![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Bourdain was right. This simple Lawson egg sandwich is a next level gastronomic experience!
![画像](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="510"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
46
1,725
3,870
ツイート
会話
返信先: さん
it looks slightly radioactive!
返信を表示
It's hard to believe that these are the words of the editor of the New York Times, America's quality paper.
1
11
99
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
You should delete this tweet because there is NO scientific evidence supporting your opinion.
1
22
167
返信先: さん, さん
Not sophiscated. Not cool.
Only appeared real intention from
deep inside.
Prejudice as a stranger.
10
返信先: さん, さん
15
102
返信先: さん, さん
Think about the words you’re using here, and what they mean in the context of the country you’re referring to.
3
28
返信先: さん
Amazing 
You mean you can see radiation without using a Geiger counterYou cannot be an ordinary Homo sapiens.
You mean you can see radiation without using a Geiger counterYou cannot be an ordinary Homo sapiens.11
112
返信先: さん, さん
I can’t overlook such inconsiderate comment. Shall complain to NY Times and require to apologize to us.
2
25
返信先: さん, さん
How dare can you say this? It’s definitely discrimination and I want you to officially apologize about your unprofessional comment.
16
返信先: さん, さん
You seem to be experiencing hallucinations and delusions, can I refer you to a good doctor?
![画像](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="344" height="329"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
返信先: さん, さん
So that means you've seen some DEFINITELY radioactive sandwiches, I guess. Otherwise how could you tell the difference? Or should I ask about this?
8
返信先: さん, さん
Intelligence and dignity are like a sample that money can never buy.
1
返信先: さん, さん
editor, you have an interesting sense of humour but lack in imagination and compassion, also responsibility.
7
You don’t even research how hard Japanese people worked hard to secure the food security, and throw a comment which brings down Japanese farmers’ efforts. If you work at NY times or whatever, be careful with your words.
4
13
返信先: さん, さん
Is this opinion of yours the same as the official opinion of nytimes?
4
返信先: さん, さん
Do you think it's funny? Do you know how many have lost lives? Have you thought of the local farmers affected by false information circulated by someone so dumb and ignorant and insensitive like you? Do you write for ? I now regret I subscribe to it.
3
90
549
とりんちさんのリプ読んでウルッときました。
1
1
25
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
you are the coldest wet blanket which gets into a little lovely sandwich party.
2
返信先: さん, さん
Please explain to us what does it mean “ it’s looks slightly radioactive!” .
返信先: さん, さん
I was disappointed with your remarks.
If that's the case, don't come to Japan!
3
返信先: さん, さん
14
98
Twitterを使ってみよう
今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。
Googleアカウントで登録
電話番号またはメールアドレスで登録
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="135"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="240" height="136"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24" height="24"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="84"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)