body { -ms-overflow-style: scrollbar; overflow-y: scroll; overscroll-behavior-y: none; } .errorContainer { background-color: #FFF; color: #0F1419; max-width: 600px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 10%; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; } .errorButton { margin: 3em 0; } .errorButton a { background: #1DA1F2; border-radius: 2.5em; color: white; padding: 1em 2em; text-decoration: none; } .errorButton a:hover, .errorButton a:focus { background: rgb(26, 145, 218); } .errorFooter { color: #657786; font-size: 80%; line-height: 1.5; padding: 1em 0; } .errorFooter a, .errorFooter a:visited { color: #657786; text-decoration: none; padding-right: 1em; } .errorFooter a:hover, .errorFooter a:active { text-decoration: underline; } #placeholder, #react-root { display: none !important; } body { background-color: #FFF !important; }

JavaScriptを使用できません。

このブラウザではJavaScriptが無効になっています。引き続きtwitter.comを利用するため、JavaScriptを有効にするか、サポートされているブラウザに切り替えてください。サポートされているブラウザのリストについては、ヘルプセンターをご覧ください。

ヘルプセンター

利用規約プライバシーポリシー Cookieのポリシー Imprint 広告情報 © 2021 Twitter, Inc.

「いま」起きていることを見つけよう

Twitterなら、「いま」起きていることをいち早くチェックできます。

アカウント作成

スレッド

会話

Lead researcher for CDC's Vaccine Breakthrough Team has confirmed that fully-vaxed patients who are hospitalized & incidentally test positive for SARS-CoV-2 are NOT seen as COVID hospitalizations or deaths This is a sharp contrast to the CDC’s stance during the pandemic

午前1:57 · 2021年6月7日Twitter Web App

件のリツイート

件の引用ツイート

件のいいね

返信先:

さん

2/The email was a response to my inquiry re: data in the team's 5/28/21 report. I asked about the diff (if any) btw 2 categories of vaxed patients cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/7 Researcher confirmed "asymp or hospitalized for a reason unrelated to COVID-19" are mutually exclusive

2

49

175

3/ Evaluating reported breakthru infections, the CDC team distinguishes 3 kinds of hosp patients. Per email, Patients B & C are "cases [they] know are not related to infection...whose outcomes were clearly NOT related to C19." Patient A? Data "isn’t strong enough to say"

12

53

186

4/ Per the team's end of May report, nearly 30% of vaccinated hospitalized-for-some-reason patients tested positive for the virus. Again, the lead researcher says these are "cases we know are not related to infection."

3

46

163

5/This is a departure from the CDC's implicit counting standards that have been applied throughout the pandemic All three "positive patient types" are included in local, state, & national data -- even tho there's no reason Patient B or C should be in case, hosp, or death numbers

2

52

191

6/ To be clear, I agree with the approach in the left image, as a starting point for reporting ALL data - not just breakthrough infections. What would our national numbers look like if it were applied? Hint: very different

5

77

261

7/ Here's a table view of the same information. Again, there's no earthly reason for the differential standards.

2

50

161

8/ In many ways, the first sentence in the email is the most

Quite an admission from the agency that has liberally defined COVID cases, hospitalizations, & deaths for over a year - to the detriment of the economy, mental health, & societal fabric, among other things

4

71

225

9/ I don’t wish COVID were smallpox, but the truth is, many deadly pathogens have clear-cut, telltale signs that leave little doubt about cause. By contrast, for this virus, we have the "any death within x number of days of a positive test" definition. Sloppy, at best.

5

30

235

10/ I stand by the assertions I made after reading the article a couple weeks ago Neither "asymptomatic COVID hospitalization" nor "asyptomatic COVID death" is a thing. Apparently, CDC's Vaccine Breakthrough Team agrees with me.

4

53

230

11/ Why aren't the standards the CDC's vaccine breakthrough team is using being used to audit & revised numbers from the entire pandemic? We need more info about what standards various counties have been applying How many more Almeda Counties are there?

Alameda County’s new COVID death toll is 25% lower than thought

County health officials reviewed COVID-19 death records and found 411 cases that were "clearly not" caused by the disease.

oaklandside.org

5

50

244

12/ Honestly, we just need to STOP

Stop PCR-testing every hospital patient for COVID.

Stop testing – and encouraging the testing – of asymptomatic individuals, regardless of setting or situation.

9

47

295

13/

Stop calling people who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 a COVID “case”. Remove or provide a breakdown of asymptomatic positives in all data at the local, state, and federal levels.

2

21

191

14/

Stop listing COVID as a cause of death when COVID clearly didn’t contribute to or cause the death.

Stop the daily reporting of test, case, hospitalization, and death numbers.

3

25

207

15/ Finally,

pretending the virus isn't endemic, seasonal, and eminently survivable. END THREAD (h/t

for help with graphics) cc:

@EthicalSkeptic

11

33

227

Clarification: I am NOT saying the CDC has changed standards for reporting Covid cases, hospitalizations, and deaths. I’m showing that the CDC’s Vax Breakthrough team does not consider asymp/incidental-positive hospitalizations/deaths as related to SARS-CoV-2 infection...

7

11

91

The point is, the team’s “criteria” for evaluating the breakthrough data should be applied retroactively and henceforth to all Covid data. Throughout the pandemic, asymp & incidental positives hv been weaponized to justify bad public health policies.

11

35

188

New Jersey providing similar data for vax breakthrough cases. Again, why couldn’t/can’t we do this for all Covid data, breakthrough-related or not? It’s what should’ve been reported all along

引用ツイート

Woke Zombie

@AWokeZombie

· 6月9日

#NJ #COVID19 1319 Breakthru cases Of those, 92 were hospitalized, but only 30 of those were because of covid Of the 92 hospitazations, 14 deaths from breakthru cases, but only 7 of those were because of covid So it begs the question: Why not the same rigor on Cases/Hosp/Death?

1

4

30

Linda Helen 微笑み

微笑み

返信先:

さん

Consistently inconsistent

メディアを再生できません。

再読み込み

11

返信先:

さん

The tests were a sham. False positives created fear. Now they have to say everyone get vaccinated because millions think they have had it and didn’t. The house of cards is starting to crumble

5

31

T. Swift (the T stands for theology)

返信先:

さん

Are not *necessarily* seen as covid hospitalizations or deaths. Which is the same as in general. Where is the contrast, exactly?

1

Emma Woodhouse にやにやした顔

にやにやした顔

引用ツイート

Emma Woodhouse にやにやした顔

にやにやした顔

@EWoodhouse7

· 6月7日

6/ To be clear, I agree with the approach in the left image, as a starting point for reporting ALL data - not just breakthrough infections. What would our national numbers look like if it were applied? Hint: very different

このスレッドを表示

1

3

返信を表示

返信先:

さん

The CDC definition for a Covid death isn't just a positive test.

1

Twitterを使ってみよう

今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。

アカウント作成

トレンド

いまどうしてる？

スポーツ

ライブ

Tour de France 2021

日本のトレンド

SEX特集

20,284件のツイート

アート・カルチャー · トレンド

トイストーリー

1,666件のツイート

BuzzFeed Japan News

昨日

「すごい刺さる」ある保育士が自分の仕事を見つめ直したきっかけとは

東洋経済オンライン

3 時間前

｢妻の出世で家庭崩壊｣40代仮面イクメンの告白

さらに表示