crucial internet infrastructure —

Stack Overflow sold to tech investor Prosus for $1.8 billion

"Don't expect to see major changes or awkward synergies," said site co-founder.

If you've ever gone looking for answers to software development questions, this screenshot probably looks quite familiar.
Enlarge / If you've ever gone looking for answers to software development questions, this screenshot probably looks quite familiar.
Jim Salter

Legendary programming Q&A site Stack Overflow is being acquired by Prosus N.V., Europe's largest tech investment firm. According to a press release on Prosus' website, the two companies entered into a definitive acquisition agreement yesterday.

According to Amazon Alexa web analytics, Stack Overflow is the 46th most heavily engaged site in the world. Since 2008, the site has served as the first stop for developers searching for answers to their programming-related questions—and eventually, their non-programming-related questions, as the Stack Exchange network of sites expanded into categories including culture, recreation, arts, science, business, and more.

Prosus will likely be much less familiar, particularly to Americans, as the Amsterdam-listed investment firm has a much lower public profile. Although based in Europe, Prosus invests internationally; for example, it has the largest single stake in Chinese gaming and social media company Tencent.

In 2001, Prosus' parent company Naspers bought a 46.5% interest in Tencent for only $34 million— but earlier this year, Prosus liquidated a 2% Tencent stake for $14.6 billion, retaining a 28.9% interest valued at roughly $200 billion. Prosus chairman Koos Bekker said the Tencent liquidation will "fund continued growth in Prosus' core business lines and emerging sectors" and create "some headroom for acquisitions."

Stack Overflow co-founder Joel Spolsky blogged about the purchase, and Stack Overflow CEO Prasanth Chandrasekar wrote a more official announcement. Both blog posts characterize the acquisition as having little to no impact on the day-to-day operation of Stack Overflow.

"How you use our site and our products will not change in the coming weeks or months, just as our company’s goals and strategic priorities remain the same," Chandrasekar said.

Spolsky went into more detail, saying that Stack Overflow will "continue to operate independently, with the exact same team in place that has been operating it, according to the exact same plan and the exact same business practices. Don't expect to see major changes or awkward 'synergies'... the entire company is staying in place: we just have different owners now."

Ars Video

Walking the 2016 NY Auto Show

162 Reader Comments

Sort comments by...
Sort comments by...
Chronological
Insightful
Highest Voted
Funniest
  1. ... sure Jan. We will see whether they end up pay walling and ruining the site, but call me jaded at this point.
    2146 posts | registered
  2. Quote:
    "Don't expect to see major changes or awkward synergies," said site co-founder.


    I'm trying to think of a single acquisition where the founders didn't say this.
    25 posts | registered
  3. Quote:
    Don't expect to see major changes


    Every single time something like this happens this is what is said. It is never true.
    186 posts | registered
  4. fritterVII wrote:
    Quote:
    "Don't expect to see major changes or awkward synergies," said site co-founder.


    I'm trying to think of a single acquisition where the founders didn't say this.


    The mere statement acknowledges that we've seen and heard this before and have reason to believe you're (the co-founder) wrong. I'd say I give this about eight times the chance of being true as the statements made about Whatsapp when Facebook bought it. What's 0 X 8 again?
    1019 posts | registered
  5. This question can be unlocked for a one time charge of $0.99 or sign up for our monthly plan at $9.99 for unlimited answers.
    32 posts | registered
  6. Sadly the amount of useful information coming out of stack overflow is lower than it used to be.

    "The solution the problem was posted in a thread from 5 years ago before the technology in your question that i didn't even read existed. I'm not going to link it. Learn to use the search function."

    More often than not, I can find a reddit thread that is far more helpful.
    25 posts | registered
  7. Imagine the damage to the collective productivity of the global tech work force if these folks drove Stack overflow into the ground.
    I think we'd see a recession.
    2989 posts | registered
  8. Based from previous experiences, a buy-out always changes the culture, even if subtly. It is rare for the new owner to not want to meddle or adjust things to their personal vision.
    2383 posts | registered
  9. My favorite anecdote about the dangers of copy/pasting answers from stackoverflow:

    https://twitter.com/Foone/status/12296424267692728321
    16160 posts | registered
  10. "Don't expect to see any shitty new monetization strategies," says guy whose company was just bought by a company whose entire existence is rooted in shitty monetization strategies.

    Okay, sure.

    I'll hope, for now, that these guys are smart enough to realize that the current value of their investment rests heavily on not doing anything overtly shitty to the community they just bought. And if they turn out to be the weasels I think they are, well, I guess Stack Overflow will no longer be among the search results I look for when I'm trying to solve a problem.
    217 posts | registered
  11. Don't expect to see major changes ...

    Image
    77 posts | registered
  12. thegrommit wrote:
    My favorite anecdote about the dangers of copy/pasting answers from stackoverflow:

    https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1229642426769272832


    Yes, if you blindly copy-paste answers instead of taking the time to understand them.

    If you do make an effort it's an excellent resource.
    7729 posts | registered
  13. "Don't expect change in the weeks and months ahead" is not especially reassuring when I frequently find exactly what I need from five or ten years ago.

    I don't think about Stack Overflow on timescales of weeks. It might take weeks to even fully characterize and understand a problem before I'd take it to SO.
    5315 posts | registered
  14. Great. Microsoft owns GitHub, now this
    33 posts | registered
  15. Disclaimer: I'm not predicting this is going to happen, it's just a rhetorical poke because that's what discussion is for.

    It would be interesting if Stack Overflow shut down, and badly documented software stopped being able to rely on it as a crutch. There are plenty of things I've used for which the only documentation seems to be "whatever answers you can find on SO".

    What if that went away?
    908 posts | registered
  16. 'Spolsky went into more detail, saying that Stack Overflow will "continue to operate independently, with the exact same team in place that has been operating it, according to the exact same plan and the exact same business practices. Don't expect to see major changes..."'

    ...except that the entire site will now be delivered as bitmapped graphics and short autoplay videos rather than text so that "cut and paste from stack overflow" will no longer be a viable development methodology. We're confident that this will have no impact on traffic or engagement.

    /s

    Last edited by jhodge on Thu Jun 03, 2021 12:55 pm

    2885 posts | registered
  17. The more times you re-assure me there will be no impact the more positive I am there will be.
    8175 posts | registered
  18. Lot of people here seem to know an awful lot about a company they only just learnt about from this article, funny that.


    We don't know Prosus but we have the experience of dozens of other acquisitions made with the statement that "nothing will change" ... until it always does.

    At least it wasn't acquired by Google so they could turn it into a chat program and then shut it down.

    Last edited by DaveSimmons on Thu Jun 03, 2021 12:57 pm

    7729 posts | registered
  19. Damn. It was nice while it lasted.
    1012 posts | registered
  20. Oh sh*t there goes the planet (err site)
    230 posts | registered
  21. Quote:
    "Don't expect to see major changes or awkward synergies," said site co-founder.


    tl,dr; I'm cashing out, there will be major changes.
    23127 posts | registered
  22. Well damn, that's my .Net Core documentation getting paywalled then.
    666 posts | registered
  23. Congratulations to Joel Spolsky and his team. Spolsky has created many great tools for software, like Fogbugz, Trello, and Stack Overflow. His blog is also a great resource.
    597 posts | registered
  24. Wednesday, 2 June 2021, barely a year after acquiring Linux Academy, which was mostly responsible for my 21 and counting IT certifications, ACloud.Guru is being acquired by Pluralight.

    Now this. Just like Amazon acquiring MGM to add more content to its "who the fuck designed this interface and why have they not been savagely beaten yet?" Prime Video service. Just like Microsoft buying Bethesda and saying some future games will be PC and XBox exclusives. Just like how Facebook devoured Instagram because, as emails show, they were viewed as a potential competitor in the future. Just like EA buying up game companies, stticking their noses into the creative process, ruining the next games, then shutting down the companies when their meddled-with games didn't do so hot. Looking at you, Westwood (Command and Conquer) and Visceral Games (Dead Space)

    Sure is cool letting companies gobble up others willy nilly like Bluto in the cafeteria in the movie Animal House1. I'm sure these companies are doing this to further lower prices and increase innovation for us, the consumer, and most certainly not to consolidate, wield more power, and increase profits at the cost of us consumers.

    ...

    Image

    Last edited by Deputy Cartman on Thu Jun 03, 2021 1:04 pm

    5047 posts | registered
  25. And just like that, the entire fields of junior software development and web design grinds to a halt...
    79 posts | registered
  26. Sure, nothing will change.

    Hopefully the Wayback machine will keep a copy of all of StackOverflow once it sits behind a paywall so its history can still be accessed.
    1362 posts | registered
  27. Well, fuck...

    Been a member of SO for ages and it is super useful. Not holding my breath out that it is going to be worthwhile much longer.

    Next month: StackOverflow Pro!
    993 posts | registered
  28. FUCK
    540 posts | registered
  29. This comment closed as a duplicate of a comment made in 2009.

    Last edited by *Legion* on Thu Jun 03, 2021 1:05 pm

    42 posts | registered
  30. Lot of people here seem to know an awful lot about a company they only just learnt about from this article, funny that.


    "You don't know the first thing about either me or my motivations," snaps fox who just purchased wildlife reserve for chickens
    217 posts | registered
  31. schizrade wrote:
    ... sure Jan. We will see whether they end up pay walling and ruining the site, but call me jaded at this point.


    It will become like ExpertSexChange.com (ExpectsExchange) where you have to pay see the answers, haha. Or they'll want to get big data behind it and somehow bundle up the data about users and questions and sell the data to someone. The idea that an investment company wanted to buyout a tech company to just let them do their own thing, sounds unbelievable. It's like the moon is made of cheese kinda unbelievable
    47 posts | registered
  32. fritterVII wrote:
    Quote:
    "Don't expect to see major changes or awkward synergies," said site co-founder.


    I'm trying to think of a single acquisition where the founders didn't say this.

    Ars certainly said the same.
    I will say though that Ars' mindset seemed to change more in the years before the condé nast acquisition than in the years after.
    8151 posts | registered
  33. That's a lot of money for a website that doesn't even have a homepage.
    441 posts | registered
  34. thegrommit wrote:
    My favorite anecdote about the dangers of copy/pasting answers from stackoverflow:

    https://twitter.com/Foone/status/1229642426769272832


    Yes, if you blindly copy-paste answers instead of taking the time to understand them.

    If you do make an effort it's an excellent resource.


    As the linked thread demonstrates, there are so-called professional developers at large companies that don't follow this excellent advice.
    16160 posts | registered
  35. onkeljonas wrote:
    fritterVII wrote:
    Quote:
    "Don't expect to see major changes or awkward synergies," said site co-founder.


    I'm trying to think of a single acquisition where the founders didn't say this.

    Ars certainly said the same.
    I will say though that Ars' mindset seemed to change more in the years before the condé nast acquisition than in the years after.


    Ars definitely changed. You can see it in the Wired articles and other cross-branding.

    The correct comparison isn't to the Ars or Stack Overflow of yore, it is whether they could have continued as independent entities. I suspect Ars is a net cashflow loss business, but Stack Overflow may have been able to continue and this is just cashing out.
    585 posts | registered
  36. "our products will not change in the coming weeks or months"

    So the changes are coming, just a bit later...
    6911 posts | registered
  37. I think people are overly pessimistic of the future of SO and prophesizing its death. The company already has ways to generate revenue (SO Jobs, Ads, SO for Teams), so I doubt there will be too much of a need for a pay wall or a Pro version of SO. There will probably be changes, but I think that a pay wall or a PRO version are unlikely.

    Last edited by No Bic on Thu Jun 03, 2021 1:17 pm

    7 posts | registered
  38. 2008: Stack Exchange wants to be the anti-Experts Exchange.
    2025: Stack Exchange becomes Experts Exchange.
    84 posts | registered

You must to comment.