Inkstone
01
Why China’s liberals like Trump
Read
02
America closes immigration door to 91.9 million communists in China
Read
03
How New Zealand managed to not anger China
Read
04
Pangolins face extinction despite trade ban
Read
Why China’s liberals like Trump

Why China’s liberals like Trump

Photo: Inkstone/Tom Leung
Photo: Inkstone/Tom Leung
00:00
09:18

    Trump’s appeal to liberal Chinese thinkers in China and the United States is rooted in antagonism and trauma, experts say.

    On the night of April 25, 2012, a bright yellow phone in Hillary Clinton’s home in northwest Washington rang. An urgent crisis was unfolding in the streets of Beijing, the former secretary of state learned on the secure call, and she had to act fast.

    In a move that risked angering China, she authorized an operation to pick up a Chinese dissident and shelter him in the US embassy. “Go get him,” Hillary recalled telling her staff in her 2014 memoir. The decision, she wrote, demonstrated America as a “beacon of freedom and opportunity.”

    Eight years later, on August 26, Chen Guangcheng, the Chinese rights activist whom the Obama administration eventually helped escape to America, spoke at the Republican National Convention – and endorsed US President Donald Trump.

    “I was speechless,” said Teng Biao, a Chinese human rights activist in the US and Chen’s former lawyer. “There is no common ground between supporting Trump and advocating for human rights.”

    Chen Guangcheng, a civil rights activist who was born blind, is best known for exposing the practice of forced abortion in China.
    Chen Guangcheng, a civil rights activist who was born blind, is best known for exposing the practice of forced abortion in China. Photo: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

    Chen’s high-profile endorsement of Trump has shocked Teng and other Chinese democracy advocates who have accused the president of debasing American democracy and the very values that they have sought to promote in China.

    But Chen, a self-taught lawyer who challenged China’s forced abortion and sterilization practices, is hardly an outlier. He’s one of many Chinese critics of Beijing, in both China and the United States, rooting for Trump in the November election.

    Their affinity for Trump illustrates the appeal of anti-Beijing rhetoric, which the president has sought to use to differentiate himself from his Democratic rival Joe Biden.

    Scholars and observers interviewed by Inkstone said the Chinese liberals’ support of Trump came also from a glorified view of the US and historical trauma that shaped their distaste for left-wing politics, factors that could color perception of their calls for political change in China.

    Tough talk sells

    Speaking on stage in front of the gold-lit columns of the Andrew W Mellon Auditorium in Washington in August, Chen Guangcheng said the US must stop the Chinese Communist Party’s “aggression,” and Trump was leading the world in this fight. 

    Chen’s remarks underscored Trump’s success in depicting himself as the more hawkish candidate who would act tough on China.

    Trump has called the Democratic nominee “Beijing Biden,” even as Trump himself quietly supported Beijing’s suppression of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang, according to his former national security adviser John Bolton. 

    And though Trump has blamed China for America’s coronavirus woes, he initially downplayed the danger of the pandemic and publicly praised Chinese President Xi Jinping’s handling of the crisis.

    While Trump’s critics may see these episodes as proof of the president’s hypocrisy, Zhang Qianfan, a law professor at Peking University and an advocate for constitutional reform in China, said many Chinese liberals see it as pragmatism.

    “Trump didn’t talk as much about human rights issues in China as his predecessors, but he acted on trade imbalances between the US and China and imposed tariffs and sanctions, which are more effective strategies when confronting China,” Zhang told Inkstone, adding that he would vote for Biden if he were American because Trump was “stretching the limits of constitutional democracy.”

    While it’s hard to quantify support for Trump among China’s liberal intellectual circles, the interviewees who talked to Inkstone suggest that Trumpers are in the majority.

    Prominent Trump supporters include Sui Muqing, a human rights activist who took part in the 1989 Tiananmen Square protest; Liu Junning, a prolific liberal author who was expelled from a government think tank for calling for political reform; and He Qinglian, an economist known for her criticism of media censorship in China.

    An increasingly unfavorable view of China in America, fanned in part by the Trump administration, has pushed Trump’s opponent to adopt toughened rhetoric against Beijing.

    At the Democratic presidential candidate debate on February 25, Biden called Chinese President Xi Jinping a “thug” and “a guy who doesn’t have a democratic bone in his body.” In September, the former vice-president called China a “serious competitor.”

    The rising pressure to take Beijing’s human rights record and trade practices to task has coincided with rising antagonism in the US toward China. A poll in March by the Washington think tank Pew Research Center found 66% of respondents held an unfavorable view of China, up from 47% in 2017 when Trump took office.

    Regardless of which candidate becomes the next president, political analysts said US-China relations are likely to remain tense in the coming years.

    American beaconism

    Scholars of the phenomenon of Trump’s large following among Chinese liberals have attributed it in part to their glorification of the American system.

    Yao Lin, a political scientist and author of a paper about pro-Trump Chinese liberals, said they often carried a “beacon complex” and are prone to idolizing the US because of their strong aversion to China’s flaws.

    This sanitized view of the US can be illustrated by Chinese liberals’ muted response to issues such as persistent racism in the United States, if not outright denial.

    “America’s systemic racism has already been resolved,” said Guo Yuhua, 64, an anthropologist at the prestigious Tsinghua University and an advocate for political reforms in China.

    Many Chinese liberals have looked at America as a beacon of democracy and freedom, overlooking systemic problems in American society.
    Many Chinese liberals have looked at America as a beacon of democracy and freedom, overlooking systemic problems in American society. Photo: AP/John Minchillo

    Guo cites the election of Barack Obama as proof that the American system doesn’t prevent African Americans from achieving higher social status.

    Lin said that this Chinese view of the US as a “model society” was reinforced by the sharp contrast between a prosperous US and a dilapidated China in the 80s, when the country had just opened its doors to the world.

    The Chinese liberal’s beaconism, Lin said, demonstrates an inability to differentiate the American ideals from the Trump administration’s policies, which could undercut their argument for political change at home and elsewhere.

    Product of trauma

    The Chinese liberals’ support of Trump also came from their rejection of policy on the left that they see as reminiscent of China’s political and economic system, Lin wrote in his paper.

    They were traumatized in the decade-long Cultural Revolution, where Maoist gangs persecuted, and sometimes killed, those considered to be anti-socialist or “capitalist roaders.”

    Those dark memories made some Chinese liberal intellectuals shudder at any campaigns that carry elements of “socialism” and sowed skepticism among them about government intervention.  

    This puts them at odds with progressive politicians such as Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, as well as large segments of the Democratic Party, despite the differences between their advocacies and the violent campaign that roiled China from 1967 to 1977.

    A poster on the street of Beijing in 1966 shows how the proletarian Red Guards should deal with the “enemy of the people,” which included landlords, rich farmers and those who favor capitalism.
    A poster on the street of Beijing in 1966 shows how the proletarian Red Guards should deal with the “enemy of the people,” which included landlords, rich farmers and those who favor capitalism. Photo: AFP/Jean Vincent

    Guo Yuhua, the Tsinghua scholar, criticized the progressive push for a more distributive political system, calling it “utopianism.”

    “Economic inequality exists in all societies. There is no way that wealth can be equally distributed among people,” she said. “China’s communism revolution has shown the total destruction of that kind of idealism.”

    Dr Chenchen Zhang, a lecturer in politics and international relations at the Queen’s University in Belfast, said Chinese liberals often don’t understand “the struggles for racial and social justice in the US” and that lack of knowledge has led them to place “false analogy between those struggles and the Cultural Revolution.”

    Giving rise to racism

    Chinese liberals who see Trump as a threat to democracy have bemoaned what they say is their peers’ misguided belief in Trump.

    Yao Lin, the Yale researcher, told Inkstone that these Trump-supporting Chinese liberals are risking cultivating far-right supporters in China. 

    “Liberal scholars should have rallied the public to resist racism and nationalism, but now they are supporting Trump and his racist policies, attracting more people to far-right thoughts,” said Yao. 

    Zhang said the affinity for right-wing politics in the US has given rise to Chinese liberals who are “straightforwardly racists.”

    Sui Muqing, the pro-democracy Tiananmen Square protester and a Trump supporter, was accused of being racist after he tweeted in August that Michelle Obama was “uglier than gorillas” after the former first lady campaigned for Biden at the Democratic National Convention. 

    In a response to Inkstone, Sui rejected accusations of racism and called his critics “politically correct leftists.”

    “Many scholars and media are too far left and they have lost their basic sense of judgment,” he said.

    Teng Biao, the human rights lawyer, said those Chinese liberals are also damaging their own credibility. 

    “Many Americans who followed these Chinese activists are disappointed by their support of Trump and tweets of racist content. People can’t get around the fact that these human rights advocates would support racism policies in America,” said Teng. 

    Qin Chen
    Qin is a multimedia producer at Inkstone. She was a senior video producer for The New Yorker.
    America closes immigration door to 91.9 million communists in China

    America closes immigration door to 91.9 million communists in China

    Photo: Reuters/Chance Chan
    Photo: Reuters/Chance Chan

    Communist party members will not be granted permanent residence or citizenship, the US Citizen and Immigration Services says.

    The United States has released guidance on its immigration laws that will make it almost impossible for members of a communist party or similar to be granted permanent residence or citizenship of America.

    The announcement, made on Friday by the US Citizen and Immigration Services (USCIS), potentially makes it harder for at least 91.9 million members of the Chinese Communist Party to immigrate to the US.

    In a sign Washington is dusting off its Cold War-era legislation, the agency said: “In general, unless otherwise exempt, any intending immigrant who is a member or affiliate of the Communist Party or any other totalitarian party … domestic or foreign, is inadmissible to the United States.”

    With over 90 million members, the Chinese Communist Party is the world’s second-largest political party.
    With over 90 million members, the Chinese Communist Party is the world’s second-largest political party. Photo: AFP/Greg Baker

    The law effectively blocks members of the Chinese Communist Party from ever obtaining permanent residency or citizenship of the US, and reinforces the widening ideology gap between the world’s two largest economies that has already damaged people-to-people exchanges.

    The USCIS said the policy amendment was “part of a broader set of laws passed by Congress to address threats to the safety and security of the United States.”

    While the alert did not mention the Chinese Communist Party, the world’s second-largest political party, by name, it adds a new dimension to the ongoing rivalry between Beijing and Washington.

    Hu Xijin, editor-in-chief Chinese tabloid newspaper Global Times, took a positive view of the rule change, saying the immigration restriction would help “keep more talents in China.”

    “Many outstanding talents in China are Communist Party members,” he said on Twitter.

    According to the announcement, exceptions may be granted if a party member can prove they joined “for the purposes of obtaining employment, food rations, or other essentials of living.”

    The policy builds on a law dating back to 1918 that classified communists, anarchists and others as security threats because of their political affiliations.

    Ren Zhiqiang, a critic of Xi Jinping who was last month sentenced to 18 years in prison on corruption charges, was a Chinese Communist Party member.
    Ren Zhiqiang, a critic of Xi Jinping who was last month sentenced to 18 years in prison on corruption charges, was a Chinese Communist Party member. Photo: Color China Photo via AP

    The US also reinforced its immigration laws during the Cold War, its decades-long stand-off with the Soviet Union.

    The 1950 Internal Security Act was the first to exclude foreign members of communist or totalitarian parties from becoming naturalized US citizens.

    There are no official figures for how many members of the Chinese Communist Party have residency or citizenship in the US.

    Since taking office in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping has launched several campaigns to crack down on government officials holding US green cards or other foreign passports. Under Communist Party rules, members face expulsion for taking up foreign residency and Chinese law forbids any citizen from adopting dual citizenship.

    According to the Migration Policy Institute, a US think tank, there were 2.5 million Chinese immigrants in the United States in 2018, or about 5.5% of its total foreign-born population.

    The same year, China accounted for 67,000 of the 1.1 million people granted permanent residency of the US, ranking it third in the nation of origin table after Mexico and Cuba.

    About one in 16 people in China are members of the ruling Communist Party.

    Almost all Chinese government officials are party members, as are most executives of state-owned enterprises and officials at public institutions.

    Past and present members include: Li Wenliang, the Wuhan doctor who flagged the risk of coronavirus, and Ren Zhiqiang, the property tycoon and critic of Xi who was last month sentenced to 18 years in prison on corruption charges. He had earlier been expelled from the party.

    Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has sought to make a clear distinction between the Chinese Communist Party and the people.
    Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has sought to make a clear distinction between the Chinese Communist Party and the people. Photo: Ashley Landis/Pool via Reuters

    China hawks in Washington are trying to separate the Chinese people from the ruling Communist Party.

    On October 1, China’s National Day, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo issued a note of congratulations to “the people of China.” Beijing responded by saying any effort to separate the ruling Communist Party from its people was doomed to fail.

    Earlier in the year, US policymakers considered banning Chinese Communist Party members from even entering the country, Reuters and The New York Times reported.

    Keegan Elmer
    Keegan is a contributor to Inkstone. He is a reporter at the South China Morning Post covering China in world affairs.
    Oct 052020
    More from this edition
    3
    How New Zealand managed to not anger China

    How New Zealand managed to not anger China

    Photo: New Zealand Herald/Mark Tantrum
    Photo: New Zealand Herald/Mark Tantrum

    New Zealand has long had an independent streak in its foreign policy. In 2020 the island nation has largely avoided a major conflict with China, unlike its Western peers. 

    On paper, China should loom large in New Zealand’s parliamentary elections later this month.

    Like its fellow Five Eyes intelligence partner Australia, claims of Chinese interference in politics shook the nation, and it has defied Beijing with its stances on Hong Kong, the Uygurs and the South China Sea. 

    And like its neighbor across the Tasman Sea, New Zealand relies on China more than any other country for its trade, sending it almost one-third of its exports.

    But in an election that is widely expected to keep Jacinda Ardern as prime minister on October 17, China has barely registered a mention. It is a reflection, in part, of how harmonious Wellington has managed to keep relations with Beijing compared with its peers.

    New Zealand is widely expected to reelect Jacinda Ardern as the country's prime minister.
    New Zealand is widely expected to reelect Jacinda Ardern as the country's prime minister. Photo: Bloomberg/Brendon O'Hagan

    While Australia and New Zealand’s other Five Eyes alliance partners (Britain, Canada and the United States) wrestle with their most acrimonious relations with China in decades, New Zealand is walking a fine line that has allowed it to avoid blowback from its biggest trading partner.

    It has managed to accomplish this while upholding many of the same policies and positions as its Western allies.

    “New Zealand is more diplomatic and probably makes much better use of behind-closed-door channels to convey its displeasure over matters in dispute,” said Alexander Gillespie, an international law professor at the University of Waikato.

    “I would not say New Zealand is afraid, but I would say it is aware of how much is at risk if it pushes too hard.”

    Despite often emulating her Western counterparts on substantive policy, Ardern, whose center-left Labour Party has been leading the rival National Party by double digits for weeks, has taken a distinct, less confrontational tack toward Beijing.

    When the US, Australia, Britain and Canada in May released a joint statement condemning Hong Kong’s national security law as a threat to rights and freedoms in the city, Ardern’s government issued its own separate statement expressing concern.

    China has managed to avoid any major conflict with China, unlike its neighbor Australia.
    China has managed to avoid any major conflict with China, unlike its neighbor Australia. Photo: AP/Kenzaburo Fukuhara

    It contained nearly identical wording but did not refer to Beijing’s international obligations under the Sino-British Joint Declaration that set out the terms of Hong Kong’s return to Chinese sovereignty. 

    New Zealand soon after canceled its extradition treaty with Hong Kong, but did not follow Australia in offering resettlement to Hongkongers who wished to leave the city.

    On a visit to Beijing last year, Ardern reportedly raised concerns about the treatment of Uygurs in Xinjiang, but only in private, and earlier this year told a business summit that while relations were “in good shape,” the sides had “different perspectives” on issues including the “situation of the Uygur people.”

    Wellington has avoided strident rhetoric about the South China Sea, but its 2018 defense white paper highlighted China’s island-building and military build-up in the disputed waters. It argued that Beijing sought to “restore claimed historical levels of influence” and “some actions in pursuit of these aims challenge the existing order.”

    The government has maintained an ambiguous stance on banning Chinese tech giant Huawei since the Government Communications Security Bureau in 2018 described it as a security risk, insisting that any decision would be country-blind and made by security services, not politicians.

    New Zealand has experienced controversies over alleged Chinese interference, such as revelations that former National Party MP Jian Yang taught English at a Chinese training facility for spies before emigrating to New Zealand.

    Foreign policy plays very little part in New Zealand parliamentary elections
    - Jason Young, director of the New Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre

    Despite that, the country has not emulated Australia’s sweeping anti-foreign interference laws that drew Beijing’s ire when they were introduced in 2018.

    Robert Patman, a professor of international relations at the University of Otago, said while there were voices in New Zealand who argued that Beijing’s political influence activities had reached a “critical level,” that view was “contested, and New Zealand’s more nuanced foreign policy probably means it will not be targeted in the same way as Australia, which is seen in Beijing to be much closer to Washington.”

    Ardern’s approach reflects a long-standing bipartisan consensus on outreach to China, whose purchases of New Zealand exports have quadrupled since the signing of a free-trade agreement in 2008.

    In 1997, New Zealand became the first Western country to support China’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO). It was also the first Western nation to join the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank in 2015 and the Belt and Road Initiative in 2017.

    New Zealand sends almost one-third of its exports to China.
    New Zealand sends almost one-third of its exports to China. Photo: Bloomberg/Brendon O'Hagan

    New Zealand, which is home to about 5.7 million people, has a long history of independent foreign policy despite its isolated location and close links to Western powers.

    In the 1980s, then Labour Prime Minister David Lange banned nuclear-powered and nuclear-armed ships from entering New Zealand waters, leading to the country’s suspension from the ANZUS Treaty military alliance involving the US and Australia. The ban, which resulted in a three-decade pause in US warships visiting the country, remains in place to this day. 

    New Zealand, unlike Australia, also opposed the 2003 US-led invasion of Iraq.

    “New Zealand has maintained an independent foreign policy for the last 35 years,” said Paul Clark, a professor of Chinese at the University of Auckland. “We are able to keep our distance from disputations on all sides. I think Beijing respects that and may even find it helpful. New Zealand can be a useful bridge or testing ground for Beijing’s policies or behaviors.”

    In the absence of any major disagreement on foreign policy, the contest between Ardern and National Party leader Judith Collins, a former lawyer, has focused on the recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic and bread-and-butter issues such as housing and health care.

    “Foreign policy plays very little part in New Zealand parliamentary elections,” said Jason Young, director of the New Zealand Contemporary China Research Centre at Victoria University of Wellington. “There is generally a consensus among the major parties about foreign policy and very little difference between the two major parties.”

    Young added: “The major parties have a similar strategy of calling out Chinese behavior when needed while trying to maintain a working political relationship to facilitate economic relations and cooperation internationally.”

    New Zealand has been one of the world's most successful countries in keeping the coronavirus under control.
    New Zealand has been one of the world's most successful countries in keeping the coronavirus under control. Photo: AP/Mark Baker

    Although Beijing has verbally lashed out at Wellington, including when Foreign Minister Winston Peters earlier this year expressed support for Taiwan’s membership in the WHO, it has not threatened its economy.

    After Canberra in April called for an independent international inquiry into the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, Beijing slapped tariffs and other restrictions on Australian beef, barley and wine, in moves widely seen in Australia as economic retaliation. 

    Chinese state media has contrasted New Zealand favorably with its bigger neighbor, with a July article in the nationalist Global Times tabloid claiming that Chinese importers could turn to New Zealand producers if Australia continued its “anti-China campaign.”

    But Young, the Victoria University of Wellington professor, said New Zealand, as a small country, could not be complacent about larger countries using “economic coercion to shape our foreign policy.”

    “Any type of serious economic action on New Zealand would have a significant impact on public opinion here, which is already strained and would highlight long-term risks for New Zealand businesses, leading them to diversify out of the China market,” he said.

    New Zealand may face a more turbulent future as criticisms of China increase.
    New Zealand may face a more turbulent future as criticisms of China increase. Photo: Brendon O'Hagan/Bloomberg

    Hongzhi Gao, a senior research fellow at the NZ Contemporary China Research Centre at Victoria University of Wellington, said New Zealand could face challenges managing ties in the future as criticisms of China inevitably increased in the country. 

    “There will be more and more, and stronger and stronger voices and criticism of China in New Zealand in the coming months and years, depending on what happens in China,” Gao said.

    “These voices may not be what Beijing wants to hear, but, once again, New Zealand is a democracy, valuing freedom of speech,” he said.

    “As long as the key politicians and key businesses in New Zealand are politically savvy and know how to get the politically natured message across without showing disrespect to China, New Zealand should not become the target.”

    John Power
    John is a contributor to Inkstone. He is a reporter for Asia Desk and This Week in Asia of the South China Morning Post.
    Oct 052020
    More from this edition
    3
    Pangolins continue to face threat of extinction despite wildlife trade bans

    Pangolins continue to face threat of extinction despite wildlife trade bans

    02:25
    Oct 052020
    More from this edition
    3
    America closes immigration door to 91.9 million communists in China

    America closes immigration door to 91.9 million communists in China

    Photo: Reuters/Chance Chan
    Photo: Reuters/Chance Chan
    We use cookies to tailor your experience, measure site performance, and present relevant advertisements. By clicking the “accept” button, you agree that cookies can be placed in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
    Accept