ツイート
会話
返信先: さん
it looks slightly radioactive!
It's hard to believe that these are the words of the editor of the New York Times, America's quality paper.
1
5
57
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
You should delete this tweet because there is NO scientific evidence supporting your opinion.
1
13
75
返信を表示
返信先: さん, さん
Looks like this granny can see radioactive through picture
She’ll be a good radioactive tester in Japan
50
203
返信先: さん, さん
Not sophiscated. Not cool.
Only appeared real intention from
deep inside.
Prejudice as a stranger.
4
返信先: さん, さん
6
25
返信先: さん, さん
Think about the words you’re using here, and what they mean in the context of the country you’re referring to.
1
7
返信先: さん
Amazing
You mean you can see radiation without using a Geiger counter
You cannot be an ordinary Homo sapiens.
7
返信先: さん, さん
I can’t overlook such inconsiderate comment. Shall complain to NY Times and require to apologize to us.
5
返信先: さん, さん
How dare can you say this? It’s definitely discrimination and I want you to officially apologize about your unprofessional comment.
1
返信先: さん, さん
You seem to be experiencing hallucinations and delusions, can I refer you to a good doctor?
返信先: さん, さん
So that means you've seen some DEFINITELY radioactive sandwiches, I guess. Otherwise how could you tell the difference? Or should I ask about this?
1
返信をさらに表示
Twitterを使ってみよう
今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。
Googleアカウントで登録
電話番号またはメールアドレスで登録