[–] 25988068? points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

The NY Post printed tons of shit about this today. Not a peep on CNN. The other networks are carrying the Barrett hearings. Go to NY Post to read the articles.

[–] 25988446? points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Facebook AND Twitter are already censoring the NY Post article.....

[–] 25988469? points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[–] 25991502? ago 

[–] 25989216? points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

bahahahahah hunter biden sleeping with a crack meth pipe in his mouth!!! ahahahaha

[–] 25989988? ago 

I wondered what that was.

[–] 25988192? points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Hunter playing the role of an international badass. These PEOPLE!

[–] 25988328? point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

To all:

Christianity is objectively correct so far as can be rationally known, and to the extent that other religions/philosophies contradict it, to that extent they are incorrect. The totality of all science has been a mostly-unwitting exercise in proving Christianity correct. The people who developed the various fields of modern science for the most part weren't consciously attempting to prove Christianity true, yet they nonetheless ended up doing so. To wit:

God's existence is a mathematical theorem within standard physics. Standard physics is the known laws of physics, viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics. This theorem has been given in the form of physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology. These aforestated known physical laws have been confirmed by every experiment conducted to date. Hence, the only way to avoid Tipler's Omega Point Theorem is to reject empirical science. As Prof. Stephen Hawking wrote, "one cannot really argue with a mathematical theorem." (From p. 67 of Stephen Hawking, The Illustrated A Brief History of Time [New York, NY: Bantam Books, 1996; 1st ed., 1988].)

Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals, such as Reports on Progress in Physics (the leading journal of the Institute of Physics, Britain's main professional organization for physicists), Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (one of the world's leading astrophysics journals), the International Journal of Theoretical Physics (a journal that Nobel Prize in Physics winner Richard Feynman also published in), and Physics Letters, among other journals.

Prof. Tipler's Ph.D. is in the field of Global General Relativity, which is the field created by Profs. Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose during the formulation of their Singularity Theorems in the 1960s. Global General Relativity is General Relativity applied on the scale of the entire universe as a whole, and is the most elite and rarefied field of physics. Tipler is also an expert in quantum field theory (i.e., Quantum Mechanics combined with special-relativistic particle physics) and computer theory.

For much more on Prof. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the details on how it uniquely conforms to, and precisely matches, the cosmology described in the New Testament, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology:

  • James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , webcitation.org/74HMsJGbP , www.freezepage.com/1560446695DXLEZNRPJS .

Additionally, in the below resource are different sections which contain some helpful notes and commentary by me pertaining to multimedia wherein Prof. Tipler explains the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE).

  • James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", Apr. 18, 2019, pastebin.com/6bZDc7rB , archive.is/uHEyL , megalodon.jp/2019-0423-0435-52/pastebin.com/6bZDc7rB .

For the historical reliability of Jesus Christ's bodily resurrection and the untenability of theories which deny his resurrection, see:

  • Prof. William Lane Craig, "Contemporary Scholarship and the Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ", Truth: A Journal of Modern Thought, Vol. 1 (1985), pp. 89-95, webcitation.org/69KCm4WtO , archive.is/8ypeB .

For more on the historicity of Jesus Christ's resurrection, see William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics (Wheaton, Ill.: Crossway Books, 3rd ed., 2008), Ch. 8: "The Resurrection of Jesus", pp. 333-404, particularly pp. 360 ff.

Regarding the Christ myth theory, virtually all the items which the Christ myth theorists claim as facts which show the parallels of Christianity with earlier pagan religions are completely fabricated modern claims that can't be found in the historical record. For an excellent discussion on this, see the following video:

  • "Shattering the Christ Myth", DrCraigJohnson (YouTube), Apr. 17, 2009, www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLA843654F0F6D4DA8 . Mirror: "Veritas Forum: Shattering the Christ Myth", Bethel Christian Fellowship, 26:39 min:sec, www.bitchute.com/video/Uo1HFlDMDhtS/ , bethelchristianfellowship.info/flash_media/jp3ChristMythCopyCat.m4v , bit.ly/2PzXxtV .

The above video is an interview of James Patrick Holding (editor of Shattering the Christ Myth: Did Jesus Not Exist? [Maitland, Fla.: Xulon Press, 2008], amazon.com/dp/1606472712 ) by Dr. Craig Johnson on the topic of the Christ myth theory. See also the below resources regarding the Christ myth theory on J. P. Holding's website:

  • "Were Bible stories and characters stolen from pagan myths?", Tekton Education and Apologetics Ministry, www.tektonics.org/copycathub.html , web.archive.org/web/20190111041306/www.tektonics.org/copycathub.html .

  • "Did Jesus exist?", op. cit., www.tektonics.org/jesusexisthub.html , web.archive.org/web/20190611232716/www.tektonics.org/jesusexisthub.html .

[–] 25988755? points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Pretty crazy when the science thought to contradict the God theory actually proves it. Aliens were going to disprove as well. Which brings me to the question, why were we made? What's our purpose? Oldest question, I know. The question looks entirely different to me these days. Is earth our nursery? And if it is...what will we be when we grow up?

[–] 25989742? points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

The oldest questions, but the simplest to answer. We are here to experience joy. In order to really know joy, juxtapositioning it with the sorrow of this world makes us appreciate it all the more. In the presence of God, all is love, all is light- so we come here to learn lessons we wouldn’t be able to learn in His presence. It’s easy to be obedient to God when we are right there with him- but here we get to choose who we will serve, exercise our free will, taste the difference between good and evil, and choose which team we are on. I have always seen life like a sonnet- a sonnet has a form, and certain rules when you are writing it. But within the parameters set by the Rule maker, we can write what ever we like. If we don’t follow the rules, it ceases to be a sonnet, and the whole purpose of writing it becomes ruined. We can always go back and edit what we’ve written and try again to make a better sonnet. Who will we be when we grow up? We are sons and daughters of the King. We have a royal heritage, and with grace and doing everything we possibly can to try and be better- we will inherit the Kingdom. It’s the ultimate plan- put on your armor patriot and trust the plan! The end is glorious- and just the beginning.

[–] 25989158? points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Hi, 25988755?. You asked, "What's our purpose?"

Pleasure. It's all contained in my above-cited "Physics of God" article. Regarding the aliens:

The aliens are quite real. Anything one can interact with is real and exists--in some form or another. The interesting question centers around what is their actual ontological nature, i.e., in what form do they actually exist.

The veridical answer to that question is that the aliens (and their precursor edition, the demons) are particular naturally-evolved parts of our own mind, i.e., they are particular subsets of our own consciousness: mostly the aliens/demons/etc. exist in our subconscious, but the highest levels of the elite occult societies have figured out over the ages various mental techniques to bring the aliens to the fore, to the conscious level. These aliens are the gods of old, the ones that required human sacrifice.

For much more on what is going on with the aliens/demons/spirit-guides/etc., see my following article:

  • James Redford, "Societal Sadomasochism", Christian Forums, Apr. 19, 2019, archive.is/JPojL , megalodon.jp/2020-0325-0427-34/theophysics.freevar.com/christianforums.com-forums-general-political-discussion.450.html , www.freezepage.com/1585078048SAWDZFDONX .

On the more literal level of extraterrestrial life, it is likely that very simple forms of life exist throughout the universe. Yet the ancient alien hypothesis along with the idea of current intelligent extraterrestrial visitations has been pushed hard by certain sectors of the corporate media, and it is low-grade B-movie science-fiction schlock. A species powerful enough to cross stars--let alone galaxies--wouldn't come to Earth as humanoid creatures in ponderous starships, but rather would use extreme nanotechnology. If they were malicious and wanted to seize the Earth, they would fall to the ground as microscopic dust, infect our craniums, and we'd all be brain-dead before we hit the ground. It would be lights-out before any human even knew that anything had occurred.

Which is to say, if a species powerful and intelligent enough to cross stars were to land on Earth, where they would land is quite literally inside everyone's skulls.

Consult footnote 247 on pp. 103-104 of my following article regarding the globalist elite's New World Order alien deception agenda:

  • James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708, archive.org/download/ThePhysicsOfGodAndTheQuantumGravityTheoryOfEverything/Redford-Physics-of-God.pdf , purl.org/redford/physics-of-god , webcitation.org/74HMsJGbP .

My foregoing article concerns physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE), which is a proof (i.e., mathematical theorem) of God's existence per the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics). Tipler's Omega Point cosmology has been extensively peer-reviewed and published in a number of the world's leading physics and science journals. However, it also analyzes the societal implications of said, particularly the implications of the exponential advancement of technology and hence also the coming radical life-extension technologies (i.e., transhumanism) in light of a world dominated by a callous oligarchy.

[–] 25988562? ago 

Are you going to try to diver Patriots from Qanon October 14th messages?

[–] 25989052? points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

25988562? wrote, "Are you going to try to diver Patriots from Qanon October 14th messages?"

This is the Message. This is what everyone is fighting for, if they are fighting for anything other than Hell eternal. From the Q project:

""
3707

Dec 17, 2019 2:39:05 PM EST

Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6 ID: 663a19 No. 7536127

>>7536020

WW.

Though, nothing should ever replace 'CHRIST' in 'CHRISTmas'.

Merry CHRISTmas, Anons/Patriots.

God is on our side.

Q
""

--James Redford

[–] 25991269? points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[–] 25990955? points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Let's play offense, go spray paint Q over every biden sign you see

Let's get attention

[–] 25988115? points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Lol how the hell did you guys get the sleeping picture of him

Damn wizards

[–] 25990078? points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I read the pictures came from his laptop that took into evidence

[–] 25991198? ago 

Or from his phone...

[–] 25988228? ago 

it was taken just before they put the bullet in his right eye.

[–] 25989112? ago 

He is with his brother now.

[–] 25988806? ago 

Wait who is it?

[–] 25988009? points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

One ping only.

load more comments ▼ (19 remaining)