She/her. Half Kuwaiti, half British. Medical doctor. Avid internationalist and supporter of cosmocracy (i.e. world government). I 'tweet' about many topics.
The name of the book is "Hostage to Khomeini".
It details the Muslim Brotherhood-Iranian connections.
It also details how Britain helped create and fund the Muslim Brotherhood movement.
Robert Dreyfuss once wrote a book about the Muslim Brotherhood-Iranian connection in the 80s.
Yes, the Brotherhood are close to Iran.
They're closer to Iran than they are to the neo-Ottomanist Erdogan.
引用ツイート
Theophilus
@lightuponlights
·
返信先: @nadiabelushiさん
Khomeinis shia esotericism is very close to ismailism
Because those are the people at the bottom of the pyramid. They genuinely think the MB is a Sunni Islamist movement. The higher you move up the pyramid, the more you realise the MB's leaders are Ismailis who are practising taqiyya. They have their own goals at the top.
引用ツイート
Theophilus
@lightuponlights
·
返信先: @nadiabelushiさん
If this is true why was the MB so anti sufi and mysticism?
It's a game between 2 different movements that are aligned together today because they both share common enemies. The neo-Ottomanists believe in their new empire. The Muslim Brotherhood's Ismaili leaders are Fatimids in disguise. They want a Fatimid revival.
The Muslim Brotherhood are using Turkey to help them come to power in Egypt. Once they take over Egypt, they'll dump Turkey.
The Turks are using the Brotherhood to gain supporters amongst the Arab masses. Once they achieve their neo-Ottoman dream, they'll dump the Brotherhood.
Don't confuse the Ismailis who control the Muslim Brotherhood for the Turkish neo-Ottomanists. The latter want a Turkish Caliphate, but the former actually want a Caliphate based in Egypt. Their present-day alliance is an alliance of convenience, and nothing more.
引用ツイート
Nadia Al-Belushi, MD
@nadiabelushi
·
Yes the Muslim Brotherhood wants a Caliphate but it's not the Caliphate people have in mind.
It's an Ismaili Caliphate, led by the Fatimid dynasty, which is currently represented by the Noorani family. The descendants of the Order of Assassins.
The "Mahdi" will be Nizari Ismaili.
This sets the stage for a Western-Middle Eastern civilisational synthesis. The masses will gradually be decoupled from their old beliefs, and embrace the new beliefs. The future of monotheism is something completely different to what began thousands of years ago.
Yes the Muslim Brotherhood wants a Caliphate but it's not the Caliphate people have in mind.
It's an Ismaili Caliphate, led by the Fatimid dynasty, which is currently represented by the Noorani family. The descendants of the Order of Assassins.
The "Mahdi" will be Nizari Ismaili.
So you can establish a link between Hassan Al Banna, founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, and Abdullah bin Maymun, the spiritual father of Nizari Ismailism, Roshaniya, Jamal Al Din Al Afghani, and the Muslim Brotherhood itself. This link spans generations and centuries.
引用ツイート
Nadia Al-Belushi, MD
@nadiabelushi
·
Nizari Ismailism is itself influenced by Abdullah bin Maymun, who believed that to reach the truth, you must go up the steps of a pyramid. At the bottom, God appears to be real. At the top, God doesn't really exist.
Nizari Ismailism is itself influenced by Abdullah bin Maymun, who believed that to reach the truth, you must go up the steps of a pyramid. At the bottom, God appears to be real. At the top, God doesn't really exist.
Hassan Al Banna was the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Al Banna took his ideas from Al Afghani, and Al Afghani was influenced by Roshaniya.
Roshaniya was a murky group with questionable beliefs and goals.
All are linked to Nizari Ismailism, which itself is an esoteric sect.
Very few know of the Roshaniya, a secret society of "enlightened ones" founded by Sufis in Afghanistan centuries ago. The eastern version of the Bavarian Illuminati, founded by Adam Weishaupt. The Roshaniya influenced Jamal Al Din Al Afghani, who later influenced Hassan Al Banna.
引用ツイート
Nadia Al-Belushi, MD
@nadiabelushi
·
Allegories usually lead to unexpected conclusions though.
The esoteric/mystical sects of Islam, Judaism and Christianity, such as Ismailism, eventually lead you to the conclusion that God doesn't exist, followed by another conclusions that we're all Gods (panpsychism). twitter.com/lightuponlight…
Allegories usually lead to unexpected conclusions though.
The esoteric/mystical sects of Islam, Judaism and Christianity, such as Ismailism, eventually lead you to the conclusion that God doesn't exist, followed by another conclusions that we're all Gods (panpsychism).
引用ツイート
Theophilus
@lightuponlights
·
返信先: @nadiabelushiさん
Everything in Book of Revelations happened in the time of Nero. John wrote it in biblical allegory to make it incoherent to the romans
Could be.
Or it could be that they all took their stuff from the same source, i.e. Sumerian civilisation. That perhaps explains why religions from faraway regions are very different.
I mean, the story of God creating Eve from Adam's rib is found in Judaism and Islam. Kinda funny.
引用ツイート
Middle East Observer
@ME_Observer_
·
返信先: @nadiabelushiさん
If you're a religious person, then it makes sense because God sent thousands of Prophets throughout history
Yes it's hard to tell allegories from literalism in these religious texts. So one has to be careful.
Some sects of Islam, Judaism & Christianity use allegories to explain passages. Especially sects that later became secretive, esoteric & mystical, such as Kabbalah & Ismailism.
引用ツイート
Theophilus
@lightuponlights
·
返信先: @nadiabelushiさん
BoR is entierly typological/metaphorical. For example babylon refers to rome. It doesnt claim that there is a real gog and magog, it refers to biblical archetypes
Well the New Testament identifies Gog and Magog as 2 separate entities from the entire world. Definitely a plagiarism of the Old Testament's "Gog FROM Magog".
The New Testament also stole the War of Ezekiel 38 and rebranded it as the Battle of Armageddon.
引用ツイート
Theophilus
@lightuponlights
·
返信先: @nadiabelushiさん
Its possible Book of revelation refers to person Gog AND his tribe. But quran and hadith are explicit that they are two different tribes
This isn't unique to Israelites. Arabs did the same in Mecca when they decided to reject all gods except one. In ancient Egypt, one of the pharaohs decided to reject all other gods and only worship Aten. This pharaoh was called Akhenaten.
引用ツイート
Nadia Al-Belushi, MD
@nadiabelushi
·
The God of Israel (HaShem) was one of many ancient Canaanite gods. The Canaanites worshipped many gods including Baal, HaShem, etc. The Israelites were an offshoot of Canaanites who decided to only worship HaShem and not to worship the other gods.
The God of Israel (HaShem) was one of many ancient Canaanite gods. The Canaanites worshipped many gods including Baal, HaShem, etc. The Israelites were an offshoot of Canaanites who decided to only worship HaShem and not to worship the other gods.
In ancient Mesopotamia, there were multiple gods and goddesses. One god apparently had sexual intercourse with a goddess for 6 days and 7 nights, and created the world as a result. This belief was incorporated into Judaism, and then later on Islam.
Another example is the Crescent and Star symbol, which Muslims stole from Christians, which they, in turn, stole from ancient Mesopotamian pagan cultures.
Also the story of God creating the world in 6 days was taken from ancient Mesopotamian beliefs.
引用ツイート
Nadia Al-Belushi, MD
@nadiabelushi
·
For example. In Islam, the Jewish phrase "Gog from Magog" is mistranslated as "Gog AND Magog". In Islam, it is thought that Gog and Magog are 2 separate peoples. But that's a mistranslation. Gog is actually a person, and Magog means "Land of Gog". But the Quran doesn't know that.
Gog was just a leader in Anatolia. His land was called Mat Gugi in Akkadian, which in Hebrew became "Magog". The Quran thinks Gog and Magog are 2 big nations/tribes but they're not. It's just an example of one religion stealing a story from another religion, and so on...