[–] mark7 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago 

Roberts isn't scared of rioting antifaggots. He is afraid of PDJT, and the reckoning coming for him, and his thug owners. Gal. 6:7 “Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” NOTHING can stop what is coming!

[–] AltUserMe points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Why didn't the other justices calmly explain that to him then, I know we're dealing with rumours here but why would it get heated?

[–] Aslanisonthemove points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Didn't a senator quote that at the watergate hearings.

[–] AltUserMe points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Are you going to be responsible for the rioting if we hear this case?"

"Don't tell me about Bush v. Gore, we weren't dealing with riots then"

Oh jesus, we have retards in the court.

[–] bobdole9 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Its almost as if Trump voters wouldn't riot harder. Oh wait...

[–] AltUserMe points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The left are all bark and no bite, some politicians are scared of the wrong side.

[–] Fateswebb points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

they're not stupid they know the liberal elites control the rioting, that its not organic... they're using that as an excuse to ignore their duties.

[–] Trizzle1 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Excuses are reasons for failure.

[–] InABlinkOfAnEye ago 

They shouldn't have their duties then. Supreme court of the land my ass!

[–] numina18 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This sounds hinky to me.

[–] TetrahedronOmega ago 

You're right. Hal Turner is a known deep-state false-flag agent provocateur on the FBI payroll. This came out in court proceedings after he encouraged his radio-show listeners to assassinate government judges.

In other news:

For irrefragable physicochemical proof that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job by deep-state elements of the US government--i.e., via the use of large quantities of thermite in the case of the collapse of the three destroyed World Trade Center towers--see pp. 75-84 of my following article:

  • James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , purl.org/redford/physics-of-god , webcitation.org/74HMsJGbP .

My foregoing article concerns physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics). Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals. However, it also analyzes the societal implications of said, particularly the implications of the exponential advancement of technology and hence also the coming radical life-extension technologies in light of a world dominated by a callous oligarchy.

[–] Scablifter points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

More anonymous people saying things that have no provenance, ignore this drivel.

[–] Jfunction points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If this is true and if its implications are being accurately presented then the SCOTUS is as weak kneed and corrupt as the the DOJ and the FBI. We know Roberts is suborned and will be gone but I am surprised to hear that Kavanaugh would not stand up to him - if that is true. ACB is an unknown quantity and I don't trust her.

In any case we will know whether they deserve to be justices or not in a few days.

[–] Peregrinatum ago 

this is cuck bs

[–] SuckaFree ago  (edited ago)

Why would Kav be smiling with the Libs and Roberts? Is he a DS plant? And why would the other two take that kind of abuse from Roberts?

"...I will tell you how to vote?"

Um, fuck that!!!

Yo have a truly impartial Court system, ALL justices MUST swear off allegiances to ANY political "Party."

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)