ツイート
会話
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="383"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
No, it means they're going to give us another update in a year to determine whether boosters are needed.
3
53
返信を表示
Translation: I have no reading comprehension skills.
1
24
返信先: さん
That's good news for New York , New Jersey ,Pennsylvania and Michigan.covid situations a bit stark there
メディアを再生できません。
再読み込み
1
5
返信先: さん, さん
Yeah would you be able to explain how the 6 month efficacy timetable works? Does that mean the vaccines only protect you for 6 months?
1
9
Seeing that the vaccines have been around for only ~6m (including clinical trial period), it's really "at least 6 months". Using other vaccines as a guide, it's probably a *lot* longer than that (potentially years), depending on the limits of the mutations
2
74
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
Yeah but what about after that? So you have to keep getting these things every 9 months?
3
3
More data is needed before we know that.
1
返信先: さん
Have there been any studies with Pfizer, regarding efficacy, when you hold off getting 2nd dose to 4 months? Are we still protected?
2
Please re-read. You’re not understanding this correctly.
1
38
返信を表示
返信先: さん
You think 6 months is a long time? It's hard to understand CNN because factual info is always buried in a storyline or spin.
5
3
Please re-read. You’re not understanding this correctly.
7
返信先: さん, さん
Hey we have to be thankful but having said that if it is 6 months -- we'll be barely done with the first round of shots around the US and will have to rinse and repeat
1
4
The vaccines have only been available for 6 mo. They will continue to monitor and we will eventually see if we need booster shots.
2
15
返信を表示
That’s the amount of data they have! Please read the article
3
返信先: さん, さん
So many people on this thread not understanding what the 6 months means. Since the vaccines have only been around a little more than six months, you can’t have a study that checks for a longer period. My goodness.
9
11
335
It’s truly frightening to see the lack of reading comprehension and critical thinking people have!
3
2
83
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
Is Moderna doing the same kind of follow up? When can we expect results?
2
12
No, they are not. It doesn't work.
2
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
I have seen 2 reports-
"For at least 6mths"
and
"After 6 mths"
Very big difference, can you clarify?
3
7
このアカウントの所有者はツイートを表示できるアカウントを制限しているため、このツイートを表示できません。詳細はこちら
返信を表示
Most likely.
1
返信を表示
凍結されたアカウントによるツイートです。詳細はこちら
We'll know when they've been around longer than 6 months.
2
凍結されたアカウントによるツイートです。詳細はこちら
The vaccine is effective for *at least* 6 months. It could be effective for years but we just don’t have that data yet since the vaccine hasn’t been around that long.
1
返信先: さん
Pfizer's assertion that it works "very well" against B.1.351 is disappointing, based as it is on a very small study involving just 6 cases in the placebo group and zero cases in the vaccine group. Effusive praise based on such an absurdly small sample size is irresponsible.
返信先: さん
To the thread - it’s only been six months - you think they have time travel, too?
3
返信先: さん, さん
Let the passport double as a voter ID card with photos valid in all states.
Many lack access to a way to get a photo Id. This’ll be an incentive to be vaccinated too!
7
3
39
Forget voter ID. The vaccine passports can just be a vaccine passport. Voter ID requirements are not only useless, they’re unconstitutional and damaging to voter turnout.
1
返信先: さん, さん
some healthcare workers were vaccinated in January. Will there be boosters by June for these folks?
2
This doesn’t mean it stops being effective in 6 months, it just means they haven’t been able to test it past six months since that’s how long the vaccine has been available.
返信先: さん
OMG, people! Use your brains, please! The vaccine has only been around roughly 6 months! They can’t have data that stretches longer because it hasn’t been out longer! This is good news! Embrace every bit of good news & SO THE HELL WHAT if we end up getting frequent boosters!
2
8
154
So that’s great news then! That means the effective period of immunity may continue to extend as more data becomes available as time goes on.
1
11
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
Scared as hell but I'm getting the shot today if they don't run out.
3
15
2
12
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
My T-Cells are laughing.
With 56 HLA class I and class II epitopes (so far) variants have nearly an impossible task ahead of them.
1
the answer 4 months later is less than .004% have ANY kind of bad reaction. Less than .001% die from a possible correlation to taking the vaccine
Twitterを使ってみよう
今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。
Googleアカウントで登録
電話番号またはメールアドレスで登録
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="135"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24" height="24"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="108"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="90"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)