>>8098129>In every actual iteration of a fundamentalist Islamic government, they've been confined to the home when unaccompanied and have been instructed to wear the veil whether they like it or not. You cannot function normally under such conditionssaudi arabia seems to be doing fine, women are allowed to pursue careers. the only case where a women must be accompanied by a male relative is when she is traveling to another city I believe.
>I.e. kill all the non believers unless they follow your word. If they persist in their non belief, then kill them. This is a call to bloodshed against all non Muslimsyou have to be a special kind of retard to think that this verse gives permission to Muslims to kill all non-Muslims, this aya was specifically talking about the polytheist of mecca who were not allowing the Muslims to enter mecca and do the hajj rituals. those polytheists would also no hesitate to kill Muslims when the forbidden months are over as well, because both of them were in a state of war. THE AYA THAT IS LITERALLY RIGHT AFTER IT SAYS;
6. And if anyone of the Mushrikin seeks your protection then grant him protection so that he may hear the Word of Allah (the Qur'an) and then escort him to where he can be secure, that is because they are men who know not.
>he was a pedophileagain, not an argument. Look at the age of consent in countries where they implement shariah, why aren't they following their prophet and allowing children marriage? maybe because Mohammad's case was different? maybe because muslims don't consider ayisha to be a minor?.
>Because it calls for maiming and bloodshed. Whether or not you consider the work of Muhammad divine is irrelevant. Claims to divinity are not sufficient justification.how does it call for maiming and bloodshed? it's just a harsh form of justice in my honest opinion. also, claims to divinity is an absolute sufficient justification, and I don't understand how would some view man-made laws to be superior over cont....
