スレッド

会話

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

Will be doing a livestream during which I will be discussing this latest column at Conservative Treehouse, in which Sundance discusses how he 'briefed' top Durham investigator Bill Aldenburg on the James Wolfe case. Going live in a few:

Sundance joins the Durham Investigation!

Yeah well to hear him tell it, he's now briefing Durham investigators even though the Durham investigation is fake. Or something. It's hard to tell. Let's di...

youtube.com

午後3:34 · 2020年8月23日Twitter Web App

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

23時間

返信先:

@drawandstrike

さん

Ok going live in 3 minutes or less!

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

While criminal investigations are still underway, indictments against fellow criminal conspirators remain unsealed, no federal investigator or prosecutor is going to **discuss the evidence a cooperating defendant gave them**. That I have to explain this is very painful.

175

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Sundance's entire premise is that both Wolfe & Clinesmith were immediately handed sweetheart deals not for their cooperation against other defendants, but instead to make sure they KEPT THEIR MOUTHS **SHUT**. Let me explain to you how this actually works.

147

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Until a federal criminal investigation is completely over, and all the indictments have been unsealed, and all the plea deals have been reached or the trials have reached their conclusion, no details about what the cooperating defendants did to get their plea deals go public.

147

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Now, you may not LIKE that this is how the federal justice system operates, but hey, there are plenty of things in the real world that remain exactly as they are because they don't take your likes or dislikes into consideration.

133

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Sundance is **assuming** James Wolfe didn't cooperate to get that deal. That assumption appears to be based on the idea that "If Wolfe had gotten a deal for cooperating, details about what evidence or fellow conspirators he gave up would've become public by now."

118

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

He goes on to assume that despite the serious national security issues raised by the Wolfe case involving the leaking of classified information, there are no other investigations related to that underway because if there was, the **DOJ WOULD HAVE ANNOUNCED THEM**.

129

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Yes, as we all know, when the DOJ undertakes a highly sensitive criminal investigation involving multiple national security issues, the first thing they do is call a press conference and let the media & the public know all about it. That is...absurd.

189

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Look at the Clinesmith plea deal. Have the prosecutors shared any of the details about exactly who or what Clinesmith gave up to get that deal? No? Well why not? Where's the harm? :) They should all tell us right now, darn it! Again, that is absurd.

169

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

None of the other indictments have been unsealed yet, several of which are tied to the exact same "hide the CIA connection to Carter Page from the FISA Court!" issue for which Clinesmith was convicted.

205

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

Anybody who thinks DOJ needs to go public with details of plea agreements given to cooperating defendants **while the other cases are still ongoing** and indictments haven't even been unsealed yet either doesn't know how this works or they do know and they are messing with you.

242

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

It wasn't until YEARS LATER we found out what the cooperating defendants in that famous 5 Mafia Families case in NYC gave up to get their plea deals. After it was all over. It will be the same way here.

176

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

22時間

So anybody saying if a federal prosecutor doesn't say at the time a cooperating defendant in a criminal case is given a deal that "We gave this guy a sweetheart deal because he gave up X, Y & Z in exchange for this deal", that means they got the deal to keep their mouth shut?

150

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

21時間

They either don't know how this actually works or they are **pretending** they don't know how this works. The second is FAR WORSE than the first. I'll forgive ignorance. Malevolence? Never. /end

186

Who's Gonna Be Lucky Indicted #2? - Brian Cates

@drawandstrike

21時間

ADDENDUM: This actually makes more sense than Sundance tracking down Aldenberg, getting him to sit for an interview that turned into a briefing, and then some kind of contractual relationship.

105

R Stephani On Clouthub @RStephani

返信先:

さん,

さん

THANKS Brian. If I go read this I will get annoyed.So I most likely won't. Even before my run in with him re you, I had wearied of his style.

R Stephani On Clouthub @RStephani

返信先:

さん,

さん

Monetizing a site w/ valuable info=no problem. Clickbait BS=prob. My instinct suggested several years ago, based on the type of behavior you illustrate here, that SD was perhaps false MAGA. It is perhaps illustrative of our WINNING that SD comes again to the fore (+++new people)

返信先:

さん

- I recommend following Brian. He’s always pretty tuned in to the facts.

返信先:

さん

Who is Sundance?

他2件の返信

返信先:

さん

The problem w/your rebuttal is that if Wolfe is a co-conspirator only a plea agreement that outlines his *FUTURE* cooperation via trial testimony against other conspirators (Warren) is how you secure their guilty verdict/plea. Wolfe should’ve been charged w/conspiracy @ minimum.

返信先:

さん

Chance that this could be good? He will attack It isn't a good idea LMAO LOL Is he crazy? A bit jealous? Come on man Unite, do not divide Not cool Too bad

STI Team

@SearTactical

22時間

1/2 Not crazy... Not jealous... More on top of all the puzzle pieces than about 99% of Americans. The "tell" from DOJ/FBI has been absolutely clear... "preserve the Reps of these agencies, and settle for the corruption." I like Barr... but he's protecting people he shouldn't

返信をさらに表示

Twitterを使ってみよう

今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。

アカウント作成

トレンド

いまどうしてる？

ビデオゲーム · トレンド

#NBA2K21

トレンドトピック: PlayStation store, #2k21demo

14,590件のツイート

テクノロジー · トレンド

iPhone 12

12,894件のツイート

The Telegraph

15 分前

Meet the Republicans abandoning Donald Trump

Financial Times

3 時間前

Trump considers fast-tracking a Covid-19 vaccine before US election

アメリカ合衆国のトレンド

Another L

3,975件のツイート

さらに表示