Why Escorts are Always a Better Deal than Relationships or Marriage: 6
In the previous post of this series, I put forth the idea that many behavioral oddities of women in dying ‘west’ make sense once you accept the hypothesis that they have internalized the capitalist belief system. The logical conclusion of that assumption is that treating them better than they are treating you will always be a losing proposition. In any case, pretty much all everything they are supposedly offering (other than sex) is an insipid simulacra of the original. To make a long story short, a relationshit is now a significantly and visibly inferior product than using escorts. I went on to write that there were other experiences, and cumulative changes in my worldview, during the 2005-2009 timespan which finally resulted in my choosing the escort-only path.
As some of you will notice, what I am about to write next has an interesting connection with the topic of another previous post. So.. what changed between 2005 and 2009? Let me explain that by describing an incident which illustrates both the process and direction of change. In mid-2006, I got to know a woman who was from a country bordering the Adriatic arm of Mediterranean Sea. She worked at some place which I frequented at that time and we got talking about a variety of things. Anyway.. she was married, but was vocal about the lack of future in that relationship. Tt helped that she was fairly young and attractive. Eventually, we went out a couple of times.
So far.. this story this sounds very boring and conventional- and it would have remained so if my worldview and attitudes had not changed over all those preceding years. To make a long story short (again), I quickly realized that she had a very specific man in her mind for cheating on her husband. She wanted a guy with a fairly specific look, height, accent, ancestry etc. Let me put it this way.. she wanted what some in “manosphere” would describe as a rich alpha- don’t they all. And then I decided to do something which I had not done on that scale and for that purpose. I slowly and methodically destroyed her mental justifications for imagining that she had a chance with such a guy. But here is the real kicker, I did it for my entertainment.
Upon realizing, quite early on, that she wanted to friendzone me- I decided to convert that ‘lost opportunity’ into some diabolical entertainment. That required me to first sit through all of her stupid chatter about what she wanted in her ‘deserved upgrade’. After making a few mental notes while smiling, I politely concluded the first meeting. A week or so later, she expressed a desire to meet again and I was happy to oblige. The second meeting went.. a bit differently. It started, as usual by me being polite and non-specific, till she brought up that issue again. I then started by playfully posing a simple and apparently question- why should the man of her dreams (for the purposes of cheating) choose her over chicks for having sex? And she took the bait..
She started by listing her non-physical attributes such as education, culture, intelligence etc. I asked her as to why she believed that those attributes carried weight in a relationship which was almost totally physical. She then tried to claim that her physical attributes were also pretty good. I pointed out that any guy with the specifications she required could easily get a more attractive woman 5-7 years younger than her to have sex with him. You see where this going.. She then claimed that she was willing to settle down with such a guy (offer of commitment) I countered by pointing out that any guy who could easily get an attractive woman 5-10 years younger than him was certainly not looking to settle down- especially with an inferior product.
And it gets better.. She then claimed that I was saying all those things because I “could not have her”. I asked her to explain whether she meant that “I wanted her” or “I wanted a woman, any woman”. She said she thought it was both. I acted surprised and told her that it was far easier for me to pay very attractive and capable escorts by the hour- and proceed to show her a few photos of them on my iPAQ handheld (remember this is 2006). She then tried to say that using escorts was immature and they did not love their customers etc. I then pointed out that we had spent a lot of time talking about her desire to cheat on her husband with a hunk, and that invalidated her talk about relationshits being real or worthwhile. All in a calm manner and with a straight face.
After a long awkward silence a bit of small talk, we parted ways and I never talked to her again. The coffee cost about four bucks, but the entertainment value was much.. much more. So.. why did I remember and mention this meeting? After all, this was hardly the first time I utilized the inconsistencies of women’s behavior to poke fun at them. In fact, I had been pointing out such issues for many years prior to this incident. For example- as early as 1999, I would make short and quick comments which ridiculed the preference of asian chicks for pathetic white guys to the face of the former. I had also previously done significantly milder versions of what is described in this post. But there was a difference, you see.. I was just doing it to rib them a bit, nothing more.
The incident described in this post was the first time that I went into a meeting like that with the sole intention of systematically mocking and insulting a person to the point that it would burn all bridges. I was not doing it to “neg” her or anything along those lines and I would have rejected sex even if she had proposed it. My mood at that time can be best described by a line from a 2008 movie.. “some men just want to watch the world burn”- and it felt awesome. In the next part of this series, I will go into other similar interactions during that timespan. Hopefully, we will also talk about why going scorched earth on some people is totally worth it and carries no real risk- the key word being some. And yes.. there are criteria to put people into that category.
What do you think? Comments?
Leave a Reply
Advocatus Diaboli
Recent Comments
![](data:image/svg+xml,<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="48" height="48"><rect fill-opacity="0"/></svg>){kind=avatar} | P Ray on Why Escorts are Always a Bette… |
 | MikeCA on Impeaching Trump, for the Seco… |
 | Impeaching Trump, fo… on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| Jack Donovan on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| AD is a megacuck, ok… on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| P Ray on Understanding the Real History… |
| Jack Donovan on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| P Ray on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| Jack Donovan on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
 | bonzo on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| P Ray on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| tenderloin spence on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| P Ray on Some Thoughts on Jeffrey Epste… |
| P Ray on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
| tenderloin spence on Banning Trump from Twitter is… |
That’s a truly amazing experience, very eye-opening and some would definitely say [LIFEFUEL]. She wanted you to be “jealous” about “maybe” having her for free … when you can pay and DEFINITELY get someone hotter.
Too many women think “A man is valued for this, so a woman should be valued for it as well. – e.g. education.” Problem is you can’t fuck her degree.
The problem is, of course … women want to cheat on the guy they’re with (who is supposedly also their best friend) … with someone who is attractive but doesn’t have many of the attributes of her boyfriend/husband.
And of course, as you’ve observed, they (wilfully) confuse sex in an alley with commitment.
Truly amazing, and the rise of feminism along with male persecution, is proving the reality that women want men to THINK they value character, when they ACT on men with the correct countenance, cock, and cash.
“…women want men to THINK they value character, when they ACT on men with the correct countenance, cock, and cash.”
Yep.
But, while much of women’s loud insistence otherwise may be outright lies designed to smokescreen their knowing, willful, deliberate actions, I concluded decades ago (I’m the 63-year-old, remember, lol) that it’s also designed to try to convince themselves that they really do value character rather than a man’s looks, cash, and package.
For them to have to admit the truth to themselves is to have to acknowledge that they are just as shallow or even more shallow than the men they disparage for being “shallow”. And, unlike men, who are able to accept the truth about ourselves and what motivates us, women are too bio-wired for snowflakery to be able to bear that truth about themselves without wholesale meltdown.
women are too bio-wired for snowflakery to be able to bear that truth about themselves without wholesale meltdown.
I personally think they’ve made their own insecurities about “wanting to fit in with other women” (the guys are all horndogs) and “I have to think about my future”(so I don’t feel guilty about lying to guys) as a justification about why they deserve complete license to be irresponsible.
In short, just excuses to behave badly BUT men and society have a duty to compensate them because they’re women.
But men demanding loyal virgin women are called “incels”.
Spot the hypocrisy, and that’s why more men are just nope-ing out of the con-game of “traditional*” marriage and society.
*”traditional” i.e. men are the bigger earners but the infidelity of women is excused “because we’re a modern society”.
“I personally think they’ve made their own insecurities …”
I do think it’s bio-wired into them and that any social conditioning is a consequent outworking of that bio-wiring which (in the case of their insecurities) further amplifies and exacerbates the instinctive behavior.
However, I also hold to what I’ve coined “The Rabid Dog Syndrome”: the dog may not have contracted rabies by choice, so it’s a victim of the rabies — but , nevertheless, the rabies makes it dangerous and if the dog steps onto my property, I’ll shoot it.
Meaning that, to me, women’s behavior is caused by their biology therefore ultimately beyond their choice, but that I don’t have to accept it, tolerate it, excuse it, nor condone it any more than I do the dangers posed by a mad rabid dog.
sorta like when we take a bunch nazi youths across state lines where “indoctrination” doesn’t cross those pesky consent laws. We tell ’em Santa Claws and the Easter Bunny ain’t real. Then we liquor ’em up and give ’em “prostate exams.” The beta ones wanna cuddle afterwords, the “alpha” stormtrooper types roll up in a ball and cry like babies…
BTW, which one of you Hindu Nuffins put this up???
It’s hurting our recruitment, please take it down…
Related, the words of wisdom from Jerry Springer:
You know, it may be easier than we think, I mean, it’s really not that hard to make a relationship work – if both parties want it to.
I mean, think about it, if there’s something we really want, most of us know how to turn on the charm to improve our chances of getting it – when you first start dating someone you pour it on, don’t you? The flowers, the notes, the calls – in other words, we all have little difficulty figuring out how to make the person we want to be happy, happy.
So, maybe there’s nothing here you really have to look up in the library or Google or read about in the waiting room of your doctor’s office.
Maybe all that’s required is being honest with yourself – do I really want to be in this relationship? – because if you do then make him or her happy and don’t pretend you don’t know how to do it.
Till next time, take care of yourself and each other.
Of course, a guy with a girl who thinks “I am settling for him”, the girl will be very hard to make happy, because she knows not being happy with him gets her the cash and prizes, which is why if you have to struggle to keep the relationship alive … SHE DOESN’T WANT YOU. And she is of course, very likely to give you an STD, drain your wallet, or make you the father of her bastard.
Well played! I can think of the few times I had the opportunity to do as you did, only I didn’t. Too soon old, too late smart! Paid dearly for those rides, I did!
One thing I wish I knew when I was young was the insight you had about that woman’s motives. Knowing that, it would be easy to discern that men are but a tool for her benefit, to use and discard once she’s gotten what she wants. That bullshit about how escorts don’t love their customers doesn’t mean that a woman you have a relationshit with does. Love, as Tina Turner once sang, has nothing to do with it.
A woman seeks financial security whether or not she desires to be a mother. She just doesn’t want to have to work for it. If she can get it by spreading her legs or opening her mouth and swallowing, that is all the work she will be willing to do – at least as long as she hasn’t gotten bored with you.
I’ve been reading lately about women who lose their desire for sex at about the one year point in any relationshit, marital or not. It seems that riding the cock carousel is what women expect to have happen. They have to have variety, or sex gets boring. I’d love to hear a woman explain how love factors into THAT arrangement!
You can read about this “research” here if you choose:
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2018/oct/13/a-strong-libido-and-bored-by-monogamy-the-truth-about-women-and-sex
I made the mistake of marrying, and my sex life almost literally ended the moment I said “I do”, for I rarely did again. So I say to you younger men, stay single. Never let a woman move in with you, and only hire pros for sex. You will have a much better experience, You can decide which woman you want each time, and you won’t have to put up with her 24/7. And you will keep control of your life.
Amusingly to me, Wednesday Martin’s pop-marketed admission had all been told fourteen years ago by Michelle Langley’s 2005 “Women’s Infidelity”.
Langley was “merely” a layperson, not a Ph”D as Martin is, so of course she’s lbeen largely ignored and unknown, but she didn’t need societally-sanctioned “credentials” to conclude and explicitly admit the very same facts which Martin will probably earn significant profit saying.
Based on her own experience and the similar experiences informally related to her by her upper-middle-class female peers, Langley stated this about women’s sexuality: by no later than the fourth year of any committed relationship, including what would socially be labeled as enviable relationships, almost all women lose sexual desire for even a guy for whom they initially, spontaneously felt (sometimes intense or even uncontrolled) sexual passion.
Langley acknowledged that, when their loss of interest occurs, while women typically blame the guy for her becoming unhappy and feeling something is missing, the guy usually hasn’t changed — he’s still the same guy with the same traits for whom, at the beginning of the relationship, the woman felt intense sexual passion and insisted was her lifelong soul-mate.
Since, historically, woman have continually tried to convince even themselves that they are monogamous, the woman can’t accept that she’s the one whose sexual feelings have changed, and so she insists it’s all the guy’s fault that she’s unhappy, lacking passion, feeling unfulfilled, no longer feeling “in love” with him.
Martin’s Ph’D will probably garner her attention, therefore the profits she’s hoping for by selling books and speaking engagements. But, it’s already all been said by a woman author over a decade ago.
And, of course, some of us men have been saying it about women all along. But, heck — we’re men, so why should anyone have believed any book we wrote? But, hopefully, women and society hearing it from a “credentialed” woman may help open a few more minds to reality.
Yup, have read that book as well (and Devlin too, much much earlier). Within the first few pages had concluded that … if the women were attracted to their husbands, they “wouldn’t have found it difficult to make the effort”. The blackpill is real and amazing, but for a quicker read, visit https://old.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/
As a post script…While I agree with most of Devlin’s review of “Women’s Infidelity” as well as with most of his views on the nature of women (about twenty years ago, before I ever heard of Devlin, Tomassi, etcetera, I coined the phrase “Dual Bio-Wiring” to explain women’s complex “marry the ugly wallet/fuck the impoverished poolboy” self-contradictory behaviors)… I disagree with and am not supportive of white nationalism.
For those with enough time and inclination to read it, here’s what, in my opinion, is a point-on-accurate critical analysis and summation of Michelle Langely’s 2005 book, “Women’s Infidelity”:
It also includes a review of and excellent commentary on Stephen Baskerville’s 2007, “Taken into Custody: The War against Fatherhood, Marriage, and the Family”.
Thank you Joe. I took the time to read your linked document. I can’t tell you specifically how many family mysteries that document solved. But I can tell you that I now understand better at least three generations of my own extended family females.
The second part explains my FIL and the horrors he went through. It is almost his history, not that he would have admitted it. He also made all of the mistakes a man makes by not learning from his experiences, included his third wife who cheated on him constantly. I inadvertently broke up one of her affairs just by helping her move once.
I would propose to have the link to this paper posted permanently on the front page of this site, and to have it referred to often. This was the information I needed to know at the time I got caught in this trap.
I’m about the same age as you, Joe. I believe that we elder men have a duty to ensure that the young men who follow us are as informed of the dangers facing them as possible. It is the only way we are going to ever fix this abuse.
Thanks again!
This may not be relevant for this post but it is an important point nevertheless. You mention a lot about modern slavery based work. Yet, you seems to provide far fewer examples of ways out of the plantation so to speak. Why?
—
Be more specific. Are you talking about advice for career etc or advice for relationshits?
Career.
i.e. You talk about how bad being a wage slave is yet don’t talk about a solution.
She didn’t want you because you’re a short, Curry smelling, Beta schlub.
—
You do realize that constantly changing your handle does not fool anybody.. right?
The funny thing about women going only after Chad Thundercock …
is that many of them can’t stop complaining when he moves on after getting a better offer.
So women, “want a man better than them, to be loyal to them alone”. But when they complain, nobody in the mainstream media tells them to stop complaining.
And then these women, want the mass of men to support them and their bastard children via tax. And of course, complain when other singlemom spawn commit crime against them (since they weren’t raised properly or got the idea from singlemom that “Gimme Gimme Gimme” was a viable economic strategy for life)
Maybe if she had learnt early that being loyal to one guy who had few options, would have given her a better life,
but on the flip side, if a man is marrying a woman his age, that’s a mistake. Usual rule applies – man 30+, woman 15+. No hymen, no diamond, as the saying goes.
Want to know why men have such a tough time in life? Having to include morons like Rajput-head-up-ass as a member.
The thought literally just occurred to me that having a woman in your life is like being a US Government employee right now (Trump hasn’t spoken yet, just for the record). You have to work for free. You can’t call in sick, there are no breaks, no days off, and no vacations. You can never do things right, yet you aren’t allowed to stop. And just one infraction can cause you to get “separated” with prejudice costing you everything you worked for.
The thought literally just occurred to me that having a woman in your life is like being a US Government employee right now (Trump hasn’t spoken yet, just for the record).
Great clip to go with what you said:
https://tinyurl.com/nx8e3aq
Cosmo Kramer: Marriage? Family? They’re prisons! Man made prisons. You’re doing time. You get up in the morning. She’s there. You go to sleep at night. She’s there. It’s like you gotta ask permission to use the bathroom. Is it all right if I use the bathroom now?!
I feel like I am not sex guy. Nor am I a peoples’ person. At least, I believe that I am. Therefore, I believe fucking escorts are like hiring Ubers. Not very sexy to think about it. Ultimately, what I want is a classy hot girl. Escorts maybe hot but definitely not classy. But I want to know what guys think is wrong with my logic above?
how do you cope with a condom? it feels like masturbating while your dick is covered in a sandwich bag. sex dolls are a better investment.
—
Get a non-latex condom?
“… many of them can’t stop complaining when he moves on after getting a better offer.
“So women, ‘want a man better than them, to be loyal to them alone”’ But when they complain, nobody in the mainstream media tells them to stop complaining.
“And then these women, want the mass of men to support them and their bastard children via tax. And of course, complain when other singlemom spawn commit crime against them (since they weren’t raised properly or got the idea from singlemom that ‘Gimme Gimme Gimme”’was a viable economic strategy for life)….”
In other words, “Toxic Femininity”.
What is your idea of traveling to have sex? Do you have any experience and any tips are highly appreciated.
Why do you fuck ugly poor girls (semi-pros)? Are they that hot?
AD, You’ve got one more follower!
41-year old divorced Indian here, and I am so glad to have found your blog (probably through Rational Male, I think). Well, you have convinced me to hire an escort, which I did over the last weekend. Best decision made and great GFE ever. Thanks!
—
Glad to hear that my advice helped. Hope your ex-wife did not get any significant amount of alimony, child support etc.
Your observation Asian women-white men dynamic is spot on. I can attest that and here’s my experience. Re-entering the dating market, I have recently been in SE Asia for work, and find Asian females here to be the most racist of all.
That high school drop-out barista I chatted with and showed some kind of interest on me and exchanged numbers. as soon as I mention, I’m Indian, she went radio silent. That low-wage secretary asking where I am from and once I mention my race, she’s a goner. Here’s the kicker. I’ll tell my race and don’t tell what passport I hold (it is usually the country they all lust to go to).
Heck, they all want white men – view them as mobile ATMs or vehicles aka beta bucks – to get them out of their miserable life or country. Worse, they all believe they deserve white guys just because they are Asian female. It’s hilarious, especially on the dating sites, where high school girls, women in mediocre careers, and single moms all want Caucasian men only from the Yoonited Staytes, Well maybe from other “rich” places too but the first choice is US.
Luckily, after reading your series of posts on why escorts are better than relationships, I decided to get one. It took me some time to get past the mental barrier. But the price is worth for the service I got. It has actually removed the sexual frustration I’d built up due to getting rejected by “quality” women post-divorce.
Yup. Asian women like to talk about how they “value” education, but while young and attractive are almost always on the arms of men with an education only in violence.
Then they say they are “mature” later so want to be with men that have money and status.
But apparently also are “chaste” and “coy” so will not be “mature” enough to tell you when they started having sex, how many boyfriends they had, or what sexual acts they did on those guys … that they won’t do to you on account of “we are a respectable couple, I am a respectable girl, I don’t do those sorts of things”.
Women hate porn, not really because of moral reasons.
It’s because, it gives ideas to the men she’s NOT attracted to, but has to be with … about what kinky things she did to the men she IS attracted to. She doesn’t want the NOT attractive men to get the animal sex. So she will say things like “porn is degrading to women, I’ve never done those things, any man who likes those things is a guy I hate”. Lel at all the lying.
These Asian women are also quite moronic, in that they don’t understand that the UK and US have minimum income laws and the reality that if your spouse doesn’t make enough money (at least until she becomes eligible to work – and remember, the citizenship is not always automatic) … she won’t be allowed to stay on.
Of course, these women “barred from immigration” then try to prey on local Asian men by saying “how I was done wrong by white guys” … ignoring their own CONSENT to be in that situation for a long period of time.
P Ray said quote “Women hate porn, not really because of moral reasons.
It’s because, it gives ideas to the men she’s NOT attracted to, but has to be with … about what kinky things she did to the men she IS attracted to.” Un Quote.
We all should understand this. We all should give some gold to P Ray for putting it into words.
As for Asian girls, I always had no real yellow fever. Unbeknownst to me I know I was being smart.
“Women hate porn, not really because of moral reasons. It’s because, it gives ideas to the men she’s NOT attracted to, but has to be with … about what kinky things she did to the men she IS attracted to.”
@Don. Absolutely. This should be drilled into our memory.
What is so annoying about Asian females is that they degrade and look down their own men – the locals. AM are not her first choice. They say things like, “Asian guys are controlling.” (Translation: They don’t put up with your BS) and foreign men (i.e. white) are so polite, kind, gallant and friendly (Yeah, to get under your panties).
You see what type of WM they hang out with here, English teachers, backpackers, “businessmen”, men past prime (in 60s or later) that had 3 children from two different women, bartenders/chefs or some low-level manager for a company that needs English speakers to work with their clients overseas. I am yet to see white men in top management (VP, Director, CEO-types) with Asian women here. At least in my corporate setting, I see these men have been married to women of their own race or nationality. But I could be wrong here because of my low sample size.
In 4 lines about what’s wrong:
1.Nice guys want sex.
2.Assholes want sex.
3.All men want sex.
4.Why is it only a problem when the nice guys want it? Shaming nice guys … is simply giving license to, and excusing women’s bad choices for relationships.
Because you’re not in a relationship … until you’re having sex with the other person.
It’s another example of “what women say, goes!” At least consequences and gravity don’t bow to their wishes.
Here’s a sample profile I pulled out today – this is what I normally see on the dating sites in East/SE-Asia and what AD has been talking about.
A somewhat better-looking (HB 6/7) or younger (<30 years) means even more specific demands such as explicitly stating: no other races or nationalities except White or West, degrees (such as PhD), income ($100K) and asset requirements (house/car). Gotta love these solipsistic profiles! :p :p
The best part about the obvious reactions to her mercenary demands, is manifold:
1. Marriage to an Australian does not guarantee automatic citizenship any more https://transferwise.com/gb/blog/how-to-get-citizenship-in-australia
Can I obtain citizenship through marriage?
There’s no special route to become an Australian citizen by marriage. Even if your partner is Australian, you’ll have to fulfil all the regular requirements to be eligible to apply, including the residence and good character rules. Having an Australian spouse or partner, however, should weigh in your favour when you need to show you have ongoing ties to the country, as part of your application pack.
2. Any Australian is going to want to “try before buying” (remember, “romance” actually means “acceptable courtship rituals before fucking outside of marriage”)
3. She never mentions her age, so is probably “out of the desirable range” (which is 20 to 15)
4. Doesn’t mention any achievements, so with the atrocious English got passed with a lowly/easy qualification like “early childhood education” (how many women are actually interested in deep subjects except to get close to Chad)
5. Is almost certain to be of those Asian semi-dopey feminists that doesn’t realise mother’s height influences son’s height so will create a manlet and tell him lies (because she had an easy time finding men, surely the son’s challenges to meet women is because of his personality, not the mother’s height that gave him poor height)
Asian women looking for a “white” knight just reminds me of “be grateful she showed her real self before you got into a relationship with her and the famous acronym LBFMPBR “Little Brown Fucking Machine – Powered By Rice”.
I think she is about hit the Wall (30). It wasn’t my intention to post this bitch’s profile. The dating site does allow to a preference for ethnicities where one could choose the race inside their profile. She did that (“Caucasian”) and then went on to highlight her repugnant in-your-face racism (“No Black or Dark Man” in all caps) on top of her profile. That really pissed me off. However, this is normal among the AF here, and, as I mentioned, a little better-looking chick means even more entitlement and higher demands. As you’d pointed out they literally have no idea about the laws or that a White guy is not going to bring them back to West to get married unless he’s a clueless beta!
“be grateful she showed her real self before you got into a relationship with her” —–> This! The biggest advantage of being a non-white is that it acts as a great filter to vet all mediocre women in the dating market.
Related, from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5555959/Why-raising-sons-question-female-empowerment-doing-boys.html
The young man who says women his age treat him like the enemy
Ravi Kumar, 30, is an office administrator from Milton Keynes.
There are times when I feel like I’m on the enemy side in a war between the sexes that, as a man, I didn’t sign up for.
The women I ask out blatantly try to establish that I’m at least as successful as they are before they’ll consider a date. I’m judged by my earning potential long before my personality becomes a consideration. I have a mother, grandmothers, a sister and a niece: I loathe the idea of any one of them being disadvantaged because of her sex. And yet, my generation seems to be expected to take male inequality on the chin, as though we deserve to be punished for sins committed against women in the past.
It’s well documented that boys are trailing behind girls at school and university. But in my experience, the problem is following us out of the classroom and into the adult world, too.
Men and women don’t seem to know how to talk to each other any more. I’m terrified of inadvertently coming across as sexist by saying the wrong thing.
If I complain, I’m told to suck it up and ‘be a man’. But the fact is, being a man seems to be what’s going against me in the first place. When I do go on dates, women seem more interested in impressing me with their latest promotion than exploring what we have in common.
Recently I went to a speed-dating event and told a girl my ambition was to become an accountant. She said she wouldn’t date an accountant; she was at the stage in her career where she would want someone who ran their own accountancy firm. I felt snubbed. I would happily date a woman less qualified than me, but women seem to want a man to provide for them financially as well as having equal rights.
I feel like I’m not just on the enemy side, but on the losing one, too. After all, successful women simply aren’t interested in a bloke like me these days.
I personally would say, the real reasons women have so many obstacles to lay before him is … 1)they’re not attracted to him by virtue of race 2)they think they will always be pretty and attractive 3)got pumped and dumped by an alpha so are looking for the next one 4)feminism taught them to never settle 5)government is now their husband – endless welfare in UK, Australia, NZ 6)nobody can tell them off because “women are always right” 7)as an Asian man you can’t complain because you “belong to a misogynist culture” 8)you must be their slave while they go on the hunt for Chad Thundercock and 9)if anything bad happens to them as a result of their choices, you are one of the people to blame, along with the other regular/ugly guys, Chad is exempt …
those blackpills need further spreading, as the years roll on more men will awaken to the absolute horrorshow of their lives.
Going to happen in Australia, already something similar has happened in NZ:
Migrants to Australia, have to stay where they are placed, require permission to move, if they move without permission cannot gain permanent residency.
Sounds a lot like the Chinese hukou model. Looks like the West is copying Asia, lol
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/migrants-face-deportation-if-they-move-under-population-control-visas-20190208-p50wkz.html
POLITICSFEDERALPOPULATION
Migrants face deportation if they move, under population control visas
By David Crowe and Eryk Bagshaw
February 8, 2019 — 7.50pm
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Send via Email
Normal text sizeLarger text sizeVery large text size
169
View all comments
Migrants will have their visas cancelled if they leave designated areas under one of the first stages of the government’s $19 million population package.
The policy, first flagged by The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age in August, will see regional councils empowered to sponsor workers.
Immigration Minister David Coleman has directed the department to send out officers to negotiate agreements with specific areas including Cairns in Queensland and Arana in western NSW.
“The visa will require people to work in that area,” he said. “You can’t just go and work somewhere else.”
He said if workers sought to move they would have to seek another visa.
Advertisement
“To be frank it would be unlikely they would obtain it and they would not be able to obtain permanent residency.
“It is about encouraging people to areas that have persistent problems in attracting people,” he said.
They already did this much earlier and more deceptively, when skilled – MALE – Asian workers came over … I recall hearing of doctors being sent down woop woop way. Because they can’t have those strange people from other cultures mixing with the educated citizens, rednecks are OK though.
What do you think is a cure for the allure of being a chad yourself?
Is there a way to pump and dump women without being a chad just like some PUAs suggest?
What do you think is a cure for the allure of being a chad yourself?
Is there a way to pump and dump women without being a chad just like some PUAs suggest?
The important thing to remember is if the price to “win” the woman is “to be a Chad” … you’re not dealing with someone who wants you as a human being, you are dealing with a person who has a “redemption cost”.
I suppose one thing a lot of women do is create psychopaths, either by:
1. breeding with men who have mental issues, since those guys are “exciting and dangerous” – observe the “great personality” of Ted Bundy in action in the latest Netflix documentary
2. messing with regular/ugly men’s heads by going hot and cold about the relationship and generally finding ways not to reciprocate OR blame him for every relationship trouble.
This is a good page to gird yourself to understand the saying: All is fair in love and war:
https://dalrock.wordpress.com/2010/10/12/is-marcos-evil-for-conning-women-looking-to-trade-sex-for-financial-security/
Technically, you are not being a pick up artist … because the women looking for a “stable guy” are usually the ones that chose to get picked up and dumped a long time ago – when they were attractive. They’re over 30, and “suddenly” interested in nice men, of course with ulterior motives and will be very eager to tell you “I’m not that type of girl (unless you’re the guy she’s really interested in)”.
Remember that she considers you adequate. She needs you to finance her lifestyle and (respectfully) show you off to her friends (you won’t be allowed to pinch her butt in public or grope her … but Chad was allowed to do that), but she doesn’t want you.
Okay, I get it. Especially after reading this. https://dissention.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/escorts-are-a-better-deal-than-real-women-03/ Thanks P Ray.
That leaves me wondering though, who gets all the instagram sluts?
Or is it not that simple?
That leaves me wondering though, who gets all the instagram sluts?
If you’re willing to pay for them you can “get” them, though whether they are “gotten” depends on whether they want to or not.
Instagram sluts can also take your money and not “deliver”, saying the money is “payment for my great companionship”.
It’s “compensated dating” without the sex that people who are dating, get. In that way the Japanese model is quite good.
One of the realisations I had after my good first GFE with escorts is that pussy is a commodity and by extension, I don’t have to put it on pedestal any more as men have to do in dating or even, dare I say, PUA. As AD mentioned elsewhere in his blog, the price is not that expensive if you are decent earner – which i think most average guys are. And the certainty that comes with hiring the escort: you’re guaranteed to get laid, unlike playing cat and mouse games with the woman you are interested in for STR, LTR or pick-up!
“Glad to hear that my advice helped. Hope your ex-wife did not get any significant amount of alimony, child support etc.”
Luckily things escalated before we had kids and I escaped the child support ransom and without debts. (The Gods took pity on me and decided to show some mercy). Still, the whole experience and process was a nightmare that had left me devastated emotionally, professionally and financially. At 41, I had to rebuild my life starting with a few hundred dollars (literally!).
Have to add this here:
Remember, misogyny is just thinking differently from a woman. That’s not allowed in this modern age of freedom of speech.
Women can do no wrong by virtue of their gender, and men’s objective criticism of women’s behaviour is misogyny.
What do you guys think of the pickup artist Ross Jeffries and NLP (Neuro-linguistic Programming)?
Pickup artistry is a sham:
The men who need it, in the age of connectivity, women will quickly go wise to it …
but the men who don’t need it, it the techniques always work on women.
What does that tell you?
If you want to get a woman’s attentions for cheap, better be attractive to other women.
Otherwise, hold an “experiences” advantage over her, e.g. “You can only get into this club with me”, “If you want that holiday it’s only with me” …
The only way most women treat regular/ugly men seeking romance is with disdain, unless they have a need for them.
So if she wants to put her hand in your money wallet, put your (Anthony) weiner in her sausage wallet. No honey, no money.
Why does most people say I’ll be lonely if I don’t marry and what is a good counter point to that stupid argument?
It is stupid because most unmarried older people I know are definitely not lonely.
The unmarried older people you know are probably not lonely because they saved all that money. Girlfriends and wives are expensive.
But those unmarried older people are also alone, and make very good pickings for the fucktrophies of singlemoms and other liberally depraved folk. Also, few people will care when they’re violently killed – the police really only work when there is pressure on them, and an old person with no living relatives can simply be forgotten.
There’s no escape, whether from the evils of women or the world, as Hesiod has said.
What would be a practical solution for old age loneliness and for not being victimized at old age?
What is the solution for it all?
This is the nearest “deadman’s switch” I can think of:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5851103/Ukrainian-mother-boy-beaten-death-faces-deported-no-longer-UK-dependent.html
Heartbroken Ukrainian mother of five-year-old boy who was brutally beaten to death by her boyfriend after losing a shoe faces being deported because she no longer has UK dependent
Ukrainian mother Liliya Breha faces being kicked out of Britain after 12 years
Permission to remain in the UK ended with the death of her British-born son Alex
Marvyn Iheanacho, 39, was jailed for life for battering girlfriend’s son to death
Despite his criminal record, he was allowed to look after Alex Malcolm, five
She didn’t take care of her kid, was a foreign partner and the kid was mashed.
In the same way certain countries have the law that until citizenship is granted, the foreign woman can only stay while the relationship with the local man continues to exist.
Those are the countries that you need to become a citizen of.
Be a citizen of a developed country. Bring in a foreign girlfriend. Make sure she doesn’t get citizenship. Seems like a good strategy. Especially in old age. Seems like a nice strategy. Thanks. I’ll look into it.
Be a citizen of a developed country.
You mean the ones talking about equality for women, that ends up being superiority of women? I would say, look for a non-white or non-English speaking country. Not necessarily both are needed. For non-white, could be Dominican Republic, Thailand (yes, foreigners CAN own property there), Brazil … For non-English try Poland, Greece or Chile
Make sure she doesn’t get citizenship.
That part’s not up to you, so read up about how residency is applied – ESPECIALLY watch out for the “he was abusive to me, so I am automatically granted a protection order and can stay on despite 1.no evidence of the abuse and 2.have not attained citizenship yet”.
The fun part is, the developed country may be wise to “our local women are crap so we will stop foreign women from getting here so that muh white supremacy (supremacy of the most racist or delusional)” can continue.
Reference: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12204793 – NEW ZEALAND
Kiwi host Michael Vickers, 52, demands apology from Immigration NZ for denying entry to 23 year old Brazilian girlfriend Polyanna Mendonca
No, his age isn’t mentioned in that article, I just checked around on Google and helpfully inserted that in. Just for context.
This is a question I am asking as an older male virgin reading the above comments. How can I get a foreign girlfriend to come live with me in my developed country in the first place?
Please answer what could be the dumbest question ever on this site. Thanks.
—
Escorts are superior to GFs, because interactions with the former are an honest transaction unlike the later.
If you just want loyal company, get a dog- not a GF or wife.
How can I get a foreign girlfriend to come live with me in my developed country in the first place?
The people after that arrangement are gold-diggers. If you are in a country that readily grants citizenship to women based on false accusations, has a large base of sour-faced feminists, ideas about relationships only being OK if the woman is older or the same age as the man, obvious double-standards in how men get treated based on looks – that cannot be complained about lest you get seen as weak and whiny, guaranteed jobs for women, lower entry requirements for women and reduced prison sentences or men are always to blame … you are already in a feminist shithole, and there is nothing to be gained from getting a foreign girlfriend to live with you, unless you are after:
1.a lighter wallet
2.custodial sentence due to coercive behaviour
3.relationship rape accusations
4.STDs
5.beatdowns by white knights (feminised societies produce men willing to jump on a woman’s command)
What about keeping company with a woman? Isn’t it great to have a woman to come home to? Let alone having someone to talk to?
—
How many long-term married guys like spending time with their wives?
I don’t understand your point. Please elaborate.
How do you deal with loneliness anyway?
“How do you deal with loneliness anyway?”
Ultimately and absolutely, there is no “forever-and-gone, now-I’m-happily-ever-after” way to solve loneliness — at any one time, there are probably more people who feel lonely (at least at times) WITHIN a long-term relationship then don’t.
At best, relationships, including long-term marriage, can alleviate loneliness only temporarily, for varying lengths of time.
Loneliness seems to be instinctive — it motivates us humans to seek sexual partners (therefore helping to ensure the species reproduces) and social partners (therefore helping to ensure we function collectively, which seems overall to create a more secure, nurturing environment for our children, which also helps ensure species survival).
Therefore, it’s probably a benefit toward species survival that humans never permanently avoid loneliness. Likely, we’re wired for “never-quite-getting-the-itch-scratched”, meaning, even after initiating sexual and social commitments, we’ll experience loneliness again in the long term. Biology isn’t concerned with our feelings per se — it uses pain to keep us seeking what will ensure species survival.
All meaning — don’t ever expect any relationship to permanently eliminate loneliness…and accept that loneliness, same as hunger and thirst, is simply part of your biological package.
I don’t understand your point. Please elaborate.
Most men are married to women that only want to be married to a man that doesn’t require care and love from them when he suffers setbacks, but demands that men be open to them, yet make fun of men who share their problems.
Do you get that? Women want to marry men … who they will never be asked to help if he has problems.
Also, a lot of “loneliness” is manufactured, because people like to present their life with their partner as having 0 problems.
Which is also why, for example, domestic violence against women will never be solved. Too many women are too stupid to understand that being a partner to a man that is bigger than you and stronger than you that they like to show “displays of dominance” … will result in violence against her. That’s why it’s hard for me to sympathise with “domestic violence survivors”, just like it’s hard for me to sympathise with “ponzi scheme survivors”.
I’m age 63, and I’ve been married to the same woman for 39 years; it’s our one-and-only marriage for each of us, and we have six kids, ages 21 to 34. We’re both atheists (meaning, we don’t remain married for any religious reason), and, I’ve never been financially successful (meaning she doesn’t stay with me for my money nor resources).
She is Asperger, which reduces her emotional reactivity, which in practical outworking means she ends up thinking and behaving a lot more logically and rationally than the majority of women — which is likely why we’re still together For an illustrative example; she has told other women for over thirty years, “If a wife can’t or won’t fulfill her husband’s sexual needs, but refuses to at least accept him getting his sexual needs met outside the marriage, then that wife is a selfish, cruel bitch who should stop claiming she loves him.” We’ve had a mutually consensual open marriage for decades.
Consequently, I have what I’d consider a rare “content marriage” — we experience ongoing problems and issues, but we partner well enough that the benefits outweigh the detriments to the point each of us concludes remaining together is the most logical choice.
So, from that point of reference, I offer these to your questions:
1) “Isn’t it great to have a woman to come home to?”
In the long term, it is only in an idealized fiction story, with no unbearable ongoing life stresses, in which all solutions happen quickly, where all difficulties and issues actually have solutions, where rationality always triumphs over irrational feelings, and in which all women truly understand men and men’s needs and want to meet those needs.
In reality, it can OCCASIONALLY be nice to have a woman to come home to. Usually, however, she’s got her own problems and stresses from which she’s expecting you to rescue her (not in the way you want to, but in the way she wants you to, which will often mean you won’t be able to rescue her “the right way” so you will disappoint, annoy, and/or anger her).
Further, in the long-term, she’s not going to focusing on nor prioritizing you and your needs, nor will she ever really understand nor want to understand your needs anyway (although she’ll claim she does or claims she wants to).
Meaning, after the initial relational honeymoon of no longer than three years or so, you’ll be coming home from one set of problems (“dealing with people outside your home”) to another set of problems (“dealing with the woman in your home”).
“A woman is nice to come home to” exists only in the idyllic “how-it-ought-to-be-and-wish-it-was” propaganda we humans tell ourselves to prevent ourselves from being truly objective about how incompatible men and women are,
2) “Let alone having someone to talk to?”
Again here, as in 1)…In the long term, a man and woman talking is similar to, say, a cat and dog talking — they may both be mammals, and share some similar needs and instincts, but the differences between them inevitably result in, at best scenario , an uneasy truce. Because men’s and women’s biochemical wirings perceive and process reality differently and also react/respond to reality very differently, she’s not going to be “talking” on the same plane you do.
Even IF total truth and honesty is possible, and even with great communication skills, expect that any “talk” with her inevitably integrates miscommunication, misunderstanding, conflicting conclusions, long-term disagreements, tension, mis-perceptions, and never-dislodgable presumptions.
Thanks joe santus for sharing so much of practical wisdom. Hope men read and benefit from it. This is a better way of using internet blogs.
@Joe santus, Thanks for answering. However, I now have more questions than I started with.
They all can be distilled to this one question. How did the human kind survived if we are so different between the genders and marriage was common for a long time or is it?
The “desire for the perfect man/woman” was tempered by the lack of widespread advertising about what such a person was like AND little social media where people spend their time comparing.
That’s the main difference between then and now.
I would say that the regular/ugly guy nowadays, is almost certainly “being settled for”, whoever they wind up with now.
Women for example, hate virginity testing or their previous romantic history being known, even to their husband … but always tell him “You have to be honest with me and don’t keep any secrets because in a relationship we tell each other everything”.
That’s the main difference between then and now.
What do you mean by the words was tempered by the lack of widespread advertising?
I am sorry but, it’s very hard to understand what you are saying.
“How did the human kind survived if we are so different between the genders and marriage was common for a long time or is it?”
My conclusion about how we humans have survived to now despite the incompatibilities between the genders is summed up by my quip, “One of th’ cosmos’ cruel pranks is pairing heterosexual reproduction with incompatible sexes”.
Our instinctual urges for sexual satisfaction, for bearing children, and for nurturing our children have inevitably overcome our incompatibility. Despite the historically-evident, objective, rational conclusion that, “Men and women can’t really get along happily for more than briefly if at all”, those instincts drive the majority of us to be with the other gender.
Instead of subordinating our instincts to our rationality and facing reality, those instincts are strong enough to, apparently, lead us to employ our rationality to conceal or at least distort the reality. As societies, as collectives, even as individuals, we create narratives which excuse, minimize, humorize, ignore, or outright deny reality, and which substitute idealized fantasies of “the-way-we-wish-it-was, or, ought-to-be” (often utilizing theism to support and even enforce acceptance of the fantasies).
As naive, idealistic young people, we’re typically susceptible to the fantasies; we’ve often believed and acted upon them, and are well-entangled in relationships, before discovering the reality.
Marriage, in various forms, and similar long-term commitments seem to be the nearly-universal “lesser-of-the-evils” compromise between our instinctual urges (for sex, offspring, and nurturing of offspring) and our incompatibility of genders.
Marriage and its equivalents have served as that “uneasy truce” between men and women, in their attempt to fulfill their instincts as a species which reproduces heterosexually and bears altricial offspring, yet who are as different as cats and dogs.
Before reliable-and-readily-available contraception, and before societal shifts enabling majorities of women to be economically-independent, that socially-sanctioned “uneasy truce” functioned “good enough” to satisfy at least many of each gender’s instinctual needs.
Heck, ancient Greek and Roman writers described the same gender incompatibilities, even the same friction we experience today, evidencing it’s nothing new at all.
As someone long before I was born explained “how” better than I can, “Because, you can’t live with ’em, but, you can’t live without ’em”.
That makes more sense. Thanks.
A friend of mine said something really wired tonight. We were at a club and one woman there was clearly an escort. I said to him that I bet $300 and she’ll be yours to lose your virginity. He in response said, “But she probably is poor, I don’t want to fuck my Uber driver so similarly I don’t want to fuck the underclass” I laughed at this. But deep down I know he meant it. I also knew that many men think like that. Yet, in their quest for royal, billionaire, supermodel pussy with excellent compatible personalities he’s going to go fucking a land whale possibly only after marrying her for lot more of a cost to him. I mean, this guy will never in a quadrillion years marry a royal. Funny eh?
I think the explanation for this kind of thinking is that, according to some deluded dudes, a royal billionaire pussy is some how better than a super hot classy pussy with out the royal and billionaire parts everything else being equal.
By the way, it’ll be interesting to hear you guys have take on this idea.
Very simple take: The woman you can recognise as an escort, is probably aged enough that the guy finds it embarassing that that is what he can get by (affordable) amounts of money. I don’t think men go looking for model-level compatible pussy – because the guys that can get that can also easily replace her, and for free too – some even get the girls spending ridiculous amounts of money to keep him in the style he’s accustomed.
One of the good deceptions women have going is the idea that all men have super-high standards, because it justifies:
1. I can treat that guy like trash because he was going to dump me anyway later and
2. At least the hot guys are “honest” by playing around, rather than a No. 1. guy who “gets his status raised by being with me, only to dump me for a hotter girl”.
When the reality is simply: women don’t want to face up to the idea that they have a lot of control in relationships … because that would mean they are on the hook for their repeated piss-poor decisions
Lovely post from the old-timer Semonides of Amorgos:
I wanted to leave this youtube video here.
It focuses on the fact that Hugh Hefner’s most famous girlfriend Holly Madison was also partially homeless when she met Hefner of Playboy Magazine fame.
It focuses on the fact that Hugh Hefner’s most famous girlfriend Holly Madison was also partially homeless when she met Hefner of Playboy Magazine fame.
A reminder that for the regular/ugly guy, if you want to get (and keep) a girl, you have to hold something over her that is difficult for others to do or expensive for them to afford. And … it’s a lot easier to get the second girl, once you have the first.
It also helps that Hefner was famous and probably monitored his home so that she wouldn’t be able to get away with false accusations so the only things she could say against him later was:
1. he had an old person smell
2. pets crapped where they wanted in the mansion
3. he wasn’t that interested in sex
By controlling the environment, he controlled the kinds of things she could say against him.
>A reminder that for the regular/ugly guy, if you want to get (and keep) a girl, you have to hold something over her that is difficult for others to do or expensive for them to afford. And it’s a lot easier to get the second girl, once you have the first.
Care to elaborate? What are some examples of things you can hold over her? Second girl, meaning?
In a contracting economy, regular/ugly men have spoken about how owning their own retail shop, not renting have made it easier for them to date younger, along with being authorities for awarding licenses, or holding off financial punishments.
People can talk about true love, but the reality is all interactions are a transaction. And that women don’t want the regular/ugly guys to have options. Because that makes them demand/expect more from their current relationships. Which the women are only usually prepared to give to Chad.
Also, a lot of women are fully aware that getting into the habit of being with non-Chads rewires the brain (just like how a woman usually around the regular/ugly guy … will in the end be with one of those, and not necessarily only after a string of Chads) to accept the regular/ugly guys – which is why they try to be around Chads if they can help it.
Speaking of A reminder that for the regular/ugly guy, if you want to get (and keep) a girl, you have to hold something over her that is difficult for others to do or expensive for them to afford. And … it’s a lot easier to get the second girl, once you have the first.
Congratulations to this guy: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7132475/Chris-Quinten-stripper-fianc-e-reveal-parents-romance-difficult.html – Coronation Street star Chris Quinten, 61, and his fiancée, 21, reveal her mother is only 38 (and she found their romance ‘difficult’)
Chris Quinten and stripper fiancée reveal her parents ‘found their romance difficult’
Yet her parents didn’t find it difficult that she became a stripper … just lel at the priorities
Coronation Street star Chris Quinten’s stripper fiancée Robyn Delabarre, 21, has admitted her parents have struggled to deal with her engagement to a man 40 years her senior – and revealed her mother (right, with Robyn) is only 38 and her father is just 40.
The brunette bombshell appeared alongside the actor, 61, on This Morning on Wednesday (left), where they spoke about their recent betrothal and the age gap between them.
‘Chris is much older but we had such a nice connection we just got on well, we spoke a lot,’ Robyn said of meeting the former soap actor, when he was managing the strip club she worked at.
The couple got engaged after just seven months of dating and have revealed they are already planning a family together.
Actually I think men need to ignore women talking crap about the age gap: the reality is, men have very little in common – even with women of their age – as usually men are the ones doing the hard slog, she gets a chance to use her sexuality to get marked more leniently or deal with problems of a lower complexity.
Besides, the guy who is attractive to women in their 40s … what is he lacking to be attractive to women in their 20s?
The reality is women are running a pussy cartel (You can’t talk about women that way … unless you’re the man many women want lol) … and very few guys are in a position to call them out on it and keep their reputations preserved.
Remember, women can’t live forever of charity and goodwill, more regular/ugly men need to approach dating with the mindset: What is she gonna give me?
The current state of women is simply because men have been giving them an easy journey.
P Ray said; “Make sure she doesn’t get citizenship.”;
What if she finds another boyfriend(s) in the developed country where I am a citizen. Then what should I do?
You can’t get citizenship “just because you have a boyfriend” – there has to be a better legal bond than that, in the case of that Ukranian mother, she had a child with her boyfriend and not JUST the relationship with her boyfriend
The scenario you are actually asking about is:
What if she finds another boyfriend(s) AFTER she has had my child in the developed country where I am a citizen?
Well, the chances are very good then that a singlemom she’s fucked, for a bunch of reasons:
1.Men don’t like to pay for other men’s kids,
2.The child will always remind that guy “You’re not my father”
3.If the best the other guy can get is a singlemom, he won’t be very committed.
4.If a woman with child thinks she can get a better deal, she is welcome to try!
5.And if she can have a better deal than you, she must have been smoking hot, so like a pro dentist I hope you gave that hole lots of (cream)fillings!
Whoops, forgot
6.The child is a constant reminder to her new boyfriend that “the guy she left, was the one she wanted to make a fucktrophy with”.
For every guy who is not white and/or not attractive:
When the women who ignored/rejected you earlier upon becoming older suddenly find you attractive …
they haven’t “matured” or “become kinder”.
Their priorities just changed:
From cock carousels, admin jobs without competition, man-shaming on facebook
to
desperation without a man to pay for everything, jobs needing actual skills and requests for bailouts.
Wow. P Ray. You dropped some gold right there. Thanks bro. Cheers. Problems in life seem a lot less hard now.
I don’t see hot girls I would like to fuck day to day except a very few at the club. I always had the problem of figuring out why there is a scarcity of hot girls I’d like to fuck. It seems like Escorts were the best option all along.
With the method you mentioned above, I can have any hot women I want right from the devloping world which if we are being honest is where the hotttest women live.
Thanks again bro. You are the coolest.
^ Also remember, the reason the woman has to have a legal anchor to her via a kid and not just “He’s my boyfriend” …
nowadays,
the only (certain) way women can get in trouble with the law or receive punishment is if they have a child.
Do anything against a man or another woman, no guarantee there will be custodial or punitive punishments.
That’s one thing a smart country does: Having a child with the man, is the only legal anchor to the new country, not just being “the girlfriend”.
Be very wary about the women that want to be your girlfriend without getting knocked up or request your help without allowing you to get physical.
P.S. The last paragraph, never mention that on social media. People getting their degrees have pointed out how women need to repay men who do things for them via sex … and are getting expelled from universities and colleges for “being predatory” or “not holding to our ethical values”.
You can only discuss the black pill after your education is complete and/or when you have a business and/or passive income of your own.
Looks like I was wrong when I said the only (certain) way women can get in trouble with the law or receive punishment is if they have a child..
They can also get in trouble … when they impinge on other women! Amazing, but that’s what women get when they demand supremacy.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6896071/British-mother-55-faces-jail-Dubai-branding-ex-husband-idiot.html
British mother, 55, has her passport confiscated and faces jail in Dubai three years after she branded her ex-husband an ‘idiot’ and his new wife a ‘horse’ on Facebook
British mother, 55, faces jail in Dubai after branding her ex-husband an ‘idiot’
Laleh Sharavesh was arrested along with her 14-year-old daughter Paris (centre and top right) when she arrived in the Arab kingdom for her ex’s funeral last month. She discovered her husband’s second wife (left) had complained about the social media post (bottom right) from 2016 and Laleh was held under Dubai’s strict cyber crime laws. While her 14-year-old daughter was allowed to return home to Britain, Laleh, 55, has been banned from leaving the country as her passport has been confiscated. Lawyers have told the single mum she faces up to two years in jail and a fine of £50,000 when she appears in court later this week. Her ordeal began on March 14 when Laleh and her daughter flew to Dubai’s for her ex husband Pedro’s funeral. He died aged 51 from a heart attack on March 3 and Laleh and her daughter, from Richmond upon Thames, Surrey, wanted to pay their final respects.
The Westernised Asian / Arabic / Persian woman … is usually very surprised to discover that the impunity she enjoys, only applies when she stays away from other countries and their laws.
Yes … Sharavesh was let go in the end ,,, but it gets more delicious.
A lot of men are complete amateurs when it comes to revenge, women are way more vicious …
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7078485/British-schoolgirl-stripped-inheritance-Dubai-Christian.html
Bereaved British schoolgirl will be stripped of £500,000 inheritance after Sharia court in Dubai is told that she is a Christian
Paris Shahravesh, 14, was due to inherit £500,000 from her banker father, Pedro Dos Shahravesh, who died of a heart attack in March
Her father’s second wife, Samah Al Hammadi, 42, applied for the inheritance and was awarded it in full by a Dubai court which believed Paris was a non-Muslim
Mrs Al Hammadi insisted that she was not to blame, saying: ‘This is not my decision. It is the court’s decision according to UAE law’
But Paris’ mother, Laleh Shahravesh, 55, insists that her daughter is a Muslim and that the court was wrongly informed
Mrs Al Hammadi had previously complained to police about Paris’ mother, Mrs Shahravesh, who called her a ‘horse’ on Facebook in 2016
Mrs Shahravesh was detained in Dubai for almost a month as a result before being released after public outcry
By PAUL THOMPSON FOR MAILONLINE
PUBLISHED: 14:36 BST, 30 May 2019 | UPDATED: 15:03 BST, 30 May 2019
The ex-wife is free to pay legal fees to address this wrong, it just might take a long time.
Again, a lot of women play 3D chess when it comes to revenge. Men have to be very careful …
Excellent tip to remember about asking dating advice of any woman calling herself “feminist” or any woman who says “men are the problem”:
Feminist advice is
1.constant goal post shifting until any attempt to approach women is immoral
but
2.not trying to approach women is seen as entitlement.
@P Ray; I am fucking escorts about once a week. The problem is that I don’t have any girl to bring home or to friends. That is a big problem as they all want me to show them my girlfriend. What would you do?
Well …
a.if you think your “self-worth” is going to be defined by your girlfriend, then you might hold on to a bad relationship just to be seen as “respectable”.
b.on the other hand, a look at a lot of those “don’t give a fuck” guys shows that they don’t care if they change women – women are replaceable – and the women don’t seem to mind.
I think better go for b. Just shamelessly escort.
Remember, the relationship with an escort is more honest than that with (most) girlfriends.
Thanks. So, you suggest that I ignore my families requests to show them my girlfriend?
Nope. Show them all your girlfriends.
Your parents will eventually let slip the bait: “Maybe you’ll be the one he finally settles down with”.
And women’s competitive instinct (without basis in reality) takes over.
Have no shame in what you do, after all, your parents gave you their looks. So they set your difficulty level, you have to adapt as best you can by whatever means.
Your reference:
Dalrock article: “Is Marcos evil for conning women looking to trade sex for financial security?”, archived here: http://archive.is/PQ9IE
It’s not as if the girls you meet (if you are a regular/ugly guy) have spent their life preparing to be loyal to only one guy or are virgins.
The dating market is now a “transaction market”. Don’t be with a woman who has a long list of qualifiers for you, or excludes a lot of physical behaviour, jokes or groping in public – because that just means she thinks you are below her.
The direct outcome of women’s double standards:
https://www.kentlive.news/news/kent-news/man-30-arrested-over-youtube-4344422
Man, 30, arrested over YouTube video of cyclist targeting women in Folkestone and Hythe
Kent Police have confirmed the suspect was arrested on suspicion of harassment
SHARE
COMMENTS
ByJohn JamesMultimedia Journalist
10:16, 20 JUL 2020UPDATED10:25, 20 JUL 2020
NEWS
See news near you
Enter your postcode
Kent Police have confirmed that a man has been arrested (Image: 1st Person Approacher)
Sign up to FREE email alerts from KentLive – Daily
Enter your email
Subscribe
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters. Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer. OurPrivacy Noticeexplains more about how we use your data, and your rights. You can unsubscribe at any time.
A 30-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of harassment after a series of videos were posted of a YouTuber appearing to approach unsuspecting women in Folkestone.
Officers made the arrest at 5pm yesterday (July 19) after receiving several reports two and half hours earlier relating to alleged inappropriate behaviour in his videos.
The YouTube headcam footage showed a cyclist targeting young women while they walked in town and in nearby Hythe.
He remains in custody while police continue their enquiries.
Remember:
1)women don’t approach men (but what about all the actors and pop stars that they are rabid fans of?)
2)women only want attractive men to approach them (ever notice how the men who are accused of harassment are not male models?)
3)sex is not important (so why do women send men to the friend zone, but refuse to give them the “benefits” of being friends?)
4)men are not entitled to sex (but I thought it wasn’t important?)
5)women think recording things is something only a creep does … but want photographs and videos of their dates and weddings and even give naked pictures to the guys they really want
6)but men who have photos of naked women are sex maniacs
7)Tinder isn’t real life – but over 40% of relationships started online
8)Women hate violent and abusive men – but somehow manage to stay with one despite all the police and domestic services available to them
9)Women are masters of relationships – but Cosmopolitan still has to give them advice about how to meet men
10)Women have so many standards for the guy they want to marry, but refuse to talk about their previous relationships, and accuse guys of wanting to know their history as “creeps”.
I feel Gable Tostee really brought the blackpill into the mainstream.
If he had not been recording Warriena Tagpuno Wright’s meltdown, he would have been blamed for her death.
Instead we have an entertaining tale about a woman who couldn’t stand that she had thrown her pussy at a guy who only saw her as a side piece, refused to take the blame for her bad choices, and could exonerate himself of her accusations.
In that case, the only way for her to preserve her dignity was to commit suicide and hope he got blamed.
I once asked what is wrong with Aaron Sleazy from you. What you said in return was eye opening and an all round great reply. That cleared all my doubts about game, anti-game and mostly how much of a bullshitter is Aaron Sleazy.
Moreover, can you take a few moments to dispel some more wisdom about the similar PUA character named Cory Skyy. If you know his stuff, please comment on what he says being correct or not.Thanks.
I would love it if you can comment a bit about what he calls eye game and its effectivity.
PUA works when you’re allowed to “play the game”.
If not, it won’t.
Perhaps this gallery will give you an understanding of that situation.
https://imgur.com/a/tEljNwT
Okay but almost no one is as ugly as those guys. So does that mean most guys have a chance.
By chnace I don’t mean one night stands.
Okay but almost no one is as ugly as those guys. So does that mean most guys have a chance.
Most guys have a chance with most girls after most girls have had their chance with the top 10% guys and didn’t manage to hold his attention.
You must understand that how much you’re allowed to get away with, is an indicator of how attractive you are.
Also remember, sexual harassment laws were put in place to make it difficult for ugly guys to interact with attractive girls.
Remember the golden rules:
Feminist advice is
1.constant goal post shifting for regular/ugly men until any attempt to approach women is seen as immoral, abusive or offensive to women
but
2.regular/ugly men not trying to approach women is seen as entitlement, patriarchal and sinister.
Okay. You answered all my questions and that led me to adapt your ideas already. I know enough now to understand what I need to do. I don’t want to fuck 30 year olds. But you mentioned that not approaching is considered entitled. Why?
But you mentioned that not approaching is considered entitled. Why?
The only guys that do not get called “entitled” when they don’t approach … are guys that the girls are already attracted to.
The way dating works is for regular/ugly guys to get the ideas repeatedly bashed into their heads:
1.you are not attractive, so you have to pamper any woman you are interested in, and
2.never deny your attention to any woman because of #1, and if required, assist them for free otherwise you are a creep.
That is why a confident regular/ugly guy is “creepy”: because he doesn’t bow down to women.
The attractive guy can say “Woman, get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich” and people will say he is joking.
The UN-attractive guy can say “Woman, get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich” and he is a dangerous misogynist that must be reported to the police.
Carefully understanding where you fit, and pretending to ignore women asking for favours, or even going away without saying anything, is the way to peace. If they won’t offer up the gash, you don’t lift a finger to help them. No need to verbalise that though, that gets guys in trouble. If you put it in words, “you are a sexual predator”. If you keep quiet, “you are a jerk”.
The reactions people give you are different depending upon whether you are a “sexual predator” or a “jerk”.
Right. Got it thanks.
Can having a lot of male and or female friends be considered an antidote to the feeling of loneliness and being alone?
Make sure you’re not being used as a
1.”popularity prop” (look, I am even friends with this person that others don’t want to, I am such a saint) or
2.”lightning rod” (let’s hear this guy air his views on women, he’s so angry but so pathetic, let him vent, takes the heat off of Chad Thundercock enjoying the double standard of behaving and thinking the same way … yet gets rewarded for his looks).
The only way having a lot of female friends is a benefit, is if they are friends with benefits.
Outside of a very rare set of circumstances to get a job done, having female friends is actually a hindrance, not a help, as:
1.few women actually want to help regular/ugly guys meet their friends – while those friends are still nubile, disease- and debt-free
2.the women that are introduced to you via female friends are usually (unstated) on the rebound from having been pumped and dumped by Chad.
On the same token of loneliness, what about having male friends in old age?
Sorry for asking. That made no sense after I asked it. Yes, it makes sense to have male friends.
Loneliness in old age is a non argument. You’ll be better off hiring staff to take care of you than a wife. Then when the robbers come after the old age pensioners, they’ll only have to kill one person and not two where by they get both you and your wife. Besides protection, there is no other reason to call the loneliness at old age argument at all. Scientists are adamant that you can feel lonely in a marriage as well. So there is the problem with out any outright solution.
I believe Dan Bilzerian has promoters and the such bringing him girls for -get this- photoshoots. I am almost certain he has sex with far less women than he does photoshoots with.
That being said, can you explain why being monied is the main reason he is living that lifestyle of sorts?
I am almost certain he has sex with far less women than he does photoshoots with.
Dan Bilzerian is trying to make himself a marketing “influencer” lifestyle. As a man to do so he has to be seen as sexually desirable and popular. Instagram by removing adult content means we never get to see (his) penis in (her) vagina. I am very certain the women attending his parties have to sign Non-Disclosure Agreements.
But actually Bilzerian being seen as #1 really shows off the cuckery of the USA.
Instead, look at Travers Beynon. Multiple relationships, actually married, parades women on leashes … and women keep turning up to his parties which are almost all women …
Bilzerian is trying to keep not having to use his own money(or as little as possible), and a rental economy where high-end properties, cars and electronics can be had is the perfect way to build the idea that you have plenty of money … without spending very much.
When he gets older, Bilzerian will have several options:
1. become a PUA “guru”.
2. become a business “consultant”.
3. become a “motivational speaker”.
That being said, can you explain why being monied is the main reason he is living that lifestyle of sorts?
He’s trying to get a job with multiple employers as the edgy face of their brand. The problem is very few can get behind him to give the public a (consumer-goods) pounding, as women make up most of the consumers in the world. If he does become a spokesman, it will be for an alcohol, clothing, watches, perfume or performance car company – the luxury goods section.
This is what women really want:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6994843/Girlfriend-Travers-Candyman-Beynon-reveals-obsession-tobacco-tycoon.html
‘Things do get a bit weird’: Girlfriend of Travers ‘Candyman’ Beynon reveals what life is like inside his Gold Coast mansion and how her MOTHER is now obsessed with the notorious playboy
Girlfriend of tobacco tycoon Travers ‘Candyman’ Beynon has posted interview
Nisha Downes, 23, is one of the live-in girlfriends of Mr Beynon who is married
Ms Downes says she is ‘obsessed’with the 47-year-old but also respects his wife
(Lel, how are you respecting a married man’s wife … by fucking the man?)
Women come up with excuses for a man they are attracted to having bad behaviour …
and come up with condemnation for a man they are NOT attracted to, even asking critical questions.
Looks like Dan Bilzerian became the face of Winclub88 – a gambling platform.
That’s where they wind up in the end – if you’re too “edgy” for legitimate business, means you become the face of a shady business.
This is another reason why women fear men who are logical, and flock to men who are reactive and impulsive. The logical ones calculate the cost …
You didn’t add the cost to up keep a woman. Food, Makeup, Childcare, Vacations and shit all adds up to a lot. A lot more than an escort a week would ever add up to. Don’t succumb to the illusion of wives or a wife.
Food and makeup alone should be more compared to an escort.
It becomes very easy to understand why many women like abusive men, they are the only ones who regularly call them out on their crap*
*However it is no coincidence that many of the men women call abusive, are men who can easily replace the woman they’re with … women only tolerate behaviour to the level of abuse, when the guy is hard to replace, makes her girlfriends jealous and keeps the drama going.
The video below shows playboy playmates then and now which sometimes indicates a differences of several decades between first and last photos. It goes to show how bad of an investment is marriage since the woman grows ugly as they age. This is in comparison to the men she dated who grows more richer as they age.
It is outright disgusting to see all the women ones they have aged.
What do you think about the legal situation with hiring escorts in Canada or any other Nordic model country and what if she makes a scene in the out-call hotel? Please answer.
—
Nordic countries are not worth it, for many reasons beyond laws. Canada is fine, as long as you are in top 4-5 (by population) cities. Also no escort with half-a-brain and employed by even an half-decent agency will make a scene in hotels. I would however suggest that you avoid anglo-white escorts or even normal chicks- too much attitude and shitty appearance.
Thanks for the answer AD. I have a friend I really care about. He is a player and therefore, has zero problems having women attracted to him. You’d normally call him a Chad. How do you convince him that he might be better off fucking escorts like you convicted me who is not a player at all?
*convinced
Just out of curiosity, what are some fantasies that you want to reenact with escorts but would never try out with a unpaid bitch?
What do you think about YMMV and would the only way to experience good sex is to be with a woman who is truly into you and not an escort?
Does the PSE really mean PSE?
—
Yes and No. It really depends on the escort. If you want my advice, just stick to GFE.
What is YMMV?
—
Your Mileage May Vary. Basically a way to tell people that non-physical rapport may vary between customers.
Did you guys heard about the 1100+ additional cases of herpes in SoCal because of Coachella? Which is a 2000% increase in SoCal area. Most guys were better off fucking escorts instead.
How much do you want to bet the additional cases are related to:
1. all women fucking the same subset of guys
2. but at the same time all men will be blamed for it
3. women use this as an excuse about how healthcare in women is being neglected
4. while saying “I would have had sex with the normal guy, if only his personality was better
Tee hee!
The other thing about herpes is that:
1. will give women more reasons to shout “I deserve abortion” … while also saying “You can’t tell me what to do!”
2. they’ll spread it to guys, of course … while saying “herpesisnormal.com” (yes, that was a website)
3. since guys are not protected by HPV, many will suffer health complications that they have to pay for
4. and as men suffer, women will be on the sidelines saying “You men are so pathetic when sick”.
Just lol at the meme gender.
correction:
3. since guys are not protected by HPV vaccine, many will suffer health complications that they have to pay for later
Which country or city do you think is best for white escort use?
Please link to any article you have done about this before if any. I am hating where I live and want to move where it is easy to fuck.
Love is a lie.
In 1 image:
The simple rule of thumb is:
1. If you can’t ask her about past relationships, number of hookups, medicines she takes or “trigger” words …
she’s using you as a fallback guy, will never give you the sex the guys she was with previously got, and doesn’t want you to know how little she wants to be invested in the relationship.
What do I say to people who say love and intimacy makes sex better?
…that while, at least for some people, intimacy might make sex “better”, even without intimacy, sex can be great.
By the way — I’m age 63, been married for 39 years to one woman, with whom I do have intimacy and love. We are “open married” — meaning, we are mutually sexually non-exclusive and each has extramarital sex partners. I have regular sex with my wife, with whom I have love and intimacy, but i also have sex with other women with whom i am not committed nor intimate. The sex with my wife is great, but the sex I have with other women is also great.
Sooo…know that, when some people make that claim about love and intimacy, they either don’t realize or accept that people are not all wired exactly the same and therefore some CAN equally enjoy sex with or without intimacy…or…they are speaking without having had enough sexual experiences to know the claim isn’t necessarily true.
@joesantus; Thanks a lot for the comment. It cleared up a lot of doubts. Most people who think love is the secret to great sex is very inexperienced themselves.
I would put it even more simply:
If she doesn’t want to have porn star sex with you, she doesn’t love you.
She already had sex of that calibre with Chad previously, and doesn’t want your ugly- or settled-for body (she calls it “true, mature love” to pollute her memories of the animal sex with Chad.
The maintenance of a proper sexual hierarchy seems very important to women, I would say you can tell what kind of a woman she is … by the type of guy she stays loyal to.
@P Ray; Very true.
Which countries do you recommend that I travel to since escorts are illegal where I live? Or is this even a good question?
Funny thing happened. I normally have vanilla sex. But the last time, I thought I should put toxic masculinity nonsense out the window and dominate/manhandle her a bit. Guess what it was the best sex I’ve had. I can see she found a new love for me as well that she thanked me for fucking her. Which, she never did before. It seems to me that man handling a woman is great for sex both for you and her. Any thoughts?
Is it recommended that you try to get to know an escort for a while or is it just sex?
Why do I get the feeling of envy seeing a hot couple and saying how good would it be if I had that? Whats wrong with me?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-7249465/Womens-brains-react-porn-nude-images-way-mens.html
Women’s brains react to porn and nude images in the same way as men’s, study finds
Researchers led by the Max Planck Institute in Germany found the stereotype of men preferring lingerie while women want a slow-burning evening to get in the mood may is not true.
Maybe the reason why so many women talk about “romance” and the intrinsic feature that it is “slow and repetitive” is because they want a man to grovel repeatedly for her cooperation in sex, as it validates how valuable she is and how worthless he is.
It could be many men who think their wives crave romance, are simply too stupid or fearful to the realisation that their wives don’t actually respect them very much.
Get this, the previous research that concluded saying women react differently to sexual stimuli was done by a woman. I don’t have to point names in the day and age of the internet, do I?
Upon realizing, quite early on, that she wanted to friendzone me- I decided to convert that ‘lost opportunity’ into some diabolical entertainment.
Yup. When women talk about how hot and successful her boyfriend is, the good reply is … then why did he choose not to be with you right now? They usually don’t big up their boyfriend when he is around.
Also this:
“Women LOVE violent men.
If MOST women wanted kind, non-violent men, then that’s what MOST men would become – OVERNIGHT.
The ‘friendzone’ is just another expression of women’s hatred of decent, kind, caring men. I would say that at least 80%, and probably 90%, of the attractive women I see with men, are with violent, miserable scumbags.
Women are terrified of intimacy, contrary to what you’ve been told all your life, and this is why they are terrified of a loving relationship.
To most women, ‘love’ means ‘he doesn’t love me, so I keep having to get him to love me’. That is a sick, masochistic vision of what ‘love’ means.
To put it even more bluntly: MOST women have got something deeply and disturbingly wrong with them. Otherwise the world wouldn’t be full of endless wars, crime, and the murder of 80 BILLION animals every year.
WOMEN are dating and marrying the millions of men who torture and kill animals every day – are those women looking for love? Of course not.
In ONE generation, women can genocide out of existence ALL of the kind and caring men in their society – just look at Afghanistan, for example. How do you think it came about that an entire country’s women are not allowed to leave the house without a man? Are all those men in Afghanistan really nice, caring men? Of course not – the nice, caring men were GENOCIDED out of existence by the stupid women who lived when the nice, caring men were still alive.”
Seen elsewhere:
The only people against using an escort are incels in denial, who care more about their pride than their own personal satisfaction. They are socialized to believe that they’re only allowed to have satisfaction from a woman who is sexually attracted to them, and they refuse to question it. That is infinitely more cucked, to play by women’s rules instead of seeking an alternative.
Let’s admit it, you are, just like me, not sexually attractive to women. It’s not your fault, you didn’t select your genetics. That means that for most of the time that you’re alive and have a sexual drive, you have to live with it being unfulfilled. If you do want to get laid, you have to exert a ridiculous amount of effort, and the reward at the end is likely a hambeast you won’t be attracted to, and you will regret sleeping with the instant you nut.
Meanwhile, there’s a dozen, really attractive foids in your city right now who will get you to bed with them in minutes and give you an experience that only Chad can get, but for a price. For a few bills of paper, you get to bypass all the rules society places on you to be an attractive, tall, successful, extraverted man.
So why do many incels here still refuse this cheatcode? Due to pride. Here are some common arguments and why they’re wrong.
1)”You have to pay for something that Chad gets for free.”
Yes, and? Most women find a majority of men unattractive. It’s only perhaps 10% of men who were lucky enough to be born sexually attractive to women. They’re the only ones that get sex from women for free.
The majority of men have to spent a lot of their time, energy and money to keep and maintain a relationship with a woman. If you think $200 for an hour is pricey, think of how pricey it is to take your girlfriend or wife out to some fancy restaurant every two weeks in order to get some duty sex. Think of how much money and energy your average guy spends trying to talk to women, dance like a dog for them, and take them out on interesting and cool dates just for a chance to be selected as a placeholder boyfriend and maybe get some sex. Think of how much it costs to finance a ring, a wedding, a new house and a car to betabux a woman who will never feel the same about you as the handsome boy that got away.
As we said before, you are not an average man. You are below average, and women do not even want you as a placeholder boyfriend. So no amount of spent money will get a woman to see you romantically, BUT you can use that same money to guarantee you’ll get laid. Saves you lots of time and money in the long run.
2)”It’s not the same as having real sex with someone who’s attracted to you.”
It might not be, but A. You don’t really know that, because you haven’t experienced real sex and B. It’s pretty fucking close.
Remember, you are blackpilled and already accept that it’s over for you. You will not be having passionate sex with someone attracted to you, ever, so take it out of your head. This is the best you got.
It’s not like the women you hire to sleep with aren’t women. They still are. They still feel silky smooth to the touch, have comfy, pillow-like breasts, and soft thighs. You will still feel immense pleasure from having your chest touch press up against hers and with her legs wrapped around your waist while her hands are massaging your back. Even if she’s paid to, her body will still react the same way to getting fucked; her breath will quicken you’ll smell a hint of sweat from her and she’ll let out involuntary moans.
I have bought a Fleshlight in the past to use and other sex toys, trust me, there is nothing in the world that can replicate the feeling of nutting inside a woman who’s wrapped around you. Your body will make you ignore the transaction, because it feels intensely good and primal.
No, she wouldn’t have had sex with you without money, but since you have paid her, her entire goal is to make you as happy as possible. You aren’t the ugliest person she will fuck, and women who don’t know how to make the man feel good emotionally as well as sexually don’t last long in the industry.
And again you aren’t ever going to have real sex, so just give it a try.
3)”Men in the past didn’t have to pay to have sex, they could just have one wife, traditionalism, blah blah blah.”
Major cope. Most men throughout the entire human experience had to pay to have sex. Prostitutes were a thing back in Ancient Egypt, in the Medieval Ages and now in the Industrialized world. There was nothing unusual about men paying for sex for the longest amount of time (and in many cultures today, there still isn’t.) The recent aversion to prostitution only happened in Westernized, feminist societies, where feminists wanted to control men’s access to sex by getting rid of prostitution. By agreeing with them that “paying for sex makes you a loser”, you are allowing yourself to adhere and listen to the rules that women placed upon you to control you.
4)”Paying for sex is cucked, you’re a simp if you pay for sex or give money to women.”
This is fucking stupid. If you pay income tax or any sort of tax, you’re indirectly giving your money to women anyhow. The state takes your money to provide child benefits and income support (mostly used by single mothers), pay for maternity leaves, abortion clinics, birth control pills and grants for women in STEM. You are already cucked by living in a society and working.
By paying a prostitute for sex, you are literally getting what you paid for. You pay a woman money, and she gives you sex. She’s not saying thank you to you on Twitch chat or calling you her best friend, she is spreading your legs for you to use her as you please for the amount of time that you paid for. It’s the furthest thing from a simp.
Related: For most men, they should not feel guilty for manipulating women because most women only want the top 10% of men, not most men, and when they do “settle down” exact a heavy price from the guy
As seen elsewhere:
Lesson 1: When entering into a sexual relationship with a man, a woman first evaluates the partner in a Machiavellian way, completely unintentionally. Her first thought is: What can I get from him? This is thought often in hamster terms, often she will postulate as to what he does, how much me might make, if he’s a ‘good guy’ (pushover). This does not suggest that women are conniving by nature, but a woman will not enter into a sexual relationship that she does not gain anything from. A woman will not have sex with a beta male unless she first gains something, but why would she fuck a beta male when she has access to chad/ chadlite?
Further to my point, the woman gains something by having sex with an alpha male; his company, protection, and biologically the access to highly desirable genes for her offspring (which is a component of all organisms way of going about things, even if we don’t realize it). As such, the idea of ‘love’ as a sort of nebulous, greater than our biological urges concept is foolish. A woman falls in ‘love’ when she meets and gets fucked by a man who is better than anything she feels she can ever hope to get. She believes that she has found ‘the one’. She falls out of love when he demonstrates traits and behaviors that show her she may be able to find better options.
Lesson 2: With that in mind, your interactions with women are framed around a sort of ‘game’ of give-and-take ( game = beating the dating game, being good looking, being chad). As you pass the shit tests, which are her fucked way of determining if you are indeed all you appear at first glance, she realizes that she can gain something from you, and if you act on her opportunity she presents, you win the “game” and get the girl. Manipulation isn’t a choice, it is going to happen regardless. A better word would be to ‘influence.’
The woman will influence a man, particularly a beta, when she sees something that she needs for survival. Beta bucks exist because a woman needs financial security, particularly when she does not have the means to support herself on her own ( this sort of shit happens after she is supposedly done getting fucked by chad and partying it up and wants to “settle down” and have some sort of “financial stability”.
An alpha would be less willing to offer up such means in a short span of time, especially not without great sacrifice on the part of the woman. A woman can play her cards right and get the thing she wants out of beta men with very little investment. Some women in the internet age have even made money without having sex or even doing professional modeling, the concept of the ‘e-whore’ is an example of that, a woman using her sexuality online in order to get her the resources she needs to survive. Eg – camgirling, onlyfans, selling videos, selling used clothes, findom, amateur porn, fetish videos. And how is she able to do this? By manipulating beta men into giving her their money for fake validation and fake acknowledgement/ attention.
Lesson 3: This doesn’t mean you need to eschew your morality. While most concepts of basic Christianity are cucked, The Bible often talks about the need for a man to assert control over his women. Men who didn’t, for example, King Ahab, his son-in-law King Jehoram, were often doomed by them.
The role of the women in a Biblical context is to submit to her husband. You may feel that such manipulation is ungodly, but if you don’t do it she will rebel and likely cause you more harm, which would disrupt the family your God wants you to create.
As for Islam, as GLO said, they are right about women. This is not an endorsement of Islam, or an endorsement of Christianity, but merely a way to dispel most men’s refusal to ‘play the game’ that is being played whether they like it or not.
Many reddit subreddits (including now-banned ones) are up to be read at
http://www.theredarchive.com/
and it also includes Female Dating Strategy
… so from this one of 2 things will happen:
1)more men will get blackpilled
2)women will stop contributing to Female Dating Strategy since it will get documented.
Very nice turn of events indeed.
Anyhow, for men who think “well, these escorts and strippers are expensive, won’t women be camming instead to get money without giving sex?”
… well …
camming is hugely saturated now, men are also playing videogames, browsing, using youtube etc … so her income is ONLY going to get higher IF SHE FUCKS THE GUY.
Take this statement from a camgirl “who likes men for their personality” lel (paraphrased):
I’ve been camming for years before I started poledancing.
It’s very brutal – it’s a numbers game.
The longer spent on camming, talking to clients – your outcomes improve.
Made only $50 this week so far after 4 camming days (3-6 hours daily).
Def. not fun at the beginning and why most girls quit
This same lady who talks about going through a very difficult time trying to get big money without touching a dick,
also writes in her profile (paraphrased): You must have USD100K in savings and make USD300K per year to be around me.
She’s 30, Father is 63 and just got laid off, Grandmother is 86 and has just written a living will … she didn’t even graduate (but somehow spent 3 years at university), and claims she can “understand multiple programming languages just by hard work” lol.
Looks like we have a winner for deluded sex-positive feminist girlfriend, that “demands you pay for everything, but men and women are equal.”, who expects special outcomes for her wasted life while not being politically connected, rich or famous.
When she’s ready to settle down:
Remember, don’t ask her for sex because relationships are not based on physical attraction.
It’s only a coincidence she wants to be attached and loyal when her looks are gone.
I don’t seem to able to find super hot escorts that I like to fuck on online escorts sites in my city in Britain. They all seem plan or so ugly to me. On the other hand, I want to fuck escorts who are at least as hot as the ones on porn after the Virus ends. What am I missing?
Save your money and ride out the CoViD-19 pandemic.
Then, look for a cheap property that you can own.
Apply the correct ad:
$1 / 12m^2 – Room available for young quiet shy lady (city/suburb here)
Have spare double bedroom for young quiet, shy lady, any nationality, who keeps to herself, who is willing to have casual times with xxyo quiet straight guy who doesn’t have visitors.
Attached ok.
Age 18+.
Very cheap rent, short or long term, part week/days ok, xx min walk to station.
Country ladies welcome.
Reap the pussy banquet. Remember, women always want men to trade money for her company … and end the day saying “let’s just be friends”.
This way you can have the last sentence, saying, “Yes, let’s be friends with benefits – you get the benefit of housing by being friendly with me.”
Between dealing with the economic fallout, virus hysteria, educational standstill, lack of employment, crime, the rise of China and Russia … nope, I don’t think “she has to fuck a guy for a place to live” is going to be far up the list of priorities.
So far, none of the guys offering this exchange have gotten sent to jail, so you should be ok.
As a matter of fact, Weinstein could have gotten more poon by using that method.
Sometimes, cheap is actually good.
Also remember, a lot of women, even while married, are looking to trade up.
From this post:
https://old.reddit.com/r/relationship_advice/comments/g96046/married_and_confused/?limit=500
(ya, they removed the comment, so here it is):
“Married and confused
Relationships
I need some advice, I have been married for more than a decade, he has a lot of good qualities that are important to me: he doesn’t smoke, he doesn’t drink, he doesn’t do any drugs, he is faithful, great provider, hard working, great father to our children, eats my food and helps in the house; however he also has some flaws like: he doesn’t like to save, he is really bad with his money, he likes to spend it all, he doesn’t celebrate anything, doesn’t like giving any gifts, doesn’t plan anything and no dates whatsoever.
This was not bothering me before, but for some reason, a year ago I started getting annoyed by these things and on top of that he has never been my type physically, now I feel confused, I have thought about leaving, and I have started looking at other guys that are my type, am I being ungrateful?
What’s wrong with me?
What should I do?
Any advice please?”
When the woman you’re with is getting annoyed by your day-to-day behaviour, she has:
1)already found someone else to fuck
2)wants you to be the bad guy by dumping her (and pay compensation) or
3)knows if you stay with her, you will have to compensate her too
Remember, it’s no coincidence that a lot of guys hit their 40s and 50s “suddenly getting divorced by their wife” … because
1)she can claim a lot of alimony
2)it’s her last viable decade to gain a baby from Chad Thundercock
3)by claiming she is “mature” at that age, has a good excuse not to have sex with her husband.
Escorts are a better deal than relationships or marriage,
only if you’re not stupid enough to pay with conditions like LiaraRoux sets out
and she’s pretty famous, you can google her
USD6,000 … and your dick doesn’t even get wet? May CoViD-19 destroy her livelihood …
Hey PeeRay,
Instead of paying her for companionship, maybe you should buy her a weed whacker to trim things up a bit…
She earns enough, she can buy it herself.
Unless that’s a “challenge” to “find a real man”.
Then 20 years later “I wuz rap3d”.
Like an animal, only a professional should handle women like her.
she also “forgot
{” too shave those pits, you think it’s some hipster thing where she also “forgets” too wipe her a$$?
Remember, women who are not attracted to their partners, will rarely, in public:
Say “I love you”
Say “I am lucky to be with you”
Have a smile for you when you turn up
Have sex with you without weeks of foreplay
Agrees to anal
Will try to minimise the problems she brings to you.
Women cannot hide their feelings very well, because they think that “being emotional” means that they have an excuse for having no filter.
Do use that against them.
And remember, she is in her teens and legal … or nothing. No hymen, no diamond.
Remember, when women are “ready for marriage”, it is usually:
1)(when she is young) to lock down a guy that many women find attractive
2)(when she is old) to steal from a regular/ugly guy via divorce because she cannot get (and keep) the guy from 1).
Ah, yes, the aryan woman does not age well…
Us white nationalists only make babies with them and then enjoy encounters with very masculine men like Jack donovan
PeeRay,
I find it a good reminder to look at nudes of women who have hit that wall…
That way, I know I’ve made not a mistake when I step into the whites only bath house…
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/7Imy9k4OtxlDwt_iuAKaBDZZia4dEK5bSG0Q6BHOvU1R8-lJujxNsZZUCvVb1j8TIC4-2sp9V8aQO3ckt0jgUvE
Dan Bilzerian may get exposed as a fraud, a renter and someone else pays his credit card according to a lawsuit by his companies former CEO according to Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/chrisroberts/2020/07/09/dan-bilzerian-is-a-renter/#7904b7f7df5d
Shady high-roller is actually just a fronting sponge for a China-based betting organisation. Very predictable!
What you said above about Dan Bilzerian is prophetic now @P Ray, isn’t it?
I am predicting that he would come down to the level of giving motivational speeches later on. After the lie is exposed however.
Dropping this here:
Today at 12:49 PM
#1
Modern human courtship norms and rituals are really just “veiled” forms of prostitution that help to ease the conscience of participants. Its so that women don’t feel like whores and men don’t feel like “johns”, but at the end of the day, there’s always a transaction taking place, its just veiled behind convoluted systems and obfuscation of words and meanings, all for the sake of preserving the “human ego” and allowing us to continue to reproduce while “feeling dignified”
COURTSHIP RITUALS/SYSTEMS ARE JUST FORMS OF INDIRECT PROSTITUTION, OF WHICH THEIR SOLE PURPOSE IS THE MAKING COURTSHIP OF THE “HUMAN ANIMAL” SEEM MORE “DIGNIFIED”, AS THE AVERAGE PERSON WOULD NOT ENJOY IT WITHOUT SUCH DELUSIONS
When you look at things for what they really are, its undeniable that you as a man are always paying in some way
DATING is weekly INSTALLMENT FEES (FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS TO SERVICES)
BIRTHDAYS, HOLIDAYS, SPECIAL OCCASIONS, ETC are MAINTENANCE FEES (TO ENSURE QUALITY OF SERVICES)
An ENGAGEMENT RING is a DOWNPAYMENT (FOR LIFETIME ACCESS TO SERVICES)
MARRIAGE is a FORFEITURE OF PERSONAL ASSETS INTO JOINT HOLDINGS (OF WHICH THE OTHER HOLDER DOES MOST OF THE SPENDING)
CHILDREN are JOINT ASSETS OF SIGNIFICANT DEBT (WITH ONLY THE OTHER HOLDER HAVING LEGAL OWNERSHIP AND VETO POWER)
A potential DIVORCE is a DEFERRED PAYMENT OF 50+% OF YOUR ASSETS (WITH THAT THREAT LOOMING OVER YOUR HEAD YOUR BARGAINING POWER (LEVERAGE) IS SEVERELY REDUCED)
Potential ALIMONY following a DIVORCE are RESTITUTION FEES (FOR SERVICES THAT ARE ASSUMED TO HAVE BEEN RENDERED)
Potential CHILD SUPPORT following a divorce are MAINTENANCE FEES on JOINT ASSETS (WHICH JUST LIKE WITHIN MARRIAGE YOU HOLD NO SAY OVER)
ETC, ETC, ETC
At the end of the day, as a man, you are ALWAYS PAYING, this is why it always confuses me to hear men say – “I don’t want to pay for sex, I want someone who is with me for me”, then they proceed to “date” and that person is only going out with them BECAUSE THEY ARE PAYING FOR THE DATE
Unless you are splitting the bill on most occasions, guess what, YOU ARE PAYING THAT WOMAN FOR COMPANIONSHIP (AND THE MERE POSSIBILITY OF SEX)
Remember, women pay for men they are attracted to, excuse their mistakes and overlook their faults
If this is not happening to you:
1) WOMEN ARE NOT INTERESTED IN YOU,
2) WOMEN ARE NOT ATTRACTED TO YOU ALONE.
Pee Ray,
You underestimate the decay of the aging aryan woman…
We convert many men to bath house nationalism upon sowing them the over 28 white women Advocates Diaboli still pays 65 bucks an hour. Well, I guess he doesn’t have to worry about teeth when a precious white woman takes out her dentures to give him a bee-jay….
There is also that series called “Fossil Fuckers” … but a lot of “mature” porn is also popular because … those women are the last to file sexual harassment lawsuits.
It seems the more physically attractive the woman, “attraction from regular/ugly men is not only invalid but unlawful too”.
That is why OnlyFans and AdmireMe will be the scourge of modern relationships.
..and sometimes the besets head is when they have no head…
For you, my str8 mind buddy, I got mine from a dead beheaded isis duebroe…
—
I don’t see the connection of this picture to the topic of this post. I rarely delete replies, but if you keep positing irrelevant stuff just to be shocking- I will have to do it.
Ya, that’s an interesting market niche, the head-shaped fleshlight.
Wonder why those seem so rare.
Now P Ray… this comment is something I wholeheartedly agree to!
Always also remember this gem:
“I don’t see the connection of this picture to the topic of this post. I rarely delete replies, but if you keep positing irrelevant stuff just to be shocking- I will have to do it.”
Make Bath Houses gr8 again!!!
This was sooo relevant, because us bath house nationalists are all behind that “tough on crime” hindu muffin Kamala Harris.
But we need to show lots of dead white wimminz for effect.
I thought you’s was smarts but I ain’t so sure reich now if you can’t understand why we gotta show lots of dead whites to get our tough on crime hindu muffin erected, er, elected….
https://eradica.wordpress.com/2018/08/27/eradicas-new-mission/
Remember, my new mission is getting white men laid (at the nationalist bath house…)
—
You posted a very similar photo of that headless woman twice. I don’t see how that emphasizes your point.
“You posted a very similar photo of that headless woman twice. I don’t see how that emphasizes your point.”
Now you listen here, boyo…
I am tryin’ to recruit some wN’s here…
We conducted a scientific experiment with Steve Sailer and found that the average WN recruit has an IQ of 78, that means lots of repetition and saying almost the same thing with a slightly different picture…
But I doubt that is the real reason you took it down…
I think the real reason you took it down was my insightful commentary to Pee Ray about your hot-0-phobia that should you lock eyes with him while tag teaming the decapitated white womyn, things would not end well.
I just proved that you aren’t as enlightened as us Nazi’s when it cuts to rubbing’ elbows and other appendages with fella white men…
You hom-0-phobe you!!!!
yayee,
you resuscitated my comment from the juice!!!!
the juice sucked my last commentary,,,
check your privilege…
err, spam filter…
Oh ya, and for people thinking:
“I will escape the now-extreme liberal hellhole of US and A for Canada” …
A 6-month relationship in many parts of Canada is considered common-law marriage.
The only 2 reasons a lot of marriage still happens in many Whitelands is:
1)She is racist against men of colour
2)She can’t afford a property on her own salary.
And to put another nail in the idea of “well, older women can always get a guy who is rich later” … the reality is, many of these rich men couple with women their age for the simple purpose of image-management so that their businesses aren’t boycotted or shown in a pervy light (of course, pandering to female sensibilities that women are forever attractive).
One of the reasons many of these businessmen are always away from home and their wife, is because they’re discreetly fucking a younger girl.
Of course, all of this comes dribbling out (lel) after the guy dies.
That is also another reason why bodyguards have a lot of juicy stories to tell about their previous employers, and why they only answer to the rich businessman.
Good final tasty blackpill:
I know, water is wet, but here:
1: mate choice criteria does not vary within a species (all foids like tall guys, etc)
2: Male sexual market value is relative (to other males)
3: Marriage is a 1:1 mate assortment (no 80/20)
-Conclusion: the majority of women are not sexually attracted to their husbands.
1: The only two sexual currencies are sperm (looks) and resources (money)
2: women who aren’t attracted to their husbands are not in it for the sperm
-Conclusion: those married women unattracted to their husband are prostitutes.
ofcourse this is obvious.
Eggs (and holes by extension) are the most valuable things in the world.
Ofcourse foids will not squander that value.
They will use their eggs to carry them through life.
A foid who doesn’t do that is either incredibly ugly or retarded for willingly handicapping herself.
It’s like being born with a 10 million dollar inheritance and working at McDonald’s.
marriagemaxxing is escortcelling, except you get zero variety and the prostitute doesn’t stay 20 forever.
She starts at 30 and ages normally.
Also you need to pretend that she’s not a prostitute otherwise she’ll stop having sex with you.
Also she can steal half your shit at any time.
Also sex with her was free and magnitudes more exciting back when she was In her prime.
Now she’s charging you for the privilege of providing for her in exchange for infrequent access to her used up, near-expired cunt.
And you need to cope circles around this fact and pretend like YOUR wife is the exception.
“Nah bro, our love is different, my girl isn’t like all the other girls. She loves me for me”.
Lmao. Stop providing and see what happens.
Upon realizing, quite early on, that she wanted to friendzone me– I decided to convert that ‘lost opportunity’ into some diabolical entertainment. That required me to first sit through all of her stupid chatter about what she wanted in her ‘deserved upgrade’. After making a few mental notes while smiling, I politely concluded the first meeting. A week or so later, she expressed a desire to meet again and I was happy to oblige. The second meeting went.. a bit differently. It started, as usual by me being polite and non-specific, till she brought up that issue again. I then started by playfully posing a simple and apparently question- why should the man of her dreams (for the purposes of cheating) choose her over chicks for having sex? And she took the bait..
Actually, women almost immediately decide to friendzone men they are not attracted to.
Of course, men are to blame for women acting like this /s
Someone else lays out a good explanation:
No matter what in any interaction with a foid you as a male are the bad guy.
Didn’t make your intentions of not wanting to be a blueballed cuck apparent early on and wanted a genuine friendship?
You weren’t being sincere and trying to get in her pants.
Decided to stop associating with her after she kept using you for favors and as an emotional tampon?
You’re the insecure guy that was never really her friend and was just trying to get in her pants.
Don’t want to be friends with foids?
Yikes most relationships start out knowing each other as friends, Dis y u inkel!
Want to be friends with foids and see where it leads?
Yikes! You should have just asked her out early on instead of being a creep and trying to pressure her.
Want to ask her out?
Yikes teehee I don’t know you like that. Dude you gotta get to know her first as friends:soy:
So LDAR is the only option where you aren’t in this predicament tbh