If you didn't look closely, you'd believe--per Uproxx--that I said J.K. Rowling's opinion on trans women is shitty and hateful. I didn't say that. The author, Josh Kurp said that. This is an editorial masquerading as information.
ツイート
会話
返信を表示
He doesn't.
1
2
返信を表示
返信を表示
返信を表示
返信を表示
Hay gente que no merece opinar
It's like if you were misquoted as saying that cake is delicious and puppies are adorable, take the W
1
42
返信先: さん
That's good news! It means that we can expect a different, better version of it in your own words!

1
4
返信先: さん
Well I beg to differ-I think it is “misinformation masquerading as an editorial”!
返信先: さん
What is wrong with journalists?!?! No integrity or objectivity whatsoever anymore! Whatever happened to people like Nelly Blye? She was amazing! If you think about it, she was the original Gonzo journalist.
返信先: さん
That would be a good thing for you to say, though, now that you've brought it up.
13
返信先: さん
Oh Stephen - you stepped in a big big wad of awful dog-shit. Cerberus crapped at the end of your driveway and you went for a bare-foot stroll.
1
You probably just gave him another book idea.
返信先: さん
Would’ve been best to let the editorial masquerading go uncorrected in this case
1
2
Ah ok
引用ツイート
Stephen King
@StephenKing
·
My opinion is that Jo Rowling is wrong about trans women. Leave shitty and hateful out of it, please.
1
返信先: さん
We were careful not to repeat those words, even double-checking to verify whether you or the article's author said it, before tweeting this: