But “with” doesn’t mean “from.”
Couldn’t have said it better myself,
![画像](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="680" height="301"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
ツイート
会話
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
返信先: さん, さん
Neither of the 2 counts towards the statistics
They are still counted as COVID19 deaths...and that is manipulation
14
返信先: さん, さん
About 4.2 million in the U.S. would’ve died from 1/1/20 to 5/31/21 if Covid had never come here. How many of the dead who had Covid likely would’ve been one of those 4.2 million if Covid had never come to the U.S?. Are there no answers to this?
4
1
10
返信先: さん, さん
Deleting the tweet looks very shady. Would have been better off leaving the tweet and conceding that this happened pre-vaccine also.
1
23
返信先: さん, さん
Just shy of 19% of breakthrough cases. If this number were similar to COVID-related deaths in the US, more than 110,000 would be “with” not “from”...
3
8
27
返信先: さん, さん
We vaccinated the elderly first, the group with the highest overall mortality rate. Of course there will be deaths after vaccinations. How stupid does the CDC believe we are at this point?
2
返信先: さん, さん
Changing the standards now is going to give red meat to every anti-..... group out there. This is just bad optics on the CDC's end.
返信先: さん, さん
If ALL 223 of them died From not just With covid-19—despite being fully vaccinated—that would still mean the C19 vaccines are among the Most Effective Ever.
223 dead of ~355,000,000 fully vaccinated vs
~3,370,000 dead of ~163,000,000 unvaccinated infected.
引用ツイート
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="24" height="24"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)
Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
·
But “with” doesn’t mean “from.”
Couldn’t have said it better myself, @dkthomp
返信をさらに表示
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="120" height="80"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>)