会話
Very interesting table. But, thinks may be more difficult. Since Sufism is transversal, you can be sunni or chi’i and being a Sufi. Like you can be mu’tazili, and Sunni, chi’i, or even ibadhi...and still having a ritual approach based on hanafism or shafi’ism...
1
1
You’re right and the intent was to convey that Sufi and theological affiliations are overlapping the legal affiliations
1
1
他4件の返信
Check out the edited volume called Progressive Muslims by Omid Safi and thinkers like Soroush, El-Zein, etc.
1
2
Definitely a helpful visual, thanks for putting it together! Still fairly phenomenological & needs to be couched in a discussion of material, social, spatial contexts etc.
Plus, there are still communities „left out“ & overlaps/blurred lines hard to represent in a single chart.
1
3
Maybe a 3D graphic artist can help us improve in this.
1
1
他1件の返信
Hi Khalil. Did you publish any paper/article on this? Can I have the link, please? I’d love to read it.
1
I’ll probably do something on my website soon
1
他1件の返信
Why do you consider the Quranists to fall under the Ahl al-sunnah camp when they completely reject the sunnah?
1
2
Because they historically come out of the Sunni traditions.
3
3
他1件の返信
他1件の返信
Oh shut up.
2
6
他2件の返信
No Ahmedis or Bareilvis or Deobandis? Muslims of Indian subcontinent are untouchable after all.
1
1
Ahmadis are there and Deobandis and Barlevis legally fall under Sunni schools already displayed
1
1
他3件の返信
There is no significant difference between wahabi and salafi. Abdul wahab was a salafi , and he simply updated salafism, nothing new
このツイートは表示できません。Learn more
凍結されたアカウントによるツイートです。Learn more
Your second statement is nonsense.
1
Cool! Any way to have a similarity index between all of these, especially Sunni side? If it's even possible.
1
Khalil, why did you differentiate between Wahhabi and Salafi? What do you see as the difference? I usually see the two terms used interchangeably.
1
I understood wahabi's as being a subset of salafis. Wahabis are salafi in aqida but hanbali in fiqh while original salafis rejected taqlid of the traditional mazahib.
But I'm sure that will have more nuance on this.
1
1
3
If there are so many types and supposedly few are extremist, and the entire world is facing terrorism threats, why are the supposedly non extremist quiet, why don't they confront / protest. Currently it seems as a monolith
凍結されたアカウントによるツイートです。Learn more
I'm quite confident that research on Islam and popularizing the findings will make the world a better place. Here's one example:
4
5
They are extreme salafis/wahabis.
1
他2件の返信
4 mere classification purposes Ur chart is OK.But 4 understanding essentials, it could b misleading.4 instance the only established Fiqhs R Hanafi, Maliki, Shafii & Hanbali.Also Sufi circles R divided in2 Naqshbandi, Chishti,Qadri & Suharwardi.Others R offshoots or mutations.
Hmm...I've studied sectarianism very thoroughly and this graph is unintentional misleading. It conflates legal differences with theological and even theological differences are typically philosophical or tertiary.
Shi'ism has more pronounced variations, true.
1
凍結されたアカウントによるツイートです。Learn more
Whenever one of those school of thoughts become politically or military power full than others, they kill the rest!
I have question brother who is fighting in Syria and Yemen.And Shia and Ahmedi in Pakistan will extinct in coming years.
So good! I wish I had this just last week when I was teaching on Islamic philosophy (al-Farabi, Avicenna, Al-Ghazali, Averroes)
1
Note the majority of Imami Ithna'ashari Shias are not Allawi - may be worth making that explicit?
Twitterを使ってみよう
今すぐ登録して、タイムラインをカスタマイズしましょう。
アカウント作成
トレンド
いまどうしてる?
アメリカ合衆国のトレンド
Austin Rivers
NFL · トレンド
Doug Pederson
トレンドトピック: Jonathan Isaac
4,156件のツイート
アメリカ合衆国のトレンド
Matt Vasgersian