スレッド
会話
返信先: さん
Add to this the data that vaccinated people also clear the virus much faster
Plus it at least halves your chance of getting infected in the first place
Being vaccinated doesn’t mean you can’t transmit, but it’s your best bet at protecting the people around you
引用ツイート
Alasdair Munro
@apsmunro
·
Did you hear vaccinated people are just as infectious as unvaccinated with Delta?
This study from Singapore shows not only do vaccines stop you getting sick with Delta, but also clear your viral load MUCH faster
Vaccines make you less infectious
medrxiv.org/cgi/content/sh
このスレッドを表示
26
152
507
Why did you cut off the right side of the graph?
2
2
10
返信を表示
引用ツイート
Chise
@sailorrooscout
·
A study out of the Netherlands shows while breakthrough infections with Delta have similar peak viral loads (Ct) to that of unvaccinated individuals, viral loads decrease faster in vaccinated individuals AND are LESS infectious than primary infections of unvaccinated individuals.
このスレッドを表示
1
3
20
返信を表示
返信を表示
返信先: さん
"Despite reduced viral viability, infectivity of individuals with breakthrough infections should not be neglected."
"Further studies are needed to assess whether the decreased infectious virus shedding in breakthroughs also lowers the chance of virus transmission"
1
13
返信先: さん, さん
You can be happy about this. Although the previous version of the story was: 'we only allow vaccinated people in to ensure everybody's safety'.
Now with Delta we got: 'vaccinated people are infectious, true, but less so'.
So what's your guess on the next variant?
5
16
返信先: さん
"Vaccinated individuals can still acquire infection and carry infectious virus."
"Vaccinated individuals should be tested"
And speaking about "rare" breakthrough infections:
Health care workers are reagularly wearing respirators
2
7
Repirator as in N95 with the respirator? These allow breath out..fyi
I can’t find IF they filtered out previous infected persons who where vaccinated afterwards. But maybe I overlooked something.
4
返信先: さん, さん
Sounds like good news, but perhaps we shouldn’t use the conclusive phrase, “turns out” for the results of a non-peer reviewed pre-print. Maybe “If this result is validated, …”.
26
返信先: さん, さん
How much "virus in the nose" is needed to transmit?
We don't know, right?
So how can you determine who is less infectious?
9
返信先: さん
I'm sure this comforts folks in communities with high vaccination and the virus is still spreading
8
返信先: さん
There is no such useful category as “vaccinated” without acknowledging that category is highly variable based on time since vaccination.
1
3
返信先: さん
Good to see this out - so much Twitter and media hype about CTs, so little understanding and communication of biological fundamentals..
引用ツイート
The Sharing Scientist
@ScienceShared
·
The human immune system is one of the most brilliant systems in nature.
I wouldn't discount it's roll in determining infectious potential...
twitter.com/ScienceShared/
このスレッドを表示
1
13
返信先: さん, さん
It amazes me that supposed scientists make such unrefined statements.
Someone who has been infected is not the same as someone who is naïve.
返信先: さん
You haven’t noted that these data haven’t been peer reviewed yet. The data are interesting but you need a disclaimer. This is a problem when non-scientists report scientific data.
1
返信を表示
返信先: さん
<media quickly retracts all misleading prior coverage and spends a week highlighting truth>
<oh wait, no it doesn't. It's onto the next overly hyped misleading narrative>
11
返信先: さん
Well it isn't peer-reviewed yet, but yes it is very likely that vaccinated people are less infectious than unvaccinated.
返信先: さん
In general the probability of culturalble virus decrease from unvaccinated to vaccinated individuals with comparable viral loads is between 10% and 30%. That is not significantly reduced. The author also just says reduced, not significantly
1
1
3
返信先: さん, さん
Your medical degree is no match for Karen with a Meme!!! Simple advice on the effectiveness of masks in closed environments is met with dishonest memes like this. Remember, this new era is Emotions>Science.
返信先: さん
We need to end the PCR testing, or at least qualify exactly what is being detected. Ct values should be published with “positive” results and standardized across healthcare systems. Currently any detected viral genetic material is cause for panic without further investigation.
1
9
Nothing useful about near term covid is peer reviewed. This comment is everywhere and utterly meaningless.
1
Twitterを使ってみよう
今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。