 無限接種ループの入るか、解脱するかってことかな。

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,370 followers
@kwteaparty
@kwteaparty

Or, if you have no conditions that increase your risk of severe complications, you could continue taking zinc & other supplements, get the virus, stay home, treat your symptoms with appropriate OTC meds, recuperate, then live the rest of your life in t

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
46 followers
Hamiltoeser
@david00769

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,509 followers
FORCEPS
@FORCEPS4

カナダからの報告。ワクチン2回接種の場合、ο株の場合はVEがマイナスに転じています。これをもって「ワクチンで重症化する」と思い込む人が続出しているわけです。 https://t.co/nX6gjhtfIP

04:52AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,071 followers
Travis Yeager
@Travis_Yeager

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
107 followers
Farmgirl
@farmflowersOR

RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
25 followers
おたた
@ribb0n13

RT @j_sato: mRNA生物製剤の3回目接種の7日後以降の対オミ株有効率が37%なわけど、これって承認基準の50%を下回っているので承認されないのではないのかな??しかもどうせ1-2ヶ月しか有効性保てないぞ…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
205 followers
18
@howling18

RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
71 followers
neveronasunday
@Farlan14Mc

RT @hughjassdevice: Negative efficacy. #theydontfuckingwork

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
853 followers
Gampel Husky 🇦🇲
@huskybags

RT @kylamb8: The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from se…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
33 followers
Derek Anderson
@DeadTheologian

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,769 followers
Mi No Comply
@Patriot_Game_

RT @JeremyRedfernFL: Keep telling us that we are wrong, but we will keep following the data in Florida. Third full dose is showing to be…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
538 followers
Freder Kamen
@FrederKamen

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
783 followers
Aditya Bawankule
@legorobotdude

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
6 followers
Nathan Wikiera
@WikieraNathan

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:51AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,628 followers
Baizuo Greengrove
@BaizuoBu

RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…

04:50AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
320 followers
Sarah Ann
@standwthepeople

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:50AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
285 followers
DR.RUDA
@DrRudaMD1

RT @shibby3235: Negative Efficacy

04:50AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
470 followers
RedPilled Mom
@Cidinha34928645

RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…

04:50AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
248 followers
Lisa Ann
@lisa_roatch

RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…

04:50AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
317 followers
Brian Ruby
@2111Monkey

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:49AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
5 followers
Chimaobi
@SChimaobiE

Trust the $ci£₦c€!

04:49AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
42 followers
James Mason
@mr67man

RT @Emily_Burns_V: Reminder of what NEGATiVE VAX effectiveness means: it means that you are MORE likely to get the disease (transmission im…

04:49AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,457 followers
Woman in tech against the woke ideology
@montreal_girl

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:49AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,457 followers
Woman in tech against the woke ideology
@montreal_girl

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:49AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
151 followers
Standup4kids
@Kourtne55842085

RT @Iamthe10percen7: Truth.

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,727 followers
Doodles
@Doodles_Doggie

More Translation: This **** does not work at all ! !

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,366 followers
Agent355
@libertybelle025

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
438 followers
《S13B1》ANTIFAのプラネ(プラネテューヌの住民)
@osdiva1

RT @morilyn1123: デンマークに続いてカナダでも2回目接種数か月後(ここでは120日)にはワクチン効果がマイナスというデータが。信頼区間を見ても「有意にマイナス」という感じです。行動パターンが違う!と言い張ってないで、生物学的な機序等、基礎的検討をすぐに始めるべき…

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
221 followers
gormpow83
@gormpow83

RT @jcephus84: @JoeKanter @HealthFreedomLA @LouisianaGov @LADeptHealth

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
8 followers
Rose34
@Rose3451333699

RT @JeremyRedfernFL: Keep telling us that we are wrong, but we will keep following the data in Florida. Third full dose is showing to be…

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
529 followers
kurohime
@Tomigahara2013

RT @gaitifuji: ADEとは何か。それはウイルス感染やワクチン接種によって体内にできた抗体が、ウイルスの感染や症状をむしろ促進してしまうという現象をさす。 https://t.co/D4zzKjdNdQ

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
300 followers
Davi Candido
@DavyCandido

RT @Ellengyn: 37 são os novos 50 😏

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
354 followers
Cooper
@CooperFreedom1

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
529 followers
kurohime
@Tomigahara2013

RT @yuzokamei47005: ワクチン効果がマイナスってことは呼び込む、悪化させる、つまりADEが起きるってこと??怖すぎです。SARSだったかMERSのときそれでワクチンを断念したらしく。 https://t.co/DJsjPWepfh

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
24 followers
Covaxin4President
@Chatley71

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:48AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,796 followers
Conservative
@icietailleurs12

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
529 followers
kurohime
@Tomigahara2013

RT @O7uGh2tQAT6nbqq: 窃取したひと可愛そうじゃないですか、足も洗えなくなっちゃったみたいですし。 https://t.co/gnOkd8DoYt

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,031 followers
Mandi
@mandiatrandom

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
529 followers
kurohime
@Tomigahara2013

RT @ducatish: ががーん ごごーん と除夜の鐘が・・・ https://t.co/It3mEmpcol

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
278 followers
コルネ2シャドウバン中
@Ultradaisuki0

これが事実と仮定して、 240日以上保てばええけど、それまでにアウトになったら終わりよな 結局は打たないことが正しい事に変わりはない

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
529 followers
kurohime
@Tomigahara2013

RT @yansuke_sax: 最後の一文を3回ご唱和ください。 https://t.co/ptdT8XfWCw

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
42 followers
conservative4life
@Cavcoinc

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
54 followers
KC
@seatripper1

Negative?

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,246 followers
mdawson
@DawsonMdhoust

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
529 followers
kurohime
@Tomigahara2013

RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
37 followers
Jules Ceasar
@Julesceasarus

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:47AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
258 followers
Gary Larson
@garl209recruit

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:46AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
191 followers
MSM is Full of 💩
@MSMisFullOfPoop

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:46AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
815 followers
InsiderCRNA 🇺🇸
@InsiderCRNA

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:46AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
208 followers
Sylvain Cote
@slybe604

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:45AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,182,955 followers
Sebastian Gorka DrG
@SebGorka

RT @ConceptualJames: I predicted a few months ago that the FDA would completely discredit itself. This is the logic of all Lysenkoism. The…

04:45AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
48 followers
Mooterman123
@mooterman123

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:45AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
287 followers
Farmer
@Farmer_J619

RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…

04:45AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,976 followers
Bob Loblaw
@Bob_Loblaw1970

RT @Wontevertweet27: @RepThomasMassie @CDCgov https://t.co/vRIYWrE9iH

04:45AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
15 followers
Information Scrutiny
@Z_DunningKruger

RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…

04:44AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
241 followers
Lu Tka
@l_utka

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:44AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
12,775 followers
Jonathan Hamel
@jhamel

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,992 followers
Cocomilady 🖕🖕🖕💪
@Dark_Lady_Dream

RT @CorinneReverbel: « L'efficacité du vaccin contre #Omicron était de 37 % (IC à 95 %, 19-50 %) ≥7 jours après avoir reçu un vaccin à ARNm…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
5,330 followers
Rocky 👩🏻🤍
@wavechaser2024

RT @JeremyRedfernFL: Keep telling us that we are wrong, but we will keep following the data in Florida. Third full dose is showing to be…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
223 followers
Jason Giles⚡
@btcbastard

RT @TracyBethHoeg: 🇨🇦Ontario reporting *negative* vax effictiveness after 2 doses against omicron "Receipt of 2 doses of COVID-19 vax not p…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
5,330 followers
Rocky 👩🏻🤍
@wavechaser2024

RT @kylamb8: The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from se…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
43 followers
Facts Over Fear
@FactsOverFear5

RT @sputnikvaccine: Study of mRNA vaccines real-world efficiency shows two shots are not protective against #Omicron, #mRNAs ineffective as…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
589 followers
stromaufwärts
@Salzmelde

RT @holmenkollin: Die nächste hochwertige Studie (test-negative design, Omicron n=3442) mit negativer VE von mRNA-Impfungen: Infektionssch…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
208 followers
ひこばえ
@hikobae007

RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
18 followers
Justin Lail
@JLAIL_JKU45

RT @kylamb8: The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from se…

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,054 followers
Matthew B
@Wontevertweet27

@RepThomasMassie @CDCgov https://t.co/vRIYWrE9iH

04:43AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
39,433 followers
Kyle Lamb
@kylamb8

The boosters are not working at all against Omicron. But good news... it won't matter because you're already protected from severe illness and Omicron isn't giving most people severe illness.

04:42AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,054 followers
Matthew B
@Wontevertweet27

RT @VPrasadMDMPH: Pre Vax 2020, FDA said 👇 they would not accept vaccine efficacy less than 50% (minimum bar) Ontario data now suggesting…

04:42AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
7,676 followers
Kinn-san
@ja8yum

RT @morilyn1123: デンマークに続いてカナダでも2回目接種数か月後(ここでは120日)にはワクチン効果がマイナスというデータが。信頼区間を見ても「有意にマイナス」という感じです。行動パターンが違う!と言い張ってないで、生物学的な機序等、基礎的検討をすぐに始めるべき…

04:42AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
3,150 followers
sara.art
@saraart4

RT @sputnikvaccine: Study of mRNA vaccines real-world efficiency shows two shots are not protective against #Omicron, #mRNAs ineffective as…

04:42AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
270 followers
keipon
@keipon01

RT @j_sato: mRNA生物製剤の3回目接種の7日後以降の対オミ株有効率が37%なわけど、これって承認基準の50%を下回っているので承認されないのではないのかな??しかもどうせ1-2ヶ月しか有効性保てないぞ… https://t.co/k2bsdUuk8r

04:41AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
2,185 followers
浅葱
@mizu_you_kan

RT @Derive_ip: オミクロンに対するワクチン効果の推定です(fromカナダ)。ファイザーの3回目接種で34%😭でモデルナは59%で合わせて37%とのこと。さらに、2回接種では、*未接種者よりも*効果が低い。端的に言えば、接種しない方が良かったということになる。 ht…

04:41AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
17 followers
Titan
@FirstBastion

RT @kerpen: Ontario. "Two doses of COVID-19 vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provides some prote…

04:41AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
260 followers
Truth Seeker of CA
@parella_anthony

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:41AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
14,019 followers
STOP praniu mózgów 🦅
@BlogerPisarz

RT @aginnt: A new study from Canada. “Two doses of COVID vaccines are unlikely to protect against infection by Omicron. A third dose provi…

04:41AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,543 followers
薩摩川内マインドフレイア
@SSSS_MindFlayer

RT @SukunaBikona7: オミクロンへの感染予防効果はデルタと比較し、有意に低下しており、7-59日後6%、60日以降はマイナスとなった。 mRNAワクチン追加接種により感染予防効果は改善し、デルタでは3回目接種7日以降93%、オミクロンでは37%となった。 htt…

04:41AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
6,081 followers
Jess
@JessClarke007

RT @sputnikvaccine: Study of mRNA vaccines real-world efficiency shows two shots are not protective against #Omicron, #mRNAs ineffective as…

04:40AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
221 followers
Dan 'No Mandate' Fowler
@theltgovernor

Must mandate then

04:40AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
1,558 followers
Nous Defions
@hughjassdevice

Negative efficacy. #theydontfuckingwork

04:40AM
ReplyRetweetFavourite
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 01, 2022.
Download PDF

Author Declarations

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
XML
Email
Share
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection
Sarah A. Buchan, Hannah Chung, Kevin A. Brown, Peter C. Austin, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonathan B. Gubbay, Sharifa Nasreen, Kevin L. Schwartz, Maria E. Sundaram, Mina Tadrous, Kumanan Wilson, Sarah E. Wilson, Jeffrey C. Kwong
medRxiv 2021.12.30.21268565; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv

Subject Area

  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS)
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (123)
  • Allergy and Immunology (331)
  • Anesthesia (79)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (729)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (127)
  • Dermatology (81)
  • Emergency Medicine (225)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (335)
  • Epidemiology (7684)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (327)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1457)
  • Geriatric Medicine (142)
  • Health Economics (322)
  • Health Informatics (1081)
  • Health Policy (555)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (399)
  • Hematology (167)
  • HIV/AIDS (310)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (9158)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (506)
  • Medical Education (169)
  • Medical Ethics (42)
  • Nephrology (170)
  • Neurology (1376)
  • Nursing (70)
  • Nutrition (212)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (272)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (396)
  • Oncology (773)
  • Ophthalmology (227)
  • Orthopedics (79)
  • Otolaryngology (147)
  • Pain Medicine (83)
  • Palliative Medicine (31)
  • Pathology (215)
  • Pediatrics (448)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (206)
  • Primary Care Research (170)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1481)
  • Public and Global Health (3323)
  • Radiology and Imaging (542)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (258)
  • Respiratory Medicine (452)
  • Rheumatology (170)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (125)
  • Sports Medicine (129)
  • Surgery (164)
  • Toxicology (34)
  • Transplantation (74)
  • Urology (57)
Email this Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against Omicron or Delta infection
Sarah A. Buchan, Hannah Chung, Kevin A. Brown, Peter C. Austin, Deshayne B. Fell, Jonathan B. Gubbay, Sharifa Nasreen, Kevin L. Schwartz, Maria E. Sundaram, Mina Tadrous, Kumanan Wilson, Sarah E. Wilson, Jeffrey C. Kwong
medRxiv 2021.12.30.21268565; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.30.21268565
This article is a preprint and has not been certified by peer review [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

We use cookies on this site to enhance your user experience. By clicking any link on this page you are giving your consent for us to set cookies.