Despite the fact that Disney loves copyrighting characters (hell, they'd probably copyright you if it were even vaguely legal) Mulan is an ancient legend and immune from Mickey's thirst for intellectual property. This also means that there are tons of live-action Mulan movies for you to enjoy, mostly made in China. The first one was a silent film back in 1927, but if you're into talkies, there's 1939's Mulan Joins the Army -- which also didn't enjoy a smooth theatrical release. One early screening was interrupted by political protestors who set fire to the film reels which led to a full-blown riot. In 1964, The Shaw Brothers Studio released Hua Mulan, an epic, operatic version of the story, which you can watch on the decidedly non-epic format of YouTube.

More recently there was the action-filled live-action Mulan: Rise of a Warrior in 2009, which looks not dissimilar from the action-filled live-action Mulan Disney was set to release. It's even a tad grittier, with adult themes and even blood.

Again, sadly, there's not a talking dragon in sight.

John Stamos plays Lance Stargrove, son of a 007-like superspy played by an actual former Bond, George Lazenby. Oh, and the wildly problematic villain just so happens to be played by a cross-dressing Gene Simmons who probably needed a swimming pool's worth of Pepto Bismal after all the scenery he devoured.

Because it was the '80s, Lazenby gets killed by a cyberpunk-esque gang. This scene is intercut with Stamos performing a gymnastics routine ... again because it was the '80s. So is it a good movie? Hell, no. Is it worth watching to see the lead singer of Jesse and the Rippers murder the bassist for KISS as the latter is trying to shove his giant tongue down the former's throat? How can you even ask that?

Of course, a new Fast and the Furious movie is pretty much irreplaceable. Sure, you could try huffing a rag soaked in motor oil and Axe Body Spray while staring at the Oxford English Dictionary definition of "family" -- but it wouldn't be quite the same. But if you want a ridiculous action movie featuring street racers and a mysteriously resurrected character, how about The Wraith starring Charlie Sheen.

The movie is about a murdered teen who comes back to life as a supercar-driving "wraith" who suddenly looks like Charlie Sheen for some reason. He takes on the gang who murdered him using the supernatural power of ... more street racing. There's a lot of '80s awkwardness and low-budget shlock, but it has some pretty good action sequences (and Randy Quaid plays the town sheriff).

There are a lot of movies about travelling across post-apocalyptic landscapes, but as far as we know, there's only which features Don Johnson and a telepathic canine: A Boy and His Dog. But instead of navigating killer aliens with the noise sensitivity of an elderly librarian, he's merely trying to meet women and get apoco-laid.

Based on a novella by legendary science fiction author Harlan Ellison, A Boy and His Dog is obviously far more absurd take on the post-apocalypse than A Quiet Place 2 -- but it's far less absurd than the cut of A Quiet Place in which the aliens were played by Jim Halpert in a leotard.

While Wonder Woman 1984's release has been pushed back until August, luckily there's another female-fronted superhero movie you can check out, and it's also set in 1984 ... because that's when it was made. We're, of course, talking about Supergirl, the spin-off of the Christopher Reeve Superman series, in which Superman is conspicuously absent, presumably so "Superman's" career wouldn't be damaged.

Supergirl wasn't exactly well received at the time; it was mostly crapped on by critics and bombed at the box office. But today the movie has its defenders. Yes, the hokey story finds Supergirl battling a love potion-wielding witch, but its unabashed camp goofballery is totally in keeping with Silver Age comics. Plus, Supergirl's love interest is played by the skeezy cokehead from Die Hard. Plus there's a scene where Supergirl super-kicks a rapist right in the balls. So really, how bad could it be?

You (yes, you) should follow JM on Twitter!