ハイリスク者のPCRの有効性等を示した論文が出ました。
"However, it would also reduce the effectiveness of self-isolation because some test results would be false negatives."
「検査は偽陰性を生み自己隔離の有効性を下げうる」
ここが理解できない人はキツイ。
https://thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30630-7/fulltext#sec1…
論文のケツはなんて書いてありますか?
Now is the time to invest in testing
capacity, policy, and planning to maximise their contribution to the fight against COVID-19.
「今こそPCR検査に投資し拡充しよう!」で締めくくられていますが。
論文の途中には何と書いてありますか?
the proportion of false-negative results would be relatively low (around 10%) on the basis of the
reported PCR test sensitivity, and most symptomatic individuals could safely return to work once well.
For example, with a 1% prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection,
a single negative test would have a greater than 99% probability of being correct (negative predictive
value).
ほら、
Specificity of PCR was assumed to be 100% on the basis of the performance of the majority of available tests
英語も読めませんか?
そして更に残念なのはこんな低レベルなデマ屋を「こびナビ」なる政府系SNSプロジェクトに採用し、税金投入してる現政権や電通です。