Bitches Like Drama: Sep 1, 2012
This post is about an incident I recently witnessed, so some of the personal details have been altered or hidden.
One of the frequent issues of discussion on blogs about ‘game’ concerns whether woman adjust their expectations to the age-linked decrease in their attractiveness and value to settle for a guy who is nice, financially stable but boring. There are some who believe that women can shed their bad boy attraction and move on to more traditional guys. My experience and observation suggests that most women can do that for a few years, but eventually the desire for excitement overcomes their desire for stability.
Imagine a couple who are now in their early 40s. The guy has a stable but boring job that pays him 200k and requires frequent travel, the woman is more educated than him but cannot get a well-paying job and is largely dependent on his money to live a nice lifestyle. Did I mention that the couple have no kids or plans to have them in the future.
Their relationship started with a one-night stand after said woman had been burned by a series of exciting but fucked up relationships. She was not into him, but the guy chased her and she found peace and calm in that relationship. It helped that he could provide a good lifestyle and support her in other ways. Things puttered along for almost 7 years and then woman (now in her early 40s) breaks up with him because she found the relationship too boring and staid. She felt that he would be happier if he found a woman who liked that sort of boring stuff.
The breakup is amicable and they still live together. She will supposedly move out after finding a job and an affordable apartment.
It is likely that, over the years, she has cheated with guys who make far less than him and care far less about her than him. The guys she will screw after the breakup will also very likely make less than him and care far less about her.
So you see- even older and intelligent women now choose drama, excitement and guys who treat them like shit over those who treat them very well and unconditionally provide for them.
What do you think? Comments?
The majority of guys, no matter how many “so-called game blogs” they may read, are still and likely always will be traditional/nice/boring. It said a lot about him (this guy) when after they ended the LTR that he still let her stay there instead of telling her she had to move out/move on. Although I personally don’t equate “treating people like garbage (that I know many guys on game blogs think makes them seem tough when in fact it is often just a cover for their inner weakness)” with being the desirable man who is “not boring” (although drama is at least not boring), for example it is possible to not physically or verbally seriously abuse women while still being a masculine man who has a attractive vibe and who does many “fun/not boring/interesting (with and without women)/exciting things (sensually, s*xually, and in other ways) to keep women interested in him.” It’s not the woman’s fault that most/this guy is so boring. Guys should learn to be not so boring and do more exciting things (I can think of at least 100 exciting (not all just drama/mentally or physicallyhurtful/boring) things that this guy could have done that I bet he didn’t do many of them and if he did then maybe she would have continued to be interested/turned on/emotionally and physiologically EXCITED with him and thus stayed with him). Also, there really is not much of “marriage/or even a stable very LTR” anymore, even though most guys still want (I don’t understand why) “marriage or a LTR,” so it would be wise for most guys to never get financially/mentally tied up with any women these days (I’m never going to get married so this is cool with me). This is probably a common story with many couples. Without much money, but especially with his amount of money, he could have done many more exciting things (many that involve s*xually exciting things that he probably was not interested in/did not have the desire to learn and experiment with/maybe not very talented at). In a few more years they both likely will be back in different BORING LTR’s.
“woman adjust their expectations to the age-linked decrease in their attractiveness and value to settle for a guy who is nice, financially stable but boring.”
No No No. Even if the woman does not cheat and sticks with it, everything will be bland and second-rate at best! Women do not accept the new reality and even if they turn 76, will sooner quit sex and live in their (often enriched) memories than put out for chump, whether he’s a good friend and husband or not.
That’s because a woman marries a man who needs to bring home the bacon, and such a guy is predictable and boring (i.e. sucker).
She enjoys the attention of a man who is unpredictable and exciting (i.e. fucker).
Of course, she “settles down” with the sucker after giving her looks and body to the fucker.
That’s why any man marrying a woman 30 and above, is getting a bad deal.
Because he’s effectively “paying full price” for someone who only intends to be marginally tolerable to gain access to his labour and fortune.
The woman is more educated than him but cannot get a well-paying job and is largely dependent on his money to live a nice lifestyle.
Yes, a Ph.D in the Arts is so useful in the real world. NEVER get married to a woman who can’t earn any money.
‘Cause then … you’ll be the only earner while she wails about having to give up her (non-existent) career and how she wants to be seen as an equal.
Funny that.
Whoops, forgot to mention that an employed man is easy to ruin by an angry (former) wife wanting to have the last word: she can just make a nuisance of herself at his workplace … very often you can be sure he will be fired.
Another reason why women love men who live from paycheque to paycheque.
agree 100%
the only reason to get seriously involved with a woman is to have children….
“Did I mention that the couple have no kids or plans to have them in the future.” This is the only sentence that matters in this scenario. If she’s busy with two children aged 4 and 6, it all changes.
—-
Really? Is that why so many couples with young children get divorced?
Are the kids really his? He better do a paternity test.
Loyalty has to be earned, and her kids living off his paycheque when they aren’t his … is an oft-repeated story.
Many women find stable men attractive … after their own lives turn to custard, but not a moment before.
I wonder why.
AWALT, plain and simple.
Number of crotchfruits is irrelevant. Stability is irrelevant. HIS feelings? Bwahahha!
Only thing that counts is her gina-tingles and the fact that the “ponyherd” isn´t shunning her anymore for being a barren (almost 40), childless, adulterous used up slut. Like they used to before the Illuminati induced feminism of today.
Pump&dump their washed up cunts when they eventually hit plenty-of-fish etc. (and they ALL will) and GYOW.
Sorry to say, but this basically sums up your post and I guess your current mental state when it comes to wimminz.
You REALLY should throw your Disney preconceptions of the female out of the “iWindow” and start listening to MEN who actually have a clue about it.
This blog is a good starting point, this one is even better.
“Really? Is that why so many couples with young children get divorced?”
yup, that’s about how old I was when my asshole parents got divorced….
Mommy was a 2nd wave feminist. Daddy was an H1B with a nerdy degree….
Neither of them gave a flying f8ck how it affected me. I don’t think I’ll be visiting either of them when they’re in the nursing home.
Neither of them gave a flying f8ck how it affected me.
Unless you were on welfare from the time they separated up until after high school, I’m guessing they gave a f8ck enough to feed you and clothe you.
Some people ask for an excessive amount of praise before they give anything back.
You know who else gets fed and a roof over their head? The family dog. People providing the bare minimum to their kids shouldn’t be surprised when they turn into screw ups.
Have you seen what Paris Hilton, Adriana Lima, Jessica Simpson do for their dogs?
First world problems indeed.
The majority of this game talk is pure mental masturbation. What most of these game blogs don’t understand is that people with plenty of options can afford to behave a certain way. People who behave as though they have options(game advice) don;t actually have any more options than they would otherwise. A guy who’s a typical nerd acting like hot shit is not going to get laid at all. The options drive the behavior, the behavior doesn’t drive the options. This is so simple, it’s stupid.
If you want to see how easy it is for a good looking guy to get laid in the 21st century click the following link and read it from the start. If you want to preserve your faith in game then don’t click it:
Absolutely correct.
When it comes to men, most women would rather have part of a “winner” rather than all of a “loser”.
Despite the fact that for all she says about men being winners or losers, she never manages to get that guy to stick around for long or be exclusive with her.
Which is exactly why men should feel no loyalty even for a woman they are dating or married to unless he can observe that she actively speaks well of him to others and respects him.
When a woman of this generation stops having sex with her husband/boyfriend, it is almost certain she is seeing someone else.
For women, once they lose attraction for the guy, nothing can change that. It’s either on or off for them.
That’s why men have to be absolutist too – in that, “If I can’t have her, she’s dead to me forever, never will I bother with her again.”
Otherwise all they are doing is acting like an animal that returns to someone that abuses them.
lulz
Anon is from PUAHate. AD’s blog is popular over on that forum’s Shitty Advice section (the most active area of the site). In any case I agree. Looks are everything in dating. This game crap is marginally useful (like numbers game, avoiding oneitis, etc) but otherwise just focus on your looks. Diet, gym, plastic surgery, whatever it takes, once you become good looking the only game you’ll have to run is the just show and don’t be a social retard game (which 98% of people can do).
Or go the resource restriction route.
Many of the “unwanted” guys are realising how desirable they become to women in a jam, and tell them to pay up if they want a favour.
Trust me, most dogs have been treated better than I have growing up…..
Stop acting like a tough guy to impress your manosphere broes P Ray, truth be told, you’ve probably gotten your ass kicked just as hard as I have….
But you know what they say, it’s not how hard you get your ass kicked, its how you peel yourself off the f8ckin’ floor….
Oh stoner, please don’t call your boyfriends to beat me up!
hahahaha….
nope advipoops ain’t my biotch….
but I’m sure Ryu and all the Inmalafide White Nationalists wouldn’t mind recreating the shower scene from American History X with you…..
anyways, man, I was the least popular kid in my school, my face got beat almost as much as your dick and we all know that’s allot…
Keep on with your delusions.
The next elections should be interesting for you.
P.S. Where are all the high paying jobs going to come from?
LOL
This story is very common among women today. It doesn’t mean they like drama always, but sometimes, a person just knows what they want (even if they want drama). I’ve met many men who tried the Cliff Huxtable family portrait routine and after 5-15 years of marriage, they step out. Why? Because they are either unhappy, married young to get away from their parents and/or they felt they were missing something and a void had to be filled.
While it definitely says more about him than it does her for a multitude of reasons, I wouldn’t fault him for having her stay with him until she got on her feet. Most of today’s 20-30 somethings have what’s called “living arrangements” (roommates) and live like MTV’s “The Real World” – either because no one is interested in the wife-and-kids routine anymore, or because the economy is so shitty (this prevents people from desiring moving out to the lily-white suburbs also). I’ve heard of many people going from being couples to being roommates.
What this also proves is that not only is “game” mental masturbation, but so is an obsession with group economics among a certain group of people (“on-point simps” aka established idiots) who feel that building communities will somehow make women loyal to them and get with their program. Morons.
It takes a little bit of thinking, but most men need to send this message out early:
“When you’re older, you’re going to want a nice guy.
There’s just one problem:
This nice guy doesn’t want an older woman who made all her mistakes with other people.”
Remember, the threat of abandonment, loss of financial support and loveless relationships are very powerful tools.
Giving people predictions of a forlorn future is not a threat.
Women shouldn’t get away with using others, and having zero consequences.