daigo madokaさんのツイート

2019年3月11日

Aneh bgt kelakuan elit2 ke dua kubu masing2 bilang anti bujer tapi kolomnya di penuhin bujer dari kubu sendiri diem aje emang pada suka maen di aer keruh sama pengikut masing2 bikin pikiran sama2 keruh

返信先:

さん,

さん

The hadith on no one being better except in piety did not contain any instructions on how to treat people, who to marry or so on.

返信先:

さん,

さん

Ibn Hisham's biography said hat Muhammad said he promised the Quraysh they would rule the Arabs and the non-Arabs would pay them or submit to them if they converted to Islam

返信先:

さん

Those hadiths were obviously talking about non-Muslims. Not about Muslims of different ethnicities. sunnah.com/muslim/43/1 In this Sunni Hadith Muhammad describes how Allah chose him out of his clan, his tribe and supra-tribe and so on above

And the one who's doing that it's should obviously scholar and thats why some of them agree and the other don't

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 1時間

返信先: @carasumarenyaさん

Because every chain should've at least three narrators and those three narrators go through a vigorous test before they're considered reliable. In Islam, we've thousands of Judith Narrators and we've a biography of each and everyone of them.

By your definition all the practice of mawali and sayyid according hanbali syafii and hanafi is wrong and they're not the real muslim isn't it? So it's make majority in muslim is not really muslim isn't it? Btw it's not opinion but it's already practiced in juristprudence

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 1時間

返信先: @carasumarenyaさん

I already stated that a direct Hadith from the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is superior than any Fiqhi Opinion. You tried to critique the Hadith by attacking Sheikh al-Albani. Your attack falls short because the Hadith is graded Sahih by Sheikh ibn Hajar al-Asqalani.

And how you confirm the chains of narration? It's basically depent on scholar isn't it?

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 2時間

That's probably because the Hadith is graded Sahih by Sheikh al-Albani and Scholars before him like Sheikh ibn Hajar al-Asqalani based on the soundness of chain? Maybe it's you who isn't understanding the matter at hand. twitter.com/carasumarenya/…

And you clearly miss the point, the different treatment that i mentioned how arab muslim treat another arab muslim according islamic juristprudence, and that hadith just only said friend of prophet is only muslim, it didn't even negate anything or answer the problem at all

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 2時間

Yeaaaaap. He isn't understanding the Hadith at all. twitter.com/carasumarenya/…

Inferiority complex? it's very clearly in ottoman empire that non sayyid it's considered better than non arab muslim, you should embrace maliki sunni instead denying

引用ツイート

Haram Police

@xanny4haram

· 2時間

返信先: @MajorARKさん

Don't respond to him. He's an inferiority complex individual. There is a lot of them in Twitter. so it's futile to reason with them everydayhealth.com/inferiority-co

Again you circling around, in that hadith clearly said my friend are believer, and the issue that i raised in arab supremacy that non arab muslim treated differently from arab muslim in society, that hadith didn't even mentioned how to treat non arab muslim and it refute nothing

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 2時間

You don't have to be a Sherlock Holmes in order to understand that in the Hadith, Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was disregarding a family close to him in lineage and prioritizing Muslims. That already refutes the concept of Arab Superiority among Muslims. Ya Allah. twitter.com/carasumarenya/…

"Nowhere i said" and you cited Article that clearly said that hadith regarded sahih by al-albani, so you don't understand article that you cited at all

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 2時間

Nowhere I said the Hadith I quoted is Sahih because Sheikh Al-Albani graded it Sahih. You're misrepresenting my position, you know. twitter.com/carasumarenya/…

that hadith said righteous friend with muslim, the problem with arab superiority that

@porbotialora

mentioned is different treatment between arab muslim and non arab muslim according madhab, and that hadith didn't even address thebissue that i raised above

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 3時間

返信先: @MajorARKさん, @carasumarenyaさん

Second, for the sake of your satisfaction, I've a Hadith from Bukhari and Muslim both.

Al albani is also clerics, and it also make your first argument about al albani said that hadith is sahih get debunked by your second statement, and make your argument inconsistent

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 3時間

返信先: @carasumarenyaさん

Actually, no. A Hadith is classed Sahih based on the soundness and reliability of the Chain of Narration, not the amount of Scholars agreeing on it. Video below explains the chain of transmission in the start: youtu.be/HZxSqsf6KYk

Btw your first hadith are considered sahih by al albani he is also clerics and receive many criticism by hadith scholar convergencestride.com/2016/02/critiq

引用ツイート

Ghazi | غازی

@MajorARK

· 3時間

返信先: @carasumarenyaさん

You ignored the Hadith I quoted by Prophet Muhammad ﷺ from Bukhari and Muslim and jumped on the views of Ibn Taymiyyah. Sigh.