Cryptography, Systems & Network Security Engineering since ~1988; Full-time Dad. See link for biog & press resources. 'Everybody Deserves Good Security'.
- YOU'VE ENABLED THE DAILY MAIL TO PRINT FAKE NEWS ABOUT END-TO-END ENCRYPTION, DISMISSING ENCRYPTION AND AND MISLEADING RE: HOW THE WHATSAPP ONLINE SAFETY TEAM HANDLES ABUSE, INCLUDING CHILD ABUSE.
I HOPE YOU'RE PROUD.
引用ツイート
Ruliquid Trader
@RULiquid
·
So much for end-to-end encryption! Facebook pay more than 1,000 workers to READ WhatsApp messages that are flagged as 'inappropriate' and even share them with the DOJ
via https://dailym.ai/ioshttps://mol.im/a/9966435
Access to Project Gutenberg (free, out-of-copyright books) is blocked in Italy; overwhelmingly the means of censorship is DNS blocking.
Elsewhere: any geeks who desire supply of *authoritative* DNS without tampered results, are invited to experiment with: https://github.com/alecmuffett/dohot…
引用ツイート
OONI
@OpenObservatory
·
[New Report] Italy blocks Gutenberg book publishing website
https://ooni.org/post/2021-italy-blocks-gutenberg-book-publishing-website/…
In collaboration w/ Davide Brunello, we published a new report which examines the blocking of the Gutenberg book publishing website across networks in #Italy based on OONI data.
#censorship
When people talk about the corrupting influence of Big Tech systematically destroying the fabric of society... just remember that Amazon - a $1.8T company - thinks that plantains are a valid substitution for bananas.
It's not that simple; the fact that the Chief Commissioner wholly ignores Apple iMessage, Apple FaceTime, WhatsApp, Telegram & Signal are all already end-to-end encrypted, demonstrates that this is a political, not practical, complaint from Government:
13/13 In order to get this, Civil Society will need to support Facebook in building End-to-End Encryption in Facebook Messenger.
This will doubtless be hard for many, in light of many "hot" issues that Facebook have caused. But if we want encryption, we have to do this 1 thing.
12/ SUMMARY: We need real cryptography, to protect data, to protect users, to protect people.
We need the freedom to design solutions & write code without a lawyer checking it for compliance with "legally maximum permitted privacy".
We need End-to-End Encryption to be "normal".
10/ You needed a software "key" from the Java website, to be able to use cryptography in Java.
Export controls and other legal tools were employed by Governments to inhibit your ability to keep data safe, secure and private.
8/ If this happens, a massive chill will pass over the Internet:
Developers and startups will need to employ lawyers to tell them what code they may/may-not write.
Architectures which strongly protect data will be avoided, in favour of ones that speculatively support snooping.
7/ So this is actually a "political game" - the world's governments want to hinder adoption of cryptography, and if they can visibly and embarrassingly stop Facebook — if they can MAKE AN EXAMPLE of Facebook — then (the thinking goes) they can stop anyone.
What happens then?
5/ If that sounds a bit narrow or paranoid — "only Facebook?" — other journalists have noted that of the big messenger solutions:
- WhatsApp
- iMessage/FaceTime
- Telegram
- Signal
- only
3/ However it seems egregious of Ms Dick to raise this on the anniversary of a event which was clearly not enabled by E2E-Encryption - because there was hardly any of it in 2001.
Hell, the Paris attacks 14 years later, were arranged via plaintext SMS:
2/ The allusion being that Security Services are already swamped in more "data" than they are "intelligence".
Evidence? INHOPE, the global Child Safety Hotline umbrella organisation, are swamped with old & stale reports, so develop "triage" tools:
https://inhope.org/EN/articles/what-is-aviator…
Ugh. It's embarrassing how many people view everything through the lens of "could this be bad for Facebook? Then it must be good" without thinking through the implications for everyone.
It's embarrassing that respectable people are supporting this nonsense.
引用ツイート
Joe Bernstein
@Bernstein
·
A little Friday column from me: Why A Facebook Watchdog Group Is Cheering A Law That Could Hurt Journalists
https://buzzfeednews.com/article/josephbernstein/why-a-facebook-watchdog-group-is-cheering-a-law-that-could…
Looks like WhatsApp is going to end-to-end encrypt cloud-stored backups now. This is great news for user privacy. Congrats to WhatsApp!
Apple, your move.
I can imagine WhatsApp receiving some sort of resistance or persuasions to not implement the backup encryption. Thanks for pushing through and releasing that
Hope this inspire the other company to consider doing the same
One of the main issues with WhatsApp as a secure messaging app is that backups are stored unencrypted in Google Drive or iCloud. They're fixing it though using a new well thought-out E2EE cloud backup system!
Developing end-to-end encrypted backups was an incredible technical challenge: an entirely new framework for key and cloud storage.
With encrypted backups they’re only accessible to you, so that neither WhatsApp nor the backup service provider can access or decrypt the messages.
WhatsApp is the leading global messaging service to offer *both* end-to-end encrypted messaging and backups on iCloud or Google Drive.
So you can make sure that bestie’s voice messages and mum’s secret recipe will be safely stored in a place only you can access.
Boris Johnson uses end-to-end encryption.
Do you think he's better than you?
引用ツイート
Alec Muffett
@AlecMuffett
·
The Prime Minister uses both WhatsApp & Signal, and presumably appreciates the benefits of end-to-end encrypted communication.
Unless the UK moves towards a "one rule for politicians, another for everyone else"-approach, if Boris can have end-to-end encrypted crypto, so can we.