Tech by VICE

The World After This

We're not going back to "normal" after the coronavirus. Here is exactly how things need to change for good, and for the better.

by Motherboard Staff
Mar 20 2020, 7:18pm

Illustration: Cathryn Virginia

Today, there are no clues as to the danger lurking outside my front door except for the eerie absence of people. Our lives are being restricted by a virus that is invisible to the naked eye, verging on abstraction, and yet it is terrifyingly real. Compare this to all the ways our lives are restricted by the many brutal rules, payments, and punishments of capitalism, which are now being revealed as actual fabrications that were subject to quick, substantive change all along—in other words, fake as hell.

Advertisement

The difference is: We can't change the fact that a virus is attacking the human species. We can change the fact that capitalists are attacking human life, too.

From arbitrary data caps being suspended by internet providers, to eviction bans, to suddenly-implemented protections for some workers, we are seeing that things we have long been told are impossible or unfeasible are suddenly OK. And as the estimates for how long our new world of "social distancing" will last stretch from weeks, to months, to a year, it's becoming more likely that when this is all over, we might not be able to return to "normal" even if we wanted to. But why would we want to?

It is clear that capitalism has failed us when people need support the most. The society we built on the premises of grift, waste, cruelty, and greed, is not one that can survive even a moderate disruption like a nasty virus without mass casualties and wrecked lives and bodies. What we urgently need, now and for the next crisis, is a society built more on resilience, solidarity, foresight, and compassion.

At this critical moment, when anything feels possible for good or for ill, we need to imagine how things can change for the better and to prevent future catastrophes. Almost nothing good comes to pass without mass struggle, and so it would be beyond naive to think that anything will happen "just" because it's plainly fucking obvious that it saves lives. Nobody knows what comes next, but it needs to be better than before. This is what it could look like. - Jordan Pearson

Advertisement

Free and universal healthcare

Last week, California Rep. Katie Porter questioned Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), on the costs that an uninsured American would face to get tested for coronavirus: $1,331. Over the course of five minutes, Porter made Redfield agree to invoke a federal regulation that would let him, and him alone, waive the cost of testing.

On March 13, the House passed legislation to make testing free anyway, but the regulation that Porter’s argument hinged on could be applied to waive the person cost of any disease for any intervention, including testing, treatment, and even transportation. It’s easy to think of worthy diseases or medical bills with costs that the CDC could unilaterally cover en masse, especially when such illnesses pose a greater risk to the community at large than to a given individual.

Inadequate testing has hampered America’s response to the pandemic, but countries with universal access to health care have gotten it right: South Korea, for example, has tested hundreds of thousands of people, while the U.S. is lagging behind. But the cost and availability of Covid-19 testing is just a symptom of underlying problems in the U.S. healthcare system that the coronavirus is now laying bare.

We’ve heard the refrain from one politician in particular, Senator Bernard Sanders, that healthcare is a basic human right: after the burden of the pandemic has lessened, we can and should scrutinize how our current system held up against single-payer systems in Britain or Australia, and then change it for good. Not only will this effect so much change in people's lives that American society may never be the same, but it will make us more resilient for the next crisis. - Maddie Bender

Advertisement

Abolish ICE and prisons

When ICE determines whether to detain or release immigrants and asylum seekers, it uses a rigged algorithm that only returns one result: Detain. Now, in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic, the tens of thousands of people this purposely-broken system has sent to overcrowded detention facilities are facing a deadly virus that is about to spread rapidly through incarcerated populations across the U.S.

Groups like the immigrant rights organization Mijente are calling for ICE to immediately cease its raids and arrests, which are enabled by technology provided by companies such as Palantir, Dell, and Microsoft. Even now, the immigration agency has continued business as usual—arresting people outside hospitals, while shopping for food, and even while picking their kids up from school.

ICE is now a public health hazard

Forcing people into packed and unsanitary detention centers "increases the risk of infection, meaning ICE is now actively endangering public health in its single-minded mission to arrest undocumented immigrants,” reads an open letter that Mijente is sending to companies in light of the Covid-19 crisis. In other words, ICE is now a public health hazard.

This is not unique to the immigration agency. In prisons and jails—which are often overcrowded, unsanitary, and filled with people charged with non-violent crimes—disease spreads rapidly throughout incarcerated populations. On Wednesday, New York’s Riker’s Island jail reported that two people (an inmate and a prison guard) had tested positive for the virus. Advocates have been warning for decades that our entire carceral system is simply not built to promote the health and well-being of incarcerated people. And as medical experts have warned, what happens inside these facilities always quickly spreads to the surrounding communities.

Advertisement

State and federal authorities are under pressure to dramatically reduce jail and prison populations. Several states including Ohio and California have begun releasing hundreds of people to slow the spread of the disease, and some prosecutors have begun declining to prosecute non-violent offenses. But ultimately, as medical experts have noted over and over, the very structure and purpose of prisons and jails—and the cops and prosecutors who fill them with human beings—is antithetical to public health. Faced with an unprecedented health crisis, there has never been a more urgent time to donate to your local bail fund and demand that elected officials empty prison cells before they’re filled with bodies. - Janus Rose

Protect and empower labor

In the midst of the coronavirus pandemic, a few companies like Patagonia and R.E.I. have done the right thing and closed stores while continuing to pay workers in full. But millions of gig workers, contractors, temps, and fast food workers aren’t so lucky. Many companies, hoping to squeeze profits out of the pandemic stock-piling hysteria, have kept their doors open and refused to provide the most basic protections like paid sick days. Just to name a few: Amazon warehouse workers, Uber and Lyft drivers, Whole Foods team members, GameStop and BestBuy retail workers, all have not been offered paid sick leave (unless they test positive for Covid-19), and many have continued to go to work even if they’re sick or at high risk.

One of the biggest takeaways from the coronavirus pandemic has been that all workers need paid sick leave (which should not be conflated with paid time off or vacation days), paid leave for parents, and healthcare. Without these protections, everyone’s safety and health is put at risk, particularly the most vulnerable members of our society. Studies show that paying workers to stay home when they’re sick substantially reduces the spread of the flu.

Now more than ever is the time to imagine a better world for workers, which we’ve seen glimpses this week with the expansion of sick leave benefits. Unfortunately though, companies that have extended new benefits during the pandemic will roll those back when this comes to a close.

Advertisement

And so, real and lasting change for workers will need to take place on a systemic level with new benefits and protections for gig workers, franchise workers, contracted workers, temps, and the service industry workers. These can be brought about with a robust union movement (unionized workers are more likely to have paid leave, healthcare benefits, and lower deductibles than their non-union counterparts) and politicians who are willing to fight for these changes at every level of government. - Lauren Kaori Gurley

A healthier climate

At the start of the decade, many environmentalists called for 2020 to be the year where global carbon emissions definitively declined. Now, thanks to a global pandemic, that’s happening on a scale nobody could have imagined. And it feels like nothing to cheer.

China, the world’s largest carbon emitter, saw its carbon footprint shrink by a quarter in February as the nation took extreme measures to combat Covid-19, including significantly scaling back heavy industry. In hard-hit Italy, electricity demands and air pollution have both plummeted in recent weeks. The airline industry is in freefall and begging for bailouts.

There’s nothing good about reducing emissions like this. In fact, if the 2008-09 financial crash is any indicator, carbon could shoot right back up as soon as the crisis is over. As nations scramble to get their economies back on track, climate goals could fall by the wayside, especially if the price of oil remains low. But it doesn’t have to be that way.

Advertisement

Instead of going back to business-as-usual, governments can put climate at the center of their economic recovery plans. Future stimulus packages can include tax credits for renewable energy and electric vehicles, as well as massive investments in green infrastructure like energy storage facilities and EV charging stations. Bailouts for polluters can include stipulations that they cut emissions in line with what the science says is needed to stave off climate catastrophe. We did a lot of this in 2009—and the result? The economy bounced back.

Right now, climate concerns are taking a back seat to the public health crisis. That’s a good thing. But as we start thinking about how to rebuild our lives in wake of this unprecedented upheaval, we’re going to have an opportunity to do so in a way that prevents far more deaths and suffering in the future. We’d be foolish not to take it. - Maddie Stone

Fast, accessible broadband

As millions of Americans hunker down to slow the spread of Covid-19, America’s broadband dysfunction is being laid bare. Many homebound Americans will find essential connectivity just out of reach, and efforts to roll back basic consumer protections have left Americans vulnerable to everything from privacy abuses to ISP billing fraud. In addition to treating their customers terribly, Covid-19 has exposed how their employees aren’t being treated much better. For decades, consumer groups, analysts, and telecom experts repeatedly warned that U.S. broadband networks were falling short. Recent studies suggest that some 42 million Americans lack access to broadband of any kind. U.S. consumers pay some of the highest rates for broadband in the developed world, and many simply can’t afford a broadband connection.

Meanwhile, U.S. broadband is rated mediocre at best at nearly every metric that matters thanks not only to a lack of broadband competition — but the well-lobbied politicians and revolving door regulators eager to defend the profitable status quo. Turn after turn, time after time, public welfare has taken a back seat to the quarterly earnings of telecom monopolies.

As America realizes broadband is an essential utility, everything from terrible U.S. broadband maps to the flimsy justification for broadband usage caps are being exposed as fantasy. Community owned and operated broadband networks, long demonized and even prohibited by law in many states, are looking better than ever in the wake of a nationwide crisis.

Advertisement

As with countless other sectors, the heartbreaking pandemic creates an opportunity to cast aside our illusions of exceptionalism and rebuild systems with an eye on affordability, accountability, and the common good. In the process shaking off monopolies that have stalled progress, gutted consumer protections, and left far too many disconnected and vulnerable. - Karl Bode

Smash the surveillance state

The United States used the September 11 attacks and the ever-present threat of "terrorism" more generally as a justification to roll out the surveillance state. This led to the passage of the Patriot Act, which included legal authority for the bulk surveillance of American citizens by the National Security Agency. It also led to the militarization of local and state police. Small towns and large cities all over the country now have tanks, for example. Before the coronavirus hit, we were just starting to take a hard look at rolling back some of the excesses of the Patriot Act.

This new pandemic must not be used as a reason to infringe on the civil liberties and privacy of millions of people. Already, we are seeing surveillance companies—many of which are untested—say that they can use their AI-powered cameras to detect those infected with coronavirus. Israel and Israeli telecoms are using a secret database of user location data to track those who are infected and those who might have come into contact with them, and American companies have considered following suit.

Advertisement

We cannot accept being constantly tracked and monitored by our governments and large corporations as the new normal

Technology of course must play a role in our response to coronavirus, and while we are in the midst of a crisis, we will probably have to accept things we wouldn't during more normal times. But after we're through to the other side, any surveillance that was used to slow the spread of the coronavirus must be rolled back. We cannot accept being constantly tracked and monitored by our governments and large corporations as the new normal. Decisions about how and when this technology is developed and deployed have to be made with the buy-in of those who will be surveilled, and these decisions must be made transparently. We should not, for example, hand huge government contracts to companies pitching untested, ethically dubious AI. Coming out of this crisis, there will be an opportunity to talk about the type of world we want to live in, and we must make clear that it's one that respects privacy. - Jason Koebler

Billionaire wealth

The last few years have shown how so many of society's problems are caused by the fact that individuals can amass incomprehensible private wealth that could, if deployed altruistically, alleviate the suffering and worry of literally millions of people basically overnight. And where are the rich now, during a public health crisis? They're sending people to work while jetting off to luxurious doomsday bunkers, getting Covid-19 tests while normal people can't, and also singing "Imagine" from bucolic getaways.

Advertisement

It is plainly obvious what needs to be done if we are going to have any sort of shot at a more resilient society: expropriate their wealth and put it to work. This isn't politics anymore, it's survival. - Jordan Pearson

Public transit that works

Transit agencies need money and they need it now. More than 220 elected officials, cities, and organizations signed a letter to Congress calling for almost $13 billion in emergency funding so transit agencies can keep providing service for essential workers even as ridership has plummeted by up to 90 percent. Congress giving money for transportation is nothing new, but the way in which it is given is critical to making sure it goes to the right place.

As I recently reported, Congress gives transit agencies money to build new things or buy new fleets of trains and buses, not to cover the costs of running service day to day. That's how the Great Recession stimulus worked, which is why nearly every city had to cut service and lay off bus drivers even as they hired construction workers and built new transit hubs. That approach won't cut it this time, and so it's time to scratch that rule.

It's also well past time to allow federal money to pay for the transit basics people care about: frequent, reliable service that goes where we need it to. A great many things are broken about the way the federal government funds public transit in this country. On the most fundamental level, there has never been a strategy formed about what goals that funding is supposed to accomplish (traffic reduction? The environment? Cost?) and how to measure whether those goals are being reached.

Admittedly, there are extremely difficult financial years ahead in an extremely difficult industry even during the best of times. Meanwhile, Congress is poised to prioritize bailing out airlines and the cruise industry before it takes a look at public transit, for reasons I think are bad and dumb.

Advertisement

There is opportunity, though: should Congress eventually meander its way to considering the fate of an industry that moves tens of millions of people every single day, it can start to ask some of those questions about what exactly they want our tax dollars to accomplish, and then actually do it. Should we actually bother to think about American public transit policy, we can make things better quickly. - Aaron Gordon

The right to repair

Coronavirus has exposed that America’s lack of right-to-repair laws are a sham. Before the virus, farmers couldn’t fix their own John Deere tractors and folks who fixed their own iPhones might wake up one day to find Apple had disabled the device.

Now, right-to-repair has become a matter of life and death. The U.S. doesn’t have enough ventilators to keep up with the demand COVID19 patients will present. To keep older ventilators and other crucial medical devices functioning, technicians need to be able to repair them. But, like iPhones, the medical device manufacturers use software to make repairs hard and do their best to keep repair manuals secret.

Even in the face of the crisis, manufacturers are keeping secrets and

making it hard to repair malfunctioning devices. To meet the demand for ventilators and spare parts, groups are gathering online to share recipes for DIY solutions. The third party repair company iFixit is building a database of manuals and repair information for medical devices. And physicians are sharing risky, but potentially life saving, techniques to hack ventilators to improve patient capacity. In Italy, device manufacturers are threatening to sue people who’ve 3D printed parts for medical devices used to treat medical device patients.

This isn’t the way things should be. People should be allowed to repair their own stuff, especially when that stuff is a life saving medical device needed during a pandemic. We shouldn’t rely on Elon Musk making ventilators to save us. We can save ourselves. Right-to-repair legislation is making progress across the United States. The virus has laid bare why it must be enshrined in law. - Matthew Gault

Advertisement

Science for the people

Covid-19 is not humanity’s first scrape with a deadly coronavirus. From 2002 to 2003, an outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), also caused by a coronavirus, killed hundreds of people. It was a wake-up call to many scientists about the potential threat of a coronavirus strain to crescendo into a pandemic.

That’s why a team led by Peter Hotez, dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and co-director of the Texas Children’s Hospital Center for Vaccine Development, had developed a SARS vaccine by 2016. The problem? No pharmaceutical or biotech companies were interested in funding trials of the vaccine in humans. The SARS outbreak had long since faded from the public’s attention, and there was no clear profit to be made from a vaccine that seemed to lack immediate demand.

We were caught flat-footed by a fixation on “innovation” and lack of public options

These structural funding gaps for neglected vaccines have now come back to bite us, with tragic consequences. Covid-19 is about 80 percent similar to SARS, as Hotez pointed out in his recent testimony to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the United States House of Representatives, but we were caught flat-footed by a fixation on “innovation” and lack of public options. As it stands right now it will likely take at least 12 to 18 months to develop a vaccine that can safely be administered to the public.

Advertisement

“The peer review system heavily biases innovation so that sometimes—like, for instance, some of the vaccines that we used, which are pretty traditional recombinant protein technology—would not be of interest even though it’s important as a health product,” Hotez told me in a call. The only reason Hotez’s team eventually created the SARS vaccine was a generous government grant for biodefense, he said.

This unprecedented pandemic demands more aggressive investment in organizations such as nonprofit product development partnerships (PDPs), which can work on vaccines for overlooked diseases such as hookworms, leishmaniasis, Chagas disease—and yes, coronavirus. This will help the global medical community anticipate and stem future outbreaks of the scale and severity of Covid-19. - Becky Ferreira

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Tagged:
Science
prison
ice
healthcare
labor
Work
Coronavirus
data caps
covid-19
More like this
Tech by VICE

Thousands of Doctors Demand ICE Release Detainees to Stop a COVID-19 Disaster

ICE won’t close its overcrowded detention centers to stop the coronavirus. Doctors say people are going to die.

by Janus Rose
Mar 18 2020, 4:57pm

The Washington Post / Getty Images

Over 3,000 medical professionals are demanding the immediate release of all detainees held in immigration facilities by ICE, warning of deadly consequences as COVID-19 continues to spread.

In an open letter sent to the US immigration agency this week, medical workers point out that the conditions of overcrowded prisons, jails, and detention facilities guarantee the rapid spread of sickness and disease—including the highly-contagious and life-threatening virus that has paralyzed cities across the world.

“Considering the extreme risk presented by these conditions in light of the global COVID-19 epidemic, it is impossible to ensure that detainees will be in a ‘safe, secure and humane environment,’ as ICE’s own National Detention Standards state,” the letter reads. “As such, we strongly recommend that ICE implement community-based alternatives to detention to alleviate the mass overcrowding in detention facilities.”

The letter is being spearheaded by Doctors for Camp Closure and New York Lawyers for the Public Interest (NYLPI), which works with incarcerated populations. As of Wednesday, the letter has been signed by more than 3,000 doctors, nurses, and medical professionals.

Medical experts warn that this not only needlessly endangers the lives of tens of thousands of immigrants and asylum seekers—many of whom have never been charged with a crime—but threatens to infect prison staff and the surrounding communities, further straining emergency medical resources.

“What happens in there happens in the community as well,” Nathaniel Katz, an instructor of medicine at Columbia University’s Irving Medical Center and a member of NYLPI’s medical steering committee, told Motherboard. “The conditions and the outbreaks that happen in these facilities are going to be reflected in the communities of which they’re a part.”

The letter comes as pressure builds on officials to take drastic measures to slow the spread of COVID-19, which the World Health Organization has declared a global pandemic.

This weekend, courts in Ohio began releasing hundreds of inmates in an effort to contain the virus. Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez similarly announced Tuesday that his office would “immediately decline to prosecute low-level offenses that don’t jeopardize public safety,” as a measure to stem the flow of people into New York City’s overcrowded prison system. And in Iran, where 129 fatalities were recently reported in a single day, the government has released 85,000 prisoners to fight back the disease.

Despite the pandemic, US immigration agencies are showing no signs of deviating from business as usual. Even after Mayor London Breed announced a “shelter-in-place” order in San Francisco, ICE agents donned masks and continued to raid and arrest immigrants in the city. Speaking to Mother Jones, one Cuban asylum seeker detained at a for-profit jail in Louisiana said that “it’s going to be a massacre” once the coronavirus inevitably arrives at the overcrowded facility.

“The idea that we continue to place people into the detention and deportation machine right now when we can’t assure the health of the people who are already in the system is really appalling,” Marinda van Dalen, a senior staff attorney at NYLPI, told Motherboard.

Even absent a full-blown pandemic, disease and illness regularly rips through jails and prisons, where overcrowded inmates live in unsanitary conditions with artificially scarce access to basic hygiene products like soap and toilet paper.

“Based on our experience working with people who are in immigration detention in New York, we’ve seen these facilities are unable to provide even basic medical care to people,” said van Dalen. “Over and over we’ve seen that the care that they’re receiving is inadequate, and that’s when we’re not facing the kind of health crisis that’s now upon us.”

An ICE spokesperson did not respond to Motherboard’s request for comment.

“These are spaces that are created for control, they are not spaces created for hygiene,” said Katz. “All of the basic public health measures that we use to prevent the spread of infectious disease are either severely lacking or absent.”

Even when treatment is available, prisons and jails have historically failed to provide it to those locked inside. For example, Katz pointed out that during the H1N1 outbreak in 2009, less than half of the country’s incarcerated population was given the vaccine. And in Michigan, nearly half the state’s prisons are currently locked down after experiencing a flu outbreak exacerbated by conditions inside, he said.

Last year, at least 3 children died of the flu after US immigration agencies refused to vaccinate the tens thousands of people held in their detention facilities. In December, Doctors For Camp Closure responded by setting up a mobile clinic to vaccinate children being held at a CBP detention facility outside San Diego. But the doctors were turned away—and one charged with a misdemeanor—after attempting to provide the inoculations.

Given COVID-19’s rapid spread—and the current lack of a vaccine—activists across the country are demanding authorities release inmates and detainees as the only moral course of action. On Monday, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against an ICE detention facility in Seattle, demanding the agency immediately release individuals who are at high risk of illness or death from the virus.

“Delaying action on this is only going to make things worse,” said Jessica Merlin, an associate professor at the University of Pittsburgh who serves as director of Doctors for Camp Closure’s Pennsylvania chapter. “The sooner we act, the better it will be.”

This article originally appeared on VICE US.

Advertisement
Tech by VICE

Coronavirus Has Caused a Drop in Emissions. Don't Celebrate Yet

Even though air pollution over China, the world’s largest emitter, has dropped substantially, anything that causes human death is counterproductive to climate justice.

by Nylah Burton
Mar 19 2020, 12:20pm

The economic slowdown caused by the reductions in aviation industries has led to stark drops in carbon emissions. Photo by Vernon Yuen/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has dramatically altered the daily lives of almost every person in the world. To contain the disease—which according to Johns Hopkins University data has infected more than 193,000 and killed more than 7,800 people globally—countries and communities have taken drastic measures, mainly lockdowns of entire regions and cities, as well as social distancing that some scientists say may need to last a year or more.

The economic slowdown caused by the reduction in aviation industries, as well as reduced work travel as people are shuttered in their homes, has led to stark drops in carbon emissions and air pollution.

So far, the countries that have seen the steepest drop in emissions are the ones who have been most affected by the pandemic. The coronavirus eliminated at least a quarter of China’s greenhouse gas emissions in two weeks during mid-February, the Independent reported. Satellite images of the country from the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) showed a shocking drop in nitrogen dioxide, a noxious gas from vehicles, power plants, and factories.

In Italy, where COVID-19 has infected more than 31,000 people and killed more than 2,500, nitrogen dioxide levels have decreased substantially between January 1 and March 11, according to the European Space Agency’s (ESA) Copernicus Sentinel-5p satellite.

The ESA found that this reduction was particularly pronounced in northern Italy, the epicentre of the outbreak in the country.

“Although there could be slight variation in the data due to cloud cover and changing weather, we are very confident that the reduction in emissions that we can see coincides with the lockdown in Italy causing less traffic and industrial activities,” said Claus Zehner, the ESA’s Copernicus Sentinel-5P mission manager, in a statement.

For some concerned with the devastating impacts of the climate crisis, this drop in emissions may seem like cause for celebration, or at least a silver lining in a gloomy cloud.

But it’s not.

This drop is short-term. Studies have shown that there was a 5.9 percent increase in global carbon emissions after the 2008 financial crisis. Drops in carbon emissions are common after global crises; they occurred during the 1918 Spanish Flu, The Great Depression (1929-1939), and the 1970s Energy Shocks and Iranian Revolution. But carbon emissions have risen at a terrifyingly exponential rate despite those drops.

Already, China is planning to relax environmental rules to allow factories idled during the epidemic to get back up to speed, which will actually make China’s air pollution much worse.

Beyond all of that, the coronavirus is expected to kill countless numbers of people. Anything that causes human death is counterintuitive to the climate justice movement.

Instead of celebrating these drops in emissions, we should all take this moment to consider making some of these measures permanent: reduce air travel, telecommute, have basic human rights like housing, healthcare, and food provided by the state. Not only will they result in long-term emissions reduction, but they will bring greater equity to all people. And that is the goal of climate justice: humans collaborating to make large-scale change to save one other.

"Radical rapid change on a global scale is possible"

Maggie Clifford, a PhD student in climate literacy and communications at American University in Washington, D.C., said the way people are coming together to help at-risk populations gives her hope.

“There is a hopeful quality to how a lot of people are responding to the pandemic,” she told VICE. “They’re saying, ‘I'm going to do this for the benefit of others who are immunocompromised or disabled or elderly.’ There is an element of beauty there.”

Clifford said there are a number of ways the pandemic can “help us gain empirical evidence that radical rapid change on a global scale is possible.” But that requires seeing the urgency that the climate crisis poses, and the necessity of the recent changes to combating that crisis.

Dr. Tracey Ritchie, an environmental educator based in Washington, D.C., told VICE that there have been “drastic overnight behaviour changes put in place for this pandemic because people are seeing that the situation is extremely urgent, extremely fatal, and spreading rapidly.”

But Ritchie said it’s been “frustrating” to see that people don’t regard the climate crisis with a similar sense of urgency and concern.

For Ritchie, it’s crucial that people “take some of these new realities and translate them into better climate action”—while keeping accessibility and equity at the forefront of their minds.

There is a lot of overlap, Ritchie stressed, between the communities most vulnerable to the climate crisis and the communities most vulnerable to the coronavirus. For example, disabled people experience environmental ableism—like being denied straws or inhalers under the guise of climate activism—and are also most at-risk for dying of the coronavirus. Indigenous peoples are being hit by the coronavirus hard, with lack of access to healthcare or supplies, and they’re also often the most affected by the climate crisis.

For Zipporah Arielle, a writer and disability activist, it’s frustrating to see many of the accommodations they and other people with disabilities have been asking for only implemented when able-bodied people feel at risk. “Seeing disabled people as expendable enough to see this as a net positive ignores the other areas we could be targeting—ones that would require a sacrifice from non-disabled people,” she told VICE.

For the past few weeks, commuting has been reduced by allowing people to work from home, and our dependence on delivery services like Amazon lessened by helping out homebound neighbours with shopping and errands. These radical changes will not only help the climate crisis, but will improve the lives of people everywhere.

The World Health Organization’s director-general, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said that COVID-19 is the “defining global health crisis of our time.” The climate crisis, which will also lead to more catastrophic infectious diseases, is also the crisis of our time. Our response to COVID-19—how we treat each other, how we advocate for each other, how we come together to make systemic change—will not only determine how many lives we save from the coronavirus, but also how many lives we save from the crises yet to come.

Nylah Burton is a writer based in Washington D.C., who covers mental health, climate, and race. Follow her on Twitter.

Have a story for Tipping Point? Email TippingPoint@vice.com

Advertisement
Health

Once and for All, the New Coronavirus Was Not Made in a Lab

A new paper explains exactly what makes it different than other coronaviruses and how we know that it wasn’t created in a lab.

by Shayla Love
Mar 20 2020, 5:40pm

BlackJack3D/Getty Images

On January 30, Arkansas senator Tom Cotton tweeted that although he didn’t know where the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, originated, he wanted to point out that "Wuhan has China’s only biosafety level-four super laboratory that works with the world’s most deadly pathogens to include, yes, coronavirus.”

He was implying, as other conspiracy theorists have continued to do, that the new virus was intentionally made and released (ignoring the fact there are many "level-four super laboratories" around the world). Politicians, including Donald Trump, continue to call SARS-CoV-2 the “Chinese virus” or “Wuhan Virus.”

But the origins of viruses, and how they come to infect humans, are almost always more complicated than a couple of evil geniuses secretly creating infectious killers. Viruses mutate constantly, playing the equivalent of a genetic slot machine until they chance upon the winning genetic sequences to allow them to jump from animals into humans, and be infectious enough to spread their genetic information far and wide.

While there’s still so much uncertainty about the COVID-19 pandemic—how long it will last, what treatment options might work, when a vaccine will arrive, there are actually a lot of things that we do know about the virus, through genetics and structural biology—including where it came from.

In a new paper in Nature Medicine, scientists from the U.S., Australia, and the U.K. analyzed the virus closely—outlining its likely origins and exactly how and why it seems to be more infectious than previous coronaviruses, like SARS or MERS. Their research also provides a resolution to the “made-in-a-lab” speculation. Kristian Andersen, an associate professor of immunology and microbiology at Scripps Research, said in a press release: “We can firmly determine that SARS-CoV-2 originated through natural processes."

“Seeing that kept me up all night”: This virus is different from other coronaviruses

You can tell a lot about a virus from its genome—what kind of virus it is, and how closely related it is to viruses you already know about. The genetic sequence to SARS-CoV-2 was made available very quickly by Chinese scientists, allowing researchers all over the world to see what made the new virus tick.

Coronaviruses get their name from spikes that cover their surface that look a bit like the sun’s corona. Those spikes are key to how the virus infects a human cell and two integral parts of the new virus’s spikes are slightly different from those of previous coronaviruses. These differences could help us understand how it’s spreading farther and infecting more people.

The first change is in the receptor-binding domain. This is part of the spike that binds to a human cell—for this virus it attaches to ACE-2, a cell membrane enzyme that regulates blood pressure.

We already knew that the 2003 SARS binding could bind pretty tightly to ACE-2. But in a Science paper this month, researchers using cryo-electron microscopy revealed that the new virus’s spike was better. It binds to the ACE-2 receptor 10 times more tightly than a SARS virus does. This difference is made possible by small variations in structure to the receptor binding domain.

Coronavirus diagram
PenWin / Getty

The second adaptation in the new coronavirus is a part of the spike called the cleavage site. The spike is a folded up-bundle, and it has to be cleaved, or cut, in a specific place to pop open, like releasing a spring. After being cleaved, the spike is used to grab onto a human cell.

The cleavage site is made up of small amino acid sequences that are recognized by cellular enzymes called proteases, enlisted to do the cutting. These molecular scissors are different for each coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2's cleavage site is made of amino acids that attract an enzyme called furin. Our bodies make furin in a lot of different tissues, but in particular, in the upper respiratory and lower respiratory tract.

When a virus has a cleavage site that attracts furin to do the cutting, it becomes more dangerous. To compare, influenza viruses are often cleaved and activated by enzymes called trypsin, "which are typically restricted to certain tissues and organs," said Jean Millet, a microbiologist at the Molecular Virology and Immunology unit of INRAE, located in France, who wasn't involved in the paper.

Experiments with avian influenza virus have shown that if they evolve a furin cleavage site, they become much more infectious. Having a furin cleavage site means that the virus is able to replicate more, and in different tissues. It can easily go into the lower respiratory tract. It may be one of the reasons that people develop pneumonia—though this hasn’t been proven for certain.

“Seeing that in the new SARS-CoV-2 when those sequences came out for the first time actually kept me up all night,” said Bob Garry, an assistant professor of microbiology and immunology at Tulane University School of Medicine and co-author of the Nature paper.

We know it didn’t come from a lab because it’s more effective than anything any human could have come up with

These changes may be alarming, but they're also how we know this virus wasn't designed in the lab. Simply put, the adaptations—specifically the binding to ACE2—are just too good for a human to have come up with it.

Computer programs that scientists use to model the interactions between a virus's spike and ACE-2 don’t predict that the receptor SARS-CoV-2 has would work very well. And yet, it does—as Wrapp found, 10 times better. It’s an indication that the alterations in the binding were selected for through natural selection, not genetic engineering.

“You couldn't predict that with any computer program,” Garry said. “Nature usually is better at doing things than we can figure out with a computer these days. That's pretty good evidence that this virus did evolve to bind to human ACE-2 on its own. Nobody helped it. If somebody had designed it, they would have used a different solution.”

I asked if there was any possibility some evil-genius person out there, with a different computer algorithm, could have come up with it. “Like in the comic books? It doesn’t seem likely,” Garry said.

"This is a convincing argument," Millet confirmed. "SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 do bind the same receptor but they do so in different ways that is most likely through an evolutionary process whereby each virus has 'figured out' different ways to do so...This goes against the notion that someone or a group would have intentionally used the SARS-CoV sequence to generate a new virus."

Additionally, if someone wanted to make a coronavirus, they would use another virus as a building block, Garry said. But the virus that is closest to SARS-CoV-2 is a bat virus that wasn’t discovered until after the outbreak. There's no evidence from the SARS-CoV-2 genome that any other virus was used as a backbone to make something new.

Where and when it came from

Viruses mutate at a steady rate, and so as they spread, researchers can look at how many adaptations they've acquired and count back in time to figure out when it appeared. Co-author Andrew Rambaut, professor of Molecular Evolution at University of Edinburgh, did this, and found that SARS-CoV-2 sprung up in humans in either late November or early December—which makes sense given it was December 31 that Chinese authorities told the World Health Organization about the outbreak.

That's the "when," but it doesn’t tell us where exactly it came from. In the SARS epidemic from the early 2000s, the virus transferred directly from a civet cat to humans. “It didn’t have to adapt,” Garry said. “It was already good to go.” With MERS, it was a similar story—the same virus that infected camels got passed to humans.

SARS and MERS didn’t transmit between people as well as the new coronavirus does. That could be because SARS-CoV-2 has adapted more to humans—meaning it didn’t just jump from an animal, but first adapted to infect us better. “I could be proven wrong tomorrow," Garry said. "Somebody could find an animal out there that has a virus that's identical to SARS-CoV-2. I don't think that's going to happen."

coronavirus
KTSDESIGN/ Getty/ SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY

The closest virus to the new coronavirus is a bat virus, RaTG13, which is 96 percent similar. Yet it’s missing one crucial thing: its spike has a different receptor binding domain, not the defining one that SARS-CoV-2 has. Intriguingly, another recently discovered virus, from the pangolin, a scaly anteater, is less like SARS-CoV-2 overall, but does have a strongly similar receptor binding domain.

Garry said that because of this, he and his co-authors think it’s possible that SARS-CoV-2 is a recombinant virus, meaning it’s a combination of two different viruses that shared their genetic information. This is like a couple moving in together and combining their kitchen appliances. Suddenly they have access to tools they didn’t before—a Vitamix and a food processor. A coronavirus might have been able to gain the enhanced receptor binding and then mutated further until genetic luck brought it the furin cleavage site.

What we don’t know is the specifics of where or when this recombination and other mutation occurred. It could have happened while the virus was still in an animal—then, after the furin cleavage adaptation, it was able to jump into humans and spread rapidly afterwards. Another possibility is that a previous non-pathogenic version of the virus was circulating in people for some time before the mutation at the cleavage site occurred and it started spreading rapidly. What we can say is that it's more complicated than just a "Chinese" or "Wuhan" disease. It's a virus that has changed and mutated many times, possibly from different animal sources, or within our own bodies, and with genetic good fortune, happened upon the right adaptations to take hold.

How all this information helps us

We won’t know the virus's origins for sure until we have more data, but the answer could be a predictor of what’s to come. If SARS-CoV-2 achieved its adaptations in animals, there's more of a risk for future similar outbreaks. If it adapted while already in humans, it's less likely those same mutations will happen again—just based on probability. Either way, we learn more about the many ways viruses make it into our lives.

“The significance is that now we know that there's a new way you can get a pathogenic coronavirus through recombination," Garry said. "Spread or passage doesn't have to be a direct jump from an animal."

Figuring out the origins of SARS-CoV-2 and how it works will be important the next time another new coronavirus emerges.

If we can understand what types of coronaviruses—with what types of features—are in animals now, it would make it easier to look at a virus's genome sequence and determine where it got its features from, or how its spike might bind to our cells. One way to do this would be to start gathering information about the coronaviruses that are in many kinds of animals now. Bat coronaviruses, for example, are incredibly under-sampled, Garry said. “We know that the diversity of coronaviruses in bats is a lot more than what we know about right now. Just figuring that out would be important.”

Sign up for our newsletter to get the best of VICE delivered to your inbox daily.

Follow Shayla Love on Twitter.

This article originally appeared on VICE US.